Search Results

Search found 22756 results on 911 pages for 'power query'.

Page 155/911 | < Previous Page | 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162  | Next Page >

  • sql: trying to select the second biggest element but selects the biggest

    - by matthy
    we want to have the second biggest element. We first use ANY to exclude the biggest one. Then we use all to select the biggest. However when we run this query, it shows the biggest and not the second one. Why? SELECT * FROM bestelling WHERE totaalprijs > ALL ( SELECT totaalprijs FROM bestelling WHERE totaalprijs < ANY ( SELECT totaalprijs FROM bestelling ) ) elements in the table: 157.00 5.00 82.80 15.00 20.00 20.00

    Read the article

  • Ordering Wordpress posts by most recent comment

    - by James
    I'm wanting to order Wordpress posts by the most recent comment. To the best of my knowledge this isn't possible using the WP_Query object, and would require a custom $wpdb query, which I can easily write. However, I then don't know how to setup the loop to run off this object. Can anyone help?

    Read the article

  • How to get max of composite data in SQL?

    - by Siddharth Sinha
    SELECT "Name""Month","Year","Value" from Table WHERE "Name" LIKE '%JERRY%' AND "Year" = (SELECT MAX("Year") FROM Table where "Name" LIKE '%JERRY%') AND "Month"= (SELECT MAX("Month") FROM Table where "Name" LIKE '%JERRY%' AND "Year"= (SELECT MAX("Year") FROM Table where "Name" LIKE '%JERRY%')) Table -- Name | Year | Month | Value ----------------------------- JERRY 2012 9 100 JERRY 2012 9 120 JERRY 2012 9 130 JERRY 2012 8 20 JERRY 2011 12 50 So i want the first three rows as output. As for the latest month for the latest year i need all the values. Can someone suggest a better cleaner query?

    Read the article

  • Execution Plan Optimization when where clause is removed then added back

    - by nmushov
    I have a stored procedure that uses a table valued function which executes in 9 seconds. If I alter the table valued function and remove the where clause, the stored procedure executes in 3 seconds. If I add the where clause back, the query still executes in 3 seconds. I took a look at the execution plans and it appears that after I remove the where clause, the execution plan includes parallelism and the scan count for 2 of my tables drops for 50000 and 65000 down to 5 and 3. After I add the where clause back, the optimized execution plan still runs unless I run DBCC FREEPROCCACHE. Questions 1. Why would SQL Server start using the optimized execution plan for both queries only when I first remove the where clause? Is there a way to force SQL Server to use this execution plan? Also, this is a paramaterized all-in-one query that uses the (Parameter is null or Parameter) in the where clause, which I believe is bad for performance. RETURNS TABLE AS RETURN ( SELECT TOP (@PageNumber * @PageSize) CASE WHEN @SortOrder = 'Expensive' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY SellingPrice DESC) WHEN @SortOrder = 'Inexpensive' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY SellingPrice ASC) WHEN @SortOrder = 'LowMiles' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Mileage ASC) WHEN @SortOrder = 'HighMiles' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY Mileage DESC) WHEN @SortOrder = 'Closest' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY P1.Distance ASC) WHEN @SortOrder = 'Newest' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [Year] DESC) WHEN @SortOrder = 'Oldest' THEN ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY [Year] ASC) ELSE ROW_NUMBER() OVER (ORDER BY InventoryID ASC) END as rn, P1.InventoryID, P1.SellingPrice, P1.Distance, P1.Mileage, Count(*) OVER () RESULT_COUNT, dimCarStatus.[year] FROM (SELECT InventoryID, SellingPrice, Zip.Distance, Mileage, ColorKey, CarStatusKey, CarKey FROM facInventory JOIN @ZipCodes Zip ON Zip.DealerKey = facInventory.DealerKey) as P1 JOIN dimColor ON dimColor.ColorKey = P1.ColorKey JOIN dimCarStatus ON dimCarStatus.CarStatusKey = P1.CarStatusKey JOIN dimCar ON dimCar.CarKey = P1.CarKey WHERE (@ExteriorColor is NULL OR dimColor.ExteriorColor like @ExteriorColor) AND (@InteriorColor is NULL OR dimColor.InteriorColor like @InteriorColor) AND (@Condition is NULL OR dimCarStatus.Condition like @Condition) AND (@Year is NULL OR dimCarStatus.[Year] like @Year) AND (@Certified is NULL OR dimCarStatus.Certified like @Certified) AND (@Make is NULL OR dimCar.Make like @Make) AND (@ModelCategory is NULL OR dimCar.ModelCategory like @ModelCategory) AND (@Model is NULL OR dimCar.Model like @Model) AND (@Trim is NULL OR dimCar.Trim like @Trim) AND (@BodyType is NULL OR dimCar.BodyType like @BodyType) AND (@VehicleTypeCode is NULL OR dimCar.VehicleTypeCode like @VehicleTypeCode) AND (@MinPrice is NULL OR P1.SellingPrice >= @MinPrice) AND (@MaxPrice is NULL OR P1.SellingPrice < @MaxPrice) AND (@Mileage is NULL OR P1.Mileage < @Mileage) ORDER BY CASE WHEN @SortOrder = 'Expensive' THEN -SellingPrice WHEN @SortOrder = 'Inexpensive' THEN SellingPrice WHEN @SortOrder = 'LowMiles' THEN Mileage WHEN @SortOrder = 'HighMiles' THEN -Mileage WHEN @SortOrder = 'Closest' THEN P1.Distance WHEN @SortOrder = 'Newest' THEN -[YEAR] WHEN @SortOrder = 'Oldest' THEN [YEAR] ELSE InventoryID END )

    Read the article

  • MySQL - Order results by relevancy, LEFT JOINS and more

    - by XaviEsteve
    Hi guys, I am trying to get some results ordered by total votes (where client votes count 2 points and other people votes are 1 point). tab_names: +-----------+ | Name | id | +------+----+ | John | 1 | | Paul | 2 | +------+----+ tab_votes: +--------+-----------+ | idname | ip | +--------+-----------+ | 2 | 127.0.0.1 | | 2 | 127.0.0.1 | | 2 | 82.23.5.1 | | 1 | 127.0.0.1 | +--------+-----------+ This is the MySQL query I've got but doesn't work: SELECT * COUNT(v.idname) AS totalvotes, (SELECT COUNT(v.ip) FROM tab_votes WHERE v.ip LIKE '$ip') AS uservotes FROM tab_names n LEFT JOIN tab_votes v ON n.id = v.idname GROUP BY n.name ORDER BY uservotes DESC, totalvotes DESC LIMIT 40

    Read the article

  • Intersect in mysql

    - by Ankur Jariwala
    Hello everyone I need to implement following query in mysql (select * from emovis_reporting where (id=3 and cut_name= '?????' and cut_name='??') ) intersect ( select * from emovis_reporting where (id=3) and ( cut_name='?????' or cut_name='??') ) I know that intersect is not in m Mysql. So I need alternate way. Please guide me....

    Read the article

  • Find Specific Rows

    - by H07R0D
    I'm trying to build a rather specific query to find a set of user_ids based on topics they have registered to. Unfortunately it's not possible to refactor the tables so I have to go with what I've got. Single table with user_id and registration_id I need to find all user_ids that have a registration_id of (4 OR 5) AND NOT 1 Each row is a single user_id/registration_id combination. My SQL skills aren't the best, so I'm really scratching my brain. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • MySQL: Ignore the timestamp attribute

    - by Nique
    I have a timestamp column in my database, and i use it for almost every field, but now, i just want to update the hit counter.. and i do not want to update the timestamp column with it. I use the timestamp field to see the last 'content' update. Not for every hit. Is it possible to let mysql stop updating the timestamp column for just one query?

    Read the article

  • MSSQL add count column near existing select columns

    - by Luis
    Hi, i have a query that returns something like this. ID | Company| Total_Money | no_items | count_Total_Money_For_Company ----------------------------------------------------------- 1 | A | 1000 | 1 | 2001 2 | A | 1001 | 0 | 2001 3 | B | 1001 | 1 | 5010 4 | B | 1002 | 1 | 5010 5 | B | 1003 | 1 | 5010 6 | B | 1004 | 1 | 5010 7 | B | 1000 | 1 | 5010 How can i add that column with the count for that company?

    Read the article

  • How do I perform 'WHERE' on groups of rows?

    - by Drew
    I have a table, which looks like: +-----------+----------+ + person_id + group_id + +-----------+----------+ + 1 + 10 + + 1 + 20 + + 1 + 30 + + 2 + 10 + + 2 + 20 + + 3 + 10 + +-----------+----------+ I need a query such that only person_ids with groups 10 AND 20 AND 30 are returned (only person_id: 1). I am not sure how to do this, as from what I can see it would require me to group the rows by person_id and then select the rows which contain all group_ids. I'm looking for something which will preserve the use of keys without resorting to string operations on group_concat() or such.

    Read the article

  • Custom search engine in asp.net mvc and entity framework

    - by Rahat
    Hi, does anyone have any idea how I can get started building a search engine for my asp.net mvc site using entity framework. I plan to build something like: http://www.carsguide.com.au/search/?N=4294962119++492&type=cars there on the left there is a refine search option panel. What's the best approach to design a model for the UI and optimized query with entity framework.

    Read the article

  • How to properly encode "[" and "]" in queries using Apache HttpClient?

    - by Jason Nichols
    I've got a GET method that looks like the following: GetMethod method = new GetMethod("http://host/path/?key=[\"item\",\"item\"]"); Such a path works just fine when typed directly into a browser, but the above line when run causes an IllegalArgumentException : Invalid URI. I've looked at using the URIUtils class, but without success. Is there a way to automatically encode this (or to add a query string onto the URL without causing HttpClient to barf?).

    Read the article

  • Jquery child elements

    - by Anton
    When I add event handler to a some elements using query: $('div').mouseover(function () { }); how can I check inside this function next: Have this "DIV"child elements "DIV"? Have this "DIV" child element "DIV" whith height more than 300?

    Read the article

  • Loading the last related record instantly for multiple parent records using Entity framework

    - by Guillaume Schuermans
    Does anyone know a good approach using Entity Framework for the problem described below? I am trying for our next release to come up with a performant way to show the placed orders for the logged on customer. Of course paging is always a good technique to use when a lot of data is available I would like to see an answer without any paging techniques. Here's the story: a customer places an order which gets an orderstatus = PENDING. Depending on some strategy we move that order up the chain in order to get it APPROVED. Every change of status is logged so we can see a trace for statusses and maybe even an extra line of comment per status which can provide some extra valuable information to whoever sees this order in an interface. So an Order is linked to a Customer. One order can have multiple orderstatusses stored in OrderStatusHistory. In my testscenario I am using a customer which has 100+ Orders each with about 5 records in the OrderStatusHistory-table. I would for now like to see all orders in one page not using paging where for each Order I show the last relevant Status and the extra comment (if there is any for this last status; both fields coming from OrderStatusHistory; the record with the highest Id for the given OrderId). There are multiple scenarios I have tried, but I would like to see any potential other solutions or comments on the things I have already tried. Trying to do Include() when getting Orders but this still results in multiple queries launched on the database. Each order triggers an extra query to the database to get all orderstatusses in the history table. So all statusses are queried here instead of just returning the last relevant one, plus 100 extra queries are launched for 100 orders. You can imagine the problem when there are 100000+ orders in the database. Having 2 computed columns on the database: LastStatus, LastStatusInformation and a regular Linq-Query which gets those columns which are available through the Entity-model. The problem with this approach is the fact that those computed columns are determined using a scalar function which can not be changed without removing the formula from the computed column, etc... In the end I am very familiar with SQL and Stored procedures, but since the rest of the data-layer uses Entity Framework I would like to stick to it as long as possible, even though I have my doubts about performance. Using the SQL approach I would write something like this: WITH cte (RN, OrderId, [Status], Information) AS ( SELECT ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY OrderId ORDER BY Id DESC), OrderId, [Status], Information FROM OrderStatus ) SELECT o.Id, cte.[Status], cte.Information AS StatusInformation, o.* FROM [Order] o INNER JOIN cte ON o.Id = cte.OrderId AND cte.RN = 1 WHERE CustomerId = @CustomerId ORDER BY 1 DESC; which returns all orders for the customer with the statusinformation provided by the Common Table Expression. Does anyone know a good approach using Entity Framework?

    Read the article

  • Correct Sql Script for Formula

    - by Madan Madan
    Can anyone help me write SQL script for the following formula? If DEP = 1 If DROP 1 PLV = 334.86 * exp(0.3541 * ACTIVE_DAYS) + 0.25 * DROP + 20 * DEP Else If DROP < 0 PLV = DROP + 70 * ACTIVE_DAYS Else PLV = 0.25 * DROP + 70 * ACTIVE_DAYS The SQL script which I have is the following SELECT IF(dep=1, if(dep=1, (334.86 * exp(0.3541 * act_days)) + (0.25 * 'drop') + (20 * dep), if('drop'<0, 'drop' + (70 * act_days), (0.25 * 'drop') + (70 * act_days))),'0') as PLV But the above query is not right as something is missing where the formula says Else PLV = 0.26 * DROP Thanks,

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162  | Next Page >