Search Results

Search found 8776 results on 352 pages for 'boolean logic'.

Page 24/352 | < Previous Page | 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  | Next Page >

  • why my array is losing it's contents when I refresh the page?

    - by Fernando SBS
    I have created an: var checkboxFarm = new Array(); then I want to record a checkbox status in that array, as there are 11 checkboxes. Button.addEventListener("click", function() { rp_farmAtivada(index); }, false); when clicked change the variable in the array: function rp_farmAtivada(index) { checkboxFarm[index] = !checkboxFarm[index]; }; but every time I refresh the page it loses all the checkboxes status and I'm aware that all that array gets the "undefined" value. the checkboxFarm array is defined in the beginning of the script, so it should have a global scope. Am I missing something?

    Read the article

  • How to determine if CNF formula is satisfiable in Scheme?

    - by JJBIRAN
    Program a SCHEME function sat that takes one argument, a CNF formula represented as above. If we had evaluated (define cnf '((a (not b) c) (a (not b) (not d)) (b d))) then evaluating (sat cnf) would return #t, whereas (sat '((a) (not a))) would return (). You should have following two functions to work: (define comp (lambda (lit) ; This function takes a literal as argument and returns the complement literal as the returning value. Examples: (comp 'a) = (not a), and (comp '(not b)) = b. (define consistent (lambda (lit path) This function takes a literal and a list of literals as arguments, and returns #t whenever the complement of the first argument is not a member of the list represented by the 2nd argument; () otherwise. . Now for the sat function. The real searching involves the list of clauses (the CNF formula) and the path that has currently been developed. The sat function should merely invoke the real "workhorse" function, which will have 2 arguments, the current path and the clause list. In the initial call, the current path is of course empty. Hints on sat. (Ignore these at your own risk!) (define sat (lambda (clauselist) ; invoke satpath (define satpath (lambda (path clauselist) ; just returns #t or () ; base cases: ; if we're out of clauses, what then? ; if there are no literals to choose in the 1st clause, what then? ; ; then in general: ; if the 1st literal in the 1st clause is consistent with the ; current path, and if << returns #t, ; then return #t. ; ; if the 1st literal didn't work, then search << ; the CNF formula in which the 1st clause doesn't have that literal Don't make this too hard. My program is a few functions averaging about 2-8 lines each. SCHEME is consise and elegant! The following expressions may help you to test your programs. All but cnf4 are satisfiable. By including them along with your function definitions, the functions themselves are automatically tested and results displayed when the file is loaded. (define cnf1 '((a b c) (c d) (e)) ) (define cnf2 '((a c) (c))) (define cnf3 '((d e) (a))) (define cnf4 '( (a b) (a (not b)) ((not a) b) ((not a) (not b)) ) ) (define cnf5 '((d a) (d b c) ((not a) (not d)) (e (not d)) ((not b)) ((not d) (not e)))) (define cnf6 '((d a) (d b c) ((not a) (not d) (not c)) (e (not c)) ((not b)) ((not d) (not e)))) (write-string "(sat cnf1) ") (write (sat cnf1)) (newline) (write-string "(sat cnf2) ") (write (sat cnf2)) (newline) (write-string "(sat cnf3) ") (write (sat cnf3)) (newline) (write-string "(sat cnf4) ") (write (sat cnf4)) (newline) (write-string "(sat cnf5) ") (write (sat cnf5)) (newline)

    Read the article

  • Database schema to store AND, OR relation, association

    - by user455387
    Many thanks for your help on this. In order for an entreprise to get a call for tender it must meet certain requirements. For the first example the enterprise must have a minimal class 4, and have qualification 2 in sector 5. Minimal class is always one number. Qualification can be anything (single, or multiple using AND, OR logical operators) I have created tables in order to map each number to it's given name. Now I need to store requirements in the database. minimal class 4 Sector Qualification 5.2 minimal class 2 Sector Qualifications 3.9 and 3.10 minimal class 3 Sector Qualifications 6.1 or 6.3 minimal class 1 Sector Qualifications (3.1 and 3.2) or 5.6 class Domain < ActiveRecord::Base has_many :domain_classes has_many :domain_sectors has_many :sector_qualifications, :through => :domain_sectors end class DomainClass < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :domain end class DomainSector < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :domain has_many :sector_qualifications end class SectorQualification < ActiveRecord::Base belongs_to :domain_sector end create_table "domains", :force => true do |t| t.string "name" end create_table "domain_classes", :force => true do |t| t.integer "number" t.integer "domain_id" end create_table "domain_sectors", :force => true do |t| t.string "name" t.integer "number" t.integer "domain_id" end create_table "sector_qualifications", :force => true do |t| t.string "name" t.integer "number" t.integer "domain_sector_id" end

    Read the article

  • Python `if x is not None` or `if not x is None`?

    - by orokusaki
    I've always thought of the if not x is None version to be more clear, but Google's style guide implies (based on this excerpt) that they use if x is not None. Is there any minor performance difference (I'm assuming not), and is there any case where one really doesn't fit (making the other a clear winner for my convention)?* *I'm referring to any singleton, rather than just None. ...to compare singletons like None. Use is or is not.

    Read the article

  • Python 3 order of testing undetermined

    - by user578598
    string='a' p=0 while (p <len(string)) & (string[p]!='c') : p +=1 print ('the end but the process already died ') while (p <1) & (string[p]!='c') : IndexError: string index out of range I want to test a condition up to the end of a string (example string length=1) why are both parts of the and executed is the condition is already false! as long as p < len(string). the second part does not even need executing. if it does a lot of performance can be lost

    Read the article

  • fastest method for minimum of two numbers

    - by user85030
    I was going through mit's opencourseware related to performance engineering. The quickest method (requiring least number of clock cycles) for finding the minimum of two numbers(say x and y) is stated as: min= y^((x^y) & -(x<y)) The output of the expression x < y can be 0 or 1 (assuming C is being used) which then changes to -0 or -1. I understand that xor can be used to swap two numbers. Questions: 1. How is -0 different from 0 and -1 in terms of binary? 2. How is that result used with the and operator to get the minimum? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • How can I use && in if in Ruby on Rails?

    - by Angela
    I tried the following && conditional for my if statement and I get a "bad range" error: <% if (from_today(contact, call.days) == 0..7) && (show_status(contact, call) == 'no status') %> Why and how can I fix it? The only other way I could do it was to have a second nested if statement and break it apart...not pretty :(

    Read the article

  • Should I use C(99) booleans ? ( also c++ booleans in c++ ?)

    - by Roman A. Taycher
    I haven't done much c programming but when I do when I need a false I put 0 when I want true I put 1, (ex. while(1)), in other cases I use things like "while(ptr)" or "if(x)". Should I try using C99 booleans, should I recommend them to others if I'm helping people new to programming learn c basics(thinking of cs 1?? students)? I'm pretty sure the Visual Studio compiler supports c99 bools, but do a lot of projects (open source and c apps in industry) compile for c89? If I don't use C bools should I at least do something like #define TRUE 1 #define FALSE 0? Also what about c++ Booleans (for c++)?

    Read the article

  • MYSQL question - AND or OR?

    - by U22199
    Which is a better way to select ans and quest from the table? SELECT * FROM tablename WHERE option='ans' OR option='quest'"; OR SELECT * FROM tablename WHERE option='ans' AND option='quest'"; Thanks so much!

    Read the article

  • Are booleans as method arguments unacceptable?

    - by koschi
    A colleague of mine states that booleans as method arguments are not acceptable. They shall be replaced by enumerations. At first I did not see any benefit, but he gave me an example. What's easier to understand? file.writeData( data, true ); Or enum WriteMode { Append, Overwrite }; file.writeData( data, Append ); Now I got it! ;-) This is definitely an example where an enumeration as second parameter makes the code much more readable. So, what's your opinion on this topic?

    Read the article

  • Logic error for Gauss elimination

    - by iwanttoprogram
    Logic error problem with the Gaussian Elimination code...This code was from my Numerical Methods text in 1990's. The code is typed in from the book- not producing correct output... Sample Run: SOLUTION OF SIMULTANEOUS LINEAR EQUATIONS USING GAUSSIAN ELIMINATION This program uses Gaussian Elimination to solve the system Ax = B, where A is the matrix of known coefficients, B is the vector of known constants and x is the column matrix of the unknowns. Number of equations: 3 Enter elements of matrix [A] A(1,1) = 0 A(1,2) = -6 A(1,3) = 9 A(2,1) = 7 A(2,2) = 0 A(2,3) = -5 A(3,1) = 5 A(3,2) = -8 A(3,3) = 6 Enter elements of [b] vector B(1) = -3 B(2) = 3 B(3) = -4 SOLUTION OF SIMULTANEOUS LINEAR EQUATIONS The solution is x(1) = 0.000000 x(2) = -1.#IND00 x(3) = -1.#IND00 Determinant = -1.#IND00 Press any key to continue . . . The code as copied from the text... //Modified Code from C Numerical Methods Text- June 2009 #include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> #define MAXSIZE 20 //function prototype int gauss (double a[][MAXSIZE], double b[], int n, double *det); int main(void) { double a[MAXSIZE][MAXSIZE], b[MAXSIZE], det; int i, j, n, retval; printf("\n \t SOLUTION OF SIMULTANEOUS LINEAR EQUATIONS"); printf("\n \t USING GAUSSIAN ELIMINATION \n"); printf("\n This program uses Gaussian Elimination to solve the"); printf("\n system Ax = B, where A is the matrix of known"); printf("\n coefficients, B is the vector of known constants"); printf("\n and x is the column matrix of the unknowns."); //get number of equations n = 0; while(n <= 0 || n > MAXSIZE) { printf("\n Number of equations: "); scanf ("%d", &n); } //read matrix A printf("\n Enter elements of matrix [A]\n"); for (i = 0; i < n; i++) for (j = 0; j < n; j++) { printf(" A(%d,%d) = ", i + 1, j + 1); scanf("%lf", &a[i][j]); } //read {B} vector printf("\n Enter elements of [b] vector\n"); for (i = 0; i < n; i++) { printf(" B(%d) = ", i + 1); scanf("%lf", &b[i]); } //call Gauss elimination function retval = gauss(a, b, n, &det); //print results if (retval == 0) { printf("\n\t SOLUTION OF SIMULTANEOUS LINEAR EQUATIONS\n"); printf("\n\t The solution is"); for (i = 0; i < n; i++) printf("\n \t x(%d) = %lf", i + 1, b[i]); printf("\n \t Determinant = %lf \n", det); } else printf("\n \t SINGULAR MATRIX \n"); return 0; } /* Solves the system of equations [A]{x} = {B} using */ /* the Gaussian elimination method with partial pivoting. */ /* Parameters: */ /* n - number of equations */ /* a[n][n] - coefficient matrix */ /* b[n] - right-hand side vector */ /* *det - determinant of [A] */ int gauss (double a[][MAXSIZE], double b[], int n, double *det) { double tol, temp, mult; int npivot, i, j, l, k, flag; //initialization *det = 1.0; tol = 1e-30; //initial tolerance value npivot = 0; //mult = 0; //forward elimination for (k = 0; k < n; k++) { //search for max coefficient in pivot row- a[k][k] pivot element for (i = k + 1; i < n; i++) { if (fabs(a[i][k]) > fabs(a[k][k])) { //interchange row with maxium element with pivot row npivot++; for (l = 0; l < n; l++) { temp = a[i][l]; a[i][l] = a[k][l]; a[k][l] = temp; } temp = b[i]; b[i] = b[k]; b[k] = temp; } } //test for singularity if (fabs(a[k][k]) < tol) { //matrix is singular- terminate flag = 1; return flag; } //compute determinant- the product of the pivot elements *det = *det * a[k][k]; //eliminate the coefficients of X(I) for (i = k; i < n; i++) { mult = a[i][k] / a[k][k]; b[i] = b[i] - b[k] * mult; //compute constants for (j = k; j < n; j++) //compute coefficients a[i][j] = a[i][j] - a[k][j] * mult; } } //adjust the sign of the determinant if(npivot % 2 == 1) *det = *det * (-1.0); //backsubstitution b[n] = b[n] / a[n][n]; for(i = n - 1; i > 1; i--) { for(j = n; j > i + 1; j--) b[i] = b[i] - a[i][j] * b[j]; b[i] = b[i] / a[i - 1][i]; } flag = 0; return flag; } The solution should be: 1.058824, 1.823529, 0.882353 with det as -102.000000 Any insight is appreciated...

    Read the article

  • How to name a method that both performs a task and returns a boolean as a status?

    - by Limbo Exile
    If there is a method bool DoStuff() { try { // doing stuff... return true; } catch (Exception ex) { return false; } } should it rather be called IsStuffDone()? Both names could be misinterpreted by the user: If the name is DoStuff() why does it return a boolean? If the name is IsStuffDone() it is not clear whether the method performs a task or only checks its result. Is there a convention for this case? Or an alternative approach, as this one is considered flawed? For example in languages that have output parameters, like C#, a boolean status variable could be passed to the method as one and the method's return type would be void.

    Read the article

  • Is it wrong to use a boolean parameter to determine behavior?

    - by Ray
    I have seen a practice from time to time that "feels" wrong, but I can't quite articulate what is wrong about it. Or maybe it's just my prejudice. Here goes: A developer defines a method with a boolean as one of its parameters, and that method calls another, and so on, and eventually that boolean is used, solely to determine whether or not to take a certain action. This might be used, for example, to allow the action only if the user has certain rights, or perhaps if we are (or aren't) in test mode or batch mode or live mode, or perhaps only when the system is in a certain state. Well there is always another way to do it, whether by querying when it is time to take the action (rather than passing the parameter), or by having multiple versions of the method, or multiple implementations of the class, etc. My question isn't so much how to improve this, but rather whether or not it really is wrong (as I suspect), and if it is, what is wrong about it.

    Read the article

  • Prove this Tautology (No Truth Tables)

    - by FSM
    This is for homework for my Discrete Math class. I understand how to prove tautologies with a truth table. I'm having trouble figuring out how to do it without though. I found this example in our text, but the solution is not provided. I was hoping someone could answer it as best they could so I could apply it to my other questions. Thanks! ! = not/invert ^ = and V = or - = if then [!P ^ (P V Q) ] - Q I also am completely lost for this question (I fear I'll be tested on something of this difficulty) [ (P - Q) ^ (Q - R) ] - (P - R) Thanks for the help all!

    Read the article

  • What perl function to use?

    - by user301087
    I'm setting something up to SSH out to several servers in 'batches'. I basically want to maintain 5 connections at a time, and when one finishes open up another (following an array of server IPs). I'm wondering for something like this should I be using fork()? If so, what logic can I use to ensure that the I maintain 5 children at a time?

    Read the article

  • How can I manage a fork pool in Perl?

    - by user301087
    I'm setting something up to SSH out to several servers in 'batches'. I basically want to maintain 5 connections at a time, and when one finishes open up another (following an array of server IPs). I'm wondering for something like this should I be using fork()? If so, what logic can I use to ensure that the I maintain 5 children at a time?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31  | Next Page >