Search Results

Search found 258446 results on 10338 pages for 'stack memory'.

Page 109/10338 | < Previous Page | 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116  | Next Page >

• release object of a return method object c

  - by Piero

  in run the app with the analyze build, and Xcode found me a lot of memory leak and there is one in particular that i don't know how solve here it is: - (UIView *) tableView:(UITableView *)tableView viewForHeaderInSection:(NSInteger)section { UIImageView *sectionImage = [[UIImageView alloc] init]; if (section == 0)sectionImage.image = [UIImage imageNamed:@"myImage.png"]; return sectionImage; } so my question is, how i can release this sectionImage? if is the return of the method? EDIT: i have another question, analyze give me another memory leak, i have this: .h @property (nonatomic, retain) NSIndexPath *directCellPath; .m @synthesize directCellPath = _directCellPath; - (id)init{ if ((self = [super initWithNibName:@"MyViewController" bundle:nil])) { self.directCellPath = [[NSIndexPath alloc] init]; } return self; } then in the code i use it and finally in the dealloc i do this: - (void)dealloc { [_directCellPath release]; [super dealloc]; } and give me a memory leak on this line: self.directCellPath = [[NSIndexPath alloc] init]; why if i have deallocated it in the dealloc?

  Read the article

• Large ListView containing images in Android

  - by Marco W.

  For various Android applications, I need large ListViews, i.e. such views with 100-300 entries. All entries must be loaded in bulk when the application is started, as some sorting and processing is necessary and the application cannot know which items to display first, otherwise. So far, I've been loading the images for all items in bulk as well, which are then saved in an ArrayList<CustomType> together with the rest of the data for each entry. But of course, this is not a good practice, as you're very likely to have an OutOfMemoryException then: The references to all images in the ArrayList prevent the garbage collector from working. So the best solution is, obviously, to load only the text data in bulk whereas the images are then loaded as needed, right? The Google Play application does this, for example: You can see that images are loaded as you scroll to them, i.e. they are probably loaded in the adapter's getView() method. But with Google Play, this is a different problem, anyway, as the images must be loaded from the Internet, which is not the case for me. My problem is not that loading the images takes too long, but storing them requires too much memory. So what should I do with the images? Load in getView(), when they are really needed? Would make scrolling sluggish. So calling an AsyncTask then? Or just a normal Thread? Parametrize it? I could save the images that are already loaded into a HashMap<String,Bitmap>, so that they don't need to be loaded again in getView(). But if this is done, you have the memory problem again: The HashMap stores references to all images, so in the end, you could have the OutOfMemoryException again. I know that there are already lots of questions here that discuss "Lazy loading" of images. But they mainly cover the problem of slow loading, not too much memory consumption.

  Read the article

• Memory leak with objective-c on alloc

  - by Grunzig

  When I use Instruments to find memory leaks, a leak is detected on Horaires *jour; jour= [[Horaires alloc] init]; // memory leak reported here by Instruments self.lundi = jour; [jour release]; and I don't know why there is a leak at this point. Does anyone can help me? Here's the code. // HorairesCollection.h #import <Foundation/Foundation.h> #import "Horaires.h" @interface HorairesCollection : NSObject < NSCopying > { Horaires *lundi; } @property (nonatomic, retain) Horaires *lundi; -init; -(void)dealloc; @end // HorairesCollection.m #import "HorairesCollection.h" @implementation HorairesCollection @synthesize lundi; -(id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone{ DefibHoraires *another = [[DefibHoraires alloc] init]; another.lundi = [lundi copyWithZone: zone]; [another autorelease]; return another; } -init{ self = [super init]; Horaires *jour; jour= [[Horaires alloc] init]; // memory leak reported here by Instruments self.lundi = jour; [jour release]; return self; } - (void)dealloc { [lundi release]; [super dealloc]; } @end // Horaires.h #import <Foundation/Foundation.h> @interface Horaires : NSObject <NSCopying>{ BOOL ferme; BOOL h24; NSString *h1; } @property (nonatomic, assign) BOOL ferme; @property (nonatomic, assign) BOOL h24; @property (nonatomic, retain) NSString *h1; -init; -(id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone; -(void)dealloc; @end // Horaires.m #import "Horaires.h" @implementation Horaires -(BOOL) ferme { return ferme; } -(void)setFerme:(BOOL)bFerme{ ferme = bFerme; if (ferme) { self.h1 = @""; self.h24 = NO; } } -(BOOL) h24 { return h24; } -(void)setH24:(BOOL)bH24{ h24 = bH24; if (h24) { self.h1 = @""; self.ferme = NO; } } -(NSString *) h1 { return h1; } -(void)setH1:(NSString *)horaire{ [horaire retain]; [h1 release]; h1 = horaire; if (![h1 isEqualToString:@""]) { self.h24 = NO; self.ferme = NO; } } -(id)copyWithZone:(NSZone *)zone{ Horaires *another = [[Horaires alloc] init]; another.ferme = self.ferme; another.h24 = self.h24; another.h1 = self.h1; [another autorelease]; return another; } -init{ self = [super init]; return self; } -(void)dealloc { [h1 release]; [super dealloc]; } @end

  Read the article

• safe structures embedded systems

  - by user405633

  I have a packet from a server which is parsed in an embedded system. I need to parse it in a very efficient way, avoiding memory issues, like overlapping, corrupting my memory and others variables. The packet has this structure "String A:String B:String C". As example, here the packet received is compounded of three parts separated using a separator ":", all these parts must be accesibles from an structure. Which is the most efficient and safe way to do this. A.- Creating an structure with attributes (partA, PartB PartC) sized with a criteria based on avoid exceed this sized from the source of the packet, and attaching also an index with the length of each part in a way to avoid extracting garbage, this part length indicator could be less or equal to 300 (ie: part B). typedef struct parsedPacket_struct { char partA[2];int len_partA; char partB[300];int len_partB; char partC[2];int len_partC; }parsedPacket; The problem here is that I am wasting memory, because each structure should copy the packet content to each the structure, is there a way to only save the base address of each part and still using the len_partX.

  Read the article

• Better variant of getting the output dinamically-allocated array from the function?

  - by Raigomaru

  Here is to variants. First: int n = 42; int* some_function(int* input) { int* result = new int[n]; // some code return result; } void main() { int* input = new int[n]; int* output = some_function(input); delete[] input; delete[] output; } Here the function returns the memory, allocated inside the function. Second variant: int n = 42; void some_function(int* input, int* output) { // some code } void main() { int* input = new int[n]; int* output = new int[n]; some_function(input, output); delete[] input; delete[] output; } Here the memory is allocated outside the function. Now I use the first variant. But I now that many built-in c++ functions use the second variant. The first variant is more comfortable (in my opinion). But the second one also has some advantages (you allocate and delete memory in the same block). Maybe it's a silly question but what variant is better and why?

  Read the article

• Practicing buffer overflow attack in Ubuntu

  - by wakandan

  I am trying to learn to use buffer overflow attack in Ubuntu. Unfortunately, I cannot turn off Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) feature in this OS, which is turned on by default. I have tried some work around found in some fedora books: echo "0" > /proc/sys/kernel/randomize_va_space but for some reason the protection's still there. Please give me some suggestions. Thanks. [edit]Actually the above command was not successful, it said "Permission Denied", even with sudo. How can I fix that? [adding] I kept on getting segmetation fault error when it shows an address in stack. Is it related to non-executable stack in ubuntu :(?

  Read the article

• Performing a Depth First Search iteratively using async/parallel processing?

  - by Prabhu

  Here is a method that does a DFS search and returns a list of all items given a top level item id. How could I modify this to take advantage of parallel processing? Currently, the call to get the sub items is made one by one for each item in the stack. It would be nice if I could get the sub items for multiple items in the stack at the same time, and populate my return list faster. How could I do this (either using async/await or TPL, or anything else) in a thread safe manner? private async Task<IList<Item>> GetItemsAsync(string topItemId) { var items = new List<Item>(); var topItem = await GetItemAsync(topItemId); Stack<Item> stack = new Stack<Item>(); stack.Push(topItem); while (stack.Count > 0) { var item = stack.Pop(); items.Add(item); var subItems = await GetSubItemsAsync(item.SubId); foreach (var subItem in subItems) { stack.Push(subItem); } } return items; } I was thinking of something along these lines, but it's not coming together: var tasks = stack.Select(async item => { items.Add(item); var subItems = await GetSubItemsAsync(item.SubId); foreach (var subItem in subItems) { stack.Push(subItem); } }).ToList(); if (tasks.Any()) await Task.WhenAll(tasks); The language I'm using is C#.

  Read the article

• iPhone: CoreGraphics and memory management

  - by carloe

  Can someone tell me what I am doing wrong here? I use this method to flip through pages in a PDF. But something in the code seems to not be released properly because every-time I pull a PDF page that contains an image my memory footprint increases. I am fairly new to CoreGraphics, and can't for the life of me figure out where this method would leak memory. -(UIImage *)pageAtIndex:(NSInteger)pageNumber withWidth:(CGFloat)width andHeight:(CGFloat)height { if((pageNumber>0) && (pageNumber<=pageCount)) { CGFloat scaleRatio; // multiplier by which the PDF Page will be scaled UIGraphicsBeginImageContext(CGSizeMake(width, height)); CGContextRef context = UIGraphicsGetCurrentContext(); CGPDFPageRef page = CGPDFDocumentGetPage(pdf, pageNumber); CGRect pageRect = CGPDFPageGetBoxRect(page, kCGPDFBleedBox); //Figure out the orientation of the PDF page and set the scaleRatio accordingly if(pageRect.size.width/pageRect.size.height < 1.0) { scaleRatio = height/pageRect.size.height; } else { scaleRatio = width/pageRect.size.width; } //Calculate the offset to center the image CGFloat xOffset = 0.0; CGFloat yOffset = height; if(pageRect.size.width*scaleRatio<width) { xOffset = (width/2)-(pageRect.size.width*scaleRatio/2); } else { yOffset = height-((height/2)-(pageRect.size.height*scaleRatio/2)); } CGContextTranslateCTM(context, xOffset, yOffset); CGContextScaleCTM(context, 1.0, -1.0); CGContextSaveGState(context); CGAffineTransform pdfTransform = CGPDFPageGetDrawingTransform(page, kCGPDFBleedBox, CGRectMake(0, 0, pageRect.size.width, pageRect.size.height), 0, true); pdfTransform = CGAffineTransformScale(pdfTransform, scaleRatio, scaleRatio); CGContextConcatCTM(context, pdfTransform); CGContextDrawPDFPage(context, page); UIImage *tempImage = [UIGraphicsGetImageFromCurrentImageContext() retain]; CGContextRestoreGState(context); UIGraphicsEndPDFContext(); UIGraphicsEndImageContext(); return tempImage; } return nil; }

  Read the article

• C# CreatePipe() -> Protected memory error

  - by M. Dimitri

  Hi all, I trying to create a pipe using C#. The code is quite simple but I get a error saying "Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt." Here the COMPLETE code of my form : public partial class Form1 : Form { [DllImport("kernel32.dll", CharSet = CharSet.Auto, SetLastError = true)] public static extern bool CreatePipe(out SafeFileHandle hReadPipe, out SafeFileHandle hWritePipe, SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES lpPipeAttributes, int nSize); [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Sequential)] public struct SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES { public DWORD nLength; public IntPtr lpSecurityDescriptor; public bool bInheritHandle; } public Form1() { InitializeComponent(); } private void btCreate_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES sa = new SECURITY_ATTRIBUTES(); sa.nLength = (DWORD)System.Runtime.InteropServices.Marshal.SizeOf(sa); sa.lpSecurityDescriptor = IntPtr.Zero; sa.bInheritHandle = true; SafeFileHandle hWrite = null; SafeFileHandle hRead = null; if (CreatePipe(out hRead, out hWrite, sa, 4096)) { MessageBox.Show("Pipe created !"); } else MessageBox.Show("Error : Pipe not created !"); } } At the top I declare : using DWORD = System.UInt32; Thank you very much if someone can help.

  Read the article

• System Out Of Memory Exception in Production Server

  - by Sachin Gupta

  We have .net application installed on production server. It is using .net FrameWork 3.0 on windows server 2003 with RAM 4 GB. But there is a problem in application while running sometimes it throws system out of memory exception. I am very frustrating with this. Also I am unable to simulate the issue. I had checked all the possibilities which can cause the problem but didn’t get any thing which solve the issue I checked on production server event log found the Out Of Memory Exception also INVALID VIEW STATE logs are there. Look at the following event log which may help to find solutions. Exception information: Exception type: HttpException Exception message: Invalid viewstate. Request information: Request path: /zContest/ScriptResource.axd User: LisaA Is authenticated: True Authentication Type: Forms Thread information: Thread ID: 10 Is impersonating: True Stack trace: at System.Web.UI.Page.DecryptStringWithIV(String s, IVType ivType) at System.Web.UI.Page.DecryptString(String s) at System.Web.Handlers.ScriptResourceHandler.DecryptParameter(NameValueCollection queryString) at System.Web.Handlers.ScriptResourceHandler.ProcessRequestInternal(HttpResponse response, NameValueCollection queryString, VirtualFileReader fileReader) at System.Web.Handlers.ScriptResourceHandler.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) at System.Web.Handlers.ScriptResourceHandler.System.Web.IHttpHandler.ProcessRequest(HttpContext context) at System.Web.HttpApplication.CallHandlerExecutionStep.System.Web.HttpApplication.IExecutionStep.Execute() at System.Web.HttpApplication.ExecuteStep(IExecutionStep step, Boolean& completedSynchronously) ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Event code: 3005 Event message: An unhandled exception has occurred. Process information: Process ID: 5388 Process name: w3wp.exe Exception information: Exception type: OutOfMemoryException Exception message: Exception of type 'System.OutOfMemoryException' was thrown. ------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Please help me out on this

  Read the article

• Memory leak / GLib issue.

  - by Andrei Ciobanu

  1: /* 2: * File: xyn-playlist.c 3: * Author: Andrei Ciobanu 4: * 5: * Created on June 4, 2010, 12:47 PM 6: */ 7:   8: #include <dirent.h> 9: #include <glib.h> 10: #include <stdio.h> 11: #include <stdlib.h> 12: #include <sys/stat.h> 13: #include <unistd.h> 14:   15: /** 16: * Returns a list all the file(paths) from a directory. 17: * Returns 'NULL' if a certain error occurs. 18: * @param dir_path. 19: * @param A list of gchars* indicating what file patterns to detect. 20: */ 21: GSList *xyn_pl_get_files(const gchar *dir_path, GSList *file_patterns) { 22: /* Returning list containing file paths */ 23: GSList *fpaths = NULL; 24: /* Used to scan directories for subdirs. Acts like a 25: * stack, to avoid recursion. */ 26: GSList *dirs = NULL; 27: /* Current dir */ 28: DIR *cdir = NULL; 29: /* Current dir entries */ 30: struct dirent *cent = NULL; 31: /* File stats */ 32: struct stat cent_stat; 33: /* dir_path duplicate, on the heap */ 34: gchar *dir_pdup; 35:   36: if (dir_path == NULL) { 37: return NULL; 38: } 39:   40: dir_pdup = g_strdup((const gchar*) dir_path); 41: dirs = g_slist_append(dirs, (gpointer) dir_pdup); 42: while (dirs != NULL) { 43: cdir = opendir((const gchar*) dirs->data); 44: if (cdir == NULL) { 45: g_slist_free(dirs); 46: g_slist_free(fpaths); 47: return NULL; 48: } 49: chdir((const gchar*) dirs->data); 50: while ((cent = readdir(cdir)) != NULL) { 51: lstat(cent->d_name, &cent_stat); 52: if (S_ISDIR(cent_stat.st_mode)) { 53: if (g_strcmp0(cent->d_name, ".") == 0 || 54: g_strcmp0(cent->d_name, "..") == 0) { 55: /* Skip "." and ".." dirs */ 56: continue; 57: } 58: dirs = g_slist_append(dirs, 59: g_strconcat((gchar*) dirs->data, "/", cent->d_name, NULL)); 60: } else { 61: fpaths = g_slist_append(fpaths, 62: g_strconcat((gchar*) dirs->data, "/", cent->d_name, NULL)); 63: } 64: } 65: g_free(dirs->data); 66: dirs = g_slist_delete_link(dirs, dirs); 67: closedir(cdir); 68: } 69: return fpaths; 70: } 71:   72: int main(int argc, char** argv) { 73: GSList *l = NULL; 74: l = xyn_pl_get_files("/home/andrei/Music", NULL); 75: g_slist_foreach(l,(GFunc)printf,NULL); 76: printf("%d\n",g_slist_length(l)); 77: g_slist_free(l); 78: return (0); 79: } 80:   81:   82: -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------==15429== 83: ==15429== HEAP SUMMARY: 84: ==15429== in use at exit: 751,451 bytes in 7,263 blocks 85: ==15429== total heap usage: 8,611 allocs, 1,348 frees, 22,898,217 bytes allocated 86: ==15429== 87: ==15429== 120 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 1 of 11 88: ==15429== at 0x4024106: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:581) 89: ==15429== by 0x4024163: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:709) 90: ==15429== by 0x40969C1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 91: ==15429== by 0x40971F6: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 92: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 93: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 94: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 95: ==15429== 96: ==15429== 129 bytes in 1 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 2 of 11 97: ==15429== at 0x4024F20: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) 98: ==15429== by 0x4081243: g_malloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 99: ==15429== by 0x409B85B: g_strconcat (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 100: ==15429== by 0x80489FE: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:62) 101: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 102: ==15429== 103: ==15429== 360 bytes in 3 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 3 of 11 104: ==15429== at 0x4024106: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:581) 105: ==15429== by 0x4024163: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:709) 106: ==15429== by 0x40969C1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 107: ==15429== by 0x4097222: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 108: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 109: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 110: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 111: ==15429== 112: ==15429== 508 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 4 of 11 113: ==15429== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) 114: ==15429== by 0x408113B: g_malloc0 (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 115: ==15429== by 0x409624D: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 116: ==15429== by 0x409710C: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 117: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 118: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 119: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 120: ==15429== 121: ==15429== 508 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 5 of 11 122: ==15429== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) 123: ==15429== by 0x408113B: g_malloc0 (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 124: ==15429== by 0x409626F: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 125: ==15429== by 0x409710C: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 126: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 127: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 128: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 129: ==15429== 130: ==15429== 508 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 6 of 11 131: ==15429== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) 132: ==15429== by 0x408113B: g_malloc0 (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 133: ==15429== by 0x4096291: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 134: ==15429== by 0x409710C: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 135: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 136: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 137: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 138: ==15429== 139: ==15429== 1,200 bytes in 10 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 7 of 11 140: ==15429== at 0x4024106: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:581) 141: ==15429== by 0x4024163: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:709) 142: ==15429== by 0x40969C1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 143: ==15429== by 0x40971F6: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 144: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 145: ==15429== by 0x8048A0D: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:61) 146: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 147: ==15429== 148: ==15429== 2,040 bytes in 1 blocks are still reachable in loss record 8 of 11 149: ==15429== at 0x402425F: calloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:467) 150: ==15429== by 0x408113B: g_malloc0 (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 151: ==15429== by 0x40970AB: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 152: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 153: ==15429== by 0x80488F0: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:41) 154: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 155: ==15429== 156: ==15429== 4,320 bytes in 36 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 9 of 11 157: ==15429== at 0x4024106: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:581) 158: ==15429== by 0x4024163: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:709) 159: ==15429== by 0x40969C1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 160: ==15429== by 0x4097222: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 161: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 162: ==15429== by 0x80489D2: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:58) 163: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 164: ==15429== 165: ==15429== 56,640 bytes in 472 blocks are possibly lost in loss record 10 of 11 166: ==15429== at 0x4024106: memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:581) 167: ==15429== by 0x4024163: posix_memalign (vg_replace_malloc.c:709) 168: ==15429== by 0x40969C1: ??? (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 169: ==15429== by 0x4097222: g_slice_alloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 170: ==15429== by 0x40988A5: g_slist_append (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 171: ==15429== by 0x8048A0D: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:61) 172: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 173: ==15429== 174: ==15429== 685,118 bytes in 6,736 blocks are definitely lost in loss record 11 of 11 175: ==15429== at 0x4024F20: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:236) 176: ==15429== by 0x4081243: g_malloc (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 177: ==15429== by 0x409B85B: g_strconcat (in /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0.2400.1) 178: ==15429== by 0x80489FE: xyn_pl_get_files (xyn-playlist.c:62) 179: ==15429== by 0x8048848: main (main.c:18) 180: ==15429== 181: ==15429== LEAK SUMMARY: 182: ==15429== definitely lost: 685,118 bytes in 6,736 blocks 183: ==15429== indirectly lost: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 184: ==15429== possibly lost: 62,769 bytes in 523 blocks 185: ==15429== still reachable: 3,564 bytes in 4 blocks 186: ==15429== suppressed: 0 bytes in 0 blocks 187: ==15429== 188: ==15429== For counts of detected and suppressed errors, rerun with: -v 189: ==15429== ERROR SUMMARY: 7 errors from 7 contexts (suppressed: 17 from 8) 190: ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- I am using the above code in order to create a list with all the filepaths in a certain directory. (In my case fts.h or ftw.h are not an option). I am using GLib as the data structures library. Still I have my doubts in regarding the way GLib is allocating, de-allocating memory ? When invoking g_slist_free(list) i also free the data contained by the elements ? Why all those memory leaks appear ? Is valgrind a suitable tool for profilinf memory issues when using a complex library like GLib ? LATER EDIT: If I g_slist_foreach(l,(GFunc)g_free,NULL);, the valgrind report is different, (All the memory leaks from 'definitely lost' will move to 'indirectly lost'). Still I don't see the point ? Aren't GLib collections implement a way to be freed ?

  Read the article

• Winforms: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt

  - by mamcx

  I have a bunch of background events. All of them call a log: private void log(string text, params object[] values) { if (editLog.InvokeRequired) { editLog.BeginInvoke( (MethodInvoker)delegate { this.log(text, values); }); } else { text = string.Format(text, values) + Environment.NewLine; lock (editLog) { editLog.AppendText(text); editLog.SelectionStart = editLog.TextLength; editLog.ScrollToCaret(); } } } Sometimes I get this, but other times not: System.AccessViolationException was unhandled Message=Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. Source=System.Windows.Forms StackTrace: at System.Windows.Forms.UnsafeNativeMethods.CallWindowProc(IntPtr wndProc, IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.DefWndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.RichTextBox.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.DebuggableCallback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam) at System.Windows.Forms.UnsafeNativeMethods.SendMessage(HandleRef hWnd, Int32 msg, Int32 wParam, Object& editOle) at System.Windows.Forms.TextBoxBase.ScrollToCaret() at Program1.frmMain.log(String text, Object[] values) in ... ... ... P.D: Not always stop at this line, randomly will be one of the three times editLog methods/properties are used. Not always a exception is throw. Sometimes look like the thing freeze. But not the main UI, just the flow of messages (ie: log look like is never called again) The app is a single form, with background process. I can't see what I doing wrong with this...

  Read the article

• AccessViolationException from a combo: Attempted to read or write protected memory

  - by Sparky

  Users are occassionally getting the above error when using our application (VB.Net, Winforms, using v2 of the framework). I'm not able to reproduce it. The callstack is as follows: : System.AccessViolationException: Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. at System.Windows.Forms.UnsafeNativeMethods.CallWindowProc(IntPtr wndProc, IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wParam, IntPtr lParam) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.DefWndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.DefWndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.ComboBox.WndProc(Message& m) at ControlEx.AutoCompleteCombo.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.OnMessage(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.Control.ControlNativeWindow.WndProc(Message& m) at System.Windows.Forms.NativeWindow.Callback(IntPtr hWnd, Int32 msg, IntPtr wparam, IntPtr lparam) The code for ControlEx.AutoCompleteCombo.WndProc is as follows: Protected Overrides Sub WndProc(ByRef m As System.Windows.Forms.Message) Try If Not m_fReadOnly Then MyBase.WndProc(m) Else Select Case m.Msg Case WM_LBUTTONDOWN, WM_LBUTTONDBLCLK ' do nothing Case Else MyBase.WndProc(m) End Select End If Catch ex As OutOfMemoryException Throw New OutOfMemoryException("Exception during WndProc for combo " & Me.Name, ex) End Try End Sub The error handling was added so we can determine which combo causes the problem when we get an OutOfMemoryException. Any clues as to what causes this would be muchly appreciated! :-)

  Read the article

• Visual Studio project using the Quality Center API remains in memory

  - by Traveling Tech Guy

  Hi, Currently developing a connector DLL to HP's Quality Center. I'm using their (insert expelative) COM API to connect to the server. An Interop wrapper gets created automatically by VStudio. My solution has 2 projects: the DLL and a tester application - essentially a form with buttons that call functions in the DLL. Everything works well - I can create defects, update them and delete them. When I close the main form, the application stops nicely. But when I call a function that returns a list of all available projects (to fill a combo box), if I close the main form, VStudio still shows the solution as running and I have to stop it. I've managed to pinpoint a single function in my code that when I call, the solution remains "hung" and if I don't, it closes well. It's a call to a property in the TDC object get_VisibleProjects that returns a List (not the .Net one, but a type in the COM library) - I just iterate over it and return a proper list (that I later use to fill the combo box): public List<string> GetAvailableProjects() { List<string> projects = new List<string>(); foreach (string project in this.tdc.get_VisibleProjects(qcDomain)) { projects.Add(project); } return projects; } My assumption is that something gets retained in memory. If I run the EXE outside of VStudio it closes - but who knows what gets left behind in memory? My question is - how do I get rid of whatever calling this property returns? Shouldn't the GC handle this? Do I need to delve into pointers? Things I've tried: getting the list into a variable and setting it to null at the end of the function Adding a destructor to the class and nulling the tdc object Stepping through the tester function application all the way out, whne the form closes and the Main function ends - it closes, but VStudio still shows I'm running. Thanks for your assistance!

  Read the article

• FindByIdentity in System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagment Memory Issues

  - by MVC Fanatic

  I'm working on an active directory managament application. In addition to the typical Create A New User, Enable/Disable an account, reset my password etc. it also managages application permissions for all of the clients web applications. Application management is handled by thousands of AD groups such as which are built from 3 letter codes for the application, section and site, there are also hundreds of AD groups which determine which applications and locations a coordinator can grant rights to. All of these groups in turn belong to other groups so I typically filter the groups list with the MemberOf property to find the groups that a user directly belongs to (or everyone has rights to do everything). I've made extensive use of the System.DirectoryServices.AccountManagment namespace using the FindByIdentity method in 31 places throughout the application. This method calls a private method FindPrincipalByIdentRefHelper on the internal ADStoreCtx class. A SearchResultCollection is created but not disposed so eventually typically once or twice a day the web server runs out of memory and all of the applications on the web server stop responsing until iis is reset because the resources used by the com objects aren't ever relased. There are places where I fall back to the underlying directory objects, but there are lot of places where I'm using the properties on the Principal - it's a vast improvement over using the esoteric ad property names in the .Net 2.0 Directory services code. I've contacted microsoft about the problem and it's been fixed in .Net 4.0 but they don't currently have plans to fix it in 3.5 unless there is intrest in the community about it. I only found information about it in a couple of places the MDSN documentation in the community content state's there is a memory leak at the bottom (guess I should have read that before using the the method) http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/bb345628.aspx And the class in question is internal and doesn't expose SearchResultsCollection outside the offending method so I can't get at the results to dispose them or inherit from the class and override the method. So my questions are Has anyone else encountered this problem? If so were you able to work around it? Do I have any option besides rewriting the application not using any of the .Net 3.5 active directory code? Thanks

  Read the article

• .NET Remoting memory leak?

  - by PrimeTSS

  I have a Remoting Class as a Singleton <configuration> <system.runtime.remoting> <application> <service> <wellknown mode="Singleton" type="PTSSLinkClasses.PTSSLinkClientDesktopRemotable, PTSSLinkClasses" objectUri="PTSSLinkDesktop" /> </service> <channels> <channel ref="http" port="8901"/> </channels> </application> </system.runtime.remoting> </configuration> Its created within a "server" Service. Another client service consumes this remote object. The client is calling the remote object every .5 second using a timer (polling) (for testing) If the server service is stopped, so the remote object is not available, memory useage for the client service keeps increasing...... I have overwritten InitialLifetimeService to return a null public override Object InitializeLifetimeService() { return null; } If a remote object is not available does .net queue all the call requests to this object??? untill all the memory is consumed? How can I dected if the remote object is not available and stop trying to call the remote method?

  Read the article

• check RAM,page file, /PAE, /3GB, SQL server memory using powershell

  - by Manjot

  I am a powershell novice. After days of searching.... I have put together a small powershell script (as below) to check page file, /PAE switch, /3GB switch, SQL server max RAM, min RAM. I am running this on 1 server. If I want to run it on many servers (from a .txt) file, How can I change it ? How can I change it to search boot.ini file's contents for a given server? clear $strComputer="." $PageFile=Get-WmiObject Win32_PageFile -ComputerName $strComputer Write-Host "Page File Size in MB: " ($PageFile.Filesize/(1024*1024)) $colItems=Get-WmiObject Win32_PhysicalMemory -Namespace root\CIMv2 -ComputerName $strComputer $total=0 foreach ($objItem in $colItems) { $total=$total+ $objItem.Capacity } $isPAEEnabled =Get-WmiObject Win32_OperatingSystem -ComputerName $strComputer Write-Host "Is PAE Enabled: " $isPAEEnabled.PAEEnabled Write-Host "Is /3GB Enabled: " | Get-Content C:\boot.ini | Select-String "/3GB" -Quiet # how can I change to search boot.ini file's contents on $strComputer $smo = new-object('Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Smo.Server') $strSQLServer $memSrv = $smo.information.physicalMemory $memMin = $smo.configuration.minServerMemory.runValue $memMax = $smo.configuration.maxServerMemory.runValue ## DBMS Write-Host "Server RAM available: " -noNewLine Write-Host "$memSrv MB" -fore "blue" Write-Host "SQL memory Min: " -noNewLine Write-Host "$memMin MB " Write-Host "SQL memory Max: " -noNewLine Write-Host "$memMax MB" Any comments how this can be improved? Thanks in advance

  Read the article

• Objective-C memory model

  - by TofuBeer

  I am attempting to wrap my head around one part of the Objective-C memory model (specifically on the iPhone, so no GC). My background is C/C++/Java, and I am having an issue with the following bit of code (also wondering if I am doing this in an "Objective-C way" or not): - (NSSet *) retrieve { NSMutableSet *set; set = [NSMutableSet new]; // would normally fill the set in here with some data return ([set autorelease]); } - (void) test { NSSet *setA; NSSet *setB; setA = [self retrieve]; setB = [[self retrieve] retain]; [setA release]; [setB release]; } start EDIT Based on comments below, the updated retrieve method: - (NSSet *) retrieve { NSMutableSet *set; set = [[[NSMutableSet alloc] initWithCapacity:100] autorelease]; // would normally fill the set in here with some data return (set); } end EDIT The above code gives a warning for [setA release] "Incorrect decrement of the reference count of an object is not owned at this point by the caller". I though that the "new" set the reference count to 1. Then the "retain" call would add 1, and the "release" call would drop it by 1. Given that wouldn't setA have a reference count of 0 at the end and setB have a reference count of 1 at the end? From what I have figured out by trial and error, setB is correct, and there is no memory leak, but I'd like to understand why that is the case (what is wrong with my understanding of "new", "autorelease", "retain", and "release").

  Read the article

• Rails 3 memory issue

  - by Erik

  Hello! I'm developing a new site based on Ruby on Rails 3 beta. I knew this might be a bad idea considering it's just beta, but I still thought it might work. Now though I'm having HUGE problems with Rails consuming huge ammounts of memory. For my application today it consumes about 10 mb per request and it doesn't seem to release it either. So I thought this might be because of bloat in my application and thus I created a test app just to compare. For my test app I just generated a model with a scaffold and then created about 20 records on this model. I then went to the index page and hit refresh and I could immediately see memory taking off! Less than my app but still about 1-3 mb per request. I'm working in OSX Leopard, with Ruby 1.8.7, Rails 3.0.0.beta and a SQLLite db for development. Does anyone recognize my problem? I would really appreciate some help here. :/ Thanks!

  Read the article

• Storing PLSQL stored-procedure values in Oracle memory caches for extended periods

  - by Ira Baxter

  I am collecting runtime profiling data from PLSQL stored procedures. The data is collected as certain stored procedures execute, but it needs to accumululate across multiple executions of those procedures. To minimize overhead, I'd like to store that profiling data in some PLSQL-accessable Oracle memory-resident storage somewhere for the duration of the data collection interval, and then dump out the accumulated values. The data collection interval might be seconds or hours; its ok not to store this data across system boots. Something like session state in web servers would do. What are my choices for storing such data? The only method I know about are contexts in dbms_sessions: procedure set_ctx (value in varchar8) as begin dbms_session.set_context ( 'Test_Ctx', 'AccumulatedValue', value, NULL, 'ProfilerSessionId' ); end set_ctx; This works, but takes some 50 milliseconds(!) per update to the accumulated value. What I'm hoping for is a way to access/store an array of values in some Oracle memory using vanilla PLSQL statements, with access times typical of array accesses made to package-local arrays.

  Read the article

• getting memory allocation at ActivityIndicator in Iphone sdk

  - by monish

  Hi Guys, Here Im gettimg memory allocation problem at activity indicator and My code is: - (id)init { if (self = [super init]) { self.title=@"Release Details"; contentView = [[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:[[UIScreen mainScreen] applicationFrame]]; contentView.backgroundColor = [UIColor clearColor]; self.view = contentView; [contentView release]; CGRect frame = CGRectMake(0,0, 320,1500); containerView = [[UIView alloc] initWithFrame:frame]; webView = [ [UIWebView alloc] initWithFrame:[[UIScreen mainScreen] bounds]]; webView.backgroundColor = [UIColor colorWithPatternImage: [UIImage imageNamed:@"background1.png"]]; webView.delegate = self; [containerView addSubview:webView]; CGRect activityViewframe = CGRectMake(20,8,20, 20); progressInd = [[UIActivityIndicatorView alloc] initWithFrame:activityViewframe]; progressInd.activityIndicatorViewStyle = UIActivityIndicatorViewStyleWhite; progressInd.autoresizingMask = (UIViewAutoresizingFlexibleLeftMargin | UIViewAutoresizingFlexibleRightMargin | UIViewAutoresizingFlexibleTopMargin | UIViewAutoresizingFlexibleBottomMargin); [containerView addSubview:progressInd]; [progressInd startAnimating]; progressInd.hidden = NO; [progressInd stopAnimating]; [self.view addSubview:containerView]; isFetch=YES; } return self; } -(void) displayInProgressRightBarButton { UIView* rightBarButtonView = [ [UIView alloc] initWithFrame:CGRectMake(270,5,45, 35)]; [rightBarButtonView addSubview:progressInd]; UIBarButtonItem* buttonItem = [[UIBarButtonItem alloc] initWithCustomView:rightBarButtonView]; self.navigationItem.rightBarButtonItem = buttonItem; [rightBarButtonView release]; [buttonItem release]; } - (void)webViewDidStartLoad:(UIWebView *)webView { [self displayInProgressRightBarButton]; [progressInd startAnimating]; [UIApplication sharedApplication].networkActivityIndicatorVisible = YES; } - (void)webViewDidFinishLoad:(UIWebView *)webView { [progressInd stopAnimating]; [UIApplication sharedApplication].networkActivityIndicatorVisible = NO; } Also I released the progressInd in dealloc eventhough it showing memory allocation at progressInd = [[UIActivityIndicatorView alloc] initWithFrame:activityViewframe]; in init. can anyone help me to solve this. Anyone's help will be much Appreciated. Thank you, Monish.

  Read the article

• Thread Synchronisation 101

  - by taspeotis

  Previously I've written some very simple multithreaded code, and I've always been aware that at any time there could be a context switch right in the middle of what I'm doing, so I've always guarded access the shared variables through a CCriticalSection class that enters the critical section on construction and leaves it on destruction. I know this is fairly aggressive and I enter and leave critical sections quite frequently and sometimes egregiously (e.g. at the start of a function when I could put the CCriticalSection inside a tighter code block) but my code doesn't crash and it runs fast enough. At work my multithreaded code needs to be a tighter, only locking/synchronising at the lowest level needed. At work I was trying to debug some multithreaded code, and I came across this: EnterCriticalSection(&m_Crit4); m_bSomeVariable = true; LeaveCriticalSection(&m_Crit4); Now, m_bSomeVariable is a Win32 BOOL (not volatile), which as far as I know is defined to be an int, and on x86 reading and writing these values is a single instruction, and since context switches occur on an instruction boundary then there's no need for synchronising this operation with a critical section. I did some more research online to see whether this operation did not need synchronisation, and I came up with two scenarios it did: The CPU implements out of order execution or the second thread is running on a different core and the updated value is not written into RAM for the other core to see; and The int is not 4-byte aligned. I believe number 1 can be solved using the "volatile" keyword. In VS2005 and later the C++ compiler surrounds access to this variable using memory barriers, ensuring that the variable is always completely written/read to the main system memory before using it. Number 2 I cannot verify, I don't know why the byte alignment would make a difference. I don't know the x86 instruction set, but does mov need to be given a 4-byte aligned address? If not do you need to use a combination of instructions? That would introduce the problem. So... QUESTION 1: Does using the "volatile" keyword (implicity using memory barriers and hinting to the compiler not to optimise this code) absolve a programmer from the need to synchronise a 4-byte/8-byte on x86/x64 variable between read/write operations? QUESTION 2: Is there the explicit requirement that the variable be 4-byte/8-byte aligned? I did some more digging into our code and the variables defined in the class: class CExample { private: CRITICAL_SECTION m_Crit1; // Protects variable a CRITICAL_SECTION m_Crit2; // Protects variable b CRITICAL_SECTION m_Crit3; // Protects variable c CRITICAL_SECTION m_Crit4; // Protects variable d // ... }; Now, to me this seems excessive. I thought critical sections synchronised threads between a process, so if you've got one you can enter it and no other thread in that process can execute. There is no need for a critical section for each variable you want to protect, if you're in a critical section then nothing else can interrupt you. I think the only thing that can change the variables from outside a critical section is if the process shares a memory page with another process (can you do that?) and the other process starts to change the values. Mutexes would also help here, named mutexes are shared across processes, or only processes of the same name? QUESTION 3: Is my analysis of critical sections correct, and should this code be rewritten to use mutexes? I have had a look at other synchronisation objects (semaphores and spinlocks), are they better suited here? QUESTION 4: Where are critical sections/mutexes/semaphores/spinlocks best suited? That is, which synchronisation problem should they be applied to. Is there a vast performance penalty for choosing one over the other? And while we're on it, I read that spinlocks should not be used in a single-core multithreaded environment, only a multi-core multithreaded environment. So, QUESTION 5: Is this wrong, or if not, why is it right? Thanks in advance for any responses :)

  Read the article

• Attempted to read or write protected memory-Sql Compact and .NEt

  - by Jankhana

  I'm using Sql Compact3.5 as my DB with C# .NET . I have a strange problem with my application. I'm running the code in two PC with same configuration except the Sql Compact installed. In one PC where Sql Compact3.5 is not installed I'm getting this strange error: Exception :Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. Inner Exception : Stack Trace : at System.Data.SqlServerCe.NativeMethods.CloseStore(IntPtr pSeStore) at System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeConnection.ReleaseNativeInterfaces() at System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeConnection.Dispose(Boolean disposing) at System.Data.SqlServerCe.SqlCeConnection.Finalize() Source : System.Data.SqlServerCe I don't know where i have went wrong. I checked my code and included try catch everywhere. I'm handling Unhandled exception also using this . I am getting this error from a console application which I'm starting from Windows Form. In both the application I've inserted the Unhandled Exception coding and it's getting executed and getting return to the texxt file. But still Microsoft Don't Error Report is getting generated and I get that Dialog box!!! Y still that dialog box is getting generated is the trouble!!! Is there any way to supress that Dialog box??? Y I'm getting this box when I'm handling the exception and it's executing my catch handler??? In another PC where SQL Compact is installed no error I get!!! Any idea y is that so???

  Read the article

• Controlling ASP.NET output cache memory usage

  - by Josh Einstein

  I would like to use output caching with WCF Data Services and although there's nothing specifically built in to support caching, there is an OnStartProcessingRequest method that allows me to hook in and set the cacheability of the request using normal ASP.NET mechanisms. But I am worried about the worker process getting recycled due to excessive memory consumption if large responses are cached. Is there a way to specify an upper limit for the ASP.NET output cache so that if this limit is exceeded, items in the cache will be discarded? I've seen the caching configuration settings but I get the impression from the documentation that this is for explicit caching via the Cache object since there is a separate outputCacheSettings which has no memory-related attributes. Here's a code snippet from Scott Hanselman's post that shows how I'm setting the cacheability of the request. protected override void OnStartProcessingRequest(ProcessRequestArgs args) { base.OnStartProcessingRequest(args); //Cache for a minute based on querystring HttpContext context = HttpContext.Current; HttpCachePolicy c = HttpContext.Current.Response.Cache; c.SetCacheability(HttpCacheability.ServerAndPrivate); c.SetExpires(HttpContext.Current.Timestamp.AddSeconds(60)); c.VaryByHeaders["Accept"] = true; c.VaryByHeaders["Accept-Charset"] = true; c.VaryByHeaders["Accept-Encoding"] = true; c.VaryByParams["*"] = true; }

  Read the article

• Attempted to read or write protected memory

  - by Interfector

  I have a sample ASP.NET MVC 3 web application that is following Jonathan McCracken's Test-Drive Asp.NET MVC (great book , by the way) and I have stumbled upon a problem. Note that I'm using MVCContrib, Rhino and NUnit. [Test] public void ShouldSetLoggedInUserToViewBag() { var todoController = new TodoController(); var builder = new TestControllerBuilder(); builder.InitializeController(todoController); builder.HttpContext.User = new GenericPrincipal(new GenericIdentity("John Doe"), null); Assert.That(todoController.Index().AssertViewRendered().ViewData["UserName"], Is.EqualTo("John Doe")); } The code above always throws this error: System.AccessViolationException : Attempted to read or write protected memory. This is often an indication that other memory is corrupt. The controller action code is the following: [HttpGet] public ActionResult Index() { ViewData.Model = Todo.ThingsToBeDone; ViewBag.UserName = HttpContext.User.Identity.Name; return View(); } From what I have figured out, the app seems to crash because of the two assignements in the controller action. However, I cannot see how there are wrong!? Can anyone help me pinpoint the solution to this problem. Thank you.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116  | Next Page >