Search Results

Search found 12952 results on 519 pages for 'model'.

Page 212/519 | < Previous Page | 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 | Next Page >

Magento 1.4 Load By Category Not Working

- by LinuxGnut

Hi folks. I have a Magento helper class I wrote that works wonderfully in 1.3. However, we're working on a new install of 1.4 and filtering by category won't work for some reason. function __construct() { Mage::app(); $this-model = Mage::getModel('catalog/product'); $this-collection = $this-model-getCollection(); $this-collection-addAttributeToFilter('status', 1);//enabled $this-collection-addAttributeToSelect('*'); } function filterByCategoryID($catID) { $this-collection-addCategoryFilter(Mage::getModel('catalog/category')-load($catID)); } I can't figure out why this isn't working in 1.4. Has anyone else come into this issue?

Read the article
How to display more things in admin.StackedInline

- by FurtiveFelon

Hi all, I have Article model and a Comment model. Comment is created in admin.py as admin.StackedInline, and it has several fields, notably content and lastUpdate. For lastUpdate, i have specified as follows: lastUpdate = models.DateTimeField('last update', auto_now=True). Understandably, lastUpdate is not displayed when i try to add new comment (or edit old ones). However, i would like it to display for older comments if possible, as a read only thing. Is there anyway of accomplishing that? Thanks a lot! Jason

Read the article
Django admin proper urls inside listview

- by hinnye

Hi, My current target is to give users the chance to download CSV files from the admin site of my application. I successfully managed to create an additional column in the model's list view this way: def doc_link(self): return '<a href="files/%s">%s</a>' % (self.output, self.output) doc_link.allow_tags = True This shows the file name and creates the link, but sadly - because it's inside my 'searches' view - it has an URL: my_site/my_app/searches/files/13.csv. This is my problem, I would like to have my files stored in the admin media directory, like this: http://my_site/media/files/13.csv Does somebody know how to give url which points "outer" from the model's directory? Maybe somehow tell Django to use the ADMIN_MEDIA_PREFIX in the link? I'd really appreciate any help, thanks!

Read the article
Jquery nested div .click event

- by Sylph

The link #loadContent will loads tree.html. Upon success loading the content, the script reinitialize some functions which is in tree.html. However, I am unable to get the .click event to function in the loaded content. Index.html <a href="#" id="loadContent">Load</a> <script type="text/javascript"> $(function() { $("#loadContent").click(function() { $.ajax({ url: "tree.html" ,success: function(data) { $('#result').html(data); $("#demo_1").tree({ rules : { use_max_children : false, use_max_depth : false }, callback : { onmove : function (NODE,REF_NODE,TYPE,TREE_OBJ,RB) { alert(TREE_OBJ.get_text(NODE) + " " + TYPE + " " + TREE_OBJ.get_text(REF_NODE)); } } }); } }); }); }); </script> <script type="text/javascript" class="source"> $(function () { $.tree.drag_start = function () { $("#log").append("<br />Drag start "); }; $.tree.drag = function () { $("#log").append(" ."); }; $.tree.drag_end = function () { $("#log").append(" Drag end<br />"); }; $("#demo_1").tree({ rules : { use_max_children : false, use_max_depth : false }, callback : { onmove : function (NODE,REF_NODE,TYPE,TREE_OBJ,RB) { alert(TREE_OBJ.get_text(NODE) + " " + TYPE + " " + TREE_OBJ.get_text(REF_NODE)); } } }); $("#demo_2").tree({ rules : { use_max_children : false, use_max_depth : false }, callback : { onmove : function (NODE,REF_NODE,TYPE,TREE_OBJ,RB) { alert(TREE_OBJ.get_text(NODE) + " " + TYPE + " " + TREE_OBJ.get_text(REF_NODE)); } } }); }); </script> <div class="demo" id="demo_2"> <ul> <li id="phtml_1" class="open"><a href="#"><ins> </ins>Root node 1</a> <ul> <li id="phtml_2"><a href="#"><ins> </ins>Child node 1</a></li> <li id="phtml_3"><a href="#"><ins> </ins>Child node 2</a></li> <li id="phtml_4"><a href="#"><ins> </ins>Some other child node with longer text</a></li> </ul> </li> <li id="phtml_5"><a href="#"><ins> </ins>Root node 2</a></li> </ul> </div> <div id="result"></div><br> <div id="log"></div> Tree.html <div class="demo" id="demo_1"> <ul> <li id="phtml_1" class="open"><a href="#"><ins> </ins>Root node 1</a> <ul> <li id="phtml_2"><a href="#"><ins> </ins>Child node 1</a></li> <li id="phtml_3"><a href="#"><ins> </ins>Child node 2</a></li> <li id="phtml_4"><a href="#"><ins> </ins>Some other child node with longer text</a></li> </ul> </li> <li id="phtml_5"><a href="#"><ins> </ins>Root node 2</a></li> <li><a class="preset_text" id="1">model 1</a> </li> <li><a class="preset_text" id="2">model 2</a></li> </ul> </div> <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $('.preset_text').click(function(){ var target = $(this).attr("id"); alert(target); }); }); </script> In tree.html, I am unable to get the alert(target). However, If I moved this section out from the "div #demo_1" in tree.html, I am able to receive alert(target). <a class="preset_text" id="1">model 1</a> <a class="preset_text" id="2">model 2</a> How can I get to detect the item clicked in the div demo_1 ? Thanks

Read the article
Django. default=datetime.now() problem

- by Shamanu4

Hello. I've such db model: from datetime import datetime class TermPayment(models.Model): dev_session = models.ForeignKey(DeviceSession, related_name='payments') user_session = models.ForeignKey(UserSession, related_name='payment') date = models.DateTimeField(default=datetime.now(),blank=True) sum = models.FloatField(default=0) cnt = models.IntegerField(default=0) class Meta: db_table = 'term_payments' ordering = ['-date'] and here new instance is added: # ... tp = TermPayment() tp.dev_session = self.conn.session # device session hash tp.user_session = self.session # user session hash tp.sum = sum tp.cnt = cnt tp.save() But i've a problem: all records in database have the same value in date field - the date of the first payment. After server restart - one record have new date and others have the same as first after restart. It's look like some data cache is using but I can't found where. database: mysql 5.1.25 django v1.1.1

Read the article
routing paramenter returns null when only supplying first paramenter in MVC

- by Ray ForRespect

My issue is that I customer Map Route in MVC which takes three parameters. When I supply all three or just two, the parameters are passed from the URL to my controller. However, when I only supply the first parameter, it is not passed and returns null. Not sure what causes this behavior. Route: routes.MapRoute( name: "Details", // Route name url: "{controller}/{action}/{param1}/{param2}/{param3}", // URL with parameters defaults: new { controller = "Details", action = "Index", param1 = UrlParameter.Optional, param2 = UrlParameter.Optional, param3 = UrlParameter.Optional } // Parameter defaults ); Controller: public ActionResult Map(string param1, string param2, string param3) { StoreMap makeMap = new StoreMap(); var storemap = makeMap.makeStoreMap(param1, param2, param3); var model = storemap; return View(model); } string param1 returns null when I navigate to: /StoreMap/Map/PARAM1NAME but it doesn't return null when I navigate to: /StoreMap/Map/PARAM1NAME/PARAM2NAME

Read the article
django: Selecting questions that was not asked

- by Oleg Tarasenko

Hi, I am creating small django application which holds some few questions (and answers for them) What I want to do is to show user random question, but only from those which was not solved by him yet. I wonder how to do this. For now, I defined user profile model this way: class UserProfile(models.Model): rank = models.IntegerField(default = 1) solvedQ = models.ManyToManyField(Question) user = models.ForeignKey(User, unique=True) So solved problems are added this way: if user.is_authenticated(): profile = user.get_profile() profile.rank += 1 profile.solvedQ.add(Question.objects.get(id=id)) Now if the view must show random question, but not from already solved list... Is there a good way to intersect Questions and solvedQuestions.... so question is chosen from the unsolved list?

Read the article
Unique constraint on more than 10 columns

- by tk

I have a time-series simulation model which has more than 10 input variables. The number of distinct simulation instances would be more than 1 million, and each simulation instance generates a few output rows every day. To save the simulation result in a relational database, i designed tables like this. Table SimulationModel { simul_id : integer (primary key), input0 : string or numeric, input1 : string or numeric, ...} Table SimulationOutput { dt : DateTime (primary key), simul_id : integer (primary key), output0 : numeric, ...} My question is, is it fine to put an unique constraint on all of the input columns of SimulationModel table? If it is not a good idea, then what kind of other options do i have to make sure each model is unique?

Read the article
Magento and unsetting a custom boolean attribute

- by Spongeboy

Hi, I've added an attribute to a customer address entity. Attribute setup code is as follows- 'entity_type_id'=>$customer_address_type_id, 'attribute_code'=>'signature_required', 'backend_type'=>'int', 'frontend_input'=>'boolean', 'frontend_label' => 'Signature required', 'is_global' => '1', 'is_visible' => '1', 'is_required' => '0', 'is_user_defined' => '0', I have then - added attribute to model\entity\setup.php added a HTML field on the edit form I am now getting the attribute saved to the database when the checkbox is checked. However, it is not being unset when checkbox is unchecked (I'm guessing due to checkbox input not being 'post'-ed if unchecked. What is the best way to uncheck this? Should I add a default value of 0? Or unset/delete the attribute before save in the controller? Should I add get/set methods to the model?

Read the article
Regular Expression issue

- by Christian Sciberras

I have the following URL structure which I need to match to and get the particular id from: /group/subgroup/id-name In short, I need to translate a URL like the following: /Blue Products/Dark Blue/5-Blue_Jelly To: /?pagename=Blue Products&model=5 IMPORTANT: I don't need to match group, I already have group. Example code: <?php foreach($cats as $cat) $cmd->rewrite('/\/'.$cat.'\/unused\/(ID)-unused\//','/?pagename='.$cat.'&model=%ID%'); ?> Edit: This is the completed code: if($groups->count()){ $names=array(); foreach($groups->rows as $row) $names[]=preg_quote($row->group); $names=implode('|',$names); $regex='('.$names.')/([^/]+)/([0-9]{1,})-([^/]+)/?$'; CmsHost::cms()->rewrite_url($regex,'index.php?pagename=Products',true); }

Read the article
Marionette js itemview not defined: then on browser refresh it is defined and all works well - race condition?

- by Robert

Yeah it's just the initial browser load or two after a cache clear. Subsequent refreshes clear the problem up. I'm thinking the item views just aren't fully constructed in time to be used in the collection views on the first load. But then they are on a refresh? Don't know. There must be something about the code sequence or loading or the load time itself. Not sure. I'm loading via require.js. Have two collections - users and messages. Each renders in its own list view. Each works, just not the first time or two the browser loads. The first time you load after clearing browser cache the console reports, for instance: "Uncaught ReferenceError: MessageItemView is not defined" A simple browser refresh clears it up. Same goes for the user collection. It's collection view says it doesn't know anything about its item view. But a simple browser refresh and all is well. My views (item and collection) are in separate files. Is that the problem? For instance, here is my message collection view in its own file: messagelistview.js var MessageListView = Marionette.CollectionView.extend({ itemView: MessageItemView, el: $("#messages") }); And the message item view is in a separate file: messageview.js var MessageItemView = Marionette.ItemView.extend({ tagName: "div", template: Handlebars.compile( '<div>{{fromUserName}}:</div>' + '<div>{{message}}</div>' + ) }); Then in my main module file, which references each of those files, the collection view is constructed and displayed: main.js //Define a model MessageModel = Backbone.Model.extend(); //Make an instance of MessageItemView - code in separate file, messagelistview.js MessageView = new MessageItemView(); //Define a message collection var MessageCollection = Backbone.Collection.extend({ model: MessageModel }); //Make an instance of MessageCollection var collMessages = new MessageCollection(); //Make an instance of a MessageListView - code in separate file, messagelistview.js var messageListView = new MessageListView({ collection: collMessages }); App.messageListRegion.show(messageListView); Do I just have things sequenced wrong? I'm thinking it's some kind of race condition only because over 3G to an iPad the item views are always undefined. They never seem to get constructed in time. PC on a hard wired connection does see success after a browser refresh or two.

Read the article
Rails: Design Pattern to Store Order of Relations

- by ChrisInCambo

Hi, I have four models: Customer, QueueRed, QueueBlue, QueueGreen. The Queue models have a one to many relationship with customers A customer must always be in a queue A customer can only be in one queue at a time A customer can change queues We must be able to find out the customers current position in their respective queue In an object model the queues would just have an array property containing customers, but ActiveRecord doesn't have arrays. In a DB I would probably create some extra tables just to handle the order of the stories in the queue. My question is what it the best way to model the relationship in ActiveRecord? Obviously there are many ways this could be done, but what is the best or the most in line with how ActiveRecord should be used? Cheers, Chris

Read the article
Twitter Bootstrap Ajax call error in dialog2.js

- by naveen kumar

We are using Twitter Bootstrap for my application. I have situation where I have to pull the data from server and show it to popup/model div. We are using dialog2.js for it but it does work. We not want to use .load functionality as we are not using any single url call. We want it to do with “URL” by ajax call and response send back to popup/model content area. We have tried following $('#proposalInDialog2').click(function(event){ var url="abc.do" $('<div/>').dialog2({title: "Goals-Based Proposal", content: url}); }); Please help us to to find out this, thanks

Read the article
How to make dropdownlist show a selected value in asp.net mvc?

- by Pandiya Chendur

I have an edit page with a Html.DropDownList in it....I cant show the dropdownlist value it always shows up with Select instead i want to make the dropdown show an item as selected based on a model value say Model.Mes_Id... Any suggestion how it can be done... <p> <label for="MeasurementTypeId">MeasurementType:</label> <%= Html.DropDownList("MeasurementType", // what should i give here?)%> <%= Html.ValidationMessage("MeasurementTypeId", "*") %> </p> EDIT: It has the list items but i want to show a value selected in the edit view... public ActionResult Edit(int id) { var mesurementTypes = consRepository.FindAllMeasurements(); ViewData["MeasurementType"] = mesurementTypes; var material = consRepository.GetMaterial(id); return View("Edit", material); }

Read the article
How to dynamically change fields in an .NET ORM

- by rsteckly

I'm working in ASP.NET in an application where often users want to add fields or change field names. I'd like to be able to have an xml schema in place that is parsed and a dynamic object model created from it that can be accessed throughout the application. My initial reaction is that this is not realistic. I think there is flexibility about the dynamic nature of it. I think the people I'm trying to build this for wouldn't mind recompiling. Even if the app recompiled, I don't know how to abstract away enough in my code access the data to allow for users changing property names, etc. How can you write LINQ when the properties might change? In short, there's two questions here: 1) is there a way to dynamically generate an object model of the database and 2) is there a way to abstract away enough so that code accessing the database doesn't break when properties change?

Read the article
Returning EF entities using WCF - Read only web service / public API

- by alex

I'm currently migrating an application from Linq-to-SQL & ASP.net Web Services (asmx) to Entity Framework and WCF. My question is, I have a bunch of POCO classes which i have xml mapping files for (for the linq to sql) I've replaced my linq to sql with an entity framework data model I've got an interface - something like IService - that has all the methods on it that i need my service to implement - for example: Product[] GetProductsByKeyword(string keyword); In the above case, Product is a POCO. I now have them as entities within my ef data model - i'm using .net 4, and could take advantage of poco support, but don't really see the need - This service is strictly read only. What's the best way of returning entities in my WCF service? I want it to support other client platforms, not just .net (so php guys could use it)

Read the article
Flask Admin didn't show all fields

- by twoface88

I have model like this: class User(db.Model): __tablename__ = 'users' __table_args__ = {'mysql_engine' : 'InnoDB', 'mysql_charset' : 'utf8'} id = db.Column(db.Integer, primary_key=True) username = db.Column(db.String(80), unique=True) email = db.Column(db.String(120), unique=True) _password = db.Column('password', db.String(80)) def __init__(self, username = None, email = None, password = None): self.username = username self.email = email self._set_password(password) def _set_password(self, password): self._password = generate_password_hash(password) def _get_password(self): return self._password def check_password(self, password): return check_password_hash(self._password, password) password = db.synonym("_password", descriptor=property(_get_password, _set_password)) def __repr__(self): return '<User %r>' % self.username I have ModelView: class UserAdmin(sqlamodel.ModelView): searchable_columns = ('username', 'email') excluded_list_columns = ['password'] list_columns = ('username', 'email') form_columns = ('username', 'email', 'password') But no matter what i do, flask admin didn't show password field when i'm editing user info. Is there any way ? Even just to edit hash code. UPDATE: https://github.com/mrjoes/flask-admin/issues/78

Read the article
Qt/C++ event loop exception handling

- by Georg

I am having an application heavily based on QT and on a lot of third party libs. THese happen to throw some exceptions in several cases. In a native Qt App this causes the application to abort or terminate. Often the main data model is still intact as I am keeping it in pure Qt with no external data. So I am thinking that I could also just recover by telling the user that there has occured an error in this an that process and he should save now or even decide to continue working on the main model. Currently the program jsut silently exits without even telling a story. Please help.

Read the article
scrolling a readonly cell in NSTableview?

- by John Velman

I have a table that the user should not be able to edit directly (although user actions may cause changes). One column may contain a string too long for any reasonable size cell, so to see everything there, the user needs to scroll the cell (using arrow keys, for example). If I make either the column or cell not editible, I loose the ability to scroll the cell. If I make it editable, of course, I loose the ability to keep the user from changeing it. (I'm using NSArray controller and a couple of NSObject controllers to get from the model to the table view using bindings. Binding compliance via @property(copy) and @synthesize. Updating the model with setXXXX:xxx). Thanks, John Velman

Read the article
1-st level routes for multiple resources in Rails

- by Leonid Shevtsov

I have a simple SEO task. There's a City model and a Brand model, and I have to create 1st-level URLs for both (e.g. site.com/honda and site.com/boston). What's the preferred routing/controller combination to do this in Rails? I can only think of map.connect '/:id', :controller => 'catchall', :action => 'index' class CatchallController < ApplicationController def index if City.exists?(:slug => params[:id]) @city = City.find_by_slug!(params[:id]) render 'cities/show' else @brand = Brand.find_by_slug!(params[:id]) render 'brands/show' end end end but it seems to be very un-Rails to put such logic into the controller. (Obviously I need to make sure that the slugs don't overlap in the models, that's done).

Read the article
Multi domain rails app. How to intelligently use MVC?

- by denial

Background: We have app a, b, and plan to add more apps into this same application. The apps are similar enough they could share many views, assets, and actions. Currently a,b live in a single rails app(2.3.10). c will be similar enough that it could also be in this rails app. The problem: As we continue to add more apps to this one app, there's going to be too much case logic that the app will soon become a nightmare to maintain. There will also be potential namespace issues. However, the apps are very similar in function and layout, it also makes sense to keep them in one app so that it's one app to maintain(since roughly 50% of site look/functionality will be shared). What we are trying to do is keep this as clean as possible so it's easy for multiple teams to work on and easy to maintain. Some things we've thought about/are trying: Engines. Make each app an engine. This would let us base routes on the domain. It also allows us to pull out controllers, models and views for the specific app. This solution does not seem ideal as we won't be reusing the apps any time soon. And explicitly stating the host in the routes doesn't seem right. Skinning/themes. The auth logic would be different between the apps. Each user model would be different. So it's not just a skinning problem. In app/view add folder sitea for sitea views, siteb for siteb views and so on. Do the same for controllers and models. This is still pretty messy and since it didn't follow naming conventions, it did not work with rails so nicely and made much of the code messier. Making another rails app. We just didn't want to maintain the same controller or view in 2 apps if they are identical. What we want to do is make the app intelligently use a controller based on the host. So there would be a sessions controller for each app, and perhaps some parent session controller for shared logic(not needed now). In each of these session controllers, it handles authentication for that specific app. So if the domain is a.mysite.com, it would use session controller for app a and know to use app a's views,models,controllers. And if the domain is b.mysite, it would use the session controller for b. And there would be a user model for a and user model for b, which also would be determined by the domain. Does anyone have any suggestions or experience with this situation? And ideally using rails 2.3.x as updating to rails 3 isn't an option right now.

Read the article
Returning a users lat lng as a string iPhone

- by Joshmattvander

Is there a way to return the users location as a string from a model? I have a model thats job is to download same JSON data from a web service. When sending in my request I need to add ?lat=LAT_HERE&lng=LNG_HERE to the end of the string. I have seen tons of examples using the map or constantly updating a label. But I cant find out how to explicitly return the lat and lng values. Im only 2 days into iPhone dev so go easy on me :)

Read the article
Rails - inheritance hierarchy of classes where an subtipe can play two roles

- by Miquel

I need to model Owners and Rentees in an application, so you have stuff that is always owned by someone and can be rented for someone else. I first approached this problem with Single Table Inheritance because both types of person will share all attributes, so you would have a model called Person associated to a table people with Owner and Rentee inheriting from Person. The problem is that Single type inheritance discerns subtypes using a field type and therefore a record in the table can represent either an Owner or a Rentee but not both at the same time, while in the real context you can have an Owner which is renting something from another Owner and therefore that person is at the same time an Owner and a Rentee. How would you approach this problem? Would you use separated tables fro owners and rentees? Is there any other type of table inheritance in Rails?

Read the article
problem while checking second check checkbox checked.

- by kumar

$('#nextpage').click(function() { $('#Details input[type=checkbox]').each( function() { if( $(this).attr('checked') ) { $("#tabs").tabs('enable', 3).tabs('select', 3); } else { $().ShowDialog('please select atleast one'); } }); }); <fieldset> <legend>information</legend> <input type="checkbox"> <label>ID#: <span><%=(null != a) ? Model.ID: 0%></span></label> <label>Name:<span><%=(null != a) ? Model.Name: null%></span></label> </fieldset> this filedset is for multiple users.. that is on the same page there are multiple fiedsetsfor multiple users.. how to handle those things.. thanks

Read the article
Building Admin Areas in Rails - General Questions

- by Carb

What is the typical format/structure for creating an administrative area in a Rails application? Specifically I am stumped in the vicinity of these topics: How do you deal with situations where a model's resources are available to both the public and the Admin? i.e. A User model where anyone can create users, login, etc but only the admin can view users, delete/update them, etc. What is the proper convention for routing? How does one structure controllers? Are duplicate controllers considered OK? i.e. An admin version and the non-admin version? Thank you!

Read the article

< Previous Page | 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 | Next Page >