Search Results

Search found 9563 results on 383 pages for 'insertion sort'.

Page 27/383 | < Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >

  • How to horizontally sort divs using Sortable in JQuery

    - by Tahir Akram
    I am looking to sort my divs horizontally in a container div. I found an example on JQuery website but that is vertical sorting. I want it horizontal. I want to do it sorting in #sortable Div. Will you please guide me how can I convert this vertical sorting in horizontal manner. CSS <style type="text/css"> #draggable1 { width: 150px; height: 35px; padding: 0.5em; } #draggable2 { width: 150px; height: 35px; padding: 0.5em; } #draggable3 { width: 150px; height: 35px; padding: 0.5em; } #sortable { width: 700px; height: 35px; padding: 0.5em; } </style> JavaScript <script type="text/javascript"> $(function() { $("#sortable").sortable({ revert: true }); }); </script> HTML <div class="demo"> <div id="sortable" class="ui-state-default"> <div id = "draggable1" class="ui-state-default">Home</div> <div id = "draggable2" class="ui-state-default">Contact Us</div> <div id = "draggable3" class="ui-state-default">FAQs</div> </div> </div> Screenshot

    Read the article

  • How to sort linq result by most similarity/equality

    - by aNui
    I want to do a search for Music instruments which has its informations Name, Category and Origin as I asked in my post. But now I want to sort/group the result by similarity/equality to the keyword such as. If I have the list { Drum, Grand Piano, Guitar, Guitarrón, Harp, Piano} << sorted by name and if I queried "p" the result should be { Piano, Grand Piano, Harp } but it shows Harp first because of the source list's sequence and if I add {Grand Piano} to the list and query "piano" the result shoud be like { Piano, Grand Piano } or query "guitar" it should be { Guitar, Guitarrón } here's my code static IEnumerable<MInstrument> InstrumentsSearch(IEnumerable<MInstrument> InstrumentsList, string query, MInstrument.Category[] SelectedCategories, MInstrument.Origin[] SelectedOrigins) { var result = InstrumentsList .Where(item => SelectedCategories.Contains(item.category)) .Where(item => SelectedOrigins.Contains(item.origin)) .Where(item => { if ( (" " + item.Name.ToLower()).Contains(" " + query.ToLower()) || item.Name.IndexOf(query) != -1 ) { return true; } return false; } ) .Take(30); return result.ToList<MInstrument>(); } Or the result may be like my old self-invented algorithm that I called "by order of occurence", that is just OK to me. And the further things to do is I need to search the Name, Category or Origin such as. If i type "Italy" it should found Piano or something from Italy. Or if I type "string" it should found Guitar. Is there any way to do those things, please tell me. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • php - sort and delete duplicates?

    - by c41122ino
    I've got an array that looks like this: Array ( [0] => Array ( num => 09989, dis => 20 ) [1] => Array ( num => 09989, dis => 10 ) [2] => Array ( num => 56676, dis => 15 ) [3] => Array ( num => 44533, dis => 20 ) [4] => Array ( num => 44533, dis => 50 ) ) First, I'm trying to sort them by num, and can't seem to get the usort example from php.net working here. It simply doesn't appear to be sorting... I'm also trying to delete the array element if it's a duplicate and whose dis value is higher than the other one. So, based on the example above, I'm trying to create: Array ( [0] => Array ( num => 09989, dis => 10 ) [1] => Array ( num => 44533, dis => 20 ) [2] => Array ( num => 56676, dis => 15 ) ) This is the code from php.net: function cmp($a, $b) { if ($a == $b) { return 0; } return ($a < $b) ? -1 : 1; }

    Read the article

  • MVC Paging and Sorting Patterns: How to Page or Sort Re-Using Form Criteria

    - by CRice
    What is the best ASP.NET MVC pattern for paging data when the data is filtered by form criteria? This question is similar to: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1425000/preserve-data-in-net-mvc but surely there is a better answer? Currently, when I click the search button this action is called: [AcceptVerbs(HttpVerbs.Post)] public ActionResult Search(MemberSearchForm formSp, int? pageIndex, string sortExpression) {} That is perfect for the initial display of the results in the table. But I want to have page number links or sort expression links re-post the current form data (the user entered it the first time - persisted because it is returned as viewdata), along with extra route params 'pageIndex' or 'sortExpression', Can an ActionLink or RouteLink (which I would use for page numbers) post the form to the url they specify? <%= Html.RouteLink("page 2", "MemberSearch", new { pageIndex = 1 })%> At the moment they just do a basic redirect and do not post the form values so the search page loads fresh. In regular old web forms I used to persist the search params (MemberSearchForm) in the ViewState and have a GridView paging or sorting event reuse it.

    Read the article

  • TreeMap sort by value

    - by vito huang
    I'm new to java, i want to write an comparator to that will let me sort TreeMap by value instead of the default natural sorting. i tried something like this, but can't find out what went wrong: import java.util.*; class treeMap { public static void main(String[] args) { System.out.println("the main"); byValue cmp = new byValue(); Map<String, Integer> map = new TreeMap<String, Integer>(cmp); map.put("de",10); map.put("ab", 20); map.put("a",5); for (Map.Entry<String,Integer> pair: map.entrySet()) { System.out.println(pair.getKey()+":"+pair.getValue()); } } } class byValue implements Comparator<Map.Entry<String,Integer>> { public int compare(Map.Entry<String,Integer> e1, Map.Entry<String,Integer> e2) { if (e1.getValue() < e2.getValue()){ return 1; } else if (e1.getValue() == e2.getValue()) { return 0; } else { return -1; } } } I guess what am i asking is what controls what get pass to comparator function, can i get an Map.Entry pass to comparator?

    Read the article

  • Improving I/O performance in C++ programs[external merge sort]

    - by Ajay
    I am currently working on a project involving external merge-sort using replacement-selection and k-way merge. I have implemented the project in C++[runs on linux]. Its very simple and right now deals with only fixed sized records. For reading & writing I use (i/o)fstream classes. After executing the program for few iterations, I noticed that I/O read blocks for requests of size more than 4K(typical block size). Infact giving buffer sizes greater than 4K causes performance to decrease. The output operations does not seem to need buffering, linux seemed to take care of buffering output. So I issue a write(record) instead of maintaining special buffer of writes and then flushing them out at once using write(records[]). But the performance of the application does not seem to be great. How could I improve the performance? Should I maintain special I/O threads to take care of reading blocks or are there existing C++ classes providing this abstraction already?(Something like BufferedInputStream in java)

    Read the article

  • LINQ : How to query how to sort result by most similarity/equality

    - by aNui
    I want to do a search for Music instruments which has its informations Name, Category and Origin as I asked in my post. But now I want to sort/group the result by similarity/equality to the keyword such as. If I have the list { Harp, Piano, Drum, Guitar, Guitarrón } and if I queried "p" the result should be { Piano, Harp } but it shows Harp first because of the list's sequence and if I add {Grand Piano} to the list and query "piano" the result shoud be like { Piano, Grand Piano } here's my code static IEnumerable<MInstrument> InstrumentsSearch(IEnumerable<MInstrument> InstrumentsList, string query, MInstrument.Category[] SelectedCategories, MInstrument.Origin[] SelectedOrigins) { var result = InstrumentsList .Where(item => SelectedCategories.Contains(item.category)) .Where(item => SelectedOrigins.Contains(item.origin)) .Where(item => { if ( (" " + item.Name.ToLower()).Contains(" " + query.ToLower()) || item.Name.IndexOf(query) != -1 ) { return true; } return false; } ) .Take(30); return result.ToList<MInstrument>(); } Or the result may be like my old self-invented algorithm that I called "by order of occurence", that is just OK to me. Is there any way to do that, please tell me. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • What is the complexity of this specialized sort

    - by ADB
    I would like to know the complexity (as in O(...) ) of the following sorting algorithm: there are B barrels that contains a total of N elements, spread unevenly across the barrels. the elements in each barrel are already sorted The sort takes combines all the elements from each barrel in a single sorted list: using an array of size B to store the last sorted element of each barrel (starting at 0) check each barrel (at the last stored index) and find the smallest element copy the element in the final sorted array, increment array counter increment the last sorted element for the barrel we picked from perform those steps N times or in pseudo: for i from 0 to N smallest = MAX_ELEMENT foreach b in B if bIndex[b] < b.length && b[bIndex[b]] < smallest smallest_barrel = b smallest = b[bIndex[b]] result[i] = smallest bIndex[smallest_barrel] += 1 I thought that the complexity would be O(n), but the problem I have with finding the complexity is that if B grows, it has a larger impact than if N grows because it adds another round in the B loop. But maybe that has no effect on the complexity?

    Read the article

  • I need to sort php jquery gallery script alphabetically

    - by David Cahill
    know nothing about php, but I have this script that reads a folder and displays a thumbnail gallery, problem is it dosent display alphabetically. Have searched the net and seen that sort does this but have no idea where to start any help would be much appreciated. heres the script $sitename = $row_wigsites['id']; $directory = 'sites/'.$sitename.'/pans'; $allowed_types=array('jpg','jpeg','gif','png'); $file_parts=array(); $ext=''; $title=''; $i=0; $dir_handle = @opendir($directory) or die("There is an error with your image directory!"); while ($file = readdir($dir_handle)) { if($file=='.' || $file == '..') continue; $file_parts = explode('.',$file); $ext = strtolower(array_pop($file_parts)); $title = implode('.',$file_parts); $title = htmlspecialchars($title); $nomargin=''; if(in_array($ext,$allowed_types)) { if(($i+1)%4==0) $nomargin='nomargin'; echo ' <div class="pic '.$nomargin.'" style="background:url('.$directory.'/'.$file.') no-repeat 50% 50%;"> <a href="'.$directory.'/'.$file.'" title="Panoramic Stills taken at '.$title.'°" rel="pan1" target="_blank">'.$title.'</a> </div>'; $i++; } } closedir($dir_handle);

    Read the article

  • PHP Include and sort by variable within file

    - by Jason Hoax
    I have written this PHP include-script but now I'm trying to sort the included files out by variables WITHIN the included php's. In other words, in each included PHP file there is a rating, now I want the ratings to be read so that when they are included they will be sorted out from highest to lowest. (scores are like 6.0 to 9.0) Kind Regards! $location = 'experiments/visualizations'; foreach (glob("$location/*.php") as $filename) { include $filename; } The included files are named randomly like: File1: $filename = "AAAA"; $projecttitle = "Project Name"; $description = "This totally explains the product"; $score = "7.6"; File 2: $filename = "BBBB"; $projecttitle = "Project Name2" $description = "This totally explains the product"; $score = "9.6"; As you can see 9.6 is higher than 7.6 but PHP sorts the includes out by name instead of variables within the file. I tried sorting, but I can't get it fixed. Help!

    Read the article

  • [jQuery] Sort contents alphabetically

    - by James
    So I am appending the following after an AJAX call, and this AJAX call may happen several time, returning several data items. And I am trying to use Tinysort [http://plugins.jquery.com/project/TinySort] to sort the list everytime, so the new items added are integrated nicely and sorted alphabetically. It unfortunately doesn't seem to be working. Any ideas? I mean, the data itself is being correctly appended, but unfortunately the sorting isn't occurring. var artists = []; $.each(data.artists, function(k, v) { artists.push('<section id="artist:' + v.name + '" class="artist"><div class="span-9"><img alt="' + v.name + '" width="34" height="34" class="photo" src="' + v.photo + '" /><strong>' + v.name + '</strong><br/><span>' + v.events + ' upcoming gig'); if (v.events != 1) { artists.push('s'); } artists.push('</span></div><div class="span-2 align-right last">Last</div><div class="clear"></div></section>'); }); $('div.artists p').remove(); $('div.artists div.next').remove(); $('div.artists').append(artists.join('')).append('<div class="next"><a href="#">Next</a></div>'); $('div.artists section').tsort('section[id]', {orderby: 'id'}); Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Help me sort programing languages a bit

    - by b-gen-jack-o-neill
    Hi, so I asked here few days ago about C# and its principles. Now, if I may, I have some additional general questions about some languages, becouse for novice like me, it seems a bit confusing. To be exact I want to ask more about language functions capabilities than syntax and so. To be honest, its just these special functions that bothers me and make me so confused. For exmaple, C has its printf(), Pascal has writeln() and so. I know in basic the output in assembler of these funtions would be similiar, every language has more or less its special functions. For console output, for file manipulation, etc. But all these functions are de-facto part of its OS API, so why is for example in C distinguished between C standard library functions and (on Windows) WinAPI functions when even printf() has to use some Windows feature, call some of its function to actually show desired text on console window, becouse the actuall "showing" is done by OS. Where is the line between language functions and system API? Now languages I dont quite understand - Python, Ruby and similiar. To be more specific, I know they are similiar to java and C# in term they are compiled into bytecode. But, I do not unerstand what are its capabilities in term of building GUI applications. I saw tutorial for using Ruby to program GUI applications on Linux and Windows. But isn´t that just some kind of upgrade? I mean fram other tutorials It seemed like these languages was first intended for small scripts than building big applications. I hope you understand why I am confused. If you do, please help me sort it out a bit, I have no one to ask.

    Read the article

  • shell script segment to avoid overwriting files

    - by johndashen
    I have a perl script (or any executable) E which will take a file foo.xml and write a file foo.txt. I use a Beowulf cluster to run E for a large number of XML files, but I'd like to write a simple job server script in shell (bash) which doesn't overwrite existing txt files. I'm currently doing something like #!/bin/sh PATTERN="[A-Z]*0[1-2][a-j]"; # this matches foo in all cases todo=`ls *.xml | grep $PATTERN`; isdone=`ls *.foo | grep $PATTERN`; whatsleft=todo - isdone; # what's the unix magic? #and then call the job server; jobserve E "$whatsleft"; and then I don't know how to get the difference between $todo and $isdone. I'd prefer using sort/uniq to something like a for loop with grep inside, but I'm not sure how to do it (pipes? temporary files?) As a bonus question, is there a way to do lookahead search in bash grep?

    Read the article

  • How to Sort a TreeList in Sitecore 6 in the Source

    - by Scott
    My team uses Sitecore 6 as content management system and then .Net to interface with Sitecore API. In many of our templates we make use of a Treelist. When adding a new item to the selected items Treelist it automatically puts the item at the bottom of the list. In some lists they get very large. In most cases end users would like to see these lists sorted descending by a Date field that is part of the templates that can be added as selected to the Treelist. Programmatically on the .Net side its very easy to handle this using Linq OrderByDescending and all displays great in the site to visitors. What I am trying to figure out is how to get it to display the same in Sitecore Content Editor. I've not found anything from Google search other than there seems to be a SortBy you can specify in the source but I tried this and can't get it to have any effect. Has anyone dealt with this before? Again, main goal is to sort items in a Treelist in the Sitecore Content Editor itself. Thanks for any input anyone has.

    Read the article

  • extra storage merge sort

    - by davit-datuashvili
    I need make a merge sort using an additional array. Here is my code: public class extra_storage{ public static void main(String[]args) { int x[]=new int[]{12,9,4,99,120,1,3,10}; int a[]=new int[x.length]; mergesort(x,0,x.length-1,a); for (int i=0;i<x.length;i++){ System.out.println(x[i]); } } public static void mergesort(int x[],int low,int high, int a[]){ if (low>=high) { return; } int middle=(low+high)/2; mergesort(x,low,middle,a); mergesort(x,middle+1,high,a); int k; int lo=low; int h=high; for (k=low;k<high;k++) if ((lo<=middle ) && ((h>high)||(x[lo]<x[h]))){ a[k]=x[lo++]; } else { a[k]=x[h++]; } for (k=low;k<=high;k++){ x[k]=a[k]; } } } But something is wrong. When I run it the output is this: 1 0 3 0 4 0 9 0 What is the problem?

    Read the article

  • How to sort NSMutableArray? Code review needed

    - by JAM
    Good evening. This code works. It sorts an array of cards by both Suit and Card Value. It is also very much brute force. Can you recommend a better way? Does Objective-C help dealing with a situation where object being sorted itself has multiple fields, on which sorting depends? -(void) sort: (NSMutableArray *) deck { NSUInteger count = [deck count]; Card *thisCard; Card *nextCard; int this; int next; BOOL stillSwapping = true; while (stillSwapping) { stillSwapping = false; for (NSUInteger i = 0; i < count; ++i) { this = i; next = i+1; if (next < count) { thisCard = [deck objectAtIndex:this]; nextCard = [deck objectAtIndex:next]; if ([thisCard suit] > [nextCard suit]) { [deck exchangeObjectAtIndex:this withObjectAtIndex:next]; stillSwapping = true; } if ([thisCard suit] == [nextCard suit]) { if ([thisCard value] > [nextCard value]) { [deck exchangeObjectAtIndex:this withObjectAtIndex:next]; stillSwapping = true; } } } } } }

    Read the article

  • Sort List <Rectangle>

    - by user1649498
    How do I sort a rectangle list by their area? Been looking into IComparable at msdn library, but can't figure it out... I wrote this: SortedL= new List<Rectangle>(); int count1 = 0; int count3 = redovi; while (count1 < count3) { int count2 = 0; while (count2 < count3) { int x = Oblici[count1].Width; int y = Oblici[count1].Height; int z = Oblici[count2].Width; int w = Oblici[count2].Height; int area1 = x * y; int area2 = z * w; int a = area1.CompareTo(area2); if (a < 0) { count1 = count2; if (count2 < (count3 - 1)) { count2++; } else break; } else if (a == 0) { if (count2 < (count3 - 1)) { count2++; } else break; } else if (a > 0) { if (count2 < count3 - 1) { count2++; } else break; } } SortedL.Add(Oblici[count1]); Oblici.RemoveAt(count1); count3 = (count3 - 1);}} And it works, but it's pretty ugly, and I know there is an easier way...

    Read the article

  • Sort wss3.0 view by more than 2 columns

    - by russellGove
    Does anyone know if it's possible to sort a sharepoint list view bymore than 3 columns. It doesn't let me do it in the UI and whwn I added this: > <Query> > <GroupBy Collapse="TRUE" GroupLimit="100"> > <FieldRef Name="Category" /> > <FieldRef Name="SubCategory" /> > <FieldRef Name="Topic" /> > </GroupBy> > <OrderBy> > <FieldRef Name="Category" /> > <FieldRef Name="SubCategory" /> > <FieldRef Name="Topic" /> > </OrderBy> > </Query> I get an error on the page: <!-- #RENDER FAILED -->

    Read the article

  • bubble sort logic error

    - by Arianule
    I was trying a basic sorting exercise and I was hoping I could receive some help with what is probably a basic logic error. int[] numbers = new int[] { 2, 5, 11, 38, 24, 6, 9, 0, 83, 7 }; for (int loop = 0; loop < numbers.Length; loop++) { Console.WriteLine(numbers[loop]); } Console.WriteLine("Performing a bubble sort"); bool flag = false; do { for (int loop = 0; loop < numbers.Length - 1; loop++) { if (numbers[loop] > numbers[loop + 1]) { int temporary = numbers[loop]; numbers[loop] = numbers[loop + 1]; numbers[loop + 1] = temporary; flag = true; } } } while (flag == false); for (int loop = 0; loop < numbers.Length; loop++) { Console.WriteLine(numbers[loop]); } kind regards arianule

    Read the article

  • PHP array ordering

    - by Melonheadjr44
    Hi, I was wondering how I could sort this array, when I use asort right now it does 14 17 16 15. How would I go to have 14 15 16 17 array(4) { [15]=> array(9) { [2025]=> string(80) "20:25 à 21:15 Spectacle / L'histoire d'un coeur / Auditorium, É.S.P. De La Salle" [2135]=> string(71) "21:35 à 22:25 Spectacle / Transfugue 2 / Auditorium, É.S.P. De La Salle" [1430]=> string(64) "14:30 à 15:30 Mise en lecture/Théâtre la Catapulte / De La Salle" [110]=> string(44) "11:00 à 13:00 Inscription / Pavillon Tabaret" [1330]=> string(49) "13:30 à 14:30 CÉRÉMONIE D'OUVERTURE / De La Salle" [1550]=> string(61) "15:50 à 16:40 Spectacle/Université Laurentienne / De La Salle" [170]=> string(57) "17:00 à 17:50 Spectacle/Université d'Ottawa / De La Salle" [1750]=> string(45) "17:50 à 19:00 REPAS DE L'AMITIÉ / De La Salle" [1915]=> string(76) "19:15 à 20:05 Spectacle / Attendre la pluie / Auditorium, É.S.P. De La Salle" } [16]=> array(8) { [1845]=> string(81) "18:45 à 19:35 Spectacle / Mimes d'horreur / Salle Académique, Université d'Ottawa" [1955]=> string(73) "19:55 à 20:45 Spectacle / Déroute / Salle Académique, Université d'Ottawa" [8]=> string(45) "08:30 à 11:30 Atelier / ABC du jeu dramatique" [13]=> string(41) "13:00 à 16:00 Atelier / Théâtre physique" [1130]=> string(28) "11:30 à 13:00 DÎNER LIBRE / " [1620]=> string(29) "16:20 à 18:20 SOUPER LIBRE / " [220]=> string(58) "22:00 à 23:30 BAL MASQUÉ / l'Agora du centre universitaire" [210]=> string(47) "21:00 à 22:00 Rétroaction / Université d'Ottawa" } [17]=> array(4) { [950]=> string(79) "09:50 à 10:40 Spectacle / Raison d'être / Salle Académique, Université d'Ottawa" [110]=> string(76) "11:00 à 11:50 Spectacle / Potionnée / Salle Académique, Université d'Ottawa" [120]=> string(28) "12:00 à 13:00 DÎNER LIBRE / " [1330]=> string(48) "13:30 à 14:30 CÉRÉMONIE DE CLÔTURE / De La Salle" } [14]=> array(1) { [150]=> string(49) "15:00 à 16:30 Préparation technique / De La Salle" } }

    Read the article

  • quick java question

    - by j-unit-122
    private static char[] quicksort (char[] array , int left , int right) { if (left < right) { int p = partition(array , left, right); quicksort(array, left, p - 1 ); quicksort(array, p + 1 , right); } for (char i : array) System.out.print(i + ” ”); System.out.println(); return array; } private static int partition(char[] a, int left, int right) { char p = a[left]; int l = left + 1, r = right; while (l < r) { while (l < right && a[l] < p) l++; while (r > left && a[r] >= p) r--; if (l < r) { char temp = a[l]; a[l] = a[r]; a[r] = temp; } } a[left] = a[r]; a[r] = p; return r; } } hi guys just a quick question regarding the above coding, i know that the above coding returns the following B I G C O M P U T E R B C E G I M P U T O R B C E G I M P U T O R B C E G I M P U T O R B C E G I M P U T O R B C E G I M O P T U R B C E G I M O P R T U B C E G I M O P R T U B C E G I M O P R T U B C E G I M O P R T U B C E G I M O P R T U B C E G I M O P R T U B C E G I M O P R T U when the sequence BIGCOMPUTER is used but my question is can someone explain to me what is happening in the code and how? i know abit about the quick-sort algorithm but it doesnt seem to be the same in the above example.

    Read the article

  • UCA + Natural Sorting

    - by Alix Axel
    I recently learnt that PHP already supports the Unicode Collation Algorithm via the intl extension: $array = array ( 'al', 'be', 'Alpha', 'Beta', 'Álpha', 'Àlpha', 'Älpha', '????', 'img10.png', 'img12.png', 'img1.png', 'img2.png', ); if (extension_loaded('intl') === true) { collator_asort(collator_create('root'), $array); } Array ( [0] => al [2] => Alpha [4] => Álpha [5] => Àlpha [6] => Älpha [1] => be [3] => Beta [11] => img1.png [9] => img10.png [8] => img12.png [10] => img2.png [7] => ???? ) As you can see this seems to work perfectly, even with mixed case strings! The only drawback I've encountered so far is that there is no support for natural sorting and I'm wondering what would be the best way to work around that, so that I can merge the best of the two worlds. I've tried to specify the Collator::SORT_NUMERIC sort flag but the result is way messier: collator_asort(collator_create('root'), $array, Collator::SORT_NUMERIC); Array ( [8] => img12.png [7] => ???? [9] => img10.png [10] => img2.png [11] => img1.png [6] => Älpha [5] => Àlpha [1] => be [2] => Alpha [3] => Beta [4] => Álpha [0] => al ) However, if I run the same test with only the img*.png values I get the ideal output: Array ( [3] => img1.png [2] => img2.png [1] => img10.png [0] => img12.png ) Can anyone think of a way to preserve the Unicode sorting while adding natural sorting capabilities?

    Read the article

  • Sort array by two specifics values in PHP

    - by Roger
    The folks have already showed me how to sort an array by a specific value using usort and a fallback function in PHP. What if this specifc value doesn't exist and we have to use two values? in the example bellow the values [4] and [5]... In other words, I want to do this: order all objects numericaly by the fith value of each object from the highest to the lowest, and addicionally, for those objects that have the fifht value is empty (in the examplem '-'), order them by the fourth value. Array( [0] => Array( [0] => links-patrocinados [1] => adwords [2] => 0,5 [3] => R$92,34 [4] => 823000 [5] => 49500 ) [1] => Array( [0] => adwords [1] => google adwords como funciona [2] => 0,38 [3] => R$0,20 [4] => 480 [5] => 480 ) [2] => Array( [0] => links-patrocinados [1] => adword [2] => 0,39 [3] => R$58,77 [4] => 49500 [5] => 2900 ) [3] => Array( [0] => agencia [1] => agencias viagens espanholas [2] => - [3] => R$0,20 [4] => 58 [5] => - ) [4] => Array( [0] => agencia [1] => era agencia imobiliaria [2] => - [3] => R$0,20 [4] => 73 [5] => - ) )

    Read the article

  • How do I display a Wicket Datatable, sorted by a specific column by default?

    - by David
    Hello everyone! I have a question regarding Wicket's Datatable. I am currently using DataTable to display a few columns of data. My table is set up as follows: DataTable<Column> dataTable = new DataTable<Column>("columnsTable", columns, provider, maxRowsPerPage) { @Override protected Item<Column> newRowItem(String id, int index, IModel<Column> model) { return new OddEvenItem<Column>(id, index, model); } }; The columns look like so: columns[0] = new PropertyColumn<Column>(new Model<String>("Description"), "description", "description"); columns[1] = new PropertyColumn<Column>(new Model<String>("Logic"), "columnLogic"); columns[2] = new PropertyColumn<Column>(new Model<String>("Type"), "dataType", "dataType"); Here is my column data provider: public class ColumnSortableDataProvider extends SortableDataProvider<Column> { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; private List<Column> list = null; public ColumnSortableDataProvider(Table table) { this.list = Arrays.asList(table.getColumns().toArray(new Column[0])); } public ColumnSortableDataProvider(List<Column> list) { this.list = list; } @Override public Iterator<? extends Column> iterator(int first, int count) { /* first - first row of data count - minimum number of elements to retrieve So this method returns an iterator capable of iterating over {first, first+count} items */ Iterator<Column> iterator = null; try { if(getSort() != null) { Collections.sort(list, new Comparator<Column>() { private static final long serialVersionUID = 1L; @Override public int compare(Column c1, Column c2) { int result=1; PropertyModel<Comparable> model1= new PropertyModel<Comparable>(c1, getSort().getProperty()); PropertyModel<Comparable> model2= new PropertyModel<Comparable>(c2, getSort().getProperty()); if(model1.getObject() == null && model2.getObject() == null) result = 0; else if(model1.getObject() == null) result = 1; else if(model2.getObject() == null) result = -1; else result = ((Comparable)model1.getObject()).compareTo(model2.getObject()); result = getSort().isAscending() ? result : -result; return result; } }); } if (list.size() > (first+count)) iterator = list.subList(first, first+count).iterator(); else iterator = list.iterator(); } catch (Exception e) { e.printStackTrace(); } return iterator; } Sorting by clicking a column works perfectly, but I would like the table to initially be sorted, by default, by the Description column. I am at a loss to do this. If you need to see some other code, please let me know. Thank you in advance!!! - D

    Read the article

  • Flex XMLListCollection sort on nested tags

    - by gauravgr8
    Hi all, I have a requirement of sorting the <ename> in the XML with in the branch. The XML goes like this: <company> <branch> <name>finance</name> <emp> <ename>rahul</ename> <phno>123456</phno> </emp> <emp> <ename>sunil</ename> <phno>123456</phno> </emp> <emp> <ename>akash</ename> <phno>123456</phno> </emp> <emp> <ename>alok</ename> <phno>123456</phno> </emp> </branch> <branch> <name>finance</name> <emp> <ename>sameer</ename> <phno>123456</phno> </emp> <emp> <ename>rahul</ename> <phno>123456</phno> </emp> <emp> <ename>anand</ename> <phno>123456</phno> </emp> <emp> <ename>sandeep</ename> <phno>123456</phno> </emp> </branch> </company> I tried it with taking XML in XMLList: var xl:XMLList = new XMLList(branch.ename) var xlc:XMLListCollection = new XMLListCollection(xl); then applied sort to the <ename>. I am able to get the sorted but XMLListCollection but the problem is I got the <ename> collection sorted but I need the sorted <ename> in the XML. I tried with deleting the the item in Collection then adding the sorted list but in that case the <name> is lost. Please help me out in sorting <ename> or is there any way to specify nested tags in SortField name? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34  | Next Page >