Search Results

Search found 19966 results on 799 pages for 'datetime query'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 153/799 | < Previous Page | 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160  | Next Page >

  • Variables are "lost" somewhere, then reappear... all with no error thrown.

    - by rob - not a robber
    Hi All, I'm probably going to make myself look like a fool with my horrible scripting but here we go. I have a form that I am collecting a bunch of checkbox info from using a binary method. ON/SET=1 !ISSET=0 Anyway, all seems to be going as planned except for the query bit. When I run the script, it runs through and throws no errors, but it's not doing what I think I am telling it to. I've hard coded the values in the query and left them in the script and it DOES update the DB. I've also tried echoing all the needed variables after the script runs and exiting right after so I can audit them... and they're all there. Here's an example. ####FEATURES RECORD UPDATE ### HERE I DECIDE TO RUN THE SCRIPT BASED ON WHETHER AN IMAGE BUTTON WAS USED if (isset($_POST["button_x"])) { ### HERE I AM ASSIGNING 1 OR 0 TO A VAR BASED ON WHTER THE CHECKBOX WAS SET if (isset($_POST["pool"])) $pool=1; if (!isset($_POST["pool"])) $pool=0; if (isset($_POST["darts"])) $darts=1; if (!isset($_POST["darts"])) $darts=0; if (isset($_POST["karaoke"])) $karaoke=1; if (!isset($_POST["karaoke"])) $karaoke=0; if (isset($_POST["trivia"])) $trivia=1; if (!isset($_POST["trivia"])) $trivia=0; if (isset($_POST["wii"])) $wii=1; if (!isset($_POST["wii"])) $wii=0; if (isset($_POST["guitarhero"])) $guitarhero=1; if (!isset($_POST["guitarhero"])) $guitarhero=0; if (isset($_POST["megatouch"])) $megatouch=1; if (!isset($_POST["megatouch"])) $megatouch=0; if (isset($_POST["arcade"])) $arcade=1; if (!isset($_POST["arcade"])) $arcade=0; if (isset($_POST["jukebox"])) $jukebox=1; if (!isset($_POST["jukebox"])) $jukebox=0; if (isset($_POST["dancefloor"])) $dancefloor=1; if (!isset($_POST["dancefloor"])) $dancefloor=0; ### I'VE DONE LOADS OF PERMUTATIONS HERE... HARD SET THE 1/0 VARS AND LEFT THE $estab_id TO BE PICKED UP. SET THE $estab_id AND LEFT THE COLUMN DATA TO BE PICKED UP. ALL NO GOOD. IT _DOES_ WORK IF I HARD SET ALL VARS THOUGH mysql_query("UPDATE thedatabase SET pool_table='$pool', darts='$darts', karoke='$karaoke', trivia='$trivia', wii='$wii', megatouch='$megatouch', guitar_hero='$guitarhero', arcade_games='$arcade', dancefloor='$dancefloor' WHERE establishment_id='22'"); ###WEIRD THING HERE IS IF I ECHO THE VARS AT THIS POINT AND THEN EXIT(); they all show up as intended. header("location:theadminfilething.php"); exit(); THANKS ALL!!!

    Read the article

  • ERROR 1005 (HY000): Can't create table 'tmp' (errno: 13)

    - by kobey
    Hi, I'm Running Mysql on ubuntu 9.10, the process of Mysql is running as root, I'm using root account when logging to Mysql, which I gave all privileges, I'm using my own db(not mysql), I can create a table, but when i try to create Temporary table i get this error: ERROR 1005 (HY000): Can't create table 'tmp' (errno: 13) For this query: CREATE TEMPORARY TABLE tmp (id int); I've plenty of space in my hard drive, all permissions are granted(also var/lib/mysql have mysql permissions). Any idea? Thanks, Koby

    Read the article

  • Exact matching of strings in SPARQL?

    - by Taz
    I have this query. It match anything which has "South in its Name". But I only want the one whose foaf:name exactly matches "South" SELECT Distinct ?TypeLabel Where { ?a foaf:name "South". ?a rdf:type ?Type. ?Type rdfs:label ?TypeLabel. }

    Read the article

  • MySQL & PHP Parameter 1 as Resource

    - by Nik
    Alright, PHP is throwing this error at me (in the log) when I run the code mentioned below: Error mysql_num_rows() expects parameter 1 to be resource, string given in (place) on line 10 Line 9-11 $queryFP = ("SELECT * FROM db"); $countFP = mysql_num_rows($queryFP); $aID = rand(1, $countFP); I think it has something to do with the $queryFP's syntax, but I'm not completely sure how to fix it since $queryFP's syntax is the simplest query I've ever seen.

    Read the article

  • How to use CASE in SQL , Syntax Error being shown

    - by Shantanu Gupta
    I am trying to retrieve some records from table based on my query but it shows me an error Msg 102, Level 15, State 1, Line 2 Incorrect syntax near ' select vd.LedgerId,(CreditAmt-DebitAmt) AS NET, CASE NET WHEN NET > 0 THEN 'Debit' WHEN NET < 0 THEN 'Credit' ELSE 'Nil'End from dbo.vdebit vd INNER JOIN dbo.vCredit vc ON vd.LedgerId=vc.LedgerId

    Read the article

  • FitNesse/Slim String Operators

    - by grootjans
    Is it possible to express this in a Query Table in FitNesse with SLIM for .net: contains(data) startswith(data) endswith(data) I know from a previous question it was possible for FitNesse/Fit with cell handler loader. I'm looking for the equivalent in Slim.

    Read the article

  • fast retrieval from MYSQL DB

    - by trojanwarrior3000
    I have a table of users - It contains around millions of rows (user-id is the primary key). I just want to retrieve user-id and their joining date. using "select user-id,joining date from table user" requires lot of time.Is there a fast way to query/retrieve the same data from this table?

    Read the article

  • Why better isolation level means better performance in MS SQL Server

    - by Oleg Zhylin
    When measuring performance on my query I came up with a dependency between isolation level and elapsed time that was surprising to me READUNCOMMITTED - 409024 READCOMMITTED - 368021 REPEATABLEREAD - 358019 SERIALIZABLE - 348019 Left column is table hint, and the right column is elapsed time in microseconds (sys.dm_exec_query_stats.total_elapsed_time). Why better isolation level gives better performance? This is a development machine and no concurrency whatsoever happens. I would expect READUNCOMMITTED to be the fasted due to less locking overhead.

    Read the article

  • Sql Shorthand For Dates

    - by vigilant
    Is there a way to write a query equivalent to select * from log_table where dt >= 'nov-27-2009' and dt < 'nov-28-2009'; but where you could specify only 1 date and say you want the results for that entire day until the next one. I'm just making this up, but something of the form: select * from log_table where dt = 'nov-27-2009':+1;

    Read the article

  • mysql PDO how to bind LIKE

    - by dmontain
    In this query select wrd from tablename WHERE wrd LIKE '$partial%' I'm trying to bind the variable '$partial%' with PDO. Not sure how this works with the % at the end. Would it be select wrd from tablename WHERE wrd LIKE ':partial%' where :partial is bound to $partial="somet" or would it be select wrd from tablename WHERE wrd LIKE ':partial' where :partial is bound to $partial="somet%" or would it be something entirely different?

    Read the article

  • Select random row from MySQL (with probability)

    - by James Simpson
    I have a MySQL table that has a row called cur_odds which is a percent number with the percent probability that that row will get selected. How do I make a query that will actually select the rows in approximately that frequency when you run through 100 queries for example? I tried the following, but a row that has a probability of 0.35 ends up getting selected around 60-70% of the time. SELECT * FROM table ORDER BY RAND()*cur_odds DESC

    Read the article

  • Deferring frequent updates in MySQL

    - by cdecker
    I have frequent updates to a user table that simply sets the last seen time of a user, and I was wondering whether there is a simple way to defer them and group them into a single query after a short timeout (5 minutes or so). This would reduce queries on my user database quite a lot.

    Read the article

  • Doctrine DQL execute passing params

    - by Karim web Developer
    I used this DQL in Doctrine $q->update('product') ->set('quantity','?') ->where('id=?'); $q->execute(array(20,5)); I check the server for the query and this the generated sql UPDATE product SET quantity = '20', updated_at = '5' WHERE (id = '2010-04-26 14:34); So I need to know why the arguments aren't in the correct places?

    Read the article

  • mySQL - How to select a date interval

    - by fabriciols
    Hello, this is my table : ------------------------------------- | user | item | date_time | | 10 | 01 | 10-10-10 20:10:05 | | 10 | 02 | 10-10-10 20:10:10 | | 10 | 03 | 10-10-10 20:10:10 | | 20 | 02 | 10-10-10 20:15:10 | | 20 | 02 | 10-10-10 20:20:10 | | 30 | 10 | 10-10-10 20:01:10 | | 30 | 20 | 10-10-10 20:01:20 | | 30 | 30 | 10-10-10 20:05:20 | ------------------------------------- i want to do a query that return a user that took multiple items in a 1min interval, like this result : ------------------------------------- | user | item | date_time | | 10 | 01 | 10-10-10 20:10:05 | | 10 | 02 | 10-10-10 20:10:10 | | 10 | 03 | 10-10-10 20:10:10 | | 30 | 10 | 10-10-10 20:01:10 | | 30 | 20 | 10-10-10 20:01:20 | ------------------------------------- how i do this ?

    Read the article

  • Search Multiple Tables of a Mysql Database

    - by DogPooOnYourShoe
    I have the following code: $query = "select * from customer where Surname like \"%$trimmed%\" OR TitleName like \"%$trimmed%\" OR PostCode like \"%$trimmed%\" order by Surname"; However, I have another table which I want to search from with the same paramaters(variables) as that. I know that something like "select * from customer,othertable" might not be possible, Is there a way to do it?

    Read the article

  • Is there an equivalent of "OPTION(RECOMPILE)" or "WITH RECOMPILE" for an entire connection?

    - by kamens
    I'm curious. Is there any way to prevent SQL query execution plans from being cached for an entire connection's duration? Can I run a command that basically says, "use OPTION(RECOMPILE) for all subsequent commands until I tell you to stop doing so?" I'm acutely aware of all the performance trade-offs here, and I know this is not a step to be taken lightly. However, I'm in a unique situation where this behavior may be advantageous.

    Read the article

  • IDs necessary in update script not being stored (or even seen!?) (PHP MySQL)

    - by Derek
    Hi guys, I really need help with this one...have spent 3 hours trying to figure it out... Basically, I have 3 tables necessary for this function to work (the query and PHP)... Authors, Books and Users. An author can have many books, and a user can have many books - that's it. When the admin user selects to update a book, they are presented with a form, displaying the current data within the fields, very straight forward... However there is one tricky part, the admin user can change the author for a book (incase they make a mistake) and also change the user for which the book is associated with. When I select to update the single book information I am not getting any values what so ever for author_id or user_id. Meaning that when the user updates the book info, the associations with the user and author is being scrapped altogether (when before there was an association)... I cannot see why this is happening because I can clearly see the IDs for the users and authors for my option values (this is because they are in select dropdowns). Here is what my sql to retrieve the user ID is: SELECT user_id, name FROM users and then i have my select options which brings up all the users in the system: <label>This book belongs to:</label> <select name="name" id="name"> <option value="<?php echo $row['user_id']?>" SELECTED><?php echo $row['name']?> - Current</option> <?php while($row = mysql_fetch_array($result)) { ?> <option value="<?php echo $row['user_id']; if (isset($_POST['user_id']));?>"><?php echo $row['name']?></option> <?php } ?> In the presented HTML form, I can select the users (by name) and within the source code I can see the IDs (for the value) matching against the names of the users. Finally, in my script that performs the update, I have this: $book_id = $_POST['book_id']; $bookname = $_POST['bookname']; $booklevel = $_POST['booklevel']; $author_id = $_POST['author_id']; $user_id = $_POST['user_id']; $sql = "UPDATE books SET bookname= '".$bookname."', booklevel= '".$booklevel."', author_id='".$author_id."', user_id= '".$user_id."' WHERE book_id = ".$book_id; The result of this query returns no value for either author_id or user_id... Obviously in this question I have given the information for the user stuff (with the HTML being displayed) but im guessing that I have the same problem with authors aswell... How can I get these ID's passed to the script so that the change can be acknowledge!! :(

    Read the article

  • C# Outer Apply in LINQ

    - by JeremySpouken
    How can I achieve Outer Apply in LINQ? I'm having a bit of a problem. Here's the SQL Query I'm using. SELECT u.masterID ,u.user ,h.created FROM dbo.Users u OUTER APPLY (SELECT TOP 1 * FROM UserHistory h where h.masterID = u.masterID ORDER BY created DESC) h

    Read the article

  • How to formulate a SQL Server indexed view that aggregates distinct values?

    - by Jeremy Lew
    I have a schema that includes tables like the following (pseudo schema): TABLE ItemCollection { ItemCollectionId ...etc... } TABLE Item { ItemId, ItemCollectionId, ContributorId } I need to aggregate the number of distinct contributors per ItemCollectionId. This is possible with a query like: SELECT ItemCollectionId, COUNT(DISTINCT ContributorId) FROM Item GROUP BY ItemCollectionId I further want to pre-calculate this aggregation using an indexed (materialized) view. The DISTINCT prevents an index being placed on this view. Is there any way to reformulate this which will not violate SQL Server's indexed view constraints?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160  | Next Page >