Search Results

Search found 9879 results on 396 pages for 'thread dump'.

Page 153/396 | < Previous Page | 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160  | Next Page >

• YouTube app fails to open up when launched.

  - by user354738

  Below logs gives any clue ? The app just opens up (we could just see the tite of the app as YouTube and it goes back to launcher tray immd.) cat=[android.intent.category.LAUNCHER] flg=0x10200000 cmp=com.google.android.youtube/.HomeActivity } 05-31 14:06:41.655: INFO/ActivityManager(1102): Start proc com.google.android.youtube for activity com.google.android.youtube/.HomeActivity: pid=2977 uid=10041 gids={3003} 05-31 14:06:41.655: DEBUG/KeyguardViewMediator(1102): setHidden false 05-31 14:06:41.796: INFO/foo(1102): ********************** resuming: 1144012408 05-31 14:06:41.897: INFO/ActivityThread(2977): Publishing provider com.google.android.youtube.SuggestionProvider: com.google.android.youtube.suggest.SuggestionProvider 05-31 14:06:41.960: INFO/YouTube(2977): Distribution channel:mvapp-android-google 05-31 14:06:42.116: INFO/AndroidRuntime(2977): AndroidRuntime onExit calling exit(-42) 05-31 14:06:42.116: INFO/dalvikvm(2977): In threadExitCheck 0xbdb0 05-31 14:06:42.116: ERROR/dalvikvm(2977): Native thread exited without telling us 05-31 14:06:42.116: ERROR/dalvikvm(2977): Native thread 2977 status: 7 05-31 14:06:42.124: DEBUG/KeyguardViewMediator(1102): setHidden false 05-31 14:06:42.139: INFO/ActivityManager(1102): Process com.google.android.youtube (pid 2977) has died

  Read the article

• Where does Firefox store the opened windows/tabs/urls for Session Restore after a crash?

  - by jens

  In which location and file does Firefox save the last windows I had opened (when Firefox crashed)? I have a complete "hot dump" copy of a file system and need to restore the state Firefox was when the system crashed, but I cannot restore the full backup itself. I can only extract the files of Firefox, but I do not know in which files I have to search for the urls that were last opened when the snapshot of the whole file system was done.

  Read the article

• What happens to an instance of ServerSocket blocked inside accept(), when I drop all references to i

  - by Hanno Fietz

  In a multithreaded Java application, I just tracked down a strange-looking bug, realizing that what seemed to be happening was this: one of my objects was storing a reference to an instance of ServerSocket on startup, one thread would, in its main loop in run(), call accept() on the socket while the socket was still waiting for a connection, another thread would try to restart the component under some conditions, the restart process missed the cleanup sequence before it reached the initialization sequence as a result, the reference to the socket was overwritten with a new instance, which then wasn't able to bind() anymore the socket which was blocking inside the accept() wasn't accessible anymore, leaving a complete shutdown and restart of the application as the only way to get rid of it. Which leaves me wondering: with no references left to the ServerSocket instance, what would free the socket for a new connection? At what point would the ServerSocket become garbage collected? In general, what are good practices I can follow to avoid this type of bug?

  Read the article

• Simple prime number program - Weird issue with threads C#

  - by Para

  Hi! This is my code: using System; using System.Collections.Generic; using System.Linq; using System.Text; using System.Threading; namespace FirePrime { class Program { static bool[] ThreadsFinished; static bool[] nums; static bool AllThreadsFinished() { bool allThreadsFinished = false; foreach (var threadFinished in ThreadsFinished) { allThreadsFinished &= threadFinished; } return allThreadsFinished; } static bool isPrime(int n) { if (n < 2) { return false; } if (n == 2) { return true; } if (n % 2 == 0) { return false; } int d = 3; while (d * d <= n) { if (n % d == 0) { return false; } d += 2; } return true; } static void MarkPrimes(int startNumber,int stopNumber,int ThreadNr) { for (int j = startNumber; j < stopNumber; j++) nums[j] = isPrime(j); lock (typeof(Program)) { ThreadsFinished[ThreadNr] = true; } } static void Main(string[] args) { int nrNums = 100; int nrThreads = 10; //var threadStartNums = new List<int>(); ThreadsFinished = new bool[nrThreads]; nums = new bool[nrNums]; //var nums = new List<bool>(); nums[0] = false; nums[1] = false; for(int i=2;i<nrNums;i++) nums[i] = true; int interval = (int)(nrNums / nrThreads); //threadStartNums.Add(2); //int aux = firstStartNum; //int i = 2; //while (aux < interval) //{ // aux = interval*i; // i=i+1; // threadStartNums.Add(aux); //} int startNum = 0; for (int i = 0; i < nrThreads; i++) { var _thread = new System.Threading.Thread(() => MarkPrimes(startNum, Math.Min(startNum + interval, nrNums), i)); startNum = startNum + interval; //set the thread to run in the background _thread.IsBackground = true; //start our thread _thread.Start(); } while (!AllThreadsFinished()) { Thread.Sleep(1); } for (int i = 0; i < nrNums; i++) if(nums[i]) Console.WriteLine(i); } } } This should be a pretty simple program that is supposed to find and output the first nrNums prime numbers using nrThreads threads working in parallel. So, I just split nrNums into nrThreads equal chunks (well, the last one won't be equal; if nrThreads doesn't divide by nrNums, it will also contain the remainder, of course). I start nrThreads threads. They all test each number in their respective chunk and see if it is prime or not; they mark everything out in a bool array that keeps a tab on all the primes. The threads all turn a specific element in another boolean array ThreadsFinished to true when they finish. Now the weird part begins: The threads never all end. If I debug, I find that ThreadNr is not what I assign to it in the loop but another value. I guess this is normal since the threads execute afterwards and the counter (the variable i) is already increased by then but I cannot understand how to make the code be right. Can anyone help? Thank you in advance. P.S.: I know the algorithm is not very efficient; I am aiming at a solution using the sieve of Eratosthenes also with x given threads. But for now I can't even get this one to work and I haven't found any examples of any implementations of that algorithm anywhere in a language that I can understand.

  Read the article

• implementing keepalives with Java

  - by Bilal

  Hi All, I am biulding a client-server application where I have to implement a keepalive mechanism in order to detect that the client has crashed or not. I have separate threads on both client and server side. the client thread sends a "ping" then sleeps for 3 seconds, while the server reads the BufferedInput Stream and checks whether ping is received, if so it makes the ping counter eqauls zero, else it increments the counter by +1, the server thread then sleeps for 3 seconds, if the ping counter reaches 3, it daclares the client as dead. The problem is that when the server reads the input stream, its a blocking call, and it blocks untill the next ping is received, irrespective of how delayed it is, so the server never detects a missed ping. any suggestions, so that I can read the current value of the stream and it doesn't block if there is nothing on the incoming stream. Thanks,

  Read the article

• "Access violation reading location" troubles retrieveing buffer from directx

  - by numerical25

  Below is my code... ID3D10Texture2D *pBackBuffer; hr = mpSwapChain->GetBuffer(0, __uuidof(ID3D10Texture2D), (LPVOID*) &pBackBuffer); and I get the following error chp1.exe': Unloaded 'C:\Windows\SysWOW64\oleaut32.dll' First-chance exception at 0x757ce124 in chp1.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: _com_error at memory location 0x0018eeb0.. First-chance exception at 0x757ce124 in chp1.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: _com_error at memory location 0x0018edd0.. First-chance exception at 0x757ce124 in chp1.exe: Microsoft C++ exception: _com_error at memory location 0x0018ef1c.. The thread 'Win32 Thread' (0xfc4) has exited with code 0 (0x0). 'chp1.exe': Unloaded 'C:\Windows\SysWOW64\D3D10Ref.DLL' First-chance exception at 0x00b71894 in chp1.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0x00000000. Unhandled ex ception at 0x00b71894 in chp1.exe: 0xC0000005: Access violation reading location 0x00000000. It appears that the error occurs in the last parameter. &pBackBuffer. I added this single line of code and the error occurs.

  Read the article

• How can I add similar functionality to a number of methods in java?

  - by Roman

  I have a lot of methods for logging, like logSomeAction, logAnotherAction etc. Now I want all these methods make a small pause after printing messages (Thread.sleep). If I do it manually, I would do something like this: //before: public static void logSomeAction () { System.out.println (msg(SOME_ACTION)); } //after: public static void logSomeAction () { System.out.println (msg(SOME_ACTION)); try { Thread.sleep (2000); } catch (InterruptedException ignored) { } } I remember that Java has proxy classes and some other magic-making tools. Is there any way avoid copy-n-pasting N sleep-blocks to N logging methods?

  Read the article

• What is the effect of final variable declaration in methods?

  - by Finbarr

  Classic example of a simple server: class ThreadPerTaskSocketServer { public static void main(String[] args) throws IOException { ServerSocket socket = new ServerSocket(80); while (true) { final Socket connection = socket.accept(); Runnable task = new Runnable() { public void run() { handleRequest(connection); } }; new Thread(task).start(); } } } Why should the Socket be declared as final? Is it because the new Thread that handles the request could refer back to the socket variable in the method and cause some sort of ConcurrentModificationException?

  Read the article

• problem-configure-jboss-to-work-with-jndi(3)

  - by Spiderman

  Sorry for opening new thread every time for the same problem. It's just that I'd like to refine my question during my investigation and it's hard to do it in stackoverflow structure on the same question (maybe on purpose). Anyway, in continuation to this thread http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2843218/problem-configure-jboss-to-work-with-jndi2 I discovered that when running an application that is deployed on my JBoss 4.2.3.GA, when I perform: Context initialContext = new InitialContext(); Object dataSource = initialContext.lookup("java:/DefaultDS"); I get null as a return value even though DefaultDS is the default datasource that comes with Jboss installation. and generally, how come initialContext return null value? if the datasource is not found it should throw NamingException and in other case it should return real object. What can I do with null? isn't it a bad error handling of javax.naming.InitialContext ???

  Read the article

• What would happen to GC if I run process with priority = RealTime?

  - by Bobb

  I have a C# app which runs with priority RealTime. It was all fine until I made few hectic changes in past 2 days. Now it runs out of memory in few hours. I am trying to find whether it is a memory leak I created of this is because I consume lot more objects than before and GC simply cant collect them because it runs with same priority. My question is - what could happen to GC when it tries to collect objects in application with RealTime priority (there is also at least one thread running with Highest thread priority)? (P.S. by realtime priority I mean Process.GetCurrentProcess().PriorityClass = ProcessPriorityClass.RealTime) Sorry forgot to tell. GC is in Server mode

  Read the article

• Java - 'continue' loop iteration after certain timeout period

  - by Matt

  Is there a way to exit ('continue;') a loop iteration after a certain timeout period? I have a loop that will run gathering data from the web and then use this data to make a calculation. The data become obsolete after about 1 to 2 seconds so if the loop iteration takes longer than 1 second then i want it to 'continue' to the next iteration. Sometimes gathering the data can take time but sometimes the calculation can take longer than 1 second so a HTTP timeout won't work for what i need. Also, while doing the calculation the thread i am using is blocked so i cannot check System.currentTimeMillis(); Is there a way to use another Thread to check the time and force the original for loop to continue.

  Read the article

• Disable the Go button in the Keyboard for a UITextfield in iphone app.

  - by coder net

  Hi, My app has a screen where keyboard is always visible. The main element of the screen is a UITextfield. For easy data entering, keyboard is always made visible. When the user finishes entering data and hits Go, the app performs a 4,5 seconds action which is done in the background thread in order to show UIActivityIndicatorView. My problem is that the Go button on the keyboard still shows as enabled since the logic is performed in the background. The user could potentially hit the Go again causing it to run again. I am not able to set editable/userinteraction properties to No because then the keyboard disappears. Is there anyway just to disable the Go button or freeze the keyboard until the background thread returns?

  Read the article

• Threading Problems in ActionScript 2.0?

  - by yar

  Is it possible to have concurrency problems (thread competition) in an onEnterFrame method in ActionScript 2.0? I have written this cheesy code as a guard: if (!busy) { // I suspect some threading problems: is that even possible in flash busy = true; movePanels(); busy = false; } but this is no assurance against thread competition. If so, how can I do a basic semaphore/lock? Note: I suspect threading problems in my app, but if they're impossible, I'll check my code differently.

  Read the article

• A Surface view and a canvas to move Bitmap

  - by John Apple Sim

  I have a SurfaceView and I want the Bitmap Logo inside it in the canvas to be movable What I'm doing wrong ? static float x, y; Bitmap logo; SurfaceView ss = (SurfaceView) findViewById(R.id.svSS); logo = BitmapFactory.decodeResource(getResources(), R.drawable.logo); x = 40; y = 415; ss.setOnTouchListener(new View.OnTouchListener() { @Override public boolean onTouch(View v, MotionEvent me) { try { Thread.sleep(50); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } switch(me.getAction()) { case MotionEvent.ACTION_DOWN: x = me.getX(); y = me.getY(); break; case MotionEvent.ACTION_UP: x = me.getX(); y = me.getY(); break; case MotionEvent.ACTION_MOVE: x = me.getX(); y = me.getY(); break; } return true; } }); public class OurView extends SurfaceView implements Runnable{ Thread t = null; SurfaceHolder holder; boolean isItOK = false; public OurView(Context context) { super(context); holder = getHolder(); } public void run (){ while (isItOK == true){ //canvas DRAWING if (!holder.getSurface().isValid()){ continue; } Canvas c = holder.lockCanvas(); c.drawARGB(255, 200, 100, 100); c.drawBitmap(logo, x,y,null); holder.unlockCanvasAndPost(c); } } public void pause(){ isItOK = false; while(true){ try { t.join(); } catch (InterruptedException e) { e.printStackTrace(); } break; } t = null; } public void resume(){ isItOK = true; t = new Thread(this); t.start(); } } Now the surface view is just black .. nothing happens also its not colored 200, 100, 100

  Read the article

• check whether fgets would block

  - by lv

  Hi, I was just wondering whether in C is it possible to peek in the input buffer or perform similar trickery to know whether a call to fgets would block at a later time. Java allows to do something like that by calling BufferedReader.ready(), this way I can implement console input something like this: while (on && in.ready()) { line = in.readLine(); /* do something with line */ if (!in.ready()) Thread.sleep(100); } this allows an external thread to gracefully shutdown the input loop by setting on to false; I'd like to perform a similar implementation in C without resorting to non portable tricks, I already know I can make a "timed out fgets" under unix by resorting to signals or (better, even though requering to take care of buffering) reimplement it on top of recv/select, but I'd prefer something that would work on windows too. TIA

  Read the article

• Android: how to update UI dynamically?

  - by pandre

  I have an Android app and I need to change UI dynamically: ex: when user presses a button, I want to change the current activity's views and, as in some cases there are a lot of views involved, I need to display a ProgressDialog. I have been using an AsyncTask, but I think that it is not the best solution, because AsyncTask's doInBackground runs a different thread, so I can't update UI from there - I have to use runOnUiThread, which runs the code in the UI Thread, but freezes the progress dialog that is shown. I guess there should be more people with similar issues, as updating UI while displaying a ProgressDialog seems to be something done regularly by applications. So does anyone have a solution to this?

  Read the article

• How do I extract a list of Windows services and their status to a text file?

  - by Alex Angas

  I would like to get a text dump of the screen you see when running services.msc (except the Description column). This is so I can run a diff after installing different software that adds services to this screen. Is this possible? If it's helpful I have access to Powershell but don't know how to retrieve this type of information from it.

  Read the article

• [java] Threading socket handler for two sided communication in tcp port

  - by raven

  I want to make a chat which will be programed in java. one computer will host the server and the other one will initiate the socket [tcp port]. now from what I read there should be a loop that will constantly read the socket which means it will make the code stuck. I have a button that is 'actionperformed' on mouse release, I want to know if it will work along with the loops that constantly reads the socket so that it will also send the infromation I wrote. If I must thread it, I want to know if the run() method must be void because if I thread it it will mean creating a new class, and the whole GUI is one big class which includes a text area, and it's private. also how can I extract the information from the socket directly to the text area? lets say the textarea variable is called "chatOutput". thx :)

  Read the article

• YouTube app failes to open up when launched.

  - by user354738

  Below logs gives any clue ? The app just opens up (we could just see the tite of the app as YouTube and it goes back to launcher tray immd.) cat=[android.intent.category.LAUNCHER] flg=0x10200000 cmp=com.google.android.youtube/.HomeActivity } 05-31 14:06:41.655: INFO/ActivityManager(1102): Start proc com.google.android.youtube for activity com.google.android.youtube/.HomeActivity: pid=2977 uid=10041 gids={3003} 05-31 14:06:41.655: DEBUG/KeyguardViewMediator(1102): setHidden false 05-31 14:06:41.796: INFO/foo(1102): ********** resuming: 1144012408 05-31 14:06:41.897: INFO/ActivityThread(2977): Publishing provider com.google.android.youtube.SuggestionProvider: com.google.android.youtube.suggest.SuggestionProvider 05-31 14:06:41.960: INFO/YouTube(2977): Distribution channel:mvapp-android-google 05-31 14:06:42.116: INFO/AndroidRuntime(2977): AndroidRuntime onExit calling exit(-42) 05-31 14:06:42.116: INFO/dalvikvm(2977): In threadExitCheck 0xbdb0 05-31 14:06:42.116: ERROR/dalvikvm(2977): Native thread exited without telling us 05-31 14:06:42.116: ERROR/dalvikvm(2977): Native thread 2977 status: 7 05-31 14:06:42.124: DEBUG/KeyguardViewMediator(1102): setHidden false 05-31 14:06:42.139: INFO/ActivityManager(1102): Process com.google.android.youtube (pid 2977) has died

  Read the article

• SwingWorker exceptions lost even when using wrapper classes

  - by Ti Strga

  I've been struggling with the usability problem of SwingWorker eating any exceptions thrown in the background task, for example, described on this SO thread. That thread gives a nice description of the problem, but doesn't discuss recovering the original exception. The applet I've been handed needs to propagate the exception upwards. But I haven't been able to even catch it. I'm using the SimpleSwingWorker wrapper class from this blog entry specifically to try and address this issue. It's a fairly small class but I'll repost it at the end here just for reference. The calling code looks broadly like try { // lots of code here to prepare data, finishing with SpecialDataHelper helper = new SpecialDataHelper(...stuff...); helper.execute(); } catch (Throwable e) { // used "Throwable" here in desperation to try and get // anything at all to match, including unchecked exceptions // // no luck, this code is never ever used :-( } The wrappers: class SpecialDataHelper extends SimpleSwingWorker { public SpecialDataHelper (SpecialData sd) { this.stuff = etc etc etc; } public Void doInBackground() throws Exception { OurCodeThatThrowsACheckedException(this.stuff); return null; } protected void done() { // called only when successful // never reached if there's an error } } The feature of SimpleSwingWorker is that the actual SwingWorker's done()/get() methods are automatically called. This, in theory, rethrows any exceptions that happened in the background. In practice, nothing is ever caught, and I don't even know why. The SimpleSwingWorker class, for reference, and with nothing elided for brevity: import java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException; import javax.swing.SwingWorker; /** * A drop-in replacement for SwingWorker<Void,Void> but will not silently * swallow exceptions during background execution. * * Taken from http://jonathangiles.net/blog/?p=341 with thanks. */ public abstract class SimpleSwingWorker { private final SwingWorker<Void,Void> worker = new SwingWorker<Void,Void>() { @Override protected Void doInBackground() throws Exception { SimpleSwingWorker.this.doInBackground(); return null; } @Override protected void done() { // Exceptions are lost unless get() is called on the // originating thread. We do so here. try { get(); } catch (final InterruptedException ex) { throw new RuntimeException(ex); } catch (final ExecutionException ex) { throw new RuntimeException(ex.getCause()); } SimpleSwingWorker.this.done(); } }; public SimpleSwingWorker() {} protected abstract Void doInBackground() throws Exception; protected abstract void done(); public void execute() { worker.execute(); } }

  Read the article

• pthreads recursively calling system command and segfault appears

  - by jess

  I have a code base where i am creating 8 threads and each thread just calls system command to display date in a continuous cycle, as shown below: void * system_thread(void *arg) { int cpu = (int)arg; printf("thread : start %d\n", cpu); for (;;) { // date ã³ãã³ãã®å®è¡ if (mode == 0) { system("date"); } else { f_hfp_nlc_Fsystem("date"); } } sleep(timerval); return NULL; } This application segfaults after running for 2-3 seconds, due to following 2 reasons: 1. read access, where the address is out of VM area 2. write acces, where it does not of write permission and its trying to modify some structure.

  Read the article

• Is it possible to create a jdbc connection without a password (using postgresql 'trust')?

  - by mojones

  I am using jdbc to connect to a postgresql database in a java application (actually the app is written in Groovy). I have postgresql set up to use the 'trust' authentication method. Is it possible to open a jdbc connection without specifying a password? When I try to use the normal constructor with a blank password, it fails with Exception in thread "Thread-2" org.postgresql.util.PSQLException: FATAL: password authentication failed for user "myuser" Even though, from the command line, this works fine psql -U myuser mydatabase Welcome to psql 8.3.5, the PostgreSQL interactive terminal. Type: \copyright for distribution terms \h for help with SQL commands \? for help with psql commands \g or terminate with semicolon to execute query \q to quit

  Read the article

• C++ WIN32: Short multitasking example

  - by Con Current

  I searched for examples on how to create a simple multithreaded app that does something similar to this: #include <iostream> using namespace std; int myConcurrentFunction( ) { while( 1 ) { cout << "b" << endl; } } int main( ) { // Start a new thread for myConcurrentFunction while( 1 ) { cout << "a" << endl; } } How can I get the above to output a and b "randomly" by starting a new thread instead of just calling myConcurrentFunction normally? I mean: What is the minimal code for it? Is it really only one function I have to call? What files do I need to include? I use MSVC 2010, Win32

  Read the article

• Android game goes blank after pressing home and restarting

  - by sirconnorstack

  I am making an Android game with an Activity called Game, a SurfaceView called GameView and a Thread called GameThread. The Game's onCreate(), I make a new GameView, which makes a new GameThread, where all the game logic and canvas drawing is carried out. However, I'm having some lifecycle difficulties. When I press back and restart it, it works fine, but when I press home and restart it, all I see is a blank screen. Here are the GameView's onSurfaceCreated() and onSurfaceDestroyed(): @Override public void surfaceCreated(SurfaceHolder holder) { mThread.mRunning = true; mThread.mWidth = getWidth(); if(mThread.mWidth > 550) mThread.mWidth = 550; mThread.mHeight = getHeight(); try { mThread.start(); } catch(IllegalThreadStateException e) { } } @Override public void surfaceDestroyed(SurfaceHolder holder) { // Wait for the secondary thread to end before finishing boolean retry = true; mThread.mRunning = false; while (retry) { try { mThread.join(); retry = false; } catch (InterruptedException e) { } } }

  Read the article

• Multi-threading concept and lock in c#

  - by Neeraj

  I read about lock, though not understood nothing at all. My question is why do we use a un-used object and lock that and how this makes something thread-safe or how this helps in multi-threading ? Isn't there other way to make thread-safe code. public class test { private object Lock { get; set; } ... lock (this.Lock) { ... } ... } Sorry is my question is very stupid, but i don't understand, although i've used it many times.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160  | Next Page >