Search Results

Search found 24105 results on 965 pages for 'advanced custom fields'.

Page 211/965 | < Previous Page | 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218  | Next Page >

  • How do I do a table join on two fields in my second table?

    - by Cannonade
    I have two tables: Messages - Amongst other things, has a to_id and a from_id field. People - Has a corresponding person_id I am trying to figure out how to do the following in a single linq query: Give me all messages that have been sent to and from person x (idself). I had a couple of cracks at this. Not quite right MsgPeople = (from p in db.people join m in db.messages on p.person_id equals m.from_id where (m.from_id == idself || m.to_id == idself) orderby p.name descending select p).Distinct(); This almost works, except I think it misses one case: "people who have never received a message, just sent one to me" How this works in my head So what I really need is something like: join m in db.messages on (p.people_id equals m.from_id or p.people_id equals m.to_id) Gets me a subset of the people I am after It seems you can't do that. I have tried a few other options, like doing two joins: MsgPeople = (from p in db.people join m in AllMessages on p.person_id equals m.from_id join m2 in AllMessages on p.person_id equals m2.to_id where (m2.from_id == idself || m.to_id == idself) orderby p.name descending select p).Distinct(); but this gives me a subset of the results I need, I guess something to do with the order the joins are resolved. My understanding of LINQ (and perhaps even database theory) is embarrassingly superficial and I look forward to having some light shed on my problem.

    Read the article

  • MySQL: selecting totals as three fields from same table as one query?

    - by coderama
    I have a table with various orders in it: ID | Date | etc... 1 | 2013-01-01 | etc 2 | 2013-02-01 | etc 3 | 2013-03-01 | etc 4 | 2013-04-01 | etc 5 | 2013-05-01 | etc 6 | 2013-06-01 | etc 7 | 2013-06-01 | etc 8 | 2013-03-01 | etc 9 | 2013-04-01 | etc 10 | 2013-05-01 | etc I want a query that ends wit the result: overallTotal | totalThisMonth | totalLastMonth 10 | 2 | 1 But I want to do this in one query! I am trying to find a way to use subqueries to do this. SO far I have: SELECT * from ( SELECT count(*) as overallTotal from ORDERS ) How can I combine this with other subqueries so I can get the totals in one query?

    Read the article

  • blackberry development problem?

    - by user188391
    i want to create this type of grid field can any one guide me? import net.rim.device.api.ui.Field; import net.rim.device.api.ui.Manager; public class GridFieldManager extends Manager { private int[] columnWidths; private int columns; private int allRowHeight = -1; public GridFieldManager(int columns, long style) { super(style); this.columns = columns; } public GridFieldManager(int[] columnWidths, long style) { super(style); this.columnWidths = columnWidths; this.columns = columnWidths.length; } public GridFieldManager(int[] columnWidths, int rowHeight, long style) { this(columnWidths, style); this.allRowHeight = rowHeight; } protected boolean navigationMovement(int dx, int dy, int status, int time) { int focusIndex = getFieldWithFocusIndex(); while(dy > 0) { focusIndex += columns; if (focusIndex >= getFieldCount()) { return false; // Focus moves out of this manager } else { Field f = getField(focusIndex); if (f.isFocusable()) { // Only move the focus onto focusable fields f.setFocus(); dy--; } } } while(dy < 0) { focusIndex -= columns; if (focusIndex < 0) { return false; } else { Field f = getField(focusIndex); if (f.isFocusable()) { f.setFocus(); dy++; } } } while(dx > 0) { focusIndex ++; if (focusIndex >= getFieldCount()) { return false; } else { Field f = getField(focusIndex); if (f.isFocusable()) { f.setFocus(); dx--; } } } while(dx < 0) { focusIndex --; if (focusIndex < 0) { return false; } else { Field f = getField(focusIndex); if (f.isFocusable()) { f.setFocus(); dx++; } } } return true; } protected void sublayout(int width, int height) { int y = 0; if (columnWidths == null) { columnWidths = new int[columns]; for(int i = 0; i < columns; i++) { columnWidths[i] = width/columns; } } Field[] fields = new Field[columnWidths.length]; int currentColumn = 0; int rowHeight = 0; for(int i = 0; i < getFieldCount(); i++) { fields[currentColumn] = getField(i); layoutChild(fields[currentColumn], columnWidths[currentColumn], height-y); if (fields[currentColumn].getHeight() > rowHeight) { rowHeight = fields[currentColumn].getHeight(); } currentColumn++; if (currentColumn == columnWidths.length || i == getFieldCount()-1) { int x = 0; if (this.allRowHeight >= 0) { rowHeight = this.allRowHeight; } for(int c = 0; c < currentColumn; c++) { long fieldStyle = fields[c].getStyle(); int fieldXOffset = 0; long fieldHalign = fieldStyle & Field.FIELD_HALIGN_MASK; if (fieldHalign == Field.FIELD_RIGHT) { fieldXOffset = columnWidths[c] - fields[c].getWidth(); } else if (fieldHalign == Field.FIELD_HCENTER) { fieldXOffset = (columnWidths[c]-fields[c].getWidth())/2; } int fieldYOffset = 0; long fieldValign = fieldStyle & Field.FIELD_VALIGN_MASK; if (fieldValign == Field.FIELD_BOTTOM) { fieldYOffset = rowHeight - fields[c].getHeight(); } else if (fieldValign == Field.FIELD_VCENTER) { fieldYOffset = (rowHeight-fields[c].getHeight())/2; } setPositionChild(fields[c], x+fieldXOffset, y + fieldYOffset); x += columnWidths[c]; } currentColumn = 0; y += rowHeight; } if (y >= height) { break; } } int totalWidth = 0; for(int i = 0; i < columnWidths.length; i++) { totalWidth += columnWidths[i]; } setExtent(totalWidth, Math.min(y, height)); } }

    Read the article

  • How can I prevent infinite recursion when using events to bind UI elements to fields?

    - by Billy ONeal
    The following seems to be a relatively common pattern (to me, not to the community at large) to bind a string variable to the contents of a TextBox. class MyBackEndClass { public event EventHandler DataChanged; string _Data; public string Data { get { return _Data; } set { _Data = value; //Fire the DataChanged event } } } class SomeForm : // Form stuff { MyBackEndClass mbe; TextBox someTextBox; SomeForm() { someTextBox.TextChanged += HandleTextBox(); mbe.DataChanged += HandleData(); } void HandleTextBox(Object sender, EventArgs e) { mbe.Data = ((TextBox)sender).Text; } void HandleData(Object sender, EventArgs e) { someTextBox.Text = ((MyBackEndClass) sender).Data; } } The problem is that changing the TextBox fires the changes the data value in the backend, which causes the textbox to change, etc. That runs forever. Is there a better design pattern (other than resorting to a nasty boolean flag) that handles this case correctly? EDIT: To be clear, in the real design the backend class is used to synchronize changes between multiple forms. Therefore I can't just use the SomeTextBox.Text property directly. Billy3

    Read the article

  • How to combine two arrays of same length to one array with two fields (not append/merge)

    - by Raj
    Say, I have an array with months $months = array('Jan', 'Feb', 'Mar'...'Dec'); And another, with days (say, for year 2010) $mdays = array(31, 28, 31...31); I want to merge/combine these two arrays, into an array like this: $monthdetails[0] = ('month' => 'Jan', 'days' => 31) $monthdetails[1] = ('month' => 'Feb', 'days' => 28) ... $monthdetails[11] = ('month' => 'Dec', 'days' => 31) I can loop through both the arrays and fill the $monthdetails. I want to know whether there are any functions/easier way for achieving the same result. Thanks! Raj

    Read the article

  • Overlaying several CLR reference fields with each other in explicit struct?

    - by thr
    Edit: I'm well aware of that this works very well with value types, my specific question is about using this for reference types. I've been tinkering around with structs in .NET/C#, and I just found out that you can do this: using System; using System.Runtime.InteropServices; namespace ConsoleApplication1 { class Foo { } class Bar { } [StructLayout(LayoutKind.Explicit)] struct Overlaid { [FieldOffset(0)] public object AsObject; [FieldOffset(0)] public Foo AsFoo; [FieldOffset(0)] public Bar AsBar; } class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { var overlaid = new Overlaid(); overlaid.AsObject = new Bar(); Console.WriteLine(overlaid.AsBar); overlaid.AsObject = new Foo(); Console.WriteLine(overlaid.AsFoo); Console.ReadLine(); } } } Basically circumventing having to do dynamic casting during runtime by using a struct that has an explicit field layout and then accessing the object inside as it's correct type. Now my question is: Can this lead to memory leaks somehow, or any other undefined behavior inside the CLR? Or is this a fully supported convention that is usable without any issues? I'm aware that this is one of the darker corners of the CLR, and that this technique is only a viable option in very few specific cases.

    Read the article

  • Cannot change UIImageView frame in a custom table cell.

    - by jkally
    I have a custom table cell. In it I have put (via the IB) an image view of a certain frame In 'cellForRowAtIndexPath', under certain conditions, I would like to modify the frame of this UIImageView, so I write something like: UIImageView *imgv = (UIImageView *)[cell viewWithTag:1]; CGRect r = CGRectMake(20.0, 20.0, 10.0, 10.0); imgv.frame = r; But nothing expected happens (The frame does move a little though not to where I want, but doesn't change its size at all);

    Read the article

  • how to make the two class fields(not referring any other table) as composite key in hibernate?

    - by M Sach
    i want to make pgId and pgName both as composite key where both pgId anf pgName are assgined values. i am not sure how should i go about it? on net i get examples where composite key column refering to column of some other table but not this kind of scenario? @Entity @Table(name = "PersonDetails") public class PersonDetailsData implements Serializable { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; @Id @Basic private int pgId; @Basic(optional = true) @Column(nullable = true) private int orgId; @Basic(optional = true) @Column(nullable = true) private String pgName; public PersonWikiDetailsData() { } public int getPpId() { return ppId; } public void setPpId(int ppId) { this.ppId = ppId; } public String getSpaceName() { return spaceName; } public void setSpaceName(String spaceName) { this.spaceName = spaceName; } }

    Read the article

  • how to compare two tables fields name with another value in mysql?

    - by I Like PHP
    I have two tables table_school school_open_time|school_close_time|school_day 8:00 AM | 9:00PM | Monday 10:00 AM | 7:00PM | Wednesday table_college college_open_time|college_close_time|college_day 10:00 AM | 8:00PM | Monday 10:00 AM | 9:00PM | Tuesday 10:00 AM | 5:00PM | Wednesday Now I want to select school_open_time school_close time, college_open_time and college_close_time according to today (means college_day=school_day=today), and also if there is no row for a specific day in any of one table then it display blank field ( LEFT JOIN , I think I can use). Please suggest me best and optimized query for this. UPDATE: if there is no open time and close time for school then college_open_time and college_close_time has to be returned( not to be filled in database,just return) as school_open_time and school_close_time. and there always must be college_open_time and college_close_time for a given day MORE UPDATE: i m using below query SELECT college_open_time,college_close_time ,school_open_time, school_close_time FROM tbl_college LEFT JOIN tbl_school ON school_owner_id=college_owner_id WHERE college_owner_id='".$_session['user_id']."' AND college_day='".date('l',time())."'"; it return single row (left hand having some value and right hand having blank value) when there is no row of a given day in table_school, BUT display seven rows with same value on left hand side(college_open_time, college_close_time) and 6 blank row on right hand side (school_open_time and school_close_time) i need only one row when both table have a row of a given day but using above query take only first row of corresponding table_school where school_owner_id is 50(let), it not see the condition that school_day name should be given day

    Read the article

  • How can I implement a 'select all' check-box on my CRM 4 custom form?

    - by Gryphoenix
    I am working on a custom CRM form with numerous checkboxes, organized by sections. I would like to implement a 'select all' feature to the form and am trying to understand how to format the JavaScript. My research thus far has pointed me to the possibility of using a FOR statement to iterate through all of the elements in the section I want to process, setting their values accordingly, but am unsure of which document.getElements ... method to utilize.

    Read the article

  • Syntax error in INSERT INTO statement in c# oledb?

    - by sameer
    I am having a table called SubMaster_Accounts, which contains 9 fields. In which I want to insert data to some fields and i want to store some other fields as NULL. I tried to write the query using query string, The sql query works perfectly when i insert the data for all the fields, but when i insert data as NULL to some of the fields it shows syntax error in Insert command. The fields which i want to insert as NULL are not constraints. How can i do it? This is my query string. insert into SubMaster_Account ([SMcode], [MSname], [Sname], [Openbalrs], [Openbalrs1], [Openbalmet], [Openbalmet1], [Creditdays], [Sdesc]) values ('" + SMcode + "','" + MSname + "','" + Sname + "'," + Openbalrs + ",'" + Openbalrs1 + "'," + Openbalmet + ",'" + Openbalmet1 + "'," + Creditdays + ",'" + Sdesc + "')

    Read the article

  • MySQL: How to copy rows, but change a few fields?

    - by Andrew
    I have a large number of rows that I would like to copy, but I need to change one field. I can select the rows that I want to copy: select * from Table where Event_ID = "120" Now I want to copy all those rows and create new rows while setting the Event_ID to 155. How can I accomplish this?

    Read the article

  • Prevent custom AccessoryView from showing selection when it's UITableViewCell is selected.

    - by groomsy
    To reproduce this, create a UITableView that contains cells with custom AccessoryViews (such as buttons to perform a specific action where touching the other part of the UITableViewCell should perform a different action). If you touch (select) the UITableView, the AccessoryView shows selection (as thought it was touched) as well. I want to prevent this and only show the AccessoryView's selected state when they actually touch the AccessoryView. Thanks in advance, groomsy

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218  | Next Page >