Search Results

Search found 41598 results on 1664 pages for 'segmentation fault'.

Page 2/1664 | < Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >

• gcc -fstack-check causes segmentation fault ?

  - by stcatz

  I have got a segmentation fault even with a "Hello World!" program sometimes. The interesting thing is that the segmentation fault not always shows up. Does there are some kind of famout bug on this flag? My gcc version is 4.1.1 with redhat 64bit.

  Read the article

• wats SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault in QT

  - by user269037

  I have a QT program which displays the data it receives over UDP. It works fine for around 30 seconds but after a while it gives Segmentation Fault and crashes. This 30 seconds is also not fixed. I used the debugger and got this Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x003c6fd4 in ?? () from /usr/lib/libQtGui.so.4 Can anyone tell me where the error might be

  Read the article

• Segmentation fault with queue in C

  - by Trevor

  I am getting a segmentation fault with the following code after adding structs to my queue. The segmentation fault occurs when the MAX_QUEUE is set high but when I set it low (100 or 200), the error doesn't occur. It has been a while since I last programmed in C, so any help is appreciated. #include <stdio.h> #include <stdlib.h> #include <string.h> #define MAX_QUEUE 1000 struct myInfo { char data[20]; }; struct myInfo* queue; void push(struct myInfo); int queue_head = 0; int queue_size = 0; int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { queue = (struct myInfo*) malloc(sizeof(struct myInfo) * MAX_QUEUE); struct myInfo info; char buf[10]; strcpy(buf, "hello"); while (1) { strcpy(info.data, buf); push(info); } } void push(struct myInfo info) { int next_index = sizeof(struct myInfo) * ((queue_size + queue_head) % MAX_QUEUE); printf("Pushing %s to %d\n", info.data, next_index); *(queue + (next_index)) = info; queue_size++; } Output: Pushing hello to 0 Pushing hello to 20 ... Pushing hello to 7540 Pushing hello to 7560 Pushing hello to 7580 Segmentation fault

  Read the article

• Segmentation fault on certain inputs and not others

  - by Brandon Schwandt

  Heres a function I wrote that has some debugging elements in it already. When i enter either a "y" or a "Y" as the input I get a segmentation fault during runtime. When I enter any other value the code runs. The seg fault kicks out after it scans and gives me the response but before the "scan worked" line is output. DOn't know why it would act like this only on these values. If anyone needs the function call I have that as well. query_user(char *response [10]) { printf("response after query call before clear=%s\n",response); strcpy(response,""); printf("response after clearing before scan=%s\n",response); printf("Enter another person into the line? y or n\n"); scanf("%s", response); printf("response after scan=%s\n",response); printf("scan worked"); } main() { char response [10]; strcpy(response,"y"); printf("response=%s\n",response); printf("When finished with program type \"done\" to exit\n"); while (strcmp(response,"done") != 0) { printf("response after while loop and before query call=%s\n",response); query_user(&response); } } output on error: response after query call before clear=y response after clearing before scan= Enter another person into the line? y or n y response after scan=y Segmentation Fault (core dumped) output on non-error: response after query call before clear=y response after clearing before scan= Enter another person into the line? y or n n response after scan=n scan worked Cycle number 0 (program continues to run outside this function)

  Read the article

• C -Segmentation fault !

  - by FILIaS

  It seems at least weird to me... The program runs normally.But after I call the enter() function for the 4th time,there is a segmentation fault!I would appreciate any help. With the following function enter() I wanna add user commands' datas to a list. [Some part of the code is already posted on another question of me, but I think I should post it again...as it's a different problem I'm facing now.] /* struct for all the datas that user enters on file*/ typedef struct catalog { char short_name[50]; char surname[50]; signed int amount; char description[1000]; struct catalog *next; }catalog,*catalogPointer; catalogPointer current; catalogPointer head = NULL; void enter(void) //user command: i <name> <surname> <amount> <description> { int n,j=2,k=0; char temp[1500]; char *short_name,*surname,*description; signed int amount; char* params = strchr(command,' ') + 1; //strchr returns a pointer to the 1st space on the command.U want a pointer to the char right after that space. strcpy(temp, params); //params is saved as temp. char *curToken = strtok(temp," "); //strtok cuts 'temp' into strings between the spaces and saves them to 'curToken' printf("temp is:%s \n",temp); printf("\nWhat you entered for saving:\n"); for (n = 0; curToken; ++n) //until curToken ends: { if (curToken) { short_name = malloc(strlen(curToken) + 1); strncpy(short_name, curToken, sizeof (short_name)); } printf("Short Name: %s \n",short_name); curToken = strtok(NULL," "); if (curToken) { surname = malloc(strlen(curToken) + 1); strncpy(surname, curToken,sizeof (surname)); } printf("SurName: %s \n",surname); curToken = strtok(NULL," "); if (curToken) { //int * amount= malloc(sizeof (signed int *)); char *chk; amount = (int) strtol(curToken, &chk, 10); if (!isspace(*chk) && *chk != 0) fprintf(stderr,"Warning: expected integer value for amount, received %s instead\n",curToken); } printf("Amount: %d \n",amount); curToken = strtok(NULL,"\0"); if (curToken) { description = malloc(strlen(curToken) + 1); strncpy(description, curToken, sizeof (description)); } printf("Description: %s \n",description); break; } if (findEntryExists(head, surname,short_name) != NULL) //call function in order to see if entry exists already on the catalog printf("\nAn entry for <%s %s> is already in the catalog!\nNew entry not entered.\n",short_name,surname); else { printf("\nTry to entry <%s %s %d %s> in the catalog list!\n",short_name,surname,amount,description); newEntry(&head,short_name,surname,amount,description); printf("\n**Entry done!**\n"); } // Maintain the list in alphabetical order by surname. } catalogPointer findEntryExists (catalogPointer head, char num[],char first[]) { catalogPointer p = head; while (p != NULL && strcmp(p->surname, num) != 0 && strcmp(p->short_name,first) != 0) { p = p->next; } return p; } catalogPointer newEntry (catalog** headRef,char short_name[], char surname[], signed int amount, char description[]) { catalogPointer newNode = (catalogPointer)malloc(sizeof(catalog)); catalogPointer first; catalogPointer second; catalogPointer tmp; first=head; second=NULL; strcpy(newNode->short_name, short_name); strcpy(newNode->surname, surname); newNode->amount=amount; strcpy(newNode->description, description); while (first!=NULL) { if (strcmp(surname,first->surname)>0) second=first; else if (strcmp(surname,first->surname)==0) { if (strcmp(short_name,first->short_name)>0) second=first; } first=first->next; } if (second==NULL) { newNode->next=head; head=newNode; } else //SEGMENTATION APPEARS WHEN IT GETS HERE! { tmp=second->next; newNode->next=tmp; first->next=newNode; } } UPDATE: SegFault appears only when it gets on the 'else' loop of InsertSort() function. I observed that segmentation fault appears when i try to put on the list names that are after it. For example, if in the list exists: [Name:b Surname:b Amount:6 Description:b] [Name:c Surname:c Amount:5 Description:c] [Name:d Surname:d Amount:4 Description:d] [Name:e Surname:e Amount:3 Description:e] [Name:g Surname:g Amount:2 Description:g] [Name:x Surname:x Amount:1 Description:x] and i put: " x z 77 gege" there is a segmentation but if i put "x a 77 gege" it continues normally....

  Read the article

• PHP Segmentation fault when started from crond

  - by Jeroen Moors

  Hello, I've a php script that's started each minute from cron. It almost always runs without any problem, except for about 10 times within 24h. The times it fails I get a segmentation fault like: bin/sh: line 1: 21815 Segmentation fault /usr/bin/myscript The number after "line 1:" is always different. I'm running: PHP 5.2.6-1+lenny8 with Suhosin-Patch 0.9.6.2 (cli) (built: Mar 14 2010 08:14:04) Is this a problem with my version of PHP? Is there a way to debug this? I have the feeling it crashes when the server load is high, but there's absolutely no prove for this. Any feedback is welcome!

  Read the article

• Segmentation fault when accessing a PHP page

  - by Justin Ethier

  Sometimes when one of our Apache web servers is restarted, we experience segmentation faults when any PHP page is subsequently accessed. The following line is printed in the httpd error_log: [Wed Jun 16 10:59:33 2010] [notice] child pid 31513 exit signal Segmentation fault (11) There will be one of these lines for each PHP page that is accessed. This appears to happen randomly - the "workaround" to-date is to restart httpd, which eventually fixes the problem (almost always after a single restart). Although we only see this happen rarely, it still happens frequently enough to be of concern. So my question is, why is this happening in the first place? Is this a known bug with the version of Apache / PHP / Linux / etc that we are using? Any ideas? The environment is: Fedora 11 Apache 2.2.15 (Default settings) PHP 5.2.13 I can provide more information if that would help narrow things down, since this error message is rather generic... Any help is appreciated.

  Read the article

• Why does this give a segmentation fault?

  - by nightcracker

  I'm stunned, why does this code give me a segmentation fault? #include <stdio.h> #define LIMIT 1500000 typedef struct { int p; int a; int b; } triplet; int main(int argc, char **argv) { int i; triplet triplets[LIMIT]; for (i = 0; i < 5; i++) { triplets[i].p = 9; // remove this line and everything works fine } printf("%d\n", triplets[15].p); return 0; } EDIT: After changing LIMIT to 150 I no longer get a segmentation fault, it prints random numbers instead.

  Read the article

• `php -v` segmentation fault

  - by John

  I'm getting an odd segmentation fault in PHP. Every few times, when I run: php -v I see: PHP 5.2.6 (cli) (built: Aug 19 2009 16:59:56) Copyright (c) 1997-2008 The PHP Group Zend Engine v2.2.0, Copyright (c) 1998-2008 Zend Technologies Segmentation fault (core dumped) Analyzing the core dump (backtrace with gdb): #0 0x00002ba6412f6c6c in ?? () #1 0x0000003f90c06367 in start_thread () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0 #2 0x0000003f904d2f7d in clone () from /lib64/libc.so.6 #3 0x0000000000000000 in ?? () Any ideas? OS: Linux version 2.6.18-92.el5 ([email protected]) (gcc version 4.1.2 20071124 (Red Hat 4.1.2-42)) #1 SMP Tue Jun 10 18:51:06 EDT 2008

  Read the article

• vector segmentation fault

  - by user1849298

  I have a problem with the segmentation fault. Look: #include<fstream> using namespace std; int main(){ int n,i,vector[10001],vectorcopy[10001]; ifstream in("program.in"); ofstream out("program.out"); in>>n; for(i=1;i<=n;i++){ in>>vector[i]; vectorcopy[i]=vector[i]; } return 0;} And the debugger says: Program recived signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault Please, tell me what to do!

  Read the article

• Printf ubuntu Segmentation fault (core dumped)

  - by Someone

  I have this code: int a; printf("&a = %u\n",(unsigned)&a); printf("a\n"); printf("b\n"); printf("c\n"); printf("d\n"); I tried to print the pointer of a variable. But it fail on the row printf("a\n"); and says Segmentation fault (core dumped) Output: &a = 134525024 Segmentation fault (core dumped) When I remove the row printf("&a = %u\n",(unsigned)&a); from the code, its success. Output: a b c d What worng in my code?

  Read the article

• Segmentation fault in std function std::_Rb_tree_rebalance_for_erase ()

  - by Sarah

  I'm somewhat new to programming and am unsure how to deal with a segmentation fault that appears to be coming from a std function. I hope I'm doing something stupid (i.e., misusing a container), because I have no idea how to fix it. The precise error is Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. Reason: KERN_INVALID_ADDRESS at address: 0x000000000000000c 0x00007fff8062b144 in std::_Rb_tree_rebalance_for_erase () (gdb) backtrace #0 0x00007fff8062b144 in std::_Rb_tree_rebalance_for_erase () #1 0x000000010000e593 in Simulation::runEpidSim (this=0x7fff5fbfcb20) at stl_tree.h:1263 #2 0x0000000100016078 in main () at main.cpp:43 The function that exits successfully just before the segmentation fault updates the contents of two containers. One is a boost::unordered_multimap called carriage; it contains one or more struct Infection objects that contain two doubles. The other container is of type std::multiset< Event, std::less< Event EventPQ called ce. It is full of Event structs. void Host::recover( int s, double recoverTime, EventPQ & ce ) { // Clearing all serotypes in carriage // and their associated recovery events in ce // and then updating susceptibility to each serotype double oldRecTime; int z; for ( InfectionMap::iterator itr = carriage.begin(); itr != carriage.end(); itr++ ) { z = itr->first; oldRecTime = (itr->second).recT; EventPQ::iterator epqItr = ce.find( Event(oldRecTime) ); assert( epqItr != ce.end() ); ce.erase( epqItr ); immune[ z ]++; } carriage.clear(); calcSusc(); // a function that edits an array cout << "Done with sync_recovery event." << endl; } The last cout << line appears immediately before the seg fault. I hope this is enough (but not too much) information. My idea so far is that the rebalancing is being attempting on ce after this function, but I am unsure why it would be failing. (It's unfortunately very hard for me to test this code by removing particular lines, since they would create logical inconsistencies and further problems, but if experienced programmers still think this is the way to go, I'll try.)

  Read the article

• Segmentation fault before return

  - by donalmg

  Hi, Why does the following code seg fault before returning: int main() { char iD[20]; memset (iD, 0, 20); char* prefix; srand (time(NULL) ); int iPrefix = rand()%1000000; sprintf(prefix, "%i", iPrefix); int len = strlen(prefix); char* staticChar = "123456789"; //set prefix into ID memcpy(iD, prefix, len); // append static value memcpy(iD+len, staticChar, 20-len); cout << "END " << endl; return 0; } At the minute, the cout will display, but I get a segmentation fault.

  Read the article

• Segmentation. strcmp [C]

  - by FILIaS

  Hello, I have a file with format: [name][number][amount] number is taken as a string. and im using it in a strcmp. Problem is that i get a segmentation fault. I know that on most cases when strcmp signs segmentation fault it means that one of the parameters is null or cant find its "end" ('\0'). I checked with gdb and i cant say if this is the problem.Take a look: > (gdb) bt full > #0 0x08048729 in lookup (hashtable=0x804b008, hashval=27, > number=0x804b740 "6900101001") > list = 0xffffffff > #1 0x080487ac in add (hashtable=0x804b008, > number=0x804b740 "9900101001", name=0x804b730 "Smithpolow", > time=6943) > new_elem = 0xffffffff > hashval = 27 > #2 0x08048b25 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbffff4b4) > number = 0x804b740 "9900101001" > name = 0x804b730 "Smithpolow" > time = 6943 > i = 2 Code: clientsList *lookup_on_Clients(clientsHashTable *hashtable,int hashval,char number[10]) { printf("NUMBER:%s\n",number); clientsList *list=hashtable[hashval].head; for(list; list!=NULL; list=list->next){ if (strcmp(number,list->number)==0) //SEGMENTATION! return list; } return NULL; } int add ( HashTable* hashtable,char number[10],char* name,int time) { List *new_elem; int hashval=hash (hashtable,number); new_elem=hashtable[hashval].head; if(hashtable[hashval].length>0) { if ((lookup (hashtable,hashval,number))!=NULL) {return 0;} } //an den uparxei stoixeio sth lista if (!(new_elem=malloc(sizeof(struct clientsList)))){ return -1;} //insert values for the new elem new_elem->number=strdup(number); new_elem->name=strdup(name); new_elem->time=time; hashtable[hashval].head=new_elem; new_elem->next=NULL; hashtable[hashval].length++; /* rehash existing entries if necessary */ if(hashTableSize(hashtable)>= 2*primes[PrimesIndex]) { hashtable = expand(hashtable); if (hashtable ==NULL){ return 0; } PrimesIndex++; } return 1; } and the main: FILE * File2; if ( ( File2=fopen(" File.txt","r")) !=NULL ) { // File.txt format: [name number time] e.g lountemis 6900254565 700651 int li = 0; char *lin = (char *) malloc(MAX_LINE * sizeof(char)); while(fgets(lin, MAX_LINE, clientFile2) != NULL) { token = my_linetok(lin, " "); if(token != NULL) { char* number ; char* name; int time; int i; for(i = 0; token[i] != NULL; i++) { name=strdup(token[0]); number=strdup(token[1]); time=atoi(token[2]); if (i==2) { int insertDone=0; insertDone =add(my_hash_table,number,name,time); } } free(name); free(number); free(token); } else { printf("Error reading line %s\n", lin); exit(1); } } } else { printf("Error opening file \nEXIT!"); exit(0); }

  Read the article

• Segmentation fault on writing char to char* address

  - by Lukas Dojcak

  hi guys, i've got problem with my little C program. Maybe you could help me. char* shiftujVzorku(char* text, char* pattern, int offset){ char* pom = text; int size = 0; int index = 0; while(*(text + size) != '\0'){ size++; } while(*(pom + index) != '\0'){ if(overVzorku(pom + index, pattern)){ while(*pattern != '\0'){ //vyment *pom s *pom + offset if(pom + index + offset < text + size){ char x = *(pom + index + offset); char y = *(pom + index); int adresa = *(pom + index + offset); *(pom + index + offset) = y; <<<<<< SEGMENTATION FAULT *(pom + index) = x; //*pom = *pom - *(pom + offset); //*(pom + offset) = *(pom + offset) + *pom; //*pom = *(pom + offset) - *pom; } else{ *pom = *pom - *(pom + offset - size); *(pom + offset - size) = *(pom + offset - size) + *pom; *pom = *(pom + offset - size) - *pom; } pattern++; } break; } index++; } return text; } Isn't important what's the programm doing. Mayby there's lot of bugs. But, why do I get SEGMENTATION FAULT (for destination see code) at this line? I'm, trying to write some char value to memory space, with help of address "pom + offset + index". Thanks for everything helpful. :)

  Read the article

• Segmentation fault in Qt application framework

  - by yan bellavance

  this generates a segmentation fault becuase of "QColor colorMap[9]";. If I remove colorMap the segmentation fault goes away. If I put it back. It comes back. If I do a clean all then build all, it goes away. If I increase its arraysize it comes back. On the other hand if I reduce it it doesnt come back. I tired adding this array to another project and What could be happening. I am really curious to know. I have removed everything else in that class. This widget subclassed is used to promote a widget in a QMainWindow. class LevelIndicator : public QWidget { public: LevelIndicator(QWidget * parent); void paintEvent(QPaintEvent * event ); float percent; QColor colorMap[9]; int NUM_GRADS; }; the error happens inside ui_mainwindow.h at one of these lines: hpaFwdPwrLvl->setObjectName(QString::fromUtf8("hpaFwdPwrLvl")); verticalLayout->addWidget(hpaFwdPwrLvl); I know i am not providing much but I will give alink to the app. Im trying to see if anyone has a quick answer for this.

  Read the article

• segmentation fault while using format string to scan input

  - by Aman Deep Gautam

  consider the code and its result: while ((row = mysql_fetch_row (table_info)) != NULL) { answer='\0'; printf ( "%s: ", row[0] ); scanf ( "%c", &answer ); getchar(); if ( answer == 'y') { printf ( "*****\n" ); table_name[index] = malloc ( strlen(row[0]) + 1 ); printf ( "*****\n" ); memcpy ( &table_name[index], &row[0], strlen(row[0]) + 1 ); } printf ( "finally inserted: %s \n", table_name[index]); } The result on execution: 1_time_access: y ***** ***** finally inserted: 1_time_access 2_time_access: y ***** ***** finally inserted: 2_time_access 39_time_access: y ***** ***** finally inserted: 39_time_access Explanation of result: row[0] has value 1_time_access, 2_time_access, 39_time_access. Now Consider a better way of doing it which is using a format string to escape the \n. I run the following code but it gives segentation fault, I cannot understand why. Code: while ((row = mysql_fetch_row (table_info)) != NULL) { answer='\0'; printf ( "%s: ", row[0] ); scanf ( "%[^\n]%*c", &answer ); if ( answer == 'y') { printf ( "*****\n" ); fflush(stdout); table_name[index] = malloc ( strlen(row[0]) + 1 ); printf ( "*****\n" ); fflush(stdout); memcpy ( &table_name[index], &row[0], strlen(row[0]) + 1 ); } printf ( "finally inserted: %s \n", table_name[index]); fflush(stdout); } Result: 1_time_access: y ***** ./set-env.sh: line 17: 15263 Segmentation fault (core dumped) ./exec dataset_one (do not worry about set-env.sh, it is the script running th program.) I canot understand why this is happening.

  Read the article

• c++ malloc segmentation fault

  - by chnet

  I have a problem about malloc(). It is weird. My code is in the following. I use random generator to generate elements for an array. The array is opened by malloc(). If the array size is smaller than 8192, it is OK. If the size is larger than 8192, it shows segment fault. void random_generator(int num, int * array) { srand((unsigned)time(0)); int random_integer; for(int index=0; index< num; index++){ random_integer = (rand()%10000)+1; *(array+index) = random_integer; cout << index << endl; } } int main() { int array_size = 10000; int *input_array; input_array = (int*) malloc((array_size)); random_generator(8192, input_array); // if the number is larger than 8192, segment fault free(input_array); }

  Read the article

• How to catch segmentation fault in Linux?

  - by Alex Farber

  I need to catch segmentation fault in third party library cleanup operations. This happens sometimes just before my program exits, and I cannot fix the real reason of this. In Windows programming I could do this with __try - __catch. Is there cross-platform or platform-specific way to do the same? I need this in Linux, gcc.

  Read the article

• segmentation fault for the simplest program??

  - by capex

  Hi, I am just starting out, but this piece of code is giving me a 'segmentation fault' and I can't find out what's wrong with it: #include<stdio.h> int main (void) { int number = 0; int lastDigit = 0; printf("Enter an integer: "); scanf("%d", number); number = number*10; printf("Number times ten is %d.\n", number); return 0; }

  Read the article

• C++ vector and segmentation faults

  - by Headspin

  I am working on a simple mathematical parser. Something that just reads number = 1 + 2; I have a vector containing these tokens. They store a type and string value of the character. I am trying to step through the vector to build an AST of these tokens, and I keep getting segmentation faults, even when I am under the impression my code should prevent this from happening. Here is the bit of code that builds the AST: struct ASTGen { const vector<Token> &Tokens; unsigned int size, pointer; ASTGen(const vector<Token> &t) : Tokens(t), pointer(0) { size = Tokens.size() - 1; } unsigned int next() { return pointer + 1; } Node* Statement() { if(next() <= size) { switch(Tokens[next()].type) { case EQUALS : Node* n = Assignment_Expr(); return n; } } advance(); } void advance() { if(next() <= size) ++pointer; } Node* Assignment_Expr() { Node* lnode = new Node(Tokens[pointer], NULL, NULL); advance(); Node* n = new Node(Tokens[pointer], lnode, Expression()); return n; } Node* Expression() { if(next() <= size) { advance(); if(Tokens[next()].type == SEMICOLON) { Node* n = new Node(Tokens[pointer], NULL, NULL); return n; } if(Tokens[next()].type == PLUS) { Node* lnode = new Node(Tokens[pointer], NULL, NULL); advance(); Node* n = new Node(Tokens[pointer], lnode, Expression()); return n; } } } }; ... ASTGen AST(Tokens); Node* Tree = AST.Statement(); cout << Tree->Right->Data.svalue << endl; I can access Tree->Data.svalue and get the = Node's token info, so I know that node is getting spawned, and I can also get Tree->Left->Data.svalue and get the variable to the left of the = I have re-written it many times trying out different methods for stepping through the vector, but I always get a segmentation fault when I try to access the = right node (which should be the + node) Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Read the article

• Segmentation fault in Qt Designer 4.6 with custom widget

  - by chedi

  Hi, I had a segmentation fault when using my new Qt Widget with Qt Designer 4.6. The problem arise when trying to preview the new widget. when using gdb I found that the problem is in qdesigner_internal::WidgetFactory::applyStyleToTopLevel: Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. qdesigner_internal::WidgetFactory::applyStyleToTopLevel (style=0x0, widget=0x1829df0) at /var/tmp/qt-x11-src-4.6.0/tools/designer/src/lib/shared/widgetfactory.cpp:777 777 /var/tmp/qt-x11-src-4.6.0/tools/designer/src/lib/shared/widgetfactory.cpp: No such file or directory. in /var/tmp/qt-x11-src-4.6.0/tools/designer/src/lib/shared/widgetfactory.cpp (gdb) bt #0 qdesigner_internal::WidgetFactory::applyStyleToTopLevel (style=0x0, widget=0x1829df0) at /var/tmp/qt-x11-src-4.6.0/tools/designer/src/lib/shared/widgetfactory.cpp:777 #1 0x00007ffff7475bed in qdesigner_internal::QDesignerFormBuilder::createPreview (fw=, styleName=..., appStyleSheet=..., deviceProfile=, scriptErrors= 0x7fffffffbee0, errorMessage=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /var/tmp/qt-x11-src-4.6.0/tools/designer/src/lib/shared/qdesigner_formbuilder.cpp:404 #2 0x00007ffff7476773 in qdesigner_internal::QDesignerFormBuilder::createPreview (fw=0x0, styleName=..., appStyleSheet=..., deviceProfile=..., errorMessage=0x0) at /var/tmp/qt-x11-src-4.6.0/tools/designer/src/lib/shared/qdesigner_formbuilder.cpp:439 #3 0x00007ffff7532b27 in qdesigner_internal::PreviewManager::createPreview (this=0x837f20, fw=0x1879200, pc=..., deviceProfileIndex=-1, errorMessage=0x7fffffffc3f0, initialZoom=-1) at /var/tmp/qt-x11-src-4.6.0/tools/designer/src/lib/shared/previewmanager.cpp:686 #4 0x00007ffff75343cf in qdesigner_internal::PreviewManager::showPreview (this=0x837f20, fw=0x1879200, pc=..., deviceProfileIndex=-1, errorMessage=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /var/tmp/qt-x11-src-4.6.0/tools/designer/src/lib/shared/previewmanager.cpp:760 #5 0x00007ffff753472f in qdesigner_internal::PreviewManager::showPreview (this=0x837f20, fw=0x1879200, style=..., deviceProfileIndex=-1, errorMessage=0x7fffffffc3f0) at /var/tmp/qt-x11-src-4.6.0/tools/designer/src/lib/shared/previewmanager.cpp:659 because a null pointer was passed there: void WidgetFactory::applyStyleToTopLevel(QStyle *style, QWidget *widget) { const QPalette standardPalette = style-standardPalette(); if (widget-style() == style && widget-palette() == standardPalette) return; //.... } I'm new in Qt and this is my first custom widget. does anybody have a clue for solving this. here is my widget code MBICInput::MBICInput(QWidget *parent) : QStackedWidget(parent){ displayPage = new QWidget(); displayPage-setObjectName(QString::fromUtf8("displayPage")); inputLB = new QLabel(displayPage); inputLB-setObjectName(QString::fromUtf8("inputLabel")); inputLB-setCursor(QCursor(Qt::PointingHandCursor)); addWidget(displayPage); EditPage = new QWidget(); EditPage-setProperty("EditInputLine", QVariant(true)); EditPage-setObjectName(QString::fromUtf8("EditPage")); inputInput = new QLineEdit(EditPage); inputInput-setGeometry(QRect(5, 10, 231, 25)); inputInput-setObjectName(QString::fromUtf8("input")); addWidget(EditPage); _animation = new QString(""); _message = new QString("Message"); _validator = new QRegExpValidator(QRegExp("[a-zA-Z]+"), this); } MBICInput::~MBICInput() { } QValidator::State MBICInput::validate(QString &text, int &pos) const{ return _validator-validate(text, pos); } void MBICInput::paintEvent(QPaintEvent *) { QPainter painter(this); painter.setRenderHint(QPainter::Antialiasing); } QSize MBICInput::minimumSizeHint() const{ return QSize(200, 40); } QSize MBICInput::sizeHint() const{ return QSize(200, 40); } void MBICInput::setAnimation(const QString &animation){ *_animation = animation; update(); } QString MBICInput::animation() const{ return *_animation; } void MBICInput::setMessage(const QString &message){ *_message = message; update(); } QString MBICInput::message() const{ return *_message; } void MBICInput::mousePressEvent(QMouseEvent *event){ if(currentIndex()==0){ setCurrentIndex(1); }else{ setCurrentIndex(0); } update(); }

  Read the article

• Getting Segmentation Fault in C++, but why?

  - by Carlos

  I am getting segmentation fault in this code but i cant figure out why. I know a segmentation fault happens when a pointer is NULL, or when it points to a random memory address. #include <iostream> #include <fstream> #include <cmath> using namespace std; //**************************** CLASS ******************************* class Database { struct data{ string city; float latitude, longitude; data *link; }*p; public: Database(); void display(); void add(string cityName, float lat, float lon); private: string cityName; float lat, lon; }; //************************** CLASS METHODS ************************** Database::Database() { p = NULL; } void Database::add(string cityName, float lat, float lon){ data *q, *t; if(p == NULL){ p = new data; p -> city = cityName; p -> latitude = lat; p -> longitude = lon; p -> link = NULL; } else{ q = p; while(q -> link != NULL){ q = q -> link; } t = new data; t -> city = cityName; t -> latitude = lat; t -> longitude = lon; q -> link = t; } } void Database::display() { data *q; cout<<endl; for( q = p ; q != NULL ; q = q->link ) cout << endl << q -> city; } //***************************** MAIN ******************************* //*** INITIALIZATION *** Database D; void loadDatabase(); //****** VARIABLES ***** //******* PROGRAM ****** int main() { loadDatabase(); D.display(); } void loadDatabase() { int i = 0; string cityName; float lat, lon; fstream city; city.open("city.txt", ios::in); fstream latitude; latitude.open("lat.txt", ios::in); fstream longitude; longitude.open("lon.txt", ios::in); while(!city.eof()){ //************************************ city >> cityName; //* * latitude >> lat; //Here is where i think is the problem longitude >> lon; //* * D.add(cityName, lat, lon); //************************************ } city.close(); latitude.close(); longitude.close(); } This is the error am actually getting in console

  Read the article

• segmentation fault using scanf

  - by agarrow

  noob question here: I'm trying to write a simple menu interface, but I keep getting a segmentation fault error and I can't figure out why. #include <stdlib.h> #include <stdio.h> int flush(); int add(char *name, char *password, char *type); int delete(char *name); int edit(char *name, char *password, char *type, char *newName, char *newPassword, char *newType); int verify(char *name, char *password); int menu(){ int input; char *name, *password, *type, *newName, *newPassword, *newType; printf("MAIN MENU \n ============\n"); printf("1. ADD\n"); printf("2. DELETE\n"); printf("3. EDIT\n"); printf("4. VERIFY\n"); printf("5. Exit\n"); printf("Selection:"); scanf("%d", &input); flush(); switch (input){ case 1: printf("%s\n", "Enter Name:"); scanf("%s", name); flush(); printf("%s\n", "enter password" ); scanf("%s", password); flush(); printf("%s\n","enter type" ); scanf("%s",type); add(name, password, type); menu(); break; case 2: printf("Enter Name:" ); scanf("%s",name); flush(); delete(name); menu(); break; case 3: printf("Enter Name:\n"); scanf("%s",name); flush(); printf("Enter Password\n"); scanf("%s", password); flush(); printf("enter type:\n"); scanf("%s", type); flush(); printf("enter your new username:\n"); scanf("%s",newName); flush(); printf("enter your new password\n"); scanf("%s", newPassword); flush(); printf("enter your new type\n"); scanf("%s",newType); flush(); edit(name, password, type, newName, newPassword, newType); menu(); break; case 4: printf("Enter Name\n"); scanf("%s",name); flush(); printf("Enter Password\n"); scanf("%s",password); flush(); verify(name, password); menu(); break; case 5: return 0; default: printf("invalid input, please select from the following:\n"); menu(); } return 0; } int flush(){ int ch; while ((ch = getchar()) != EOF && ch != '\n') ; return 0; } I get the segmentation fault after entering two fields, in any menu option

  Read the article

• strange segmentation fault during function return

  - by Kyle

  I am running a program on 2 different machines. On one it works fine without issue. On the other it results in a segmentation fault. Through debugging, I have figured out where the fault occurs, but I can't figure out a logical reason for it to happen. In one function I have the following code: pass_particles(particle_grid, particle_properties, input_data, coll_eros_track, collision_number_part, world, grid_rank_lookup, grid_locations); cout<<"done passing particles"<<endl; The function pass_particles looks like: void pass_particles(map<int,map<int,Particle> > & particle_grid, std::vector<Particle_props> & particle_properties, User_input& input_data, data_tracking & coll_eros_track, vector<int> & collision_number_part, mpi::communicator & world, std::map<int,int> & grid_rank_lookup, map<int,std::vector<double> > & grid_locations) { //cout<<"east-west"<<endl; //east-west exchange (x direction) map<int, vector<Particle> > particles_to_be_sent_east; map<int, vector<Particle> > particles_to_be_sent_west; vector<Particle> particles_received_east; vector<Particle> particles_received_west; int counter_x_sent=0; int counter_x_received=0; for(grid_iter=particle_grid.begin();grid_iter!=particle_grid.end();grid_iter++) { map<int,Particle>::iterator part_iter; for (part_iter=grid_iter->second.begin();part_iter!=grid_iter->second.end();) { if (particle_properties[part_iter->second.global_part_num()].particle_in_box()[grid_iter->first]) { //decide if a particle has left the box...need to consider whether particle was already outside the box if ((part_iter->second.position().x()<(grid_locations[grid_iter->first][0]) && part_iter->second.position().x()>(grid_locations[grid_iter->first-input_data.z_numboxes()][0])) || (input_data.periodic_walls_x() && (grid_iter->first-floor(grid_iter->first/(input_data.xz_numboxes()))*input_data.xz_numboxes()<input_data.z_numboxes()) && (part_iter->second.position().x()>(grid_locations[input_data.total_boxes()-1][0])))) { particles_to_be_sent_west[grid_iter->first].push_back(part_iter->second); particle_properties[particle_grid[grid_iter->first][part_iter->first].global_part_num()].particle_in_box()[grid_iter->first]=false; counter_sent++; counter_x_sent++; } else if ((part_iter->second.position().x()>(grid_locations[grid_iter->first][1]) && part_iter->second.position().x()<(grid_locations[grid_iter->first+input_data.z_numboxes()][1])) || (input_data.periodic_walls_x() && (grid_iter->first-floor(grid_iter->first/(input_data.xz_numboxes()))*input_data.xz_numboxes())>input_data.xz_numboxes()-input_data.z_numboxes()-1) && (part_iter->second.position().x()<(grid_locations[0][1]))) { particles_to_be_sent_east[grid_iter->first].push_back(part_iter->second); particle_properties[particle_grid[grid_iter->first][part_iter->first].global_part_num()].particle_in_box()[grid_iter->first]=false; counter_sent++; counter_x_sent++; } //select particles in overlap areas to send to neighboring cells else if ((part_iter->second.position().x()>(grid_locations[grid_iter->first][0]) && part_iter->second.position().x()<(grid_locations[grid_iter->first][0]+input_data.diam_large()))) { particles_to_be_sent_west[grid_iter->first].push_back(part_iter->second); counter_sent++; counter_x_sent++; } else if ((part_iter->second.position().x()<(grid_locations[grid_iter->first][1]) && part_iter->second.position().x()>(grid_locations[grid_iter->first][1]-input_data.diam_large()))) { particles_to_be_sent_east[grid_iter->first].push_back(part_iter->second); counter_sent++; counter_x_sent++; } ++part_iter; } else if (particles_received_current[grid_iter->first].find(part_iter->first)!=particles_received_current[grid_iter->first].end()) { if ((part_iter->second.position().x()>(grid_locations[grid_iter->first][0]) && part_iter->second.position().x()<(grid_locations[grid_iter->first][0]+input_data.diam_large()))) { particles_to_be_sent_west[grid_iter->first].push_back(part_iter->second); counter_sent++; counter_x_sent++; } else if ((part_iter->second.position().x()<(grid_locations[grid_iter->first][1]) && part_iter->second.position().x()>(grid_locations[grid_iter->first][1]-input_data.diam_large()))) { particles_to_be_sent_east[grid_iter->first].push_back(part_iter->second); counter_sent++; counter_x_sent++; } part_iter++; } else { particle_grid[grid_iter->first].erase(part_iter++); counter_removed++; } } } world.barrier(); mpi::request reqs_x_send[particles_to_be_sent_west.size()+particles_to_be_sent_east.size()]; vector<multimap<int,int> > box_sent_x_info; box_sent_x_info.resize(world.size()); vector<multimap<int,int> > box_received_x_info; box_received_x_info.resize(world.size()); int counter_x_reqs=0; //send particles for(grid_iter_vec=particles_to_be_sent_west.begin();grid_iter_vec!=particles_to_be_sent_west.end();grid_iter_vec++) { if (grid_iter_vec->second.size()!=0) { //send a particle. 50 will be "west" tag if (input_data.periodic_walls_x() && (grid_iter_vec->first-floor(grid_iter_vec->first/(input_data.xz_numboxes()))*input_data.xz_numboxes()<input_data.z_numboxes())) { reqs_x_send[counter_x_reqs++]=world.isend(grid_rank_lookup[grid_iter_vec->first + input_data.z_numboxes()*(input_data.x_numboxes()-1)], grid_iter_vec->first + input_data.z_numboxes()*(input_data.x_numboxes()-1), particles_to_be_sent_west[grid_iter_vec->first]); box_sent_x_info[grid_rank_lookup[grid_iter_vec->first + input_data.z_numboxes()*(input_data.x_numboxes()-1)]].insert(pair<int,int>(world.rank(), grid_iter_vec->first + input_data.z_numboxes()*(input_data.x_numboxes()-1))); } else if (!(grid_iter_vec->first-floor(grid_iter_vec->first/(input_data.xz_numboxes()))*input_data.xz_numboxes()<input_data.z_numboxes())) { reqs_x_send[counter_x_reqs++]=world.isend(grid_rank_lookup[grid_iter_vec->first - input_data.z_numboxes()], grid_iter_vec->first - input_data.z_numboxes(), particles_to_be_sent_west[grid_iter_vec->first]); box_sent_x_info[grid_rank_lookup[grid_iter_vec->first - input_data.z_numboxes()]].insert(pair<int,int>(world.rank(),grid_iter_vec->first - input_data.z_numboxes())); } } } for(grid_iter_vec=particles_to_be_sent_east.begin();grid_iter_vec!=particles_to_be_sent_east.end();grid_iter_vec++) { if (grid_iter_vec->second.size()!=0) { //send a particle. 60 will be "east" tag if (input_data.periodic_walls_x() && (grid_iter_vec->first-floor(grid_iter_vec->first/(input_data.xz_numboxes())*input_data.xz_numboxes())>input_data.xz_numboxes()-input_data.z_numboxes()-1)) { reqs_x_send[counter_x_reqs++]=world.isend(grid_rank_lookup[grid_iter_vec->first - input_data.z_numboxes()*(input_data.x_numboxes()-1)], 2000000000-(grid_iter_vec->first - input_data.z_numboxes()*(input_data.x_numboxes()-1)), particles_to_be_sent_east[grid_iter_vec->first]); box_sent_x_info[grid_rank_lookup[grid_iter_vec->first - input_data.z_numboxes()*(input_data.x_numboxes()-1)]].insert(pair<int,int>(world.rank(),2000000000-(grid_iter_vec->first - input_data.z_numboxes()*(input_data.x_numboxes()-1)))); } else if (!(grid_iter_vec->first-floor(grid_iter_vec->first/(input_data.xz_numboxes())*input_data.xz_numboxes())>input_data.xz_numboxes()-input_data.z_numboxes()-1)) { reqs_x_send[counter_x_reqs++]=world.isend(grid_rank_lookup[grid_iter_vec->first + input_data.z_numboxes()], 2000000000-(grid_iter_vec->first + input_data.z_numboxes()), particles_to_be_sent_east[grid_iter_vec->first]); box_sent_x_info[grid_rank_lookup[grid_iter_vec->first + input_data.z_numboxes()]].insert(pair<int,int>(world.rank(), 2000000000-(grid_iter_vec->first + input_data.z_numboxes()))); } } } counter=0; for (int i=0;i<world.size();i++) { //if (world.rank()!=i) //{ reqs[counter++]=world.isend(i,1000000000,box_sent_x_info[i]); reqs[counter++]=world.irecv(i,1000000000,box_received_x_info[i]); //} } mpi::wait_all(reqs, reqs + world.size()*2); //receive particles //receive west particles for (int j=0;j<world.size();j++) { multimap<int,int>::iterator received_info_iter; for (received_info_iter=box_received_x_info[j].begin();received_info_iter!=box_received_x_info[j].end();received_info_iter++) { //receive the message if (received_info_iter->second<1000000000) { //receive the message world.recv(received_info_iter->first,received_info_iter->second,particles_received_west); //loop through all the received particles and add them to the particle_grid for this processor for (unsigned int i=0;i<particles_received_west.size();i++) { particle_grid[received_info_iter->second].insert(pair<int,Particle>(particles_received_west[i].global_part_num(),particles_received_west[i])); if(particles_received_west[i].position().x()>grid_locations[received_info_iter->second][0] && particles_received_west[i].position().x()<grid_locations[received_info_iter->second][1]) { particle_properties[particles_received_west[i].global_part_num()].particle_in_box()[received_info_iter->second]=true; } counter_received++; counter_x_received++; } } else { //receive the message world.recv(received_info_iter->first,received_info_iter->second,particles_received_east); //loop through all the received particles and add them to the particle_grid for this processor for (unsigned int i=0;i<particles_received_east.size();i++) { particle_grid[2000000000-received_info_iter->second].insert(pair<int,Particle>(particles_received_east[i].global_part_num(),particles_received_east[i])); if(particles_received_east[i].position().x()>grid_locations[2000000000-received_info_iter->second][0] && particles_received_east[i].position().x()<grid_locations[2000000000-received_info_iter->second][1]) { particle_properties[particles_received_east[i].global_part_num()].particle_in_box()[2000000000-received_info_iter->second]=true; } counter_received++; counter_x_received++; } } } } mpi::wait_all(reqs_y_send, reqs_y_send + particles_to_be_sent_bottom.size()+particles_to_be_sent_top.size()); mpi::wait_all(reqs_z_send, reqs_z_send + particles_to_be_sent_south.size()+particles_to_be_sent_north.size()); mpi::wait_all(reqs_x_send, reqs_x_send + particles_to_be_sent_west.size()+particles_to_be_sent_east.size()); cout<<"x sent "<<counter_x_sent<<" and received "<<counter_x_received<<" from rank "<<world.rank()<<endl; cout<<"rank "<<world.rank()<<" sent "<<counter_sent<<" and received "<<counter_received<<" and removed "<<counter_removed<<endl; cout<<"done passing"<<endl; } I only posted some of the code (so ignore the fact that some variables may appear to be undefined, as they are in a portion of the code I didn't post) When I run the code (on the machine in which it fails), I get done passing but not done passing particles I am lost as to what could possibly cause a segmentation fault between the end of the called function and the next line in the calling function and why it would happen on one machine and not another.

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12  | Next Page >