Search Results

Search found 71879 results on 2876 pages for 'file handling'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 153/2876 | < Previous Page | 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160  | Next Page >

  • How to prevent swallowing exceptions caused by unset expectations for a mocked object?

    - by Schultz9999
    I am looking for a way to modify catch block depending on if it's executed during the unit test run or not. The purpose is basically to detect/setup mock expectations which are swallowed because catch doesn't rethrow. I am using MSTest. One obvious thing is using preprocessor but I don't think it works. Especially if to use DEBUG define. There should be an easy way to detect that, shouldn't it? I must have been looking for something wrong because I couldn't find much info on that. try {...} catch(Exception) { Log(...); #if DEBUG throw; #endif }

    Read the article

  • ExceptionHandling with Spring 3

    - by mjf
    I have this controller: @RequestMapping(value = "*.xls", method = RequestMethod.GET) public String excel(Model model) { return "excel"; The excel wiew opens actually a ExcelViewer, which is build in method protected void buildExcelDocument(Map<String, Object> map, WritableWorkbook ww, HttpServletRequest hsr, HttpServletResponse hsr1) throws Exception { Class.writecontent Class.writeMoreContent Called methods write content to the Excel sheet and they can throw e.g biffException. How can I show a certain error page when Exception is occured? I tried this @Controller public class ExcelController { @ExceptionHandler(BiffException.class) public String handleException(BiffException ex) { return "fail"; } @RequestMapping(value = "*.xls", method = RequestMethod.GET) public String excel(Model model) { return "excel"; } } But I'm getting the server's error message about Exceptions. Maybe a bean definition missing?

    Read the article

  • error handling in asp.net

    - by user98454
    Hi How can i pass the different types of errors from Data access layer to presentation layer? suppose if we take the northwind database scenario I want to delete the customer, so i selected one customer in ui and clicked the "delete" button.It internally calls the "delete" in data access layer. The prerequisite for deleting the customer is that the customer doesn't have any orders.So in data access layer we wil check whether that customer has any orders.If the customer has orders how can we pass the message from dal to presentation layer that the customer has orders and we don't delete. Am i doing right?is there any other ways to deal with this type? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • Handling JSON and HTML templates in jQuery

    - by Toby Hede
    I have an ajax-enabled site that presents a lot of dynamic content by interpolating JSON values with HTML. This all works fine. BUT it means I have significant amounts of HTML all through my JavaScript. For example: var template = "<div>Foo: {bar}</div><div>Blah: {vtha}</div>"; template.interpolate({bar:"bar",blah:"vtha"}); I have cut this down a fair bit - some of my dynamic elements have quite a lot of HTML and a lot going on. I am using jQuery and I am building on Rails, so if there is something smart in either framework, that would be great. For reference, the String interpolation function used above is: String.prototype.interpolate = function (o) { return this.replace(/{([^{}]*)}/g, function (a, b) { var r = o[b]; return typeof r === 'string' || typeof r === 'number' ? r : a; } ); };

    Read the article

  • nicer way of handling dom than DOMCategory?

    - by IttayD
    I'm trying to create a DSL that can easily use a dom node. Using DOMCategory is nice, but adds the noise of 'use(DOMCategory)'. Is there a way to avoid that? I tried wrapping the script call inside a call to 'use', but this doesn't seem to work in closures.

    Read the article

  • Check for live Data Source Name Before proceeding

    - by n_kips
    Would it be ok to get a CF app to check for a valid database before proceeding to process that request? This is because there may be instances where the database server may be down or being upgraded, hence an error comes when a db dependant request is made. If there is no connection to the db server, the user can be safely redirected to a safe page. Or can cfcatch work? How can this check be done? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • What is a good generic sibling control Javascript communication strategy?

    - by James
    I'm building a webpage that is composed of several controls, and trying to come up with an effective somewhat generic client side sibling control communication model. One of the controls is the menu control. Whenever an item is clicked in here I wanted to expose a custom client side event that other controls can subscribe to, so that I can achieve a loosely coupled sibling control communication model. To that end I've created a simple Javascript event collection class (code below) that acts as like a hub for control event registration and event subscription. This code certainly gets the job done, but my question is is there a better more elegant way to do this in terms of best practices or tools, or is this just a fools errand? /// Event collection object - acts as the hub for control communication. function ClientEventCollection() { this.ClientEvents = {}; this.RegisterEvent = _RegisterEvent; this.AttachToEvent = _AttachToEvent; this.FireEvent = _FireEvent; function _RegisterEvent(eventKey) { if (!this.ClientEvents[eventKey]) this.ClientEvents[eventKey] = []; } function _AttachToEvent(eventKey, handlerFunc) { if (this.ClientEvents[eventKey]) this.ClientEvents[eventKey][this.ClientEvents[eventKey].length] = handlerFunc; } function _FireEvent(eventKey, triggerId, contextData ) { if (this.ClientEvents[eventKey]) { for (var i = 0; i < this.ClientEvents[eventKey].length; i++) { var fn = this.ClientEvents[eventKey][i]; if (fn) fn(triggerId, contextData); } } } } // load new collection instance. var myClientEvents = new bsdClientEventCollection(); // register events specific to the control that owns it, this will be emitted by each respective control. myClientEvents.RegisterEvent("menu-item-clicked"); Here is the part where this code above is consumed by source and subscriber controls. // menu control $(document).ready(function() { $(".menu > a").click( function(event) { //event.preventDefault(); myClientEvents.FireEvent("menu-item-clicked", $(this).attr("id"), null); }); }); <div style="float: left;" class="menu"> <a id="1" href="#">Menu Item1</a><br /> <a id="2" href="#">Menu Item2</a><br /> <a id="3" href="#">Menu Item3</a><br /> <a id="4" href="#">Menu Item4</a><br /> </div> // event subscriber control $(document).ready(function() { myClientEvents.AttachToEvent("menu-item-clicked", menuItemChanged); myClientEvents.AttachToEvent("menu-item-clicked", menuItemChanged2); myClientEvents.AttachToEvent("menu-item-clicked", menuItemChanged3); }); function menuItemChanged(id, contextData) { alert('menuItemChanged ' + id); } function menuItemChanged2(id, contextData) { alert('menuItemChanged2 ' + id); } function menuItemChanged3(id, contextData) { alert('menuItemChanged3 ' + id); }

    Read the article

  • Handling Messages in Console Apps/DLLs in C++ Win32

    - by vsimon
    I would like to have the ability to process Win32 messages in a console app and/or inside a standalone DLL. I have been able to do it in .NET with the following article and it works great in C# inside a console app and standalone DLL http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/magazine/cc163417.aspx Is there a way to do the equivalent with C/C++ Win32 APIs? I have tried doing RegisterClassEx(...) and CreateWindow(...) even passing in HWND_MESSAGE to hWndParent but the trouble is that after the "invisible" window is created messages are not being processed probably due to the lack of a message pump. Where would the message pump go if you had a DLL entry point? I have tried creating another thread in a DLL and put while(GetMesage(..)) there but that did not work either. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • In FLEX, How can you stop ENTER Key from my Alert being caught by the control that initiated the Al

    - by WeeJavaDude
    I am having an issue where I show an AlertBox message when the user hits ENTER and the focus is in a text area. The pop up works fine, but when the user hits enter the Alert closes as expected, but the TextArea listener receives the ENTER event from the Alert and pops the dialog up again. I have tried a number of ways to catch and eat the event but so far I have not been lucky. Is there way to accomplish this? public function init():void { myTextInput.addEventListener(KeyboardEvent.KEY_UP, handleKeyStrokes); } public function handleKeyStrokes(evt:KeyboardEvent):void { if(evt.keyCode == Keyboard.ENTER) { myAlert = Alert.show("This is a test and only a test", "Title", 4, null, alertCallBack); } } <mx:TextInput id="myTextInput" left="600" top="10"> </mx:TextInput>

    Read the article

  • better way of handling nested list

    - by laspal
    Hi, I have list my_list = [ [1,2,3,4,5,6], [1,3,4],[34,56,56,56]] for item in my_list: var1,var2,var3,var4,var5,var6 = None if len(item) ==1: var1 = item[0] if len(item) == 2: var1 = item[0] var2 = item[1] if len(item) == 3: var1 = item[0] var2 = item[1] var3 = item[2] if len(item) == 4: var1 = item[0] var2 = item[1] var3 = item[2] var4 = item[3] fun(var1,var2,var3,var4,var5,var6) I have a function def fun(var1, var2 = None, var3 = None, var4 = None, var5=None, var6= None) Depending upon the values in my inner list. I am passing it to function. I hope I made it clear. Thanks

    Read the article

  • C# Dynamic Keyword exception handling

    - by user972255
    The below code throws an exception when executing this line (i.e. something.Add(name)). I want to catch the actual exception when executing this. I mean I don't want to use catch(Exception ex) instead of that I want to know what is the correct exception thrown here. try { dynamic name= "test"; var something = new List<decimal>(); something.Add(name); } catch(Exception ex) { throw ex; } Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • I've caught an exception!! Now what?

    - by Jonesy
    Hi folks, I've started using try catch blocks (bit late i know!) but now im not sure what to do with the exception once i've caught it. What do people usually do here? -- Jonesy Try connection.Open() Dim sqlCmd As New SqlCommand("do some SQL", connection) Dim sqlDa As New SqlDataAdapter(sqlCmd) sqlDa.Fill(dt) Catch ex As SQLException ' ahhhh what to do now!!!? Finally connection.Close() End Try

    Read the article

  • Handling right-click within a MenuItem

    - by tylerl
    Is it possible to check for a right-click on a menu item in .NET? It appears that the framework doesn't expose it as an Event, but I've seen other applications (like Chrome and Firefox) which allow you to bring up a right-click context menu for a menu item. Presumably with a little event-loop magic you can do the same thing in .NET, right?

    Read the article

  • How to get MVC action to return 404

    - by zaph0d
    I have an action that takes in a string that is used to retrieve some data. If this string results in no data being returned (maybe because it has been deleted), I want to return a 404 and display an error page. I currently just use return a special view that display a friendly error message specific to this action saying that the item was not found. This works fine, but would ideally like to return a 404 status code so search engines know that this content no longer exists and can remove it from the search results. What is the best way to go about this? Is it as simple as setting Response.StatusCode = 404?

    Read the article

  • Handling row selection from a simple grid using jquery and asp.net mvc

    - by Jonn
    Using a simple table and jquery, how would you manually handle selection using jquery? So far, I've managed to add a gridrowselected class on the tr when the click event is called so that I'll know which row is currently selected. But I don't know how to pass the selected data back to the controller (or at least an index I placed on the row). I tried something like this $(function() { $('#ProjectList .gridrow').click(function() { // Get row's index var projectId = $(this).find('input[name$=ProjectId]').val(); // Remove the input if it already exists var parentForm = $(this).parents('form'); parentForm.remove('input[name="selectedRows"][value="' + projectId + '"]'); // If it is selected, create the form. If it's not selected then the input just gets removed (the user must have clicked on it and deselected the row) if ($(this).hasClass('gridrow-selected') === true) { parentForm.append($('<input>', { type: "hidden", name: "selectedRows", value: projectId })); } }); }); which I'm expecting to create a hidden input so that when I post, selectedRows gets passed onto the controller. But all it does is create the input, but the data still doesn't get passed to the controller.

    Read the article

  • C++ Storing variables and inheritance

    - by Kaa
    Hello Everyone, Here is my situation: I have an event driven system, where all my handlers are derived from IHandler class, and implement an onEvent(const Event &event) method. Now, Event is a base class for all events and contains only the enumerated event type. All actual events are derived from it, including the EventKey event, which has 2 fields: (uchar) keyCode and (bool)isDown. Here's the interesting part: I generate an EventKey event using the following syntax: Event evt = EventKey(15, true); and I ship it to the handlers: EventDispatch::sendEvent(evt); // void EventDispatch::sendEvent(const Event &event); (EventDispatch contains a linked list of IHandlers and calls their onEvent(const Event &event) method with the parameter containing the sent event. Now the actual question: Say I want my handlers to poll the events in a queue of type Event, how do I do that? x Dynamic pointers with reference counting sound like too big of a solution. x Making copies is more difficult than it sounds, since I'm only receiving a reference to a base type, therefore each time I would need to check the type of event, upcast to EventKey and then make a copy to store in a queue. Sounds like the only solution - but is unpleasant since I would need to know every single type of event and would have to check that for every event received - sounds like a bad plan. x I could allocate the events dynamically and then send around pointers to those events, enqueue them in the array if wanted - but other than having reference counting - how would I be able to keep track of that memory? Do you know any way to implement a very light reference counter that wouldn't interfere with the user? What do you think would be a good solution to this design? I thank everyone in advance for your time. Sincerely, Kaa

    Read the article

  • Exception handling in WebForms

    - by user999379
    I have a webform with a formview <asp:FormView ID="formViewBrouwers" runat="server" AllowPaging="True" DataKeyNames="BrouwerNr" DataSourceID="brouwerDataSource" onitemupdated="formViewBrouwers_ItemUpdated" onitemupdating="formViewBrouwers_ItemUpdating" oniteminserted="formViewBrouwers_ItemInserted" oniteminserting="formViewBrouwers_ItemInserting"> <EditItemTemplate> BrouwerNr: <asp:Label ID="BrouwerNrLabel1" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("BrouwerNr") %>' /> <br /> BrNaam: <asp:TextBox ID="BrNaamTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("BrNaam") %>' /> <br /> Adres: <asp:TextBox ID="AdresTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Adres") %>' /> <br /> Postcode: <asp:TextBox ID="PostcodeTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Postcode") %>' /> <br /> Gemeente: <asp:TextBox ID="GemeenteTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Gemeente") %>' /> <br /> Omzet: <asp:TextBox ID="OmzetTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Omzet") %>' /> <br /> Status: <asp:TextBox ID="StatusTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Status") %>' /> <br /> <asp:LinkButton ID="UpdateButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="True" CommandName="Update" Text="Update" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ID="UpdateCancelButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Cancel" Text="Cancel" /> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> BrNaam: <asp:TextBox ID="BrNaamTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("BrNaam") %>' /> <br /> Adres: <asp:TextBox ID="AdresTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Adres") %>' /> <br /> Postcode: <asp:TextBox ID="PostcodeTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Postcode") %>' /> <br /> Gemeente: <asp:TextBox ID="GemeenteTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Gemeente") %>' /> <br /> Omzet: <asp:TextBox ID="OmzetTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Omzet") %>' /> <br /> Status: <asp:TextBox ID="StatusTextBox" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Status") %>' /> <br /> <asp:LinkButton ID="InsertButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="True" CommandName="Insert" Text="Insert" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ID="InsertCancelButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Cancel" Text="Cancel" /> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> BrouwerNr: <asp:Label ID="BrouwerNrLabel" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("BrouwerNr") %>' /> <br /> BrNaam: <asp:Label ID="BrNaamLabel" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("BrNaam") %>' /> <br /> Adres: <asp:Label ID="AdresLabel" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Adres") %>' /> <br /> Postcode: <asp:Label ID="PostcodeLabel" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Postcode") %>' /> <br /> Gemeente: <asp:Label ID="GemeenteLabel" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Gemeente") %>' /> <br /> Omzet: <asp:Label ID="OmzetLabel" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Omzet") %>' /> <br /> Status: <asp:Label ID="StatusLabel" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("Status") %>' /> <br /> <asp:LinkButton ID="EditButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Edit" Text="Edit" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ID="DeleteButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="Delete" Text="Delete" /> &nbsp;<asp:LinkButton ID="NewButton" runat="server" CausesValidation="False" CommandName="New" Text="New" /> </ItemTemplate> <PagerSettings Mode="NextPreviousFirstLast" /> </asp:FormView> In my property Postcode I check the value like this: private Int16 postcodeValue; public Int16 Postcode { get { return postcodeValue; } set { if (value < 1000 || value > 9999) { throw new Exception("Postcode moet tussen 1000 en 9999 liggen"); } else { postcodeValue = value; } } } How can I handle the exception I threw? If there is an exception I want a label to appear with the following exception?

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160  | Next Page >