Search Results

Search found 19967 results on 799 pages for 'document template'.

Page 166/799 | < Previous Page | 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173  | Next Page >

  • Using javascript to access a json array from php

    - by celenius
    I'm trying to understand how my php script can pass an array to my javascript code. Using the following php, I pass an array: $c = array(3,2,7); echo json_encode($c); My javascript is as follows: $.post("getLatLong.php", { latitude: 500000}, function(data){ arrayData = data document.write(arrayData) document.write(arrayData[0]); document.write(arrayData[0]); document.write(arrayData[0]); }); </script> What is printed out on screen is [3,2,7][3, I'm trying to understand how json_encode works - I though I would be able to pass the array to a variable, and then access it like a normal javascript array, but it views my array as one large text string. How do ensure that it reads it like an array?

    Read the article

  • Storing and retrieving dynamically created pdf in sql using c#

    - by mwright
    I have been playing around with creation of pdf documents for a project that I'm working on. I would like to store the generated pdf document in a SQL database and then later be able to retrieve this pdf as well. What are some suggestions for doing this? Can the document be stored in the database without physically creating the document on the server?

    Read the article

  • Duplicate ID/indexes and looping

    - by Justin Alexander
    I realize having two elements in the same html doc with the same ID is wrong, bad, immoral, and will lead to global warming. But... I'm trying to write an XSS widgit, so I really have no control over the quality of the parent web page. I loop through document.images to retrieve a list of images on the page. I perform an action on each one. for(img in document.images){ ... } i've also tried for(var i=0;i<document.images.length;i++){ ... } in both cases it allows me to loop through all of the elements, BUT when trying trying to reference an object with a duplicate ID, I always get the first (in order of the html). When using debugger in IE8 i'm able to see that both elements ARE listed, but that they both have the same index (in IE the index of the document.images is either sequential or matches the image ID) Does anyone have a better solution?

    Read the article

  • go programming POST FormValue can't be printed

    - by poor_programmer
    Before I being a bit of background, I am very new to go programming language. I am running go on Win 7, latest go package installer for windows. I'm not good at coding but I do like some challenge of learning a new language. I wanted to start learn Erlang but found go very interesting based on the GO I/O videos in youtube. I'm having problem with capturing POST form values in GO. I spend three hours yesterday to get go to print a POST form value in the browser and failed miserably. I don't know what I'm doing wrong, can anyone point me to the right direction? I can easily do this in another language like C#, PHP, VB, ASP, Rails etc. I have search the entire interweb and haven't found a working sample. Below is my sample code. Here is Index.html page {{ define "title" }}Homepage{{ end }} {{ define "content" }} <h1>My Homepage</h1> <p>Hello, and welcome to my homepage!</p> <form method="POST" action="/"> <p> Enter your name : <input type="text" name="username"> </P> <p> <button>Go</button> </form> <br /><br /> {{ end }} Here is the base page <!DOCTYPE html> <html lang="en"> <head> <title>{{ template "title" . }}</title> </head> <body> <section id="contents"> {{ template "content" . }} </section> <footer id="footer"> My homepage 2012 copy </footer> </body> </html> now some go code package main import ( "fmt" "http" "strings" "html/template" ) var index = template.Must(template.ParseFiles( "templates/_base.html", "templates/index.html", )) func GeneralHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { index.Execute(w, nil) if r.Method == "POST" { a := r.FormValue("username") fmt.Fprintf(w, "hi %s!",a); //<-- this variable does not rendered in the browser!!! } } func helloHandler(w http.ResponseWriter, r *http.Request) { remPartOfURL := r.URL.Path[len("/hello/"):] fmt.Fprintf(w, "Hello %s!", remPartOfURL) } func main() { http.HandleFunc("/", GeneralHandler) http.HandleFunc("/hello/", helloHandler) http.ListenAndServe("localhost:81", nil) } Thanks! PS: Very tedious to add four space before every line of code in stackoverflow especially when you are copy pasting. Didn't find it very user friendly or is there an easier way?

    Read the article

  • Loading and removing images with DOM, Javascript

    - by jesse
    I'm new to DOM and I'm having trouble removing multiple images that I loaded this loads 7 images (1.jpg, 2.jpg, etc..) function loadImages() { for (var i = 1; i < 8; i++ ) { var img = document.createElement("img"); img.src = "images/"+i+".jpg"; var idName = "img"+i+""; document.getElementById(idName).appendChild(img); } } this should remove all of them, but doesn't.. I think it breaks at the removeChild line. function removeImages() { for (var i = 1; i < 8; i++ ) { var idName = "img"+i+""; var d = document.getElementById(idName); d.removeChild(document.getElementById(img)); } } I think I'm doing something fundamentally wrong, because I don't fully understand how this works...

    Read the article

  • to set value parent page's frame from popup.

    - by cem
    I want to set label's value from popup.But label is in frame and I dont know how to achieve it from popup. From parent page,i get this label by following javascript function. But when I use this function in popup page, I cant find topframe.Do u have any solution about how to success it? if (window.parent.document.getElementById('lbl')) { window.parent.document.getElementById('lbl').innerText = sender.getSelectedItem().get_text(); } else { window.parent.frames['topFrame'].document.getElementById('lbl').innerText = sender.getSelectedItem().get_text(); }

    Read the article

  • How to delete images from memory in a browser

    - by trefeater
    Hi all. Is it possible to delete some images from the browser (firefox2) memory using javascript? By doing this, I want to save some precious browser memory and let my web app to work better. I guess that if possible, it will be something like this: delete (document.images[7]); document.images[7].src = null; document.images[7] = null; Thanks guys!

    Read the article

  • generating dynamic word documents for mass mailing

    - by bluesystem
    I need to generate a mass mailing based on a word document model with PHP. Given is a database with the adresses and the data that need to be filled in my word model. I want to generate a single word document with the different adresses and field contents from the database. We have a Linux server and the COM object is not avalaible. Is there a ready to use class to do this? Did you had any experiance with PHPWord? What is the best practice in this case? In the ideal case the client should just upload th word master document, with the fields that need to be filled and then fusioned to a multiple pages word document containing the whole mailing.

    Read the article

  • how to get large pictures from photo album via facebook graph api

    - by Nav
    I am currently using the following code to retrieve all the photos from a user profile FB.api('/me/albums?fields=id,name', function(response) { //console.log(response.data.length); for (var i = 0; i < response.data.length; i++) { var album = response.data[i]; FB.api('/' + album.id + '/photos', function(photos) { if (photos && photos.data && photos.data.length) { for (var j = 0; j < photos.data.length; j++) { var photo = photos.data[j]; // photo.picture contain the link to picture var image = document.createElement('img'); image.src = photo.picture; document.body.appendChild(image); image.className = "border"; image.onclick = function() { //this.parentNode.removeChild(this); document.getElementById(info.id).src = this.src; document.getElementById(info.id).style.width = "220px"; document.getElementById(info.id).style.height = "126px"; }; } } }); } }); but, the photos that it returns are of poor quality and are basically like thumbnails.How to retrieve larger photos from the albums. Generally for profile picture I use ?type=large which returns a decent profile image but the type=large is not working in the case of photos from photo albums and also is there a way to get the photos in zip format from facebook once I specify the photo url as I want users to be able to download the photos.

    Read the article

  • a question of javascript DOM functions in IE 6

    - by CunruiLi
    <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"> <head> <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8" /> <title>Test</title> </head> <body> <div id="test"> </div> <script type="text/javascript"> var check = function(){ alert(document.examsys); } var _form = document.createElement("form"); _form.name = "examsys"; _form.action="javascript:;" for(var i=0 ; i<5; i++){ _form.innerHTML += "<input type='radio' name='answer' value='ccc' />&nbsp;abc<br />"; } var submit = document.createElement("input"); submit.type = "image"; submit.src = "tijiao.gif"; submit.alt = "Submit"; if(submit.attachEvent){ submit.attachEvent("onclick",check); } else if(submit.addEventListener){ submit.addEventListener("click",check,false); } _form.appendChild(submit); document.getElementById("test").appendChild(_form); </script> </body> </html> why in IE6 the document.examsys returns "undefined".

    Read the article

  • Passing javascript form variables into jQuery function not working

    - by Chase
    I am trying to pass some JavaScript variables that I have assigned to form variables into a query string used by a jQuery plug in called fancybox. If I hard code in the string that I want lightbox works great, however I need it to pass some form values in there to make it work as desire. <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function(){ var item = document.itemFinder.item; var zip = document.itemFinder.zip; var radius = document.itemFinder.radius; var dataString = "item=" + item + "&zip=" + zip + "&radius=" + radius; $("#various3").fancybox({ ajax : { type : "POST", data : dataString}, 'scrolling' : 'auto', 'overlayOpacity' : '0' } ); }); </script> What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Autocomplete and User define keyboard

    - by Geetha
    Hi All, I am using asp:button to create a keyboard with A-Z and 0-9 for touch screen using Java script. This keyboard is linked with one textbox. If we click one button corresponding text will be displayed on the textbox. Its working fine. I have included the autocomplete feature to this textbox using jquery JQuery Autocomplete. Problem: The autocomplete is not working if i my user define keyboard. How to modify my key buttons as keyboard keys? Is it possible? Is there any other way to achieve this? Code: <asp:TextBox ID="txtSearch" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <asp:Button ID="zero" runat="server" Text="0" CssClass="myclass" OnClientClick="return typeLetter(this);" TabIndex="20"/> function typeLetter(currentbutton) { if (previousActiveElement != null) { if (previousActiveElement == 'antSearchText'){ var position = document.getElementById('position').value; if (position == '') { alert('chk position'); } else { var existingString = document.getElementById(previousActiveElement).value; var beforeString = existingString.substring(0, position); var afterString = existingString.substring(position, existingString.length); document.getElementById(previousActiveElement).value = beforeString + currentbutton.value + afterString; setCaretPosition(document.getElementById(previousActiveElement), parseInt(position) + 1); setCaretPosition(document.getElementById(previousActiveElement), parseInt(position) + 1); } } } return false; }

    Read the article

  • jQuery Validate on form submitted by JavaScript

    - by Daniel
    My form is submitted by a link using JavaScript, but I am also trying to validate the from justing jQuery validate. The validation doesn't work when submitted by the link, but it does if I change the link to a submit button. What am I doing wrong? My form: <form id="findmatch" method="post" action="search"> <div> <label class="formlabel">Match Type <input type="text" name="matchtype" id="matchtype" class="forminput" /> </label> <label class="formlabel">Location (postcode) <input type="text" name="location" id="location" class="forminput" /> </label> <label class="formlabel">Radius (miles) <input type="text" name="Radius" id="Radius" class="forminput" /> </label> <label class="formlabel">Keywords <input type="text" onblur="javascript:usePointFromPostcode(document.getElementById('location').value, showCompleteLatLng)" onchange="javascript:usePointFromPostcode(document.getElementById('location').value, showCompleteLatLng)" name="keywords" id="keywords" class="forminput" /> </label> <input id="lat" class="hidden" name="lat" type="text" value="" /> <input id="lon" class="hidden" name="lon" type="text" value="" /> <a href="javascript:document.getElementById('findmatch').submit();" onmouseover="javascript:usePointFromPostcode(document.getElementById('location').value, showCompleteLatLng)" class="submit">Search</a> </div> </form> And my jQuery is <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function () { $("#findmatch").validate({ rules: { location: "required", Radius: { required: true, digits: true }, keywords: "required" }, messages: { location: "Please enter your postcode", Radius: { required: "Please enter a radius", digits: "Please only enter numbers" }, keywords: "Please enter the keywords you wish to search for" } }); }); </script>

    Read the article

  • CoreData leak when reading a property

    - by Kamchatka
    Hello, I have the following code in a loop iterating over the different document objects: NSAutoreleasePool* pool = [[NSAutoreleasePool alloc] init]; [document primitiveValueForKey:@"data"]; [data writeToFile:filename atomically:NO]; [document.managedObjectContext refreshObject:document mergeChanges:NO]; [pool release]; The "data" property is a large blob (a 1MB image). And as I monitor the memory with the Allocation Instrument memory usage is increasing. I cannot find where the leak is coming from and how to remove it. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • localStorage not working in IE9 and Firefox

    - by maha
    I am working with localStorage. My code is perfectly working in Chrome, but not in IE9 and Firefox. Here is the code: document.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded", restoreContents, false); document.getElementsByTagName("body")[0].onclick=function(){saveContents('myList','contentMain', event, this);}; function amIclicked(e, eleObject) { alert("amIClicked"); e = e || event; var target = e.target || e.srcElement; alert("target = " + target.id); if(target.id=='pageBody' || target.id=='Save') return true; else return false; } function saveContents(e, d, eveObj, eleObject) { //alert("saveContents"); if (amIclicked(eveObj, eleObject)) { var cacheValue = document.getElementById(e).innerHTML; var cacheKey = "key_" + selectedKey; var storage = window.localStorage; //alert ("cacheKey = " + cacheKey + " ,cacheValue = " + cacheValue); if(typeof(Storage)!=="undifined"){ localStorage.setItem("cacheKey","cacheValue"); } //alert ("Saved!!"); var dd = document.getElementById(d); //document.getElementById("contentMain").style.display == "none"; dd.style.display = "none"; } } function restoreContents(e,k) { //alert("test"); if(k.length < 1) { return; } var mySavedList = localStorage["key_" + k]; if (mySavedList != undefined) { document.getElementById(e).innerHTML = mySavedList; } } <a onclick="ShowContent('contentMain','myList','Sample_1'); return true;" href="#" >Sample 1</a><br/><br/> <a onclick="ShowContent('contentMain','myList','Sample_2'); return true;" href="#" >Sample 2</a><br/><br/> <div style="display:none;display:none;position:absolute;border-style: solid;background-color: white;padding: 5px;"id="contentMain"> <ol id="myList" contenteditable="true"> <li>Enter Content here</li> </ol> <!--<input id="editToggleButton" type="button" value="Edit"/>--> </div> When I debugging in Iexplore Iam getting the error as SCRIPT5007: Unable to get value of the property 'length': object is null or undefined sample_1.html, line 157 character 3 Thanks

    Read the article

  • What is the problems for my xml file format ?

    - by python
    <? $xml="<?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8' standalone='no'?> <Document> <pain.001.001.02> <books> <book> <qty>12</qty> <title>C++</title> </book> <book> <qty>21</qty> <title>PHP</title> </book> </books> <books> <book> <qty>25</qty> <title>Java</title> </book> <book> <qty>32</qty> <title>Python</title> </book> <book> <qty>22</qty> <title>History</title> </book> </books> </pain.001.001.02> </Document> "; $doc = new DOMDOcument; $doc->loadxml($xml); $xpath = new DOMXpath($doc); $arr = array( array( '12;C++', '21;PHP'), array( '25;Java', '32;Python' ) ); # Remove elements based on qty and title foreach($arr as $items) { foreach($items as $item) { list($qty, $title) = explode(';', $item); foreach($xpath->query('//pain.001.001.02/books/book[title="'.$title.'"][qty="'.$qty.'"]') as $book) { $book->parentNode->removeChild($book); } } } # Remove empty <books> foreach($xpath->query('pain.001.001.02/books[count(book)=0]') as $empty) { $empty->parentNode->removeChild($empty); } header('Content-type: text/xml'); echo $doc->savexml(); ?> If I put <Document> in the xml document , get the expected result BUT If change <Document> to <Document xmlns="urn:iso:std:iso:20022:tech:xsd:pain.001.001.02"> get UNEXPECTED RESULT? Do you have any idea? thanks

    Read the article

  • Where are the function literals c++?

    - by academicRobot
    First of all, maybe literals is not the right term for this concept, but its the closest I could think of (not literals in the sense of functions as first class citizens). The idea is that when you make a conventional function call, it compiles to something like this: callq <immediate address> But if you make a function call using a function pointer, it compiles to something like this: mov <memory location>,%rax callq *%rax Which is all well and good. However, what if I'm writing a template library that requires a callback of some sort with a specified argument list and the user of the library is expected to know what function they want to call at compile time? Then I would like to write my template to accept a function literal as a template parameter. So, similar to template <int int_literal> struct my_template {...};` I'd like to write template <func_literal_t func_literal> struct my_template {...}; and have calls to func_literal within my_template compile to callq <immediate address>. Is there a facility in C++ for this, or a work around to achieve the same effect? If not, why not (e.g. some cataclysmic side effects)? How about C++0x or another language? Solutions that are not portable are fine. Solutions that include the use of member function pointers would be ideal. I'm not particularly interested in being told "You are a <socially unacceptable term for a person of low IQ>, just use function pointers/functors." This is a curiosity based question, and it seems that it might be useful in some (albeit limited) applications. It seems like this should be possible since function names are just placeholders for a (relative) memory address, so why not allow more liberal use (e.g. aliasing) of this placeholder. p.s. I use function pointers and functions objects all the the time and they are great. But this post got me thinking about the don't pay for what you don't use principle in relation to function calls, and it seems like forcing the use of function pointers or similar facility when the function is known at compile time is a violation of this principle, though a small one.

    Read the article

  • How can I append and execute a script inside an iframe in a cross browser way (specifically IE!)?

    - by agmin
    Background: I need to load ad scripts after the DOM has loaded. Because many of the scripts use document.write() and other potentially bad functions to run after the DOM has loaded, I want to load the scripts inside an iframe. So when the ad needs to be shown, an event is triggered which does the following: var iframe = document.createElement('iframe'); iframe.setAttribute('id', 'iframeId'); iframe.setAttribute('src', 'about:blank'); var adContainer = document.getElementById('AdContainer'); adContainer.appendChild(iframe); var val = '<html><head></head><body>'; val += '<scr' + 'ipt type="text/javascript" src="' + url + '"></scr' + 'ipt>'; val += '</body></html>'; If I don't assign the html and body tags to val, the script automatically gets appended to the head of the iframe and fails to execute in FF. In IE, the script doesn't execute with or without the head/body/html tags. var doc = iframe.contentWindow || iframe.contentDocument; if (doc.document){ doc = doc.document } doc.open(); doc.write(val); doc.close(); I found this last bit of code here: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1591135/why-does-appending-a-script-to-a-dynamically-created-iframe-seem-to-run-the-s. I do NOT want to load jquery in the iframe though, I just want to append a script and have it execute. My current solution seems to work great in FF and Webkit. However, IE doesn't execute the script. The script is written to the page, but doesn't start running. Is there a better way to append the script to the iframe so it will run cross browser? Or is it possible to tell IE to run the script? I know that I could load an external document with the ad script via the iframe, but I don't want to make the extra call to my server if I can do this dynamically. Also, I've tried using appendChild() on the iframe's body to insert the script, but since the script element is created outside the iframe's DOM this doesn't seem to work.

    Read the article

  • What's an effective way to move data from one open browser tab to another?

    - by slk
    I am looking for a quick way to grab some data off of one Web page and throw it into another. I don't have access to the query string in the URL of the second page, so passing the data that way is not an option. Right now, I am using a Greasemonkey user script in tandem with a JS bookmarklet trigger: javascript:doIt(); // ==UserScript== // @include public_site // @include internal_site // ==/UserScript== if (document.location.host.match(internal_site)) { var datum1 = GM_getValue("d1"); var datum2 = GM_getValue("d2"); } unsafeWindow.doIt = function() { if(document.location.host.match(public_site)) { var d1 = innerHTML of page element 1; var d2 = innerHTML of page element 2; //Next two lines use setTimeout to bypass GM_setValue restriction window.setTimeout(function() {GM_setValue("d1", d1);}, 0); window.setTimeout(function() {GM_setValue("d2", d2);}, 0); } else if(document.location.host.match(internal_site)) { document.getElementById("field1").value = datum1; document.getElementById("field2").value = datum2; } } While I am open to another method, I would prefer to stay with this basic model if possible, as this is just a small fraction of the code in doIt() which is used on several other pages, mostly to automate date-based form fills; people really like their "magic button." The above code works, but there's an interruption to the workflow: In order for the user to know which page on the public site to grab data from, the internal page has to be opened first. Then, once the GM cookie is set from the public page, the internal page has to be reloaded to get the proper information into the internal page variables. I'm wondering if there's any way to GM_getValue() at bookmarklet-clicktime to prevent the need for a refresh. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • DefaultStyledDocument.styleChanged(Style style) may not run in a timely manner?

    - by Paul Reiners
    I'm experiencing an intermittent problem with a class that extends javax.swing.text.DefaultStyledDocument. This document is being sent to a printer. Most of the time the formatting of the document looks correct, but once in a while it doesn't. It looks like some of the changes in the formatting have not been applied. I took a look at the DefaultStyledDocument.styleChanged(Style style) code: /** * Called when any of this document's styles have changed. * Subclasses may wish to be intelligent about what gets damaged. * * @param style The Style that has changed. */ protected void styleChanged(Style style) { // Only propagate change updated if have content if (getLength() != 0) { // lazily create a ChangeUpdateRunnable if (updateRunnable == null) { updateRunnable = new ChangeUpdateRunnable(); } // We may get a whole batch of these at once, so only // queue the runnable if it is not already pending synchronized(updateRunnable) { if (!updateRunnable.isPending) { SwingUtilities.invokeLater(updateRunnable); updateRunnable.isPending = true; } } } } /** * When run this creates a change event for the complete document * and fires it. */ class ChangeUpdateRunnable implements Runnable { boolean isPending = false; public void run() { synchronized(this) { isPending = false; } try { writeLock(); DefaultDocumentEvent dde = new DefaultDocumentEvent(0, getLength(), DocumentEvent.EventType.CHANGE); dde.end(); fireChangedUpdate(dde); } finally { writeUnlock(); } } } Does the fact that SwingUtilities.invokeLater(updateRunnable) is called, rather than invokeAndWait(updateRunnable), mean that I can't count on my formatting changes appearing in the document before it is rendered? If that is the case, is there a way to ensure that I don't proceed with rendering until the updates have occurred?

    Read the article

  • textbox required equal false

    - by Donato bruno comunali F. dutra
    how do I make the textbox that required equal to false in this code $(document).ready(function () { $("#<%= chkSpecialIntegration.ClientID %>").click(function () { if (this.checked) { $("#<%= ddlTypeSpecialIntegration.ClientID %>").show(); document.getElementById('<%=txtTotalScoreDebit.ClientID %>').Required = false; } else{ $("#<%= ddlTypeSpecialIntegration.ClientID %>").hide(); document.getElementById('<%=txtTotalScoreDebit.ClientID %>').Required = true; } }); });

    Read the article

  • How to store a function in a member of class? (Using function as callback)

    - by Dane
    I want to store a function as a class member and call it inside the class? Pretty much like a callback function. My class draw a document but every document must drawn differently. So I want to assign a function (written outside of the class) into one of the members of the class and then call it when I want to draw the document. This function mostly is responsible for transforming objects according to each specific document. Here is my class: class CDocument { public: CDocument(); ~CDocument(); void *TransFunc(); } void Transform() { } int main() CDocument* Doc = new CDocument(); Doc->TransFunc = Transform(); } I know that this is probably simple question, but I couldn't find the answer by googling or searching SO.

    Read the article

  • Work with AJAX response with DOM methods

    - by Stomped
    I'm retrieving an entire HTML document via AJAX - and that works fine. But I need to extract certain parts of that document and do things with them. Using a framework (jquery, mootools, etc) is not an option. The only solution I can think of is to grab the body of the HTML document with a regex (yes, I know, terrible) ie. <body>(.*)</body> put that into the current page's DOM in a hidden element, and work with it from there. Is there an easier/better way? Update I've done some testing, and inserting an entire HTML document into a created element behaves a bit differently across browsers I've tested. For example: FF3.5: keeps the contents of the HEAD and BODY tags IE7 / Safari4: Only includes what's between ... Opera 10.10: Keeps HEAD and everything inside it, Keeps contents of BODY The behavior of IE7 and Safari are ideal, but different browsers are doing this differently. Since I'm loading a predetermined HTML document I think I'm going to use the regEx to grab what I want and insert it into a DOM element - unless someone has other suggestions.

    Read the article

  • dojo TimeTextBox don't listen to on blur event

    - by kawtousse
    Hi everyone, I want to add an on blur event to a dojo timetextbox but the event never been runned so the declaration of the timetextbox is like this: <label>End</label><input id="endp" name="endp" onBlur="calculateTimeSpent2(startp,endp,output);" /> the javascript function is like this: function calculateTimeSpent2(startp,endp,outputp) { var tmp0=document.getElementById('startp').value.split(':'); var tmp1=document.getElementById('endp').value.split(':'); if (tmp0[0]!='' && tmp1[0]!='') { var val1= findtime(tmp0[0],tmp0[1],tmp1[0],tmp1[1]); var tmp=val1.split(':'); if (tmp[0].indexOf('-')==-1) document.getElementById('outputp').value=val1; else { alert ("Start Time must be lower than End Time "); document.getElementById('endp').focus(); } } } I don't understand why dojo didn't execute the event correctly while loosing the focus. I tried to put the type=text but it does'nt work. Thanks for help.

    Read the article

  • Having trouble uploading a file

    - by neo skosana
    Hi I am having trouble uploading a file. First of all I have a class: class upload { private $name; private $document; public function __construct($nme,$doc) { $this->setName($nme); $this->setDocument($doc); } public function setName($nme) { $this->name = $nme; } public function setDocument($doc) { $this->document = $doc; } public function fileNotPdf() { /* Was the file a PDF? */ if ($this->document['type'] != "application/pdf") { return true; } else { return false; } } public function fileNotUploaded() { /* Make sure that the file was POSTed. */ if (!(is_uploaded_file($this->document['tmp_name']))) { return true; } else { return false; } } public function fileNotMoved($repositry) { /* move uploaded file to final destination. */ $result = move_uploaded_file($this->document['tmp_name'], "$repositry/$this->name.pdf"); if($result) { return false; } else { return true; } } } Now for my main page: $docName = $_POST['name']; $page = $_FILES['doc']; if($_POST['submit']) { /* Set a few constants */ $filerepository = "np"; $uploadObj = new upload($docName, $page); if($uploadObj->fileNotUploaded()) { promptUser("There was a problem uploading the file.",""); } elseif($uploadObj->fileNotPdf()) { promptUser("File must be in pdf format.",""); } elseif($uploadObj->fileNotMoved($filerepository)) { promptUser("File could not be uploaded to final destination.",""); } else { promptUser("File has been successfully uploaded.",""); } } The errors that I get: Warning: move_uploaded_file(about.pdf)[function.move-uploaded-file]: failed to open stream: No such file or directory in... Warning: move_uploaded_file()[function.move-uploaded-file]: Unable to move 'c:\xampp\tmp\php13.tmp' to 'about.pdf' in... File could not be uploaded to final destination.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173  | Next Page >