Search Results

Search found 26801 results on 1073 pages for 'google chrome extensions'.

Page 275/1073 | < Previous Page | 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282  | Next Page >

  • A relatively new blog seems to be getting very poor Google indexing

    - by Genadinik
    I have a new blog that is 2 months old. In the first few weeks, it was getting indexed nicely and my GoogleWebmaster reports were showing that it was getting crawled and began ranking for some terms. Then as I kept writing, the GoogleWebmaster report thinned out and showed less and less terms that this blog ranks for. Now there are only 4 terms with one of them being my name. Is there something I need to do to keep the old posts to remain indexed and crawled? Thanks, Alex

    Read the article

  • Google offre un SDk permettant de créer des web apps natives en C et C++ dans son navigateur Chrome

    Google offre un SDk permettant de créer des web apps natives en C et C++ dans son navigateur Chrome Google vient de sortir une présentation du SDK de Native Client, sa technologie open source qui permet à des codes natifs en C et C++ de s'exécuter dans un navigateur. Ceci permettra d'utiliser des applications plus avancées sur le web, et qui pourront tourner dans Google Chrome. Les capacités des applications web sont étendues au delà des limites imposées par l'utilisation de JavaScript. Un aperçu vidéo du SDK vient d'être publié, il montre les bases de son utilisation : comment se lancer dans l'écriture d'une application en quelques minutes seulement. Google offre donc un compiler C et C++ basé sur GCC...

    Read the article

  • WordPress SEO For Achieving Top Google Rankings

    If you have hung around the internet and gotten a little whiff of the SEO updates, you would have already gathered that if you have your website optimized, you stand the chance of getting better hits and more profits and ranking on the search engines. However, it might seem like something unattainable since you might not have any idea of how you can get the necessary optimization for your blog. At first, most bloggers are often undecided on the kind of software that would be ideal for their blogging enterprise, but with time, they come to settle...

    Read the article

  • Google Drive : une version pour iOS s'attaque à iCloud, un nouveau SDK et un mode hors-ligne pour Chrome sont disponibles

    Google Drive : une version pour iOS s'attaque à iCloud Un nouveau SDK et un mode hors-ligne pour Chrome sont disponibles Tout comme Chrome (disponible pour iOS) et tout comme les Google Maps (accessible hors-ligne sur Android), Google Drive ? le service de stockage qui chapeaute à présent Google Docs ? est disponible offline et sur les terminaux mobiles d'Apple. Hors-ligne. Ce qui signifie que l'utilisateur peut « créer et éditer des documents ou laisser un commentaire. Tous les changements seront automatiquement synchronisés dès que vous vous r...

    Read the article

  • jQuery .find() doesn't return data in IE but does in Firefox and Chrome

    - by Steve Hiner
    I helped a friend out by doing a little web work for him. Part of what he needed was an easy way to change a couple pieces of text on his site. Rather than having him edit the HTML I decided to provide an XML file with the messages in it and I used jQuery to pull them out of the file and insert them into the page. It works great... In Firefox and Chrome, not so great in IE7. I was hoping one of you could tell me why. I did a fair but of googling but couldn't find what I'm looking for. Here's the XML: <?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?> <messages> <message type="HeaderMessage"> This message is put up in the header area. </message> <message type="FooterMessage"> This message is put in the lower left cell. </message> </messages> And here's my jQuery call: <script type="text/javascript"> $(document).ready(function() { $.get('messages.xml', function(d) { //I have confirmed that it gets to here in IE //and it has the xml loaded. //alert(d); gives me a message box with the xml text in it //alert($(d).find('message')); gives me "[object Object]" //alert($(d).find('message')[0]); gives me "undefined" //alert($(d).find('message').Length); gives me "undefined" $(d).find('message').each(function() { //But it never gets to here in IE var $msg = $(this); var type = $msg.attr("type"); var message = $msg.text(); switch (type) { case "HeaderMessage": $("#HeaderMessageDiv").html(message); break; case "FooterMessage": $("#footermessagecell").html(message); break; default: } }); }); }); </script> Is there something I need to do differently in IE? Based on the message box with [object Object] I'm assumed that .find was working in IE but since I can't index into the array with [0] or check it's Length I'm guessing that means .find isn't returning any results. Any reason why that would work perfectly in Firefox and Chrome but fail in IE? I'm a total newbie with jQuery so I hope I haven't just done something stupid. That code above was scraped out of a forum and modified to suit my needs. Since jQuery is cross-platform I figured I wouldn't have to deal with this mess. Edit: I've found that if I load the page in Visual Studio 2008 and run it then it will work in IE. So it turns out it always works when run through the development web server. Now I'm thinking IE just doesn't like doing .find in XML loaded off of my local drive so maybe when this is on an actual web server it will work OK. I have confirmed that it works fine when browsed from a web server. Must be a peculiarity with IE. I'm guessing it's because the web server sets the mime type for the xml data file transfer and without that IE doesn't parse the xml correctly.

    Read the article

  • Google and the SEO Hosting Network

    When you are choosing any type of SEO Company, what you have to remember is that it is very important that you get your hands on the very best SEO hosting network as such a type of networking company can help you to ensure that your website can do much better than any other. Another great advantage that is associated with choosing such type of SEO hosting network is that you are doing whatever is possible to ensure that your website can do very well in a search engine.

    Read the article

  • Google Sites API - File Cabinets: Spaces and extension separator (.) are removed from file names

    - by user1299447
    We have a series of internal reports that we update regularly from our internal databases. We built an application in C# that uploads these reports to a Google Site. Everything works fine, except that the name of the file shown to the final user in the File Cabinet does not include the original spaces nor the extension separator (.) For example, Stock per warehouse.pdf is shown as : Stockperwarehousepdf Below is a simplified version of the code. private AtomEntry UploadAttachment(string filename, AtomEntry parent, string title, string description) { SiteEntry entry = new SiteEntry(); AtomCategory category = new AtomCategory(SitesService.ATTACHMENT_TERM, SitesService.KIND_SCHEME); category.Label = "attachment"; entry.Categories.Add(category); AtomLink parentLink = new AtomLink(AtomLink.ATOM_TYPE, SitesService.PARENT_REL); parentLink.HRef = parent.SelfUri; entry.Links.Add(parentLink); entry.MediaSource = new MediaFileSource(filename, MediaFileSource.GetContentTypeForFileName(filename)); entry.Content.Type = MediaFileSource.GetContentTypeForFileName(filename); entry.Title.Text= title; entry.Summary.Text = description; AtomEntry newEntry = null; newEntry = service.Insert(new Uri(makeFeedUri("content")), entry); } The key line is where the MediaFileSource object is created. Any idea of what we are missing? I've tried all sort of changes :(

    Read the article

  • How to Get Your Website on Top of Google

    Have you ever searched for something then just clicked the very first thing that came to the top? Well even if you haven't plenty of other people out there do this. So if they search for your site's category then you better be the one at the top of the list. If not first then let's try to make it on the first page at least.

    Read the article

  • How can I get sessions to work if I'm using Google App Engine + Django 1.1?

    - by user341642
    Is there a way for me to get sessions working? I know Django has built in session management, and GAE has some tools for it if you're using their watered down version of Django 0.96, but is there a way to get sessions to work if you're trying to use GAE w/ Django 1.1 (i.e. use_library() call). I assume using a db-backed session doesn't work, and a file system backed one won't work b/c we don't have access to the filesystem if we deploy to the Google production servers. This kinda worked (as in didn't crap out) when I used SessionMiddleware backed by a local-memory backed cache and a non-persistent cache (i.e. setting SESSION_ENGINE to django.contrib.sessions.backends.cache). But the session never seems to persist in this case, no matter how I set the timeouts. A new session key is generated on every page reload. Maybe this is b/c the GAE assumes complete statelessness with each request and blows away my local cache? Apologies in advance, I'm pretty new to Python. Any suggestions would be greatly appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Get to the Top of Google With Blogging

    There are many websites out there all trying to get noticed by the search engines which will in turn help them to be found by users. Every website wants more traffic coming into it whether it is providing information or selling products.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282  | Next Page >