Search Results

Search found 14037 results on 562 pages for 'alter index'.

Page 285/562 | < Previous Page | 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292  | Next Page >

  • Add Unique Key For Nullable Columns - SQL Server

    - by Ruby
    I'm using sql server 2008 R2 and would like to apply unique key constraint to nullable columns. This code works good, but if I have multiple columns to add this rule to, it would generate as many 'nullbuster' columns. ALTER TABLE tblBranch ADD nullbuster AS (CASE WHEN column1 IS NULL THEN BranchID ELSE NULL END); CREATE UNIQUE INDEX UK_Column1 ON tblBranch(column1,nullbuster); tblBranch is the table name, nullbuster would be the new column name, BranchId is the Primary key column of the target table, and Column1 is the column name of the target column. Is there any way that I could achieve the goal without generating new columns.

    Read the article

  • Unable to modify a table

    - by the Hampster
    I'm having trouble with mysql. I can read and write, but now I want to add some fields to a table. I run this command: ALTER TABLE Pubs ADD COLUMN issue tinyint AFTER volume; but get this error message: ERROR 7 (HY000): Error on rename of './user_acct/Pubs.MYI' to './user_acct/#sql2-cb0-76f2.MYI' (Errcode: 13) I created this table a few months ago, modified it a little bit, so it worked then. I can still update and insert items, but I just can't modify the table anymore. Any help would be appreciated. --Dave

    Read the article

  • deleting a large number of rows from a table

    - by Azeem
    We have a requirement to delete rows in the order of millions from multiple tables as a batch job (note that we are not deleting all the rows, we are deleting based on a timestamp stored in an indexed column). Obviously a normal DELETE takes forever (because of logging, referential constraint checking etc.). I know in the LUW world, we have ALTER TABLE NOT LOGGED INITIALLY but I can't seem to find the an equivalent SQL statement for DB2 v8 z/OS. Any one has any ideas on how to do this really fast? Also, any ideas on how to avoid the referential checks when deleting the rows? Please let me know.

    Read the article

  • iPhone developing FOR jailbroken devices (not USING jailbroken devices!)

    - by Marek
    I would like to dig into developing for jailbroken devices, just to test what the device could do. I would like, for instance, to alter the ipod music based on geo-location, so i have to program a new daemon that runs in background and fetch gps informations at regular interlavs and then make something with them. Longitude, longitude, for instance, does exactly this, even when the device is locked, and then upload the informations on google latidude. I have some experience as an iphone developer, but i'm not sure on where to find documentation to accomplish such a task. I know about the books "iphone open application development" and "the iphone developer's coockbook", but i don't own them and i'm not sure they have what i'm looking for. Any advice on this?

    Read the article

  • ManyToManyField error when having recursive structure. How to solve it?

    - by luc
    Hello, I have the following table in the model with a recursive structure (a page can have children pages) class DynamicPage(models.Model): name = models.CharField("Titre",max_length=200) parent = models.ForeignKey('self',null=True,blank=True) I want to create another table with manytomany relation with this one: class UserMessage(models.Model): name = models.CharField("Nom", max_length=100) page = models.ManyToManyField(DynamicPage) The generated SQL creates the following constraint: ALTER TABLE `website_dynamicpage` ADD CONSTRAINT `parent_id_refs_id_29c58e1b` FOREIGN KEY (`parent_id`) REFERENCES `website_dynamicpage` (`id`); I would like to have the ManyToMany with the page itself (the id) and not with the parent field. How to modify the model to make the constraint using the id and not the parent? Thanks in advance

    Read the article

  • How do you write a recursive stored procedure

    - by Grayson Mitchell
    I simply want a stored procedure that calculates a unique id and inserts it. If it fails it just calls itself to regenerate said id. I have been looking for an example, but cant find one, and am not sure how I should get the sp to call itself, and set the appropriate output parameter. I would also appreciate someone pointing out how to test this sp also. ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[DataContainer_Insert] @SomeData varchar(max), @DataContainerId int out AS BEGIN -- SET NOCOUNT ON added to prevent extra result sets from -- interfering with SELECT statements. SET NOCOUNT ON; BEGIN TRY SELECT @UserId = MAX(UserId) From DataContainer INSERT INTO DataContainer (UserId, SomeData) VALUES (@UserId, SomeData) SELECT @DataContainerId = scope_identity() END TRY BEGIN CATCH --try again exec DataContainer_Insert @DataContainerId, @SomeData END CATCH END

    Read the article

  • SQL Stored Procedure fired from C# Code-Behind not working on UPDATE

    - by CSSHell
    I have a stored procedure called from a C# code-behind. The code fires but the update command does not get performed. The stored procedure, if run directly, works. I think I am having a brain fart. Please help. :) CODEBEHIND protected void btnAbout_Click(object sender, EventArgs e) { SqlConnection myConnection = new SqlConnection(strConnection); SqlCommand myCommand = new SqlCommand("spUpdateCMSAbout", myConnection); myConnection.Open(); myCommand.CommandType = CommandType.StoredProcedure; myCommand.Parameters.Add("@AboutText", SqlDbType.NVarChar, -1).Value = txtAbout.Text.ToString(); myCommand.ExecuteNonQuery(); myConnection.Close(); } STORED PROCEDURE ALTER PROCEDURE fstage.spUpdateCMSAbout ( @AboutText nvarchar(max) ) AS BEGIN SET NOCOUNT ON; UPDATE fstage.staticCMS SET About = @AboutText; END HTML <asp:Button ID="btnAbout" runat="server" Text="Save" CausesValidation="False" onclick="btnAbout_Click" UseSubmitBehavior="False" /> C# .NET 4.0

    Read the article

  • How to change data structure in mysql using mysqldump without deleting files

    - by Don Quixote
    Essentially what I'm trying to do is sync a production server with a sandbox server, but only the table structures and stored procedures. The procedures aren't any problem since they can be overriden, but the problem is the tables. I want to sync and alter their structures on the production server using mysqldump (or any other way that you can propose) without altering any existing data. If it helps, I only want to add more columns, not remove any existing ones. Also, I am using mysqlyog. Is there any way to do this?

    Read the article

  • how to represent negative number to array of integers ?

    - by stdnoit
    I must convert string of 1324312321 to array of integers in java this is fine. I could use integer parseint and string substring method but how do I repesent -12312312 to my original array of integer.. the fact that - is a char / string and convert to array of integer would alter the value ( even though I convert - to integer-equivalent , it would change the rest of 12312312) it must be an array of integers and how should I convert negative numbers and still keeep the same value somehow reminding me of two complements trick but i dont think i need to go down to binary level in my program.. any other trick for doing this? thanks!

    Read the article

  • Creating immutable objects from javabean

    - by redzedi
    Hi All, I am involved in this project where we are building on good bit of legacy code. I have a particular situation about one big java bean object which has to be transferred over wire. So my first thought was to make it immutable and serializable to do the trick .At this point I am faced with a few difficult choices :- 1 Ideally I want some way to automatically generate an immutable, serializable version of this class. I dont have the scope to refactor or alter this class in any way and i would really really hate to have to copy paste the class with a different name ?? 2 Assuming that i gave up on 1 i.e i actually chose to duplicate code of the HUGE javabean class , i still will be in the unsavoury situation of having to write a constructor with some 20-25 parameters to make this class immutable. what is a better way to make a class immutable other than constructor injection ?? Thanks and Regards,

    Read the article

  • Stored Procedure - forcing execution order

    - by meepmeep
    I have a stored procedure that itself calls a list of other stored procedures in order: CREATE PROCEDURE [dbo].[prSuperProc] AS BEGIN EXEC [dbo].[prProc1] EXEC [dbo].[prProc2] EXEC [dbo].[prProc3] --etc END However, I sometimes have some strange results in my tables, generated by prProc2, which is dependent on the results generated by prProc1. If I manually execute prProc1, prProc2, prProc3 in order then everything is fine. It appears that when I run the top-level procedure, that Proc2 is being executed before Proc1 has completed and committed its results to the db. It doesn't always go wrong, but it seems to go wrong when Proc1 has a long execution time (in this case ~10s). How do I alter prSuperProc such that each procedure only executes once the preceding procedure has completed and committed? Transactions?

    Read the article

  • Grails unit testing and bootstrap

    - by tbruyelle
    I wrote an unit test for a controller. I have a Bootstrap file which alter the metaclass of domain classes by adding a method asPublicMap(). I use this method in the controller to return domain classes as json but only some selected public fields. My unit test failed because of MissingMethodException for asPublicMap(). As I understood, bootstrap classes are not loaded for unit tests, only for integration tests. That's why I got this error. My question is : Is there another place to put metaclass manipulation in order to take them into account during unit tests ?

    Read the article

  • What will happen if I change the type of a column from int to year?

    - by MachinationX
    I have a table in MySQL 4.0 which currently has a year field as a smallint(6) type. What will happen if I convert it directly to a Year type with a query like the following: ALTER TABLE t MODIFY y YEAR(4) NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP; When the current members of column y have values like 2010? I assume that because the year type is technically values from 1-255, values above that will be truncated or broken. So if MySQL isn't smart enough to realize that 2010(int) = 110(year), what would be the simplest query or queries to convert the values? Thanks for your help!

    Read the article

  • phpMyAdmin "No database selected" MySQL

    - by user1751660
    I downloaded a MySQL backup file and promptly imported into MAMP's phpMyAdmin. I got this return: Error SQL query: -- -- Database: `mysql` -- -- -------------------------------------------------------- -- -- Table structure for table `columns_priv` -- CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `columns_priv` ( `Host` CHAR( 60 ) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL DEFAULT '', `Db` CHAR( 64 ) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL DEFAULT '', `User` CHAR( 16 ) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL DEFAULT '', `Table_name` CHAR( 64 ) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL DEFAULT '', `Column_name` CHAR( 64 ) COLLATE utf8_bin NOT NULL DEFAULT '', `Timestamp` TIMESTAMP NOT NULL DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP ON UPDATE CURRENT_TIMESTAMP , `Column_priv` SET( 'Select', 'Insert', 'Update', 'References' ) CHARACTER SET utf8 NOT NULL DEFAULT '', PRIMARY KEY ( `Host` , `Db` , `User` , `Table_name` , `Column_name` ) ) ENGINE = MYISAM DEFAULT CHARSET = utf8 COLLATE = utf8_bin COMMENT = 'Column privileges'; MySQL said: #1046 - No database selected I did not alter the .sql file at all. Any hints on how i can get this puppy going locally? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • MySQL, Altering Table from Latin-1 to UTF-8

    - by brant
    I would like to rid new entries into my database of Latin-1 characters and just allow UTF-8. I plan to Alter table and make the following changes: Charset: latin1 - utf-8 Collation: latin1_swdish_ci - utf8_general_ci The table in question has 1 million rows. Is this a good idea? What are the risks of doing this? What happens to data that I try to input that is not in utf-8? What happens to data that has been previously entered that is not utf-8?

    Read the article

  • Easy way to compute how close an auto_increment is to its maximum value?

    - by David M
    So yesterday we had a table that has an auto_increment PK for a smallint that reached its maximum. We had to alter the table on an emergency basis, which is definitely not how we like to roll. Is there an easy way to report on how close each auto_increment field that we use is to its maximum? The best way I can think of is to do a SHOW CREATE TABLE statement, parse out the size of the auto-incremented column, then compare that to the AUTO_INCREMENT value for the table. On the other hand, given that the schema doesn't change very often, should I store information about the columns' maximum values and get the current AUTO_INCREMENT with SHOW TABLE STATUS?

    Read the article

  • TSQL - create a stored proc inside a transaction statement

    - by Chris L
    I have a sql script that is set to roll to production. I've wrapped the various projects into separate transactions. In each of the transactions we created stored procedures. I'm getting error messages Msg 156, Level 15, State 1, Line 4 Incorrect syntax near the keyword 'procedure'. I created this example script to illustrate Begin Try Begin Transaction -- do a bunch of add/alter tables here -- do a bunch of data manipulation/population here -- create a stored proc create procedure dbo.test as begin select * from some_table end Commit End Try Begin Catch Rollback Declare @Msg nvarchar(max) Select @Msg=Error_Message(); RaisError('Error Occured: %s', 20, 101,@Msg) With Log; End Catch The error seems to imply that I can't create stored procs inside of transaction, but I'm not finding any docs that say otherwise(maybe google isn't being freindly today).

    Read the article

  • Validating a date with symfony using sfValidatorSchema

    - by aaronfalloon
    I'm using the following widget to allow a user to input a date $this->widgetSchema['first_registration'] = new sfWidgetFormDate(array( 'format' => '%month%/%year%', 'years' => range(date('Y', time()) - 15, date('Y', time()) + 15) )); The default format for a date using this widget is %month%/%day%/%year% and so that's what the default validator for this widget checks for. However, I've attempted to alter the validator... $this->validatorSchema['first_registration'] = new sfValidatorDate(array( 'date_format' => '%month%/%year%', 'with_time' => false )); This isn't working and I'm still getting an invalid error. Does anybody know why?

    Read the article

  • Linq.Where-to-SQL on a text field comparing to a list of values

    - by StampedeXV
    Customer.text is a field in an T-SQL DB (that I do not control and thus may not alter) of type "text". I'd like to do something like this: List<string> compare = new List<string>(); compare.Add("one"); compare.Add("two"); var q = from t in customer where t.text.Contains( compare.First()) select t; this will work. But now I'd like to do something like: (!NOT WORKING!) var q = from t in customer where compare.Contains( t.text ) select t; How can I achieve this? Is it even possible?

    Read the article

  • Error when creating database in MySQL using Netbeans 6.8

    - by nix
    I am trying to create a database using MySQL statements in NetBeans 6.8. However, I keep getting Error code 1064. I don't know what the problem is really since the same statements work in NetBeans 6.0. Here is the error: Error code 1064, SQL state 42000: You have an error in your SQL syntax; check the manual that corresponds to your MySQL server version for the right syntax to use near '; /*!40000 ALTER TABLE students ENABLE KEYS */; -- -- Definition of table `w' at line 1016 Line 46, column 1

    Read the article

  • Robust Way of Selecting All Text in Textbox

    - by Emil
    I'm trying to have the content of the an HTML textbox be selected fully onFocus. I know the simple solution of putting a onfocus="this.select()" on the component but this is not a good solution because if a user double clicks into the area the selection is lost and in browsers like chrome it is rarely working like it should and just reverts into input form. I have searched on Google for a little while and can't find a good solution, most suggestions are of this simple solution. What I would like it is that the selection inside the textbox not change once selected and if possible the user should not be able to edit the content of the textbox, for example if you have used AdSense when you grab code from AdSense the selection never changes and your unable to alter the code in the textbox. Any solutions would be appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Encryption By Certificate

    - by user1817240
    I am encrypting customer name in database at database level. While saving in database only first letter of customer name is saved and hence while decrypting only first letter is retrieved. The following code shows the test sp. ALTER PROCEDURE [dbo].[spc_test_insert] ( @sFIRST_NAME typ_encryptedtext, ) AS BEGIN DECLARE @sSENCRYPTION_KEY char(15) DECLARE @sCERTIFICATE char(22) SET @sSENCRYPTION_KEY='SymmetricKey1' SET @sCERTIFICATE='CustomerCertificate' OPEN SYMMETRIC KEY SymmetricKey1 DECRYPTION BY CERTIFICATE CustomerCertificate; INSERT INTO test_table ( FIRST_NAME, ) Values ( -- Add the Params to be Added... EncryptByKey(Key_GUID(@sSENCRYPTION_KEY),@sFIRST_NAME), ) CLOSE SYMMETRIC KEY SymmetricKey1 END encryption decryption working fine in normal insert but its not working in stored procedure.

    Read the article

  • doctrine default values and relations

    - by Skirmantas
    Concept: Lets say we have table Properties with columns id and name (lets say with some predefined values: "Good" "Better" "Best"). Another table Users has column property_id with many to one relation on Properties (property_id = id). Users has default value on property_id, lets say 1 which means "Good". We might have another table analogue to Users however with default property, lets say "Better". What I need is ability to change default value for Users or other tables in administrator's panel. In mysql I can set default value for column like this: ALTER TABLE <Table> CHANGE <Column> DEFAULT <NEW_DEFAULT_VALUE> I can retrieve default value: SELECT DEFAULT(<Column>) FROM <Table> LIMIT 1 Is it possible to achieve this concept with Doctrine? What I actually need is such method in my table class: class UserTable extend Doctrine_Table { /* ... */ getDefaultProperty() { } setDefaultProperty($value) { /* $value can be either integer or Doctrine_Record */ } }

    Read the article

  • Need help... how to add md5 to password field in php?

    - by jones
    Hi mates, i looking some help and nice attention here.. i bought some php script many years ago and now no suport anymore... i just want to add md5 to password field.. here my form: <?php $SQL = "SELECT * from USERS WHERE USERNAME = '$_SESSION[username]'"; $result = @mysql_query( $SQL ); $row = @mysql_fetch_array( $result ); include 'menu.php'; ?> <FORM METHOD="post" ACTION="?page=query_client"> <INPUT TYPE="hidden" NAME="controller" VALUE="USERS~update~account_details&up=1~<?php echo $row[ID]; ?>"> <TABLE CLASS="basictable"> <TR> <TD CLASS="tdmenu" WIDTH="40%">Username</TD> <TD CLASS="tdmenu" WIDTH="60%"> <b><?php echo $row[USERNAME]; ?></b> </TD> </TR> <TR> <TD CLASS="tdmenu" WIDTH="40%">Password *</TD> <TD CLASS="tdmenu" WIDTH="60%"> <INPUT TYPE="PASSWORD" NAME="PASSWORD" SIZE="40" VALUE="<?php echo $row[PASSWORD]; ?>"> </TD> </TR> <TR> <TD CLASS="tdmenu" WIDTH="40%">Email Address *</TD> <TD CLASS="tdmenu" WIDTH="60%"> <INPUT TYPE="text" NAME="EMAIL" SIZE="40" VALUE="<?php echo $row[EMAIL]; ?>"> </TD> </TR> <TR> <TD CLASS="tdmenu" WIDTH="40%">Full Name *</TD> <TD CLASS="tdmenu" WIDTH="60%"> <INPUT TYPE="text" NAME="FULLNAME" SIZE="40" VALUE="<?php echo $row[FULLNAME]; ?>"> </TD> <TR> <TD CLASS="tdmenu" WIDTH="40%">Address *</TD> <TD CLASS="tdmenu" WIDTH="60%"> <INPUT TYPE="text" NAME="ADDRESS1" SIZE="40" VALUE="<?php echo $row[ADDRESS1]; ?>"> </TD> </TR> <BR> <TABLE CLASS="basictable"> <TR> <TD CLASS="tdhead2" > <DIV ALIGN="CENTER"><B> <INPUT TYPE="submit" NAME="Submit" VALUE="Submit"> </B></DIV> </TD> </TR> </TABLE> </FORM> and the it self as query_client.php inside look like: <?PHP @session_start(); $controller = $_POST['controller']; $pieces = explode("~", $controller); $table = $pieces[0]; $qt = $pieces[1]; $return = $pieces[2]; $id = $pieces[3]; $hack = $pieces[4]; if ($qt == insert) $qt = 'INSERT INTO'; if ($qt == update) { $qt = 'UPDATE'; $end = "WHERE ID = '$id'"; } $pre = array_keys( $_POST ); mysql_query ("CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS `$table` (`ID` INT NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT , PRIMARY KEY ( `id` ) )"); $count = count($pre); $count = $count - 2; $sql = "$qt $table SET"; for ($i=0; $i < $count; $i++) { $x=$i+1; $y = $_POST[$pre[$x]]; $d = $y; mysql_query ("ALTER TABLE `$table` ADD `$pre[$x]` TEXT NOT NULL"); $sql .= " `$pre[$x]` = '$d',"; } $sql .= " ID = '$id' $end"; $query = mysql_query($sql) or die("$sql_error" . mysql_error()); if (empty($hack)) { } else { $pieces = explode("/", $hack); $h0 = $pieces[0]; $h1 = $pieces[1]; $h2 = $pieces[2]; $h3 = $pieces[3]; $h4 = $pieces[4]; $h5 = $pieces[5]; mysql_query ("ALTER TABLE `$table` $h0 $h1 $h2 $h3 $h4 $h5"); $query = mysql_query($sql) or die("$sql_error" . mysql_error()); } if (isset($_GET[inc])) include "$_GET[inc].php"; ?> so please help me how to add md5 in PASSWORD field? thanks in advance..

    Read the article

  • SSRS Performance Mystery

    - by user101654
    I have a stored procedure that returns about 50000 records in 10sec using at most 2 cores in SSMS. The SSRS report using the stored procedure was taking 20min and would max out the processor on an 8 core server for the entire time. The report was relatively simple (i.e. no graphs, calculations). The report did not appear to be the issue as I wrote the 50K rows to a temp table and the report could display the data in a few seconds. I tried many different ideas for testing altering the stored procedure each time, but keeping the original code in a separate window to revert back to. After one Alter of the stored procedure, going back to the original code, the report and server utilization started running fast, comparable to the performance of the stored procedure alone. Everything is fine for now, but I am would like to get to the bottom of what caused this in case it happens again. Any ideas?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292  | Next Page >