Search Results

Search found 3826 results on 154 pages for 'graph theory'.

Page 21/154 | < Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >

  • ISO 12207 - testing being only validation activity? [closed]

    - by user970696
    Possible Duplicate: How come verification does not include actual testing? ISO norm 12207 states that testing is only validation activity, while all static inspections are verification (that requirement, code.. is complete, correct..). I did found some articles saying its not correct but you know, it is not "official". I would like to understand because there are two different concepts (in books & articles): 1) Verification is all testing except for UAT (because only user can really validate the use). E.g. here OR 2) Verification is everything but testing. All testing is validation. E.g. here Definitions are mostly the same, as Sommerville's: The aim of verification is to check that the software meets its stated functional and non-functional requirements. Validation, however, is a more general process. The aim of validation is to ensure that the software meets the customer’s expectations. It goes beyond simply checking conformance with the specification to demonstrating that the software does what the customer expects it to do It is really bugging me because I tend to agree that functional testing done on a product (SIT) is still verification because I just follow the requirements. But ISO does not agree..

    Read the article

  • What is the aim of software testing?

    - by user970696
    Having read many books, there is a basic contradiction: Some say, "the goal of testing is to find bugs" while other say "the goal of the testing is to equalize the quality of the product", meaning that bugs are its by-products. I would also agree that if testing would be aimed primarily on a bug hunt, who would do the actual verification and actually provided the information, that the software is ready? Even e.g. Kaner changed his original definiton of testing goal from bug hunting to quality assesement provision but I still cannot see the clear difference. I percieve both as equally important. I can verify software by its specification to make sure it works and in that case, bugs found are just by products. But also I perform tests just to brake things. Also what definition is more accurate?

    Read the article

  • How often do CPUs make calculation errors?

    - by veryfoolish
    In Dijkstra's Notes on Structured Programming he talks a lot about the provability of computer programs as abstract entities. As a corollary, he remarks how testing isn't enough. E.g., he points out the fact that it would be impossible to test a multiplication function f(x,y) = x*y for any large values of x and y across the entire ranges of x and y. My question concerns his misc. remarks on "lousy hardware". I know the essay was written in the 1970s when computer hardware was less reliable, but computers still aren't perfect, so they must make calculation mistakes sometimes. Does anybody know how often this happens or if there are any statistics on this?

    Read the article

  • Semantic algorithms

    - by Mythago
    I have a more theoretical than practical question. I'll start with an example - when I get an email and open it on my iPad, there is a feature, which recognizes the timestamp from the text and offers me to create an event in the calendar. Simply told, I want to know theoretically how it's done - I believe it's some kind of semantic parsing, and I would like if someone could point me to some resources, where I can read more about this.

    Read the article

  • Come up with a real-world problem in which only the best solution will do (a problem from Introduction to algorithms) [closed]

    - by Mike
    EDITED (I realized that the question certainly needs a context) The problem 1.1-5 in the book of Thomas Cormen et al Introduction to algorithms is: "Come up with a real-world problem in which only the best solution will do. Then come up with one in which a solution that is “approximately” the best is good enough." I'm interested in its first statement. And (from my understanding) it is asked to name a real-world problem where only the exact solution will work as opposed to a real-world problem where good-enough solution will be ok. So what is the difference between the exact and good enough solution. Consider some physics problem for example the simulation of the fulid flow in the permeable medium. To make this simulation happen some simplyfing assumptions have to be made when deriving a mathematical model. Otherwise the model becomes at least complex and unsolvable. Virtually any particle in the universe has its influence on the fluid flow. But not all particles are equal. Those that form the permeable medium are much more influental than the ones located light years away. Then when the mathematical model needs to be solved an exact solution can rarely be found unless the mathematical model is simple enough (wich probably means the model isn't close to reality). We take an approximate numerical method and after hours of coding and days of verification come up with the program or algorithm which is a solution. And if the model and an algorithm give results close to a real problem by some degree that is good enough soultion. Its worth noting the difference between exact solution algorithm and exact computation result. When considering real-world problems and real-world computation machines I believe all physical problems solutions where any calculations are taken can not be exact because universal physical constants are represented approximately in the computer. Any numbers are represented with the limited precision, at least limited by amount of memory available to computing machine. I can imagine plenty of problems where good-enough, good to some degree solution will work, like train scheduling, automated trading, satellite orbit calculation, health care expert systems. In that cases exact solutions can't be derived due to constraints on computation time, limitations in computer memory or due to the nature of problems. I googled this question and like what this guy suggests: there're kinds of mathematical problems that need exact solutions (little note here: because the question is taken from the book "Introduction to algorithms" the term "solution" means an algorithm or a program, which in this case gives exact answer on each input). But that's probably more of theoretical interest. So I would like to narrow down the question to: What are the real-world practical problems where only the best (exact) solution algorithm or program will do (but not the good-enough solution)? There are problems like breaking of cryptographic ciphers where only exact solution matters in practice and again in practice the process of deciphering without knowing a secret should take reasonable amount of time. Returning to the original question this is the problem where good-enough (fast-enough) solution will do there's no practical need in instant crack though it's desired. So the quality of "best" can be understood in any sense: exact, fastest, requiring least memory, having minimal possible network traffic etc. And still I want this question to be theoretical if possible. In a sense that there may be example of computer X that has limited resource R of amount Y where the best solution to problem P is the one that takes not more than available Y for inputs of size N*Y. But that's the problem of finding solution for P on computer X which is... well, good enough. My final thought that we live in a world where it is required from programming solutions to practical purposes to be good enough. In rare cases really very very good but still not the best ones. Isn't it? :) If it's not can you provide an example? Or can you name any such unsolved problem of practical interest?

    Read the article

  • Validation and Verification explanation (Boehm) - I cannot understand its point

    - by user970696
    Hopefully my last thread about V&V as I found the B.Boehm is text which I just do not understand well (likely my technical English is not that good). http://csse.usc.edu/csse/TECHRPTS/1979/usccse79-501/usccse79-501.pdf Basically he says that verification is about checking that products derived from requirements baseline must correspond to it and that deviation leads only to changes in these derived products (design, code). But he says it begins with design and ends with acceptance tests (you can check the V model inside). The thing is, I have accepted ISO12207 in terms of all testing is validation, yet it does not make any sense here. In order to be sure the product complies with requirements (acceptance test) I need to test it. Also it says that validation problems means that requirements are bad and needs to be changed - which does not happen with testing that testers do, who just checks correspondence with requirements.

    Read the article

  • Quality Assurance=inspections, reviews..?

    - by user970696
    Studying this subject extensively, the most books state the following: Quality Assurance: prevention activity. Act of inspection, reviewing.. Quality Control: testing While there are some exceptions that mention that QA deals with just processes (planning, strategy, standard application etc.) which is IMHO much closer to real QA, yet I cannot find any good reference in Google Books. I believe that inspections, reviews, testing is all quality control as it is about checking products, no matter if it is the final one or work products. The problem is that so many authors do not agree. I would be grateful for detailed explanation, ideally with a reference.

    Read the article

  • Is there such a thing these days as programming in the small?

    - by WeNeedAnswers
    With all the programming languages that are out there, what exactly does it mean to program in the small and is it still possible, without the possibility of re-purposing to the large. The original article which mentions in the small was dated to 1975 and referred to scripting languages (as glue languages). Maybe I am missing the point, but any language that you can built components of code out of, I would regard to being able to handle "in the large". Is there a confusion on what Objects are and do they really figure as being mandatory to being able to handle "the large". Many have argued that this is the true meaning of "In the large" and that the concepts of objects are best fit for the job.

    Read the article

  • Bug severity classification issues

    - by KyleMinn
    In a book I have, there is a following classification of defect: Critical : A defect receives a “critical” severity level if one or more critical system functionalities are impaired by a defect with is impaired and there is no workaround. High: A defect receives a “high” severity level if some fundamental system functionalities are impaired but a workaround exists. Medium: A defect receives a “medium” severity level if no critical functionality is impaired and a workaround exists for the defect. Low: A defect receives a “low” severity level if the problem involves a cosmetic feature of the system. To be honest, I do not get it.. For example point 2. What if fundamental but not critical feature is impaired and there is NOT a workaround. The same for point 3: what if no critical functionality is affected but there is no workaround? E.g. optional field in the registration form does not work. No workaround but barely an issue.

    Read the article

  • How to use lists in equivalence partitioning?

    - by KhDonen
    I have read that equivalence partitioning can be used typically for intervals or lists, e.g. I assume it can be used for every set of inputs. Anyway if the requirement says that allowed colors are (RED,BLUE,BLACK, GREEN), I cannot treat them like a list, right? I mean, testing one of them would not be enough because developers most likely used some switch-case and thus it is not real "set" where one could represent also the others. So how it is meant with lists? Also what is not that clear to me, I do not think it is always possible to do the initial partioning and then design the test cases. What about checking two lines intersection: Y=MX+C. (two inputs) 1) The lines are paraller. M1=M1 but C1 must be different from C2. 2) Lines are intersecting. M1 must be different from M2. 3) Coincident. The are the same. How can I use partitioning here? THis is actually taken from a book and it says that these sets are eq.classes.

    Read the article

  • Very original V&V explanation (Bohm) - I cannot understand its point

    - by user970696
    Hopefully my last thread about V&V as I found the B.Boehm is text which I just do not understand well (likely my technical English is not that good). http://csse.usc.edu/csse/TECHRPTS/1979/usccse79-501/usccse79-501.pdf Basically he says that verification is about checking that products derived from requirments baseline must correspond to it and that deviation leads only to changes in these derived products (design, code). But he says it begins with design and ends with acceptance tests (you can check the V model inside). The thing is, I have accepted ISO12207 in terms of all testing is validation, yet it does not make any sense here. In order to be sure the product complies with requirements (acceptance test) I need to test it. Also it says that validation problems means that requirements are bad and needs to be changed - which does not happen with testing that testers do, who just checks correspondence with requirements.

    Read the article

  • Legal Applications of Metamorphic Code

    - by V_P
    Firstly, I would like to state that I already understand the 'vx' applications for Metamorphic code. I am not here to ask a question related to any of those topics as that would be inappropriate in this context. I would like to know if anyone has ever used 'Metamorphic' code in practice, for purposes other than those previously stated, if so, what was the reasoning for using said concept. In essence I am trying to discover a purpose for this concept, if any, other than circumventing anti-virus scanners and the like.

    Read the article

  • How to deploy jBPM 3.2.2 console on Oracle 10g iAS

    - by Balint Pato
    Hi! Does anybody have experience regarding deployment of the jBPM Administration Console on Oracle 10g iAS? I successfully deployed it using an .ear, security mappings working, I can even login to the console, Hibernate finds the JNDI datasource but it cannot find the TransactionManager. I see no log, only the exception thrown in the jsf page: Can anybody help me? The hibernate.cfg.xml file now looks like this: <?xml version='1.0' encoding='utf-8'?> <!DOCTYPE hibernate-configuration PUBLIC "-//Hibernate/Hibernate Configuration DTD 3.0//EN" "http://hibernate.sourceforge.net/hibernate-configuration-3.0.dtd"> <hibernate-configuration> <session-factory> <!-- hibernate dialect --> <property name="hibernate.dialect">org.hibernate.dialect.Oracle9Dialect</property> <!-- JDBC connection properties (begin) === <property name="hibernate.connection.driver_class">org.hsqldb.jdbcDriver</property> <property name="hibernate.connection.url">jdbc:hsqldb:mem:jbpm</property> <property name="hibernate.connection.username">sa</property> <property name="hibernate.connection.password"></property> ==== JDBC connection properties (end) --> <property name="hibernate.cache.provider_class">org.hibernate.cache.HashtableCacheProvider</property> <!-- DataSource properties (begin) --> <property name="hibernate.connection.datasource">java:/JbpmDS</property> <!-- DataSource properties (end) --> <!-- JTA transaction properties (begin) --> <property name="hibernate.transaction.factory_class">org.hibernate.transaction.JTATransactionFactory</property> <!-- <property name="hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_class">org.hibernate.transaction.JBossTransactionManagerLookup</property>--> <!-- JTA transaction properties (end) --> <!-- CMT transaction properties (begin) === <property name="hibernate.transaction.factory_class">org.hibernate.transaction.CMTTransactionFactory</property> <property name="hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_class">org.hibernate.transaction.JBossTransactionManagerLookup</property> ==== CMT transaction properties (end) --> <!-- logging properties (begin) --> <property name="hibernate.show_sql">true</property> <property name="hibernate.format_sql">true</property> <property name="hibernate.use_sql_comments">true</property> <--==== logging properties (end) --> <!-- ############################################ --> <!-- # mapping files with external dependencies # --> <!-- ############################################ --> <!-- following mapping file has a dependendy on --> <!-- 'bsh-{version}.jar'. --> <!-- uncomment this if you don't have bsh on your --> <!-- classpath. you won't be able to use the --> <!-- script element in process definition files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/action/Script.hbm.xml"/> <!-- following mapping files have a dependendy on --> <!-- 'jbpm-identity.jar', mapping files --> <!-- of the pluggable jbpm identity component. --> <!-- Uncomment the following 3 lines if you --> <!-- want to use the jBPM identity mgmgt --> <!-- component. --> <!-- identity mappings (begin) --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/identity/User.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/identity/Group.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/identity/Membership.hbm.xml"/> <!-- identity mappings (end) --> <!-- following mapping files have a dependendy on --> <!-- the JCR API --> <!-- jcr mappings (begin) === <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/variableinstance/JcrNodeInstance.hbm.xml"/> ==== jcr mappings (end) --> <!-- ###################### --> <!-- # jbpm mapping files # --> <!-- ###################### --> <!-- hql queries and type defs --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/db/hibernate.queries.hbm.xml" /> <!-- graph.action mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/action/MailAction.hbm.xml"/> <!-- graph.def mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/def/ProcessDefinition.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/def/Node.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/def/Transition.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/def/Event.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/def/Action.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/def/SuperState.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/def/ExceptionHandler.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/instantiation/Delegation.hbm.xml"/> <!-- graph.node mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/node/StartState.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/node/EndState.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/node/ProcessState.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/node/Decision.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/node/Fork.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/node/Join.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/node/MailNode.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/node/State.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/node/TaskNode.hbm.xml"/> <!-- context.def mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/def/ContextDefinition.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/def/VariableAccess.hbm.xml"/> <!-- taskmgmt.def mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/def/TaskMgmtDefinition.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/def/Swimlane.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/def/Task.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/def/TaskController.hbm.xml"/> <!-- module.def mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/module/def/ModuleDefinition.hbm.xml"/> <!-- bytes mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/bytes/ByteArray.hbm.xml"/> <!-- file.def mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/file/def/FileDefinition.hbm.xml"/> <!-- scheduler.def mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/scheduler/def/CreateTimerAction.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/scheduler/def/CancelTimerAction.hbm.xml"/> <!-- graph.exe mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/exe/Comment.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/exe/ProcessInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/exe/Token.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/exe/RuntimeAction.hbm.xml"/> <!-- module.exe mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/module/exe/ModuleInstance.hbm.xml"/> <!-- context.exe mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/ContextInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/TokenVariableMap.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/VariableInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/variableinstance/ByteArrayInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/variableinstance/DateInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/variableinstance/DoubleInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/variableinstance/HibernateLongInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/variableinstance/HibernateStringInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/variableinstance/LongInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/variableinstance/NullInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/exe/variableinstance/StringInstance.hbm.xml"/> <!-- job mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/job/Job.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/job/Timer.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/job/ExecuteNodeJob.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/job/ExecuteActionJob.hbm.xml"/> <!-- taskmgmt.exe mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/exe/TaskMgmtInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/exe/TaskInstance.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/exe/PooledActor.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/exe/SwimlaneInstance.hbm.xml"/> <!-- logging mapping files --> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/logging/log/ProcessLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/logging/log/MessageLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/logging/log/CompositeLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/log/ActionLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/log/NodeLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/log/ProcessInstanceCreateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/log/ProcessInstanceEndLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/log/ProcessStateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/log/SignalLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/log/TokenCreateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/log/TokenEndLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/graph/log/TransitionLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/VariableLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/VariableCreateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/VariableDeleteLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/VariableUpdateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/variableinstance/ByteArrayUpdateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/variableinstance/DateUpdateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/variableinstance/DoubleUpdateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/variableinstance/HibernateLongUpdateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/variableinstance/HibernateStringUpdateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/variableinstance/LongUpdateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/context/log/variableinstance/StringUpdateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/log/TaskLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/log/TaskCreateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/log/TaskAssignLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/log/TaskEndLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/log/SwimlaneLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/log/SwimlaneCreateLog.hbm.xml"/> <mapping resource="org/jbpm/taskmgmt/log/SwimlaneAssignLog.hbm.xml"/> </session-factory> </hibernate-configuration> ---- edit --- I have already tried the hibernate.transaction.manager_lookup_class to set to the JBoss version (org.hibernate.transaction.JBossTransactionManagerLookup) it did not work...well it's not that suprising...I'll try now: org.hibernate.transaction.OC4JTransactionManagerLookup I tried with CMT instead of JTA, but it didn't work also.

    Read the article

  • Good Java graph algorithm library?

    - by Nick Fortescue
    Has anyone had good experiences with any Java libraries for Graph algorithms. I've tried JGraph and found it ok, and there are a lot of different ones in google. Are there any that people are actually using successfully in production code or would recommend? To clarify, I'm not looking for a library that produces graphs/charts, I'm looking for one that helps with Graph algorithms, eg minimum spanning tree, Kruskal's algorithm Nodes, Edges, etc. Ideally one with some good algorithms/data structures in a nice Java OO API.

    Read the article

  • how can i get user notifications with the new Graph API

    - by user63898
    hello all im making switch to the new Graph API , and i try to replace all the rest api with the new Graph api reading the docs i saw i have some kind of real time function ( im not sure its related to getting the user notifications ) that suppose to return me callback . but im my case i like to invoke simple http command and get the user notification like ( like the old notification api's ) how can i do it now ? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Using PyLab to create a 2D graph from two separate lists

    - by user324333
    Hey Guys, This seems like a basic problem with an easy answer but I simply cannot figure it out no matter how much I try. I am trying to create a line graph based on two lists. For my x-axis, I want my list to be a set of strings. x_axis_list = ["Jan-06","Jul-06","Jan-07","Jul-07","Jan-08"] y_axis_list = [5,7,6,8,9] Any suggestions on how to best graph these items?

    Read the article

  • How to embed a hgactivity graph in hgweb

    - by Ton
    I would like to embed an actity graph created by hgactivity inside my hgweb webinterface. What's the best method to do so. Here's a screenshot of a hgactivity graph: It shows the number of commits through time to a Mercurial repository.

    Read the article

  • oprofile unable to produce call graph

    - by aaa
    hello I am trying to use oprofile to generate call graph. Compiler is g++, platform is linux x86-64, linker is gfortran C++ code is compiled with -fno- omit-frame-pointer. oprofile is started with --callgraph=25. report I run with --callgraph. the call graph is produced but it's only includes self time, which is not much use what am I missing?

    Read the article

  • Smallest sum of graph weight, where each node are connceted (like a network)

    - by Svisstack
    Hello, What algorithm I can use for problem like this: Have a graph positive weighted, i want to know a smallest possible sum of weights where each node are connected (connected like a network, where each node is a eg. network device). In this network each node can be connected with other node by some other other nodes in way. But all nodes from input graph must be in a network. Any one can help me with this?

    Read the article

  • depth first search graph by using linked list

    - by programmerwannabe
    im using mac book and i cannot read the text file using this code. moreover, can you guys please add function(graph is connected?, and is this graph tree?) inputA.txt consist 1 2 1 6 1 5 2 3 2 6 3 4 3 6 4 5 4 6 5 6 #include <stdio.h> #include <memory.h> #include <stdlib.h> #define MAX 10 #define TRUE 1 #define FALSE 0 typedef struct Graph{ int vertex; struct Graph* link; } g_node; typedef struct graphType{ int x; int visited[MAX]; g_node* adjList_H[MAX]; } graphType; typedef struct stack{ int data; struct stack* link; } s_node; s_node* top; void push(int item){ s_node* n=(s_node*)malloc(sizeof(s_node)); n->data = item; n->link = top; top = n; } int pop(){ int item; s_node* n=top; if(top == NULL){ puts("\nstack is empty!\n"); return 0; } else { item = n-> data; top = n->link; free(n); return item; } } void createGraph(graphType* g){ int v; g->x = 1; for(v=1 ; v < MAX ; v++){ g -> visited[v] = FALSE; g -> adjList_H[v] = NULL; } } void insertVertex(graphType* g, int v){ if(((g->x)) > MAX){ puts("\n it has been overed the number of vertex\n"); return ; } g -> x++; } void insertEdge(graphType* g, int u, int v){ g_node* node; if(u >= g -> x || v >= g -> x){ puts("\n no vertex in the graph\n"); return ; } node = (g_node*)malloc(sizeof(g_node)); node -> vertex = v; node -> link = g -> adjList_H[u]; g-> adjList_H[u] = node; } void print_adjList(graphType* g){ int i; g_node *p; for(i=1 ; i<g -> x ; i++){ printf("\n\t\t vertex %d adjacency list ", i); p = g -> adjList_H[i]; while(p){ printf("-> %d", p-> vertex); p = p-> link; } } } void DFS_adjList(graphType* g, int v) { g_node* w; top = NULL; push(v); g->visited[v] = TRUE; printf(" %d", v); while(top != NULL){ w=g->adjList_H[v]; while(w){ if (!g->visited[w->vertex]){ push(w->vertex); g->visited[w->vertex] = TRUE; printf(" %d", w->vertex); v = w->vertex; w=g->adjList_H[v]; } else w= w->link; } v = pop(); } } int main (int argc, const char * argv[]) { FILE *fp; char mychar; char arr[][2]={0, }; int j, k; int i; graphType *G9; G9 = (graphType*)malloc(sizeof(graphType)); createGraph(G9); for(i=1; i<7 ; i++) insertVertex(G9, i); fp = fopen("inputD.txt", "r"); for(j = 0 ; j< 10 ; j++){ for(k = 0 ; k < 2 ; k++){ mychar = fgetc(fp); if(mychar = EOF){ j=10; break; } else if(mychar == ' ') continue; else if(mychar <= '9' || mychar >= '1'){ arr[j][k] = mychar; printf("%d%d", arr[i][k]); } } } insertEdge(G9, 1, 2); insertEdge(G9, 1, 6); insertEdge(G9, 1, 5); insertEdge(G9, 2, 3); insertEdge(G9, 2, 6); insertEdge(G9, 3, 4); insertEdge(G9, 3, 6); insertEdge(G9, 4, 5); insertEdge(G9, 4, 6); insertEdge(G9, 5, 6); insertEdge(G9, 6, 5); insertEdge(G9, 6, 4); insertEdge(G9, 5, 4); insertEdge(G9, 6, 3); insertEdge(G9, 4, 3); insertEdge(G9, 6, 2); insertEdge(G9, 3, 2); insertEdge(G9, 5, 1); insertEdge(G9, 6, 1); insertEdge(G9, 2, 1); printf("\n graph adjacency list "); print_adjList(G9); printf("\n \n//////////////////////////////////////////////\n\n depth fist search >> "); DFS_adjList(G9, 1); return 0; }

    Read the article

  • Efficient way to store a graph for calculation in Hadoop

    - by user337499
    I am currently trying to perform calculations like clustering coefficient on huge graphs with the help of Hadoop. Therefore I need an efficient way to store the graph in a way that I can easily access nodes, their neighbors and the neighbors' neighbors. The graph is quite sparse and stored in a huge tab separated file where the first field is the node from which an edge goes to the second node in field two. Thanks in advance!

    Read the article

  • Line Graph CGPoints from NSMutableArray

    - by Mattog1456
    I have been trying to adapt the code from the accelerometer example such that when the user depresses a uibutton a point is added to a line graph. Working on the converting two floats, which are the result of calculate as below into a CGPoint and converting the CGPoint into an NSValue and then adding this to a NSMutableArray with the following -(IBAction)calculate:(id)sender { self.points = [NSMutableArray array]; CGPoint pt = CGPointMake(d, c); [self.points addObject:[NSValue valueWithCGPoint:pt]]; NSLog(@"%@", NSStringFromCGPoint(pt)); NSLog(@"%@", [NSString stringWithFormat:@"%d points", self.points.count ]); } But for some reason I am only getting one object stored in the array, it seems everytime push the calculate button the object pt gets overwritten, on the plus side it has the correct x,y coords. Any ideas on this one? UPDATE Removed self.points = [NSMutableArray array]; and placed it in view did load, also set the first points to 0,0. so that is working ok. Now the next problem is that I have a Graph subclass where the CG Drawing is taking place. I am trying to figure out a simple way to be able to access the above NSMutableArray which is in a ViewController class from the graph class. Am so close to the end but am really stuck, any help would be great. Still trying to draw a line graph on a UIView which is on a UIScrollview. The draw rect method is in the UIView Subclass and everything is working there, I have gridlines and labels on the axis and I can draw manually onto it. But the problem I have is that I cannot read the NSMutableArray of the CGPoints, which are the x and y coords. The ViewController performs a calculation and the results are written to the NSMutable array and this is all working fine as well, I can see the CGpoints and their values being written with NSLogs in the ViewController. I have tried various ways to set the NSMutableArray up as a global but to no avail, everything runs but while I can see the points being written in the ViewController they are just not visible to the UIView Subclass. I have also tried to use the addObserver and observeValueForKeyPath methods and once again while everything runs the subclass cannot see the array. Any ideas, suggestions, tips or thoughts would be great

    Read the article

  • Import GraphViz graph to Microsoft Word 14

    - by rmetzger
    I have created a GraphViz dot-file to visualize a data flow. I have to write a documentation using Microsoft Word and I'd like to include the graph in the document. For some wired reason, MS Word is not able to import SVG files. Then, I generated a .eps file using dot -Teps plan.dot -o plan.eps But once imported into Word, the picture looks horrible. I also tried to convert the svg to wmf using Inkscape. It also looked horrible. Is there a clean way to generate a file using GraphViz that Word can read?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28  | Next Page >