Search Results

Search found 16565 results on 663 pages for 'private meta'.

Page 221/663 | < Previous Page | 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228  | Next Page >

  • How to eliminate one of my extra DropDownLists in ASP.NET?

    - by salvationishere
    I'm developing a C#/SQL web app in VS 2008 but for some reason I have one extra DropDownList. The very first dropdownlist displaying is empty. Can you help me identify the cause of this behavior? I'm baffled! An excerpt of my code is below. private DropDownList[] newcol; // Add DropDownList Control to Placeholder private DropDownList[] CreateDropDownLists() { DropDownList[] dropDowns = new DropDownList[NumberOfControls]; for (int counter = 0; counter < NumberOfControls; counter++) { DropDownList ddl = new DropDownList(); SqlDataReader dr2 = ADONET_methods.DisplayTableColumns(targettable); ddl.ID = "DropDownListID" + counter.ToString(); int NumControls = targettable.Length; DataTable dt = new DataTable(); dt.Load(dr2); ddl.DataValueField = "COLUMN_NAME"; ddl.DataTextField = "COLUMN_NAME"; ddl.DataSource = dt; ddl.SelectedIndexChanged += new EventHandler(ddlList_SelectedIndexChanged); ddl.DataBind(); ddl.AutoPostBack = true; ddl.EnableViewState = true; //Preserves View State info on Postbacks //ddlList.Style["position"] = "absolute"; //ddl.Style["top"] = 80 + "px"; //ddl.Style["left"] = 0 + "px"; dr2.Close(); dropDowns[counter] = ddl; } return dropDowns; } protected void ddlList_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { DropDownList ddl = (DropDownList)sender; string ID = ddl.ID; } //Create display panel private void CreateDisplayPanel() { btnSubmit.Style.Add("top", "auto"); btnSubmit.Style.Add("left", "auto"); btnSubmit.Style.Add("position", "absolute"); newcol = CreateDropDownLists(); for (int counter = 0; counter < NumberOfControls; counter++) { pnlDisplayData.Controls.Add(newcol[counter]); pnlDisplayData.Controls.Add(new LiteralControl("<br><br><br>")); pnlDisplayData.Visible = true; pnlDisplayData.FindControl(newcol[counter].ID); } }

    Read the article

  • DFS Backtracking with java

    - by Cláudio Ribeiro
    I'm having problems with DFS backtracking in an adjacency matrix. Here's my code: (i added the test to the main in case someone wants to test it) public class Graph { private int numVertex; private int numEdges; private boolean[][] adj; public Graph(int numVertex, int numEdges) { this.numVertex = numVertex; this.numEdges = numEdges; this.adj = new boolean[numVertex][numVertex]; } public void addEdge(int start, int end){ adj[start-1][end-1] = true; adj[end-1][start-1] = true; } List<Integer> visited = new ArrayList<Integer>(); public Integer DFS(Graph G, int startVertex){ int i=0; if(pilha.isEmpty()) pilha.push(startVertex); for(i=1; i<G.numVertex; i++){ pilha.push(i); if(G.adj[i-1][startVertex-1] != false){ G.adj[i-1][startVertex-1] = false; G.adj[startVertex-1][i-1] = false; DFS(G,i); break; }else{ visited.add(pilha.pop()); } System.out.println("Stack: " + pilha); } return -1; } Stack<Integer> pilha = new Stack(); public static void main(String[] args) { Graph g = new Graph(6, 9); g.addEdge(1, 2); g.addEdge(1, 5); g.addEdge(2, 4); g.addEdge(2, 5); g.addEdge(2, 6); g.addEdge(3, 4); g.addEdge(3, 5); g.addEdge(4, 5); g.addEdge(6, 4); g.DFS(g, 1); } } I'm trying to solve the euler path problem. the program solves basic graphs but when it needs to backtrack, it just does not do it. I think the problem might be in the stack manipulations or in the recursive dfs call. I've tried a lot of things, but still can't seem to figure out why it does not backtrack. Can somebody help me ?

    Read the article

  • Thread-safe use of a singleton's members

    - by Anthony Mastrean
    I have a C# singleton class that multiple classes use. Is access through Instance to the Toggle() method thread-safe? If yes, by what assumptions, rules, etc. If no, why and how can I fix it? public class MyClass { private static readonly MyClass instance = new MyClass(); public static MyClass Instance { get { return instance; } } private int value = 0; public int Toggle() { if(value == 0) { value = 1; } else if(value == 1) { value = 0; } return value; } }

    Read the article

  • Annotations: methods vs variables

    - by Zenzen
    I was always sure (don't know why) that it's better to add annotations to variables, but while browsing the Hibernate doc http://docs.jboss.org/hibernate/stable/annotations/reference/en/html_single/#entity-hibspec-collection I noticed they tend to annotate the methods. So should I put my annotations before methods, like this: @Entity public class Flight implements Serializable { private long id; @Id @GeneratedValue public long getId() { return id; } public void setId(long id) { this.id = id; } } Or is it better to do it like this: @Entity public class Flight implements Serializable { @Id @GeneratedValue private long id; public long getId() { return id; } public void setId(long id) { this.id = id; } } Or maybe there's no difference?

    Read the article

  • Storing API keys in Android, is obfustication enough?

    - by fredley
    I'm using the Dropbox API. In the sample app, it includes these lines: // Replace this with your consumer key and secret assigned by Dropbox. // Note that this is a really insecure way to do this, and you shouldn't // ship code which contains your key & secret in such an obvious way. // Obfuscation is good. final static private String CONSUMER_KEY = "PUT_YOUR_CONSUMER_KEY_HERE"; final static private String CONSUMER_SECRET = "PUT_YOUR_CONSUMER_SECRET_HERE"; I'm well aware of the mantra 'Secrecy is not Security', and obfuscation really only slightly increases the amount of effort required to extract the keys. I disagree with their statement 'Obfustication is good'. What should I do to protect the keys then? Is obfustication good enough, or should I consider something more elaborate?

    Read the article

  • How do I find out if an object can be Invoke()'d?

    - by Jurily
    Consider the following class: public class Event<T> { public delegate void Handler<t>(t msg); private event Handler<T> E; public void connect(Delegate handler) { E += delegate(T msg) { object target = handler.Target; if (Invokable(target) { target.BeginInvoke(handler, new object[] { msg }); } }; } public void emit(T msg) { if ( E != null ) { E(msg); } } private static bool Invokable(object o) { // magic } } How do I implement Invokable(), and what else do I need for this code to compile?

    Read the article

  • how can add an extra select in this query?

    - by BulgedSnowy
    i've three tables related. images: id | filename | filesize | ... nodes: image_id | tag_id tags: id | name And i'm using this query to search images containing x tags SELECT images.* FROM images INNER JOIN nodes ON images.id = nodes.image_id WHERE tag_id IN (SELECT tags.id FROM tags WHERE tags.tag IN ("tag1","tag2")) GROUP BY images.id HAVING COUNT(*)= 2 The problem is that i need to retrieve also all images contained by the retrieved image, and i need this in the same query. This the actual query wich search retrieve all tags contained by the image: SELECT tag FROM nodes JOIN tags ON nodes.tag_id = tags.id WHERE image_id = images.id and nodes.private = images.private ORDER BY tag How can i mix this two to have only one query?

    Read the article

  • Structuremap and creating objects with initial state

    - by Simon
    I have an object which needs a dependency injected into it public class FootballLadder { public FootballLadder(IMatchRepository matchRepository, int round) { // set initial state this.matchRepo = matchRepository; this.round = round; } public IEnumerable<LadderEntry> GetLadderEntries() { // calculate the ladder based on matches retrieved from the match repository // return the calculated ladder } private IMatchRepository matchRepo; private int round; } For arguments sake, lets assume that I can't pass the round parameter into the GetLadderEntries call itself. Using StructureMap, how can I inject the dependency on the IMatchRepository and set the initial state? Or is this one of those cases where struggling against the framework is a sign the code should be refactored?

    Read the article

  • Undefined / Uninitialized default values in a class

    - by Jir
    Let's suppose you have this class: class A { public: A () {} A (double val) : m_val(val) {} ~A () {} private: double m_val; }; Once I create an instance of A, how can I check if m_val has been initialized/defined? Put it in other words, is there a way to know if m_val has been initialized/defined or not? Something along the lines of the defined operator in Python, I suppose. (But correct me if I'm wrong.) I thought of modifying the class and the c-tors the following way: class A { public: A () : defined(false) {} A (double val) : m_val(val), defined(true) {} ~A () {} private: double m_val; bool defined; }; How do you rate this solution? Any suggestion? TIA, Chris

    Read the article

  • can this keyword be used in an abstract class in java

    - by Reddy
    I tried with below example, it is working fine. I expected it to pick sub-class's value since object won't be created for super class (as it is abstract). But it is picking up super class's field value only. Please help me understand what is the concepts behind this? abstract class SuperAbstract { private int a=2; public void funA() { System.out.println("In SuperAbstract: this.a "+a); } } class SubClass extends SuperAbstract { private int a=34; } I am calling new SubClass.funA(); I am expecting it to print 34, but it is printing 2.

    Read the article

  • class which cannot be derived

    - by benjamin button
    I found this code here class Usable; class Usable_lock { friend class Usable; private: Usable_lock() {} Usable_lock(const Usable_lock&) {} }; class Usable : public virtual Usable_lock { // ... public: Usable(); Usable(char*); // ... }; Usable a; class DD : public Usable { }; DD dd; // error: DD::DD() cannot access // Usable_lock::Usable_lock(): private member Could anybody explain me this code?

    Read the article

  • What is the best way to "override" enums?

    - by Tyler
    I have a number of classes which extend an abstract class. The abstract parent class defines an enum with a set of values. Some of the subclasses inherit the parent class's enum values, but some of the subclasses need the enum values to be different. Is there any way to somehow override the enum for these particular subclasses, and if not, what is a good way to achieve what I'm describing? class ParentClass { private MyEnum m_EnumVal; public virtual MyEnum EnumVal { get { return m_EnumVal; } set { m_EnumVal = value; } } public enum MyEnum { a, b, c }; } class ChildClass : ParentClass { private MyEnum m_EnumVal; public virtual MyEnum EnumVal { get { return m_EnumVal; } set { m_EnumVal = value; } } public enum MyEnum { d, e, f }; }

    Read the article

  • What to do with lookup entities selected from drop down select ? How to send them to the service lay

    - by arrages
    I am developing a spring mvc based application. I have a simple pojo form object, the problem is that many properties will be taked from drop down lists that are populated from lookup entities, so I return the entity ID to the form object. public NewCarRequestForm { private makeId; // this are selected from a drop down. private modelId; } Should I just send this lookup entity ID to the service layer? or should I validated that this ID is correct (Somebody can send any random ID through the request) before and how? Now there is a problem if I want to validated something based on some property of the lookup entity. Do I perform a database lookup of the entity just to perform the validation? thanks.

    Read the article

  • Defining multiple VBA objects within one function or sub-routine?

    - by Harokitty
    I have the following VBA code: Option Explicit Private a(2) as Double Private b(2) as Double Public Function Hello(X1 As Double, X2 As Double) As Double a(1) = X1 + X2 a(2) = X1/X2 b(1) = X1 b(2) = X2^2 Hello = a(1)+a(2)+b(1)+b(2) End Function Within the function Hello I have defined a(1),a(2),b(1),b(2). However, I want to make some function or sub-routine that accepts X1 and X2 as arguments and spits out the values for a(1),a(2),b(1),b(2). This is because I use the above definitions for a(1),a(2),b(1),b(2) in about 20 functions in my module and would like to avoid having to do the following in each function that I use thesis in: a(1) = X1 + X2 a(2) = X1/X2 b(1) = X1 b(2) = X2^2

    Read the article

  • How to fix this IndexOutOfBoundsException

    - by Rida
    My program runs fine, but there is a little problem. When I add new tracks previously existing file to the ListBox, the program experiences an error. The code seems unwilling to do looping in a new file which was added in a different time. Please help me. Thanks .... public partial class Form1 : Form { //... string[] files, paths; private void button1_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { if (openFileDialog1.ShowDialog() == DialogResult.OK) { files = openFileDialog1.SafeFileNames; paths = openFileDialog1.FileNames; for (int i = 0; i < files.Length - 1; i++) { listBox1.Items.Add(files[i]); } } } private void listBox1_SelectedIndexChanged(object sender, EventArgs e) { axWindowsMediaPlayer1.URL = paths[listBox1.SelectedIndex]; } }

    Read the article

  • An error occurred creating the form. See Exception.InnerException for details. The error is: Object

    - by Ben
    I get this error when attempting to debug my form, I cannot see where at all the error could be (also does not highlight where), anyone have any suggestions? An error occurred creating the form. See Exception.InnerException for details. The error is: Object reference not set to an instance of an object. Public Class Form1 Dim dateCrap As String = "Date:" Dim IPcrap As String = "Ip:" Dim pcCrap As String = "Computer:" Dim programCrap As String = "Program:" Dim textz As String = TextBox1.Text Dim sep() As String = {vbNewLine & vbNewLine} Dim sections() As String = Text.Split(sep, StringSplitOptions.None) Dim NewArray() As String = TextBox1.Text.Split(vbNewLine) Private Sub Button2_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button2.Click For i = 0 To sections.Count - 1 TextBox2.Text = sections(i) Dim text2 As String = TextBox2.Text Dim sep2() As String = {vbNewLine & vbNewLine} Dim sections2() As String = Text.Split(sep, StringSplitOptions.None) Dim FTPinfo() As String = TextBox2.Text.Split(vbNewLine) Dim clsRequest As System.Net.FtpWebRequest = _ DirectCast(System.Net.WebRequest.Create(sections2(0).Replace("Url/Host:", "")), System.Net.FtpWebRequest) clsRequest.Credentials = New System.Net.NetworkCredential(sections2(1).Replace("Login:", ""), (sections2(2).Replace("Password:", ""))) clsRequest.Method = System.Net.WebRequestMethods.Ftp.UploadFile ' read in file... Dim bFile() As Byte = System.IO.File.ReadAllBytes(txtShellDir.Text) ' upload file... Dim clsStream As System.IO.Stream = clsRequest.GetRequestStream() clsStream.Write(bFile, 0, bFile.Length) clsStream.Close() clsStream.Dispose() Next End Sub Private Sub Button3_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) Handles Button3.Click ListBox1.Items.Clear() Dim fdlg As OpenFileDialog = New OpenFileDialog() fdlg.Title = "Browse for the FTP List you wish to use." fdlg.InitialDirectory = Application.ExecutablePath fdlg.Filter = "All files (*.txt)|*.txt|txt files (*.txt)|*.txt" fdlg.FilterIndex = 2 fdlg.RestoreDirectory = True If fdlg.ShowDialog() = DialogResult.OK Then 'ListBox1.Items.AddRange(Split(My.Computer.FileSystem.ReadAllText(fdlg.FileName), vbNewLine)) TextBox1.Text = My.Computer.FileSystem.ReadAllText(fdlg.FileName) End If Dim tmp() As String = TextBox1.Text.Split(CChar(vbNewLine)) For Each line As String In tmp If line.Length > 1 Then TextBox1.AppendText(line & vbNewLine) End If Next TextBox1.Text = TextBox1.Text.Replace(" ", "") TextBox1.Text = TextBox1.Text.Replace("----------------------------------------------------------", vbNewLine) For Each item As String In NewArray ListBox1.Items.Add(item) Next Try For i = 0 To ListBox1.Items.Count - 1 If ListBox1.Items(i).Contains(dateCrap) Then ListBox1.Items.RemoveAt(i) End If Next Catch ex As Exception End Try Try For i = 0 To ListBox1.Items.Count - 1 If ListBox1.Items(i).Contains(IPcrap) Then ListBox1.Items.RemoveAt(i) End If Next Catch ex As Exception End Try Try For i = 0 To ListBox1.Items.Count - 1 If ListBox1.Items(i).Contains(pcCrap) Then ListBox1.Items.RemoveAt(i) End If Next Catch ex As Exception End Try Try For i = 0 To ListBox1.Items.Count - 1 If ListBox1.Items(i).Contains(programCrap) Then ListBox1.Items.RemoveAt(i) End If Next Catch ex As Exception End Try TextBox1.Text = "" For Each thing As Object In ListBox1.Items TextBox1.AppendText(thing.ToString & vbNewLine) Next End Sub Private Sub Button4_Click(ByVal sender As System.Object, ByVal e As System.EventArgs) For i = 0 To ListBox1.SelectedItems.Count - 1 TextBox1.Text = TextBox1.Text & ListBox1.Items.Item(i).ToString() & vbNewLine Next End Sub End Class

    Read the article

  • MVVM Binding To Property == Null

    - by LnDCobra
    I want to show some elements when a property is not null. What is the best way of achieving this? The following is my ViewModel: class ViewModel : ViewModelBase { public Trade Trade { get { return _trade; } set { SetField(ref _trade, value, () => Trade); } } private Trade _trade; } ViewModelBase inherits INotifyPropertyChanged and contains SetField() The Following is the Trade class: public class Trade : INotifyPropertyChaged { public virtual Company Company { get { return _company; } set { SetField(ref _company, value, () => Company); } } private Company _company; ...... } This is part of my View.xaml <GroupBox Visibility="{Binding Path=Trade.Company, Converter={StaticResource boolToVisConverter}}" /> I would like this groupbox to show only if Trade.Company is not null (so when a user selects a company). Would I need to create a custom converter to check for null and return the correct visibility or is there one in .NET?

    Read the article

  • Write to text file using ArrayList

    - by Ugochukwutubelum Chiemenam
    The program is basically about reading from a text file, storing the current data into an ArrayList, then writing data (from user input) into the same text file. Kindly let me know where I am going wrong in this sub-part? The data inside the text file is as follows: abc t1 1900 xyz t2 1700 The compiler is showing an error at the line output.format("%s%s%s%n", public class justTesting { private Scanner input; private Formatter output; private ArrayList<Student> tk = new ArrayList<Student>(); public static void main(String[] args) { justTesting app = new justTesting(); app.create(); app.writeToFile(); } public void create() { Text entry = new Text(); Scanner input = new Scanner(System.in); System.out.printf("%s\n", "Please enter your name, ID, and year: "); while (input.hasNext()) { try { entry.setName(input.next()); entry.setTelNumber(input.next()); entry.setDOB(input.next()); for (int i = 0; i < tk.size(); i++) { output.format("%s%s%s%n", tk.get(i).getName(), tk.get(i) .getTelNumber(), tk.get(i).getDOB()); } } catch (FormatterClosedException fce) { System.err.println("Error writing to file."); return; } catch (NoSuchElementException nsee) { System.err.println("Invalid input. Try again: "); input.nextLine(); } System.out.printf("%s\n", "Please enter your name, ID, and year: "); } } public void writeToFile() { try { output = new Formatter("testing.txt"); } catch (SecurityException se) { System.err .println("You do not have write access permission to this file."); System.exit(1); } catch (FileNotFoundException fnfe) { System.err.println("Error opening or creating file."); System.exit(1); } } }

    Read the article

  • Can you data bind to a property that contains parameter in Silverlight?

    - by rip
    In silverlight, can you bind to a property that contains parameter? For example, the following doesn’t seem to work. Am I missing something or is this not possible? C# private System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string, string> ValuesField = new System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary<string, string>(); public string Value { get { return ValuesField(FieldName); } set { ValuesField(FieldName) = value; } } VB Private ValuesField As New System.Collections.Generic.Dictionary(Of String, String) Public Property Value(ByVal FieldName As String) As String Get Return ValuesField(FieldName) End Get Set(ByVal value As String) ValuesField(FieldName) = value End Set End Property XAML <TextBox Name="TextBox1" VerticalAlignment="Top" Width="120"Text="{Binding Path=Value[MyField],Mode=TwoWay }" />

    Read the article

  • Object reference case study

    - by Skogen
    When person 1 become partner with person 3, person 2 should no longer have person 1 as partner. How should I solve this? public class Person { private String name; private Person partner; public Person(String name){ this.name = name; } public void setPartner(Person partner){ this.partner = partner; partner.partner = this; } public static void main(String[] args) { Person one = new Person("1"); Person two = new Person("2"); Person three = new Person("3"); Person four = new Person("4"); one.setPartner(two); three.setPartner(four); one.setPartner(three); //Person two is still partner with person 1 }

    Read the article

  • Is it a good or bad practice to call instance methods from a java constructor?

    - by Steve
    There are several different ways I can initialize complex objects (with injected dependencies and required set-up of injected members), are all seem reasonable, but have various advantages and disadvantages. I'll give a concrete example: final class MyClass { private final Dependency dependency; @Inject public MyClass(Dependency dependency) { this.dependency = dependency; dependency.addHandler(new Handler() { @Override void handle(int foo) { MyClass.this.doSomething(foo); } }); doSomething(0); } private void doSomething(int foo) { dependency.doSomethingElse(foo+1); } } As you can see, the constructor does 3 things, including calling an instance method. I've been told that calling instance methods from a constructor is unsafe because it circumvents the compiler's checks for uninitialized members. I.e. I could have called doSomething(0) before setting this.dependency, which would have compiled but not worked. What is the best way to refactor this? Make doSomething static and pass in the dependency explicitly? In my actual case I have three instance methods and three member fields that all depend on one another, so this seems like a lot of extra boilerplate to make all three of these static. Move the addHandler and doSomething into an @Inject public void init() method. While use with Guice will be transparent, it requires any manual construction to be sure to call init() or else the object won't be fully-functional if someone forgets. Also, this exposes more of the API, both of which seem like bad ideas. Wrap a nested class to keep the dependency to make sure it behaves properly without exposing additional API:class DependencyManager { private final Dependency dependency; public DependecyManager(Dependency dependency) { ... } public doSomething(int foo) { ... } } @Inject public MyClass(Dependency dependency) { DependencyManager manager = new DependencyManager(dependency); manager.doSomething(0); } This pulls instance methods out of all constructors, but generates an extra layer of classes, and when I already had inner and anonymous classes (e.g. that handler) it can become confusing - when I tried this I was told to move the DependencyManager to a separate file, which is also distasteful because it's now multiple files to do a single thing. So what is the preferred way to deal with this sort of situation?

    Read the article

  • Problems getting PowerPoint Combobox to list items correctly

    - by mike toyn
    I am creating a PowerPoint in which I want users to be able to select an item from a list in a combo box. Nothing needs to happen after this, it is just to provide a record, on screen, of their choice. My problem is that I seem to either be able to populate the combo box and users can select an item but the list gets longer each time the combobox is clicked on (i.e each time it is clicked on the list gets duplicated). Or alternatively, I can clear the combo box, then populate it but in this scenario, the users choice also seems to get cleared. VBA example 1: Private Sub ComboBox1_DropButtonClick() With ComboBox1 .AddItem " ", 0 .AddItem "speed", 1 .AddItem "provisionality", 2 .AddItem "automation", 3 .AddItem "replication", 4 .AddItem "communicability", 5 .AddItem "multi-modality", 6 .AddItem "non-linearity", 7 .AddItem "capacity", 8 .AddItem "interactivity", 9 End With End Sub VBA example 2: Private Sub ComboBox1_DropButtonClick() ComboBox1.Clear With ComboBox1 .AddItem " ", 0 .AddItem "speed", 1 .AddItem "provisionality", 2 .AddItem "automation", 3 .AddItem "replication", 4 .AddItem "communicability", 5 .AddItem "multi-modality", 6 .AddItem "non-linearity", 7 .AddItem "capacity", 8 .AddItem "interactivity", 9 End With End Sub Can anyone help?

    Read the article

  • Which Java library lets me initialize an object's properties from a properties file?

    - by Kjetil Ødegaard
    Is there a Java library that lets you "deserialize" a properties file directly into an object instance? Example: say you have a file called init.properties: username=fisk password=frosk and a Java class with some properties: class Connection { private String username; private String password; public void setUsername(String username) { this.username = username; } public void setPassword(String password) { this.password = password; } } I want to do this: Connection c = MagicConfigurator.configure("init.properties", new Connection()) and have MagicConfigurator apply all the values from the properties file to the Connection instance. Is there a library with a class like this?

    Read the article

  • MessageBox.Show not raising HelpRequested event

    - by Trevortni
    I have a form that is showing a MessageBox using MessageBox.Show, and trying to receive events from the Help button on the MessageBox so I can execute my own code. The Microsoft documentation shows how to do this; however, using what is suggested does not work. Here's a shortened version of my code: Private Function MethodName() As Boolean AddHandler Me.HelpRequested, AddressOf Me.MsgBoxHelpRequested Select Case MessageBox.Show("Text", "Title", MessageButtons.YesNoCancel, MessageBoxIcon.Question, MessageBoxDefaultButton.Button2, 0, True) Case MsgBoxResult.Yes ' Do stuff Case MsgBoxResult.No ' Do stuff Case MsgBoxResult.Cancel RemoveHandler Me.HelpRequested, AddressOf Me.MsgBoxHelpRequested Return False End Select RemoveHandler Me.HelpRequested, AddressOf Me.MsgBoxHelpRequested End Function Private Sub MsgBoxHelpRequested(ByVal sender As Object, ByVal hlpevent As System.Windows.Forms.HelpEventArgs) ' Breakpoint that never gets hit ' More code End Sub I've been searching for a solution to this problem, but the best I've found is this question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/2407880/how-to-detect-help-button-press-in-windows-forms-messagebox that refers me back to the same Microsoft code that doesn't seem to be working. Can anybody help me with this? Thank you.

    Read the article

  • Table per subclass inheritance relationship: How to query against the Parent class without loading a

    - by Arthur Ronald F D Garcia
    Suppose a Table per subclass inheritance relationship which can be described bellow (From wikibooks.org - see here) Notice Parent class is not abstract @Entity @Inheritance(strategy=InheritanceType.JOINED) public class Project { @Id private long id; // Other properties } @Entity @Table(name="LARGEPROJECT") public class LargeProject extends Project { private BigDecimal budget; } @Entity @Table(name="SMALLPROJECT") public class SmallProject extends Project { } I have a scenario where i just need to retrieve the Parent class. Because of performance issues, What should i do to run a HQL query in order to retrieve the Parent class and just the Parent class without loading any subclass ???

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228  | Next Page >