Search Results

Search found 42781 results on 1712 pages for 'function calls'.

Page 273/1712 | < Previous Page | 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280  | Next Page >

  • Cascading dropdowns

    - by SnowJim
    Hi! I am working with cascading dropdowns in MVC. It appears that I will not be able to easily create dropdowns on demand, instead I will have to add the dropdowns before sending it to the client. This is how I am doing it right now: In the aspx page <%: Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.ModelViewAd.Category1, Model.ModelViewAd.Category1List, "-- Välj kategori --")%> <%: Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.ModelViewAd.Category2, Model.ModelViewAd.Category2List, "-- Välj kategori --")%> <%: Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.ModelViewAd.Category3, Model.ModelViewAd.Category3List, "-- Välj kategori --")%> <%: Html.DropDownListFor(model => model.ModelViewAd.Category4, Model.ModelViewAd.Category4List, "-- Välj kategori --")%> This is rendered like this : <select id="ModelViewAd_Category1" name="ModelViewAd.Category1"> <option value="">-- V&#228;lj kategori --</option> <option value="10">Fordon</option> <option value="15">F&#246;r hemmet</option> <option value="17">Bostad</option> </select> <select id="ModelViewAd_Category2" name="ModelViewAd.Category2"> <option value="">-- V&#228;lj kategori --</option> </select> <select id="ModelViewAd_Category3" name="ModelViewAd.Category3"> <option value="">-- V&#228;lj kategori --</option> </select> <select id="ModelViewAd_Category4" name="ModelViewAd.Category4"> <option value="">-- V&#228;lj kategori --</option> </select> This is what the script on the page looks like: <script type="text/javascript"> $(function () { $("select#ModelViewAd_Category1").change(function () { var id = $(this).val(); var urlAction = "/AdCategory/GetCategoriesByParent1/" + id; $.getJSON(urlAction, { id: id }, function (data) { $("#ModelViewAd_Category2").addItems(data.d); }); }); $("select#ModelViewAd_Category2").change(function () { var id = $(this).val(); var urlAction = "/AdCategory/GetCategoriesByParent1/" + id; $.getJSON(urlAction, { id: id }, function (data) { $("#ModelViewAd_Category3").addItems(data.d); }); }); $("select#ModelViewAd_Category3").change(function () { var id = $(this).val(); var urlAction = "/AdCategory/GetCategoriesByParent1/" + id; $.getJSON(urlAction, { id: id }, function (data) { $("#ModelViewAd_Category4").addItems(data.d); }); }); }); </script> And then I have an included file that contains this: $.fn.clearSelect = function () { return this.each(function () { if (this.tagName == 'SELECT') this.options.length = 0; }); } $.fn.addItems = function (data) { return this.clearSelect().each(function () { if (this.tagName == 'SELECT') { var dropdownList = this; $.each(data, function (index, optionData) { var option = new Option(optionData.Text, optionData.Value); if ($.browser.msie) { dropdownList.add(option); } else { dropdownList.add(option, null); } if ($(this).children().size() < 2) { $(this).hide(); } else { $(this).show(); } }); } }); } The problem I now have is that I need to hide the dropdowns that do not contain any options or only contain one option. This should be checked when doing a call to the service as well as when the page is sent to the client ("POSTBACK"). What I need is : 4 Dropdowns Only the first dropdown is visible when first entering the page. When selecting an option from dropdown1 the dropdown2 will be populated and so on If there is only 1 option then the dropdown should be hidden If all 4 dropdowns are set and the end-user changes dropdown1, then dropdown2 should be reloaded and the rest be hidden If the user has selected some of the dropdowns (say 1, 2 and 3) and hit submit and the page is not accepted on the server side (not valid) the dropdowns should be set exactly as when the user clicked the submit button when the page returns to the user. Any suggestions on this?

    Read the article

  • Is it possible in .NET to set the local endpoint (IP address) when using webclient to consume a web

    - by Tom
    I'm wondering if it is possible using .NET to call a remote web service and in effect specify which IP the call is made on. I'm consuming a service that limits the number of calls I can make based on IP. The service costs in the 20k range after the free limit is used up. I'm very close to enough calls but not quite there using the free service. My server has 3 IP so I could in effect triple the number of calls I could make to the remote service by changing the IP.

    Read the article

  • Class architecture, no friends allowed

    - by Captain Comic
    The question of why there are no friends in C# has been extensively discussed. I have the following design problems. I have a class that has only one public function AddOrder(Order ord). Clients are allowed to call only this function. All other logic must be hidden. Order class is listening to market events and must call other other function of TradingSystem ExecuteOrder, so I have to make it public as well. Doing that I will allow clients of Trading system to call this function and I don't want that. class TradingSystem { // Trading system stores list of orders List<Order> _orders; // this function is made public so that Order can call ir public ExecuteOrder(Order ord) { } // this function is made public for external clients public AddOrder(OrderRequest ordreq) { // create order and pass it this order.OnOrderAdded(this); } } class Order { TradingSystem _ts; public void OnOrderAdded(TradingSystem ts) { _ts = ts; } void OnMarketEvent() { _ts.ExecuteOrder() } }

    Read the article

  • Best Practices For Secure APIs?

    - by Ferrett Steinmetz
    Let's say I have a website that has a lot of information on our products. I'd like some of our customers (including us!) to be able to look up our products for various methods, including: 1) Pulling data from AJAX calls that return data in cool, JavaScripty-ways 2) Creating iPhone applications that use that data; 3) Having other web applications use that data for their own end. Normally, I'd just create an API and be done with it. However, this data is in fact mildly confidential - which is to say that we don't want our competitors to be able to look up all our products every morning and then automatically set their prices to undercut us. And we also want to be able to look at who might be abusing the system, so if someone's making ten million complex calls to our API a day and bogging down our server, we can cut them off. My next logical step would be then to create a developers' key to restrict access - which would work fine for web apps, but not so much for any AJAX calls. (As I see it, they'd need to provide the key in the JavaScript, which is in plaintext and easily seen, and hence there's actually no security at all. Particularly if we'd be using our own developers' keys on our site to make these AJAX calls.) So my question: after looking around at Oauth and OpenID for some time, I'm not sure there is a solution that would handle all three of the above. Is there some sort of canonical "best practices" for developers' keys, or can Oauth and OpenID handle AJAX calls easily in some fashion I have yet to grok, or am I missing something entirely?

    Read the article

  • Generate Permutations of a List

    - by Eric Mercer
    I'm writing a function that takes a list and returns a list of permutations of the argument. I know how to do it by using a function that removes an element and then recursively use that function to generate all permutations. I now have a problem where I want to use the following function: (define (insert-everywhere item lst) (define (helper item L1 L2) (if (null? L2) (cons (append L1 (cons item '())) '()) (cons (append L1 (cons item L2)) (helper item (append L1 (cons (car L2) '())) (cdr L2))))) (helper item '() lst)) This function will insert the item into every possible location of the list, like the following: (insert-everywhere 1 '(a b)) will get: '((1 a b) (a 1 b) (a b 1)) How would I use this function to get all permutations of a list? I now have: (define (permutations lst) (if (null? lst) '() (insert-helper (car lst) (permutations (cdr lst))))) (define (insert-helper item lst) (cond ((null? lst) '()) (else (append (insert-everywhere item (car lst)) (insert-helper item (cdr lst)))))) but doing (permutations '(1 2 3)) just returns the empty list '().

    Read the article

  • how does this animation work?

    - by icicleking
    I'm working with cookies to run or not run a jQuery animation someone else built: $(function () { $('div.transitional').click(function () { $('div.intro').removeClass('hidden'); $('div.final').off('click'); }); ShowDiv($("div.transitional.hidden")[0]); }); function ShowDiv(target) { target = $(target); target.removeClass('hidden'); target.delay(500).animate({ opacity: 1.0 }, 300, 'easeInExpo', function () { ShowDiv($("div.transitional.hidden")[0]); }) } I have the cookie part working, but I'm confused about the anonymous function and the "ShowDiv" function. What is each part doing? Functionally, the animation makes visible a series of pictures, then the whole site. I want to skip the animation and just make the whole site visible(if cookies='visited'). I'd like to do this without rewriting the animation script. here's a link. What happens now is if you have the cookie the animation doesn't run and everything is hidden.

    Read the article

  • Stop running this script, IE7 using PHP

    - by Jomel Dicen
    I incorporate javascript in my PHP program: Try to check my codes. It loops depend on the number of records in database. for instance: $counter = 0; foreach($row_value as $data): echo $this->javascript($counter, $data->exrate, $data->tab); endforeach; private function javascript($counter=NULL, $exrate=NULL, $tab=NULL){ $js = " <script type='text/javascript'> $(function () { var textBox0 = $('input:text[id$=quantity{$counter}]').keyup(foo); var textBox1 = $('input:text[id$=mc{$counter}]').keyup(foo); var textBox2 = $('input:text[id$=lc{$counter}]').keyup(foo); function foo() { var value0 = textBox0.val(); var value1 = textBox1.val(); var value2 = textBox2.val(); var sum = add(value1, value2) * (value0 * {$exrate}); $('input:text[id$=result{$counter}]').val(parseFloat(sum).toFixed(2)); // Compute Total Quantity var qtotal = 0; $('.quantity{$tab}').each(function() { qtotal += Number($(this).val()); }); $('#tquantity{$tab}').text(qtotal); // Compute MC UNIT var mctotal = 0; $('.mc{$tab}').each(function() { mctotal += Number($(this).val()); }); $('#tmc{$tab}').text(mctotal); // Compute LC UNIT var lctotal = 0; $('.lc{$tab}').each(function() { lctotal += Number($(this).val()); }); $('#tlc{$tab}').text(lctotal); // Compute Result var result = 0; $('.result{$tab}').each(function() { result += Number($(this).val()); }); $('#tresult{$tab}').text(result); } function add() { var sum = 0; for (var i = 0, j = arguments.length; i < j; i++) { if (IsNumeric(arguments[i])) { sum += parseFloat(arguments[i]); } } return sum; } function IsNumeric(input) { return (input - 0) == input && input.length > 0; } }); </script> "; return $js; } When I running this on IE this message is always annoying me " Stop running this script? A script on this page is causing your web browser to run slowly. If it continues to run, your computer might become unresponsive." but in firefox it's functioning well.

    Read the article

  • dialog box not showing error

    - by user281180
    Hi, I`m having the following error . Why am I having this error and how can I solve it? $("SelectProject").dialog is not a function http://localhost:1419/Customer Line 57 $("#SelectProject").dialog is not a function http://localhost:1419/Customer Line 69 My codes are as follows: $(document).ready(function() { $("#project_link").click(function() { $('SelectProject').dialog('open'); return false; }); $('#SelectProject').dialog({ autoOpen: false, width: 800, position: [130, 200], buttons: { "Cancel": function() { $(this).dialog("close"); }, "Accept": function() { $(this).dialog("close"); } } });

    Read the article

  • accessing my public methods from within my namespace

    - by Derek Adair
    I am in the process of making my own namespace in JavaScript... (function(window){ (function(){ var myNamespace = { somePublicMethod: function(){ }, anotherPublicMethod: function(){ } } return (window.myNamespace = window.my = myNamespace) }()); })(window); I'm new to these kinds of advanced JavaScript techniques and i'm trying to figure out the best way to call public methods from within my namespace. It appears that within my public methods this is being set to myNamespace. Should I call public methods like... AnotherPublicMethod: function(){ this.somePublicMethod() } or... AnotherPublicMethod: function(){ my.somePublicMethod(); } is there any difference?

    Read the article

  • Code to generate random numbers in C++

    - by user1678927
    Basically I have to write a program to generate random numbers to simulate the rolling of a pair of dice. This program should be constructed in multiple files. The main function should be in one file, the other functions should be in a second source file, and their prototypes should be in a header file. First I write a short function that returns a random value between 1 and 6 to simulate the rolling of a single 6-sided die.Second, i write a function that pretends to roll a pair of dice by calling this function twice. My program starts by asking the user how many rolls should be made. Then I write a function to simulate rolling the dice this many times, keeping a count of exactly how many times the values 2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12(each number is the sum of a pair of dice) occur in an array. Later I write a function to display a small bar chart using these counts that ideally would look something like below for a sample of 144 rolls, where the number of asterisks printed corresponds to the count: 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Next, to see how well the random number generator is doing, I write a function to compute the average value rolled. Compare this to the ideal average of 7. Also, print out a small table showing the counts of each roll made by the program, the ideal count based on the frequencies above given the total number of rolls, and the difference between these values in separate columns. This is my incomplete code so far: "Compiler visual studio 2010" int rolling(){ //Function that returns a random value between 1 and 6 rand(unsigned(time(NULL))); int dice = 1 + (rand() %6); return dice; } int roll_dice(int num1,int num2){ //it calls 'rolling function' twice int result1,result2; num1 = rolling(); num2 = rolling(); result1 = num1; result2 = num2; return result1,result2; } int main(void){ int times,i,sum,n1,n2; int c1,c2,c3,c4,c5,c6,c7,c8,c9,c10,c11;//counters for each sum printf("Please enter how many times you want to roll the dice.\n") scanf_s("%i",&times); I pretend to use counters to count each sum and store the number(the count) in an array. I know i need a loop (for) and some conditional statements (if) but m main problem is to get the values from roll_dice and store them in n1 and n2 so then i can sum them up and store the sum in 'sum'.

    Read the article

  • Which is the best and appropriate way to write the code in Winforms ?

    - by Harikrishna
    What is the best way to write the code ? (1) Like directly writing the code in the button_click() event. or (2) Make the function of that code which I write in button_click() event and write this function in one class and then that function I should call in the button_Click() event.Like is it called three-tired approach to write the code ? Like in button_Click() event I write the code to save the records in csv file from datatable.So I should write that code in button_Click() event or I should make one new function and one new class and write that code in that function which is the new class and calling that function in button_Click() event. This is only one example but I am talking about all the code written in my application that which is the appropriate and best way to write the code and what are the benefits ? Note that I write the code in Winforms with c#.

    Read the article

  • jquery toggle did not work properly...

    - by pradeep
    function advanced_search() { $("#advanced_link").toggle( function(){ $('#advanced_link').text('Hide - Advanced Search'); $('.advanced_search').show(); }, function(){ $('#advanced_link').text('Show - Advanced Search'); $('.advanced_search').hide(); }); } this code worked for me..but when i tried to use the css property like function advanced_search() { $("#advanced_link").toggle( function(){ $('#advanced_link').text('Hide - Advanced Search'); $('.advanced_search').css('display','inline'); }, function(){ $('#advanced_link').text('Show - Advanced Search'); $('.advanced_search').css('display','none'); }); } it did not work...is there any thing wrong in second code...??

    Read the article

  • passing dynamic values in callback method

    - by swastican
    is there a way to pass dynamic values to callback function in js or jquery or nodejs. for(var i = 0; i < 10; i++) { filename = 'file'+i+'.html'; request(url, function(error, response, body) { test(error, response, body, filename); }); function test(error, response, body, filename) { console.log('file name ' + filename); if(response.statusCode == 200){ console.log('done'); } } I refered this so article for passing values to callback function. link: [JavaScript: Passing parameters to a callback function the output always seems to be 9 How can i pass values dynamically? The callback function always refers the last value of filename.

    Read the article

  • window.onload DOM loading in popup, browser compatibility

    - by user1477508
    I have HTML popup window and i want add text after opening window with spec. function: var win = window.open('private.php', data.sender_id , 'width=300,height=400'); win.window.onload = function() { //function for add text //chrome and firefox fire, IE and Opera not }; This work perfectly with Chrome and Firefox, but Opera and IE9 won't working. Please tell me best way to do that with IE and Opera. I try with: $(document).ready(function(){ //function for add text }); but same thing. I found solution, but i wont know is there better solution then setTimeout??? Instead onload event i use: setTimeout(function(){ //add text },200);

    Read the article

  • Odd toString behavior in javascript

    - by George
    I have this small function that's behaving oddly to me. Easy enough to work around, but enough to pique my curiosity. function formatNumber(number,style) { if (typeof style == 'number') { style = style.toString(); } return (number).format(style); } The return format part is based on another function that requires the style variable to be a string to work properly, so I'm just checking if style is a number and if it is to convert it to a string. When the function above is written as is, the format function format doesn't work properly. However when I write it as simply: return (number).format(style.toString()); Everything works. Is there a difference between putting the .toString function inside the format call vs performing it before hand and setting it as the variable style?

    Read the article

  • stored context in a JQuery variable does not work

    - by user203687
    The following works fine: $(function() { EnableDisableButtons(); $('#TextBox1').keyup(function() { EnableDisableButtons(); }); }); function EnableDisableButtons() { var len = $('#TextBox1').val().length; if (len == 0) { $("#Button1").attr("disabled", "disabled"); } else { $("#Button1").attr("disabled", ""); } } But the following does not work at all: var txt = $('#TextBox1'); $(function() { EnableDisableButtons(); txt.keyup(function() { EnableDisableButtons(); }); }); function EnableDisableButtons() { var len = txt.val().length; if (len == 0) { $("#Button1").attr("disabled", "disabled"); } else { $("#Button1").attr("disabled", ""); } } The error it was throwing was " 'txt.val().length' is null or not an object". Can anyone help me on this. thanks

    Read the article

  • Purpose of front() and back() in assigning values in a Queue? (C++)

    - by kevin
    I have declared: queue<int, list<int> > Q After a series of calls: Q.push(37); Q.pop(); Q.push(19); Q.push(3); Q.push(13); Q.front(); Q.push(22); Q.push(8); Q.back(); I get: 19-3-13-22-8-NULL What I don't get is what the calls to Q.front() and Q.back() do. From what I understand, they return a reference to the first or last elements respectively, but I dont see how my list would be any different had those calls not been made. Do they have any effect? Sorry if this seems trivial, but I'm trying to figure out of those calls have a purpose, or of my professor is just trying to screw with me.

    Read the article

  • Multiple Remote call made simultenously

    - by Sudeep Kumar
    I was making multiple remote calls and they are done sequentially and when I am getting a result event back it's triggering calls to all the methods with ResultEvent as an argument . I am supposed to receive the result event only in the method given inthe event listener but it's triggering calls to all the methods with ResultEvent as an argument . Has anyone come across this kind of problem? Is there any workaround for it?

    Read the article

  • How do I compute a variable in Javascript if and only if it is used?

    - by LLer
    This is what I'm doing right now. var foo = function() { var x = someComplicatedComputationThatMayTakeMoreTime(); this.foo = function() { return x; }; return x; } It works but only if foo is called as a function like so foo(); But what if I want to call it as a normal variable with a value? I could modify the code to be var foo = function() { var x = someComplicatedComputationThatMayTakeMoreTime(); this.foo = x; return x; } That would allow me to only call it once as a function and after that as a regular variable. But it's still not what I want. Plus it gets complicated if it accidentally gets called as a function again, returning an error. Is this even possible in Javascript?

    Read the article

  • Is there a method I can override on a JavaScript object to control what is displayed by console.log?

    - by agnoster
    I'm thinking in particular of Chrome, though Firebug would be interesting to. I've tried toString() and valueOf(), but neither of those seem to be used. Interestingly, if I take a function it'll display the function definition - but then if I add a toString() method it will show null! var a = function(){}; console.log(a); // output: function (){} a.toString = function(){ return 'a'; }; console.log(a); // output: null a.valueOf = function(){ return 'v'; }; console.log(a); // output: null Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • More efficient way to write this Jquery code

    - by adamwstl
    Is there a better, more efficient way to write this code? It's a make shift drop down menu that allows user to RSVP for multiple people. Sorry, it's kind of a mess, but I think what I'm doing is clear. If not, I'm at my computer and will respond quickly with more info need be. //There's got to be a better way to do this $('#guest_num_1').click( function() { $('#num_guests a#quant_guests').html("1") $('.guest_name_2, .guest_name_3, .guest_name_4, .guest_name_5, .guest_name_6 ').hide() }); $('#guest_num_2').click( function() { $('#num_guests a#quant_guests').html("2") $('.guest_name_2').fadeIn() $('.guest_name_3, .guest_name_4, .guest_name_5, .guest_name_6').hide() }); $('#guest_num_3').click( function() { $('#num_guests a#quant_guests').html("3") $('.guest_name_2, .guest_name_3').fadeIn() $('.guest_name_4, .guest_name_5, .guest_name_6').hide() }); $('#guest_num_4').click( function() { $('#num_guests a#quant_guests').html("4") $('.guest_name_2, .guest_name_3, .guest_name_4').fadeIn() $('.guest_name_5, .guest_name_6').hide() }); $('#guest_num_5').click( function() { $('#num_guests a#quant_guests').html("5") $('.guest_name_2, .guest_name_3, .guest_name_4, .guest_name_5').fadeIn() $('.guest_name_6').hide() }); $('#guest_num_6').click( function() { $('#num_guests a#quant_guests').html("6") $('.guest_name_2, .guest_name_3, .guest_name_4, .guest_name_5, .guest_name_6').fadeIn() });

    Read the article

  • Sync issue in collection fetch backbone

    - by Stefano Maglione
    i'm fetching a collection but i've problem because into the collection the function parse use an another ajax call.So if i try to console.log the response of fetch after the fetch linecode but it is ever undefined. Function call fetch: friends: function(){ var amici=new Amicizie(); var amicilist=amici.fetch(); console.log(amicilist);<---undefined,because executed before fetch collection called: var obj={}; var Amicizie = Backbone.Collection.extend({ url:'https://api.parse.com/1/classes/User/', parse: function(data) { var cur_user=Parse.User.current().id; $.ajax({ type: 'GET', headers: {'X-Parse-Application-Id':'qS0KL***EM1tyhM9EEPiTS3VMk','X-Parse-REST-API- Key':'nh3eoUo9G***JIfIt1Gm'}, url: "https://api.parse.com/1/classes/_User/?where=....", success: function(object) { console.log(object ); obj=object; console.log(obj ); }, error: function(data) { console.log("ko" ); } }); return obj.results; } }); return Amicizie; });

    Read the article

  • javascript will not work onload

    - by user2711818
    The javascript on the page needs to work onpage load. So I tried adding the document ready function into the code. It doesn't seem to work. http://janeucreative.com/daddychallenge/bag.html <script>$(document).ready(function() { function addItem(item) { var itemInCart = item.cloneNode(true); itemInCart.onclick = function() { removeItem(this); }; var cart = document.getElementById("cart"); cart.appendChild(itemInCart); } function removeItem(item) { var itemInItems = item.cloneNode(true); itemInItems.onclick = function() { addItem(this); }; var cart = document.getElementById("cart"); cart.removeChild(item); } init(); });</script> Any advice would be much appreciated! I'm very new to javascript and just trying to learn it a step at a time.

    Read the article

  • .ajax not being invoked

    - by coffeeaddict
    I've got a javascript function I created. Somewhere in that function, this line is called: var divContent = getDataAsyncHtml(dialogDiv.attr("winHref")); I'm not sure why the .ajax is not being invoked once it hits my getDataAsyncHtml function. Do I need a function() ? function getDataAsynHtml(urlWithContent) { alert("urlWithContent: " + urlWithContent); // jQuery async request $.ajax( { url: urlWithContent, success: function(data) { return $('.result').html(data); alert('Load was performed.'); } }); }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280  | Next Page >