Search Results

Search found 19742 results on 790 pages for 'search tree'.

Page 29/790 | < Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 | Next Page >

Asymptotic runtime of list-to-tree function

- by Deestan

I have a merge function which takes time O(log n) to combine two trees into one, and a listToTree function which converts an initial list of elements to singleton trees and repeatedly calls merge on each successive pair of trees until only one tree remains. Function signatures and relevant implementations are as follows: merge :: Tree a -> Tree a -> Tree a --// O(log n) where n is size of input trees singleton :: a -> Tree a --// O(1) empty :: Tree a --// O(1) listToTree :: [a] -> Tree a --// Supposedly O(n) listToTree = listToTreeR . (map singleton) listToTreeR :: [Tree a] -> Tree a listToTreeR [] = empty listToTreeR (x:[]) = x listToTreeR xs = listToTreeR (mergePairs xs) mergePairs :: [Tree a] -> [Tree a] mergePairs [] = [] mergePairs (x:[]) = [x] mergePairs (x:y:xs) = merge x y : mergePairs xs This is a slightly simplified version of exercise 3.3 in Purely Functional Data Structures by Chris Okasaki. According to the exercise, I shall now show that listToTree takes O(n) time. Which I can't. :-( There are trivially ceil(log n) recursive calls to listToTreeR, meaning ceil(log n) calls to mergePairs. The running time of mergePairs is dependent on the length of the list, and the sizes of the trees. The length of the list is 2^h-1, and the sizes of the trees are log(n/(2^h)), where h=log n is the first recursive step, and h=1 is the last recursive step. Each call to mergePairs thus takes time (2^h-1) * log(n/(2^h)) I'm having trouble taking this analysis any further. Can anyone give me a hint in the right direction?

Read the article
Binary Search Tree, cannot do traversal

- by ihm

Please see BST codes below. It only outputs "5". what did I do wrong? #include <iostream> class bst { public: bst(const int& numb) : root(new node(numb)) {} void insert(const int& numb) { root->insert(new node(numb), root); } void inorder() { root->inorder(root); } private: class node { public: node(const int& numb) : left(NULL), right(NULL) { value = numb; } void insert(node* insertion, node* position) { if (position == NULL) position = insertion; else if (insertion->value > position->value) insert(insertion, position->right); else if (insertion->value < position->value) insert(insertion, position->left); } void inorder(node* tree) { if (tree == NULL) return; inorder(tree->left); std::cout << tree->value << std::endl; inorder(tree->right); } private: node* left; node* right; int value; }; node* root; }; int main() { bst tree(5); tree.insert(4); tree.insert(2); tree.insert(10); tree.insert(14); tree.inorder(); return 0; }

Read the article
How to deploy the advanced search page using Module in SharePoint 2013

- by ybbest

Today, I’d like to show you how to deploy your custom advanced search page using module in Visual Studio 2012.Using a module is the way how SharePoint deploy all the publishing pages to the search centre. Browse to the template under 15 hive of SharePoint2013, then go to the SearchCenterFiles under Features(as shown below).Then open the Files.xml it shows how SharePoint using module to deploy advanced search.You can download the solution here. Now I am going to show you how to deploy your custom advanced search page.The feature is located in the C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\Web Server Extensions\15\TEMPLATE\FEATURES\SearchCenterFiles . To deploy SharePoint advanced Search pages, you need to do the following: 1. Create SharePoint2013 project and then create a module item. 2. Find how Out of box SharePoint deploy the Advanced Search Page from Files.xml and copy and paste it into the elements.xml <File Url="advanced.aspx" Type="GhostableInLibrary"> <Property Name="PublishingPageLayout" Value="~SiteCollection/_catalogs/masterpage/AdvancedSearchLayout.aspx, $Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,SearchCenterAdvancedSearchTitle;" /> <Property Name="Title" Value="$Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,Search_Advanced_Page_Title;" /> <Property Name="ContentType" Value="$Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,contenttype_welcomepage_name;" /> <AllUsersWebPart WebPartZoneID="MainZone" WebPartOrder="1"> <![CDATA[ <WebPart xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WebPart/v2"> <Assembly>Microsoft.Office.Server.Search, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c</Assembly> <TypeName>Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.AdvancedSearchBox</TypeName> <Title>$Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,AdvancedSearch_Webpart_Title;</Title> <Description>$Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,AdvancedSearch_Webpart_Description;</Description> <FrameType>None</FrameType> <AllowMinimize>true</AllowMinimize> <AllowRemove>true</AllowRemove> <IsVisible>true</IsVisible> <SearchResultPageURL xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">results.aspx</SearchResultPageURL> <TextQuerySectionLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">$Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,AdvancedSearch_FindDocsWith_Title;</TextQuerySectionLabelText> <ShowAndQueryTextBox xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowAndQueryTextBox> <ShowPhraseQueryTextBox xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowPhraseQueryTextBox> <ShowOrQueryTextBox xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowOrQueryTextBox> <ShowNotQueryTextBox xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowNotQueryTextBox> <ScopeSectionLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">$Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,AdvancedSearch_NarrowSearch_Title;</ScopeSectionLabelText> <ShowLanguageOptions xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowLanguageOptions> <ShowResultTypePicker xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowResultTypePicker> <ShowPropertiesSection xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowPropertiesSection> <PropertiesSectionLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">$Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,AdvancedSearch_AddPropRestrictions_Title;</PropertiesSectionLabelText> </WebPart> ]]> </AllUsersWebPart> </File> 3. Customize your SharePoint advanced Search Page by modifying the Advanced Search Box and Export the webpart and copy the webpart file to the elements under module. 4. Export the web part and copy the content of the web part file to the elements.xml in the module. <File Path="AdvancedSearchPage\advanced.aspx" Url="employeeAdvanced.aspx" Type="GhostableInLibrary"> <Property Name="PublishingPageLayout" Value="~SiteCollection/_catalogs/masterpage/AdvancedSearchLayout.aspx, $Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,SearchCenterAdvancedSearchTitle;" /> <Property Name="Title" Value="$Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,Search_Advanced_Page_Title;" /> <Property Name="ContentType" Value="$Resources:Microsoft.Office.Server.Search,contenttype_welcomepage_name;" /> <AllUsersWebPart WebPartZoneID="MainZone" WebPartOrder="1"> <![CDATA[ <WebPart xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns="http://schemas.microsoft.com/WebPart/v2"> <Title>Advanced Search Box</Title> <FrameType>None</FrameType> <Description>Displays parameterized search options based on properties and combinations of words.</Description> <IsIncluded>true</IsIncluded> <ZoneID>MainZone</ZoneID> <PartOrder>1</PartOrder> <FrameState>Normal</FrameState> <Height /> <Width /> <AllowRemove>true</AllowRemove> <AllowZoneChange>true</AllowZoneChange> <AllowMinimize>true</AllowMinimize> <AllowConnect>true</AllowConnect> <AllowEdit>true</AllowEdit> <AllowHide>true</AllowHide> <IsVisible>true</IsVisible> <DetailLink /> <HelpLink /> <HelpMode>Modeless</HelpMode> <Dir>Default</Dir> <PartImageSmall /> <MissingAssembly>Cannot import this Web Part.</MissingAssembly> <PartImageLarge /> <IsIncludedFilter /> <Assembly>Microsoft.Office.Server.Search, Version=15.0.0.0, Culture=neutral, PublicKeyToken=71e9bce111e9429c</Assembly> <TypeName>Microsoft.Office.Server.Search.WebControls.AdvancedSearchBox</TypeName> <SearchResultPageURL xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">results.aspx</SearchResultPageURL> <TextQuerySectionLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">Find documents that have...</TextQuerySectionLabelText> <ShowAndQueryTextBox xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowAndQueryTextBox> <AndQueryTextBoxLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox" /> <ShowPhraseQueryTextBox xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowPhraseQueryTextBox> <PhraseQueryTextBoxLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox" /> <ShowOrQueryTextBox xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowOrQueryTextBox> <OrQueryTextBoxLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox" /> <ShowNotQueryTextBox xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowNotQueryTextBox> <NotQueryTextBoxLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox" /> <ScopeSectionLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">Narrow the search...</ScopeSectionLabelText> <ShowScopes xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">false</ShowScopes> <ScopeLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox" /> <DisplayGroup xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">Advanced Search</DisplayGroup> <ShowLanguageOptions xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">false</ShowLanguageOptions> <LanguagesLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox" /> <ShowResultTypePicker xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowResultTypePicker> <ResultTypeLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox" /> <ShowPropertiesSection xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">true</ShowPropertiesSection> <PropertiesSectionLabelText xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox">Add property restrictions...</PropertiesSectionLabelText> <Properties xmlns="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:AdvancedSearchBox"><root xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"> <LangDefs> <LangDef DisplayName="Arabic" LangID="ar"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Bengali" LangID="bn"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Bulgarian" LangID="bg"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Catalan" LangID="ca"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Simplified Chinese" LangID="zh-cn"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Traditional Chinese" LangID="zh-tw"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Croatian" LangID="hr"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Czech" LangID="cs"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Danish" LangID="da"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Dutch" LangID="nl"/> <LangDef DisplayName="English" LangID="en"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Finnish" LangID="fi"/> <LangDef DisplayName="French" LangID="fr"/> <LangDef DisplayName="German" LangID="de"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Greek" LangID="el"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Gujarati" LangID="gu"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Hebrew" LangID="he"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Hindi" LangID="hi"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Hungarian" LangID="hu"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Icelandic" LangID="is"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Indonesian" LangID="id"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Italian" LangID="it"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Japanese" LangID="ja"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Kannada" LangID="kn"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Korean" LangID="ko"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Latvian" LangID="lv"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Lithuanian" LangID="lt"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Malay" LangID="ms"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Malayalam" LangID="ml"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Marathi" LangID="mr"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Norwegian" LangID="no"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Polish" LangID="pl"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Portuguese" LangID="pt"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Punjabi" LangID="pa"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Romanian" LangID="ro"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Russian" LangID="ru"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Slovak" LangID="sk"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Slovenian" LangID="sl"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Spanish" LangID="es"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Swedish" LangID="sv"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Tamil" LangID="ta"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Telugu" LangID="te"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Thai" LangID="th"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Turkish" LangID="tr"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Ukrainian" LangID="uk"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Urdu" LangID="ur"/> <LangDef DisplayName="Vietnamese" LangID="vi"/> </LangDefs> <Languages> <Language LangRef="en"/> <Language LangRef="fr"/> <Language LangRef="de"/> <Language LangRef="ja"/> <Language LangRef="zh-cn"/> <Language LangRef="es"/> <Language LangRef="zh-tw"/> </Languages> <PropertyDefs> <PropertyDef Name="Path" DataType="url" DisplayName="URL"/> <PropertyDef Name="Size" DataType="integer" DisplayName="Size (bytes)"/> <PropertyDef Name="Write" DataType="datetime" DisplayName="Last Modified Date"/> <PropertyDef Name="FileName" DataType="text" DisplayName="Name"/> <PropertyDef Name="Description" DataType="text" DisplayName="Description"/> <PropertyDef Name="Title" DataType="text" DisplayName="Title"/> <PropertyDef Name="Author" DataType="text" DisplayName="Author"/> <PropertyDef Name="DocSubject" DataType="text" DisplayName="Subject"/> <PropertyDef Name="DocKeywords" DataType="text" DisplayName="Keywords"/> <PropertyDef Name="DocComments" DataType="text" DisplayName="Comments"/> <PropertyDef Name="CreatedBy" DataType="text" DisplayName="Created By"/> <PropertyDef Name="ModifiedBy" DataType="text" DisplayName="Last Modified By"/> <PropertyDef Name="EmployeeNumber" DataType="text" DisplayName="EmployeeNumber"/> <PropertyDef Name="EmployeeId" DataType="text" DisplayName="EmployeeId"/> <PropertyDef Name="EmployeeFirstName" DataType="text" DisplayName="EmployeeFirstName"/> <PropertyDef Name="EmployeeLastName" DataType="text" DisplayName="EmployeeLastName"/> </PropertyDefs> <ResultTypes> <ResultType DisplayName="Employee Document" Name="default"> <KeywordQuery/> <PropertyRef Name="EmployeeNumber" /> <PropertyRef Name="EmployeeId" /> <PropertyRef Name="EmployeeFirstName" /> <PropertyRef Name="EmployeeLastName" /> </ResultType> <ResultType DisplayName="All Results"> <KeywordQuery/> <PropertyRef Name="Author" /> <PropertyRef Name="Description" /> <PropertyRef Name="FileName" /> <PropertyRef Name="Size" /> <PropertyRef Name="Path" /> <PropertyRef Name="Write" /> <PropertyRef Name="CreatedBy" /> <PropertyRef Name="ModifiedBy" /> </ResultType> <ResultType DisplayName="Documents" Name="documents"> <KeywordQuery>IsDocument="True"</KeywordQuery> <PropertyRef Name="Author" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocComments"/> <PropertyRef Name="Description" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocKeywords"/> <PropertyRef Name="FileName" /> <PropertyRef Name="Size" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocSubject"/> <PropertyRef Name="Path" /> <PropertyRef Name="Write" /> <PropertyRef Name="CreatedBy" /> <PropertyRef Name="ModifiedBy" /> <PropertyRef Name="Title"/> </ResultType> <ResultType DisplayName="Word Documents" Name="worddocuments"> <KeywordQuery>FileExtension="doc" OR FileExtension="docx" OR FileExtension="dot" OR FileExtension="docm" OR FileExtension="odt"</KeywordQuery> <PropertyRef Name="Author" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocComments"/> <PropertyRef Name="Description" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocKeywords"/> <PropertyRef Name="FileName" /> <PropertyRef Name="Size" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocSubject"/> <PropertyRef Name="Path" /> <PropertyRef Name="Write" /> <PropertyRef Name="CreatedBy" /> <PropertyRef Name="ModifiedBy" /> <PropertyRef Name="Title"/> </ResultType> <ResultType DisplayName="Excel Documents" Name="exceldocuments"> <KeywordQuery>FileExtension="xls" OR FileExtension="xlsx" OR FileExtension="xlsm" OR FileExtension="xlsb" OR FileExtension="ods"</KeywordQuery> <PropertyRef Name="Author" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocComments"/> <PropertyRef Name="Description" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocKeywords"/> <PropertyRef Name="FileName" /> <PropertyRef Name="Size" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocSubject"/> <PropertyRef Name="Path" /> <PropertyRef Name="Write" /> <PropertyRef Name="CreatedBy" /> <PropertyRef Name="ModifiedBy" /> <PropertyRef Name="Title"/> </ResultType> <ResultType DisplayName="PowerPoint Presentations" Name="presentations"> <KeywordQuery>FileExtension="ppt" OR FileExtension="pptx" OR FileExtension="pptm" OR FileExtension="odp"</KeywordQuery> <PropertyRef Name="Author" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocComments"/> <PropertyRef Name="Description" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocKeywords"/> <PropertyRef Name="FileName" /> <PropertyRef Name="Size" /> <PropertyRef Name="DocSubject"/> <PropertyRef Name="Path" /> <PropertyRef Name="Write" /> <PropertyRef Name="CreatedBy" /> <PropertyRef Name="ModifiedBy" /> <PropertyRef Name="Title"/> </ResultType> </ResultTypes></root></Properties> </WebPart> ]]> </AllUsersWebPart> </File> 5.Deploy your custom solution and you will have a custom advanced search page.

Read the article
Change the Way Google Search Results Display in Firefox

- by Asian Angel

Are you tired of the default look for search results at Google? If you want a different and customized pleasing look for them, then join us as we look at the GoogleMonkeyR User Script. Note: User Style Scripts & User Scripts can be added to most browsers but we are using Firefox & the Greasemonkey extension for our example here. Before Here is the standard look for search results at Google…not bad but it really does not stand out that well either. Installing the User Script You may be asking yourself what makes this particular user script different from others. Take a look at the list of goodies that you get access to and you will understand: Multiple columns of results Removes “Sponsored Links” Add numbers to the results Auto-load more results Removes web search dialogues Open links in a new tab Favicons GooglePreview Self updating Can be configured from a simple user dialogue To get started click on the Webpage Install Button. Once you click on the Webpage Install Button you will see the following window asking for confirmation to add the user script to Firefox. Click Install to complete the process. GoogleMonkeyR in Action Refreshing the same search page shown above shows a noticeable difference already. The light blue background makes the search results stand out a bit better. This is an improvement from before but you will definitely want to have a look to see just how far you can go… Right click on the Greasemonkey Status Bar Icon, go to User Script Commands, and select GoogleMonkeyR Preferences. Once you have clicked on GoogleMonkeyR Preferences the search page will be shaded out and you will have access to the user script’s preferences. This is where you can really make your search results unique looking! Here are the changes that we started out with… After refreshing our search results things looked even better. A look at the entire page of results with our browser maximized and set for two columns. If you have the Auto load more results Option enabled new results will be added very quickly as you scroll down. Our set of search results after adding Favicons & GooglePreview Images. Conclusion If you have been wanting a more dramatic and pleasing look for the search results at Google then you can not go wrong with the GoogleMonkeyR User Script. Change as little or as much as you want to get that perfect look in your browser. Link Install the GoogleMonkeyR User Script Download the Greasemonkey extension for Firefox (Mozilla Add-ons) Similar Articles Productive Geek Tips Make Firefox Quick Search Use Google’s Beta Search KeysMake Firefox Built-In Search Box Use Google’s Experimental Search KeysMake Firefox Show Google Results for Default Address Bar SearchesCombine Wolfram Alpha & Google Search Results in FirefoxHow To Run 4 Different Google Searches at Once In the Same Tab TouchFreeze Alternative in AutoHotkey The Icy Undertow Desktop Windows Home Server – Backup to LAN The Clear & Clean Desktop Use This Bookmarklet to Easily Get Albums Use AutoHotkey to Assign a Hotkey to a Specific Window Latest Software Reviews Tinyhacker Random Tips VMware Workstation 7 Acronis Online Backup DVDFab 6 Revo Uninstaller Pro Explorer++ is a Worthy Windows Explorer Alternative Error Goblin Explains Windows Error Codes Twelve must-have Google Chrome plugins Cool Looking Skins for Windows Media Player 12 Move the Mouse Pointer With Your Face Movement Using eViacam Boot Windows Faster With Boot Performance Diagnostics

Read the article
Entity Framework, full-text search and temporary tables

- by markus

I have a LINQ-2-Entity query builder, nesting different kinds of Where clauses depending on a fairly complex search form. Works great so far. Now I need to use a SQL Server fulltext search index in some of my queries. Is there any chance to add the search term directly to the LINQ query, and have the score available as a selectable property? If not, I could write a stored procedure to load a list of all row IDs matching the full-text search criteria, and then use a LINQ-2-Entity query to load the detail data and evaluate other optional filter criteria in a loop per row. That would be of course a very bad idea performance-wise. Another option would be to use a stored procedure to insert all row IDs matching the full-text search into a temporary table, and then let the LINQ query join the temporary table. Question is: how to join a temporary table in a LINQ query, as it cannot be part of the entity model?

Read the article
Hibernate Search Paging + FullTextSearch + Criteria

- by Roy Chan

I am trying to do a search with some criteria FullTextQuery fullTextQuery = fullTextSession.createFullTextQuery(finalQuery, KnowledgeBaseSolution.class).setCriteriaQuery(criteria); and then page it //Gives me around 700 results result.setResultCount(fullTextQuery.getResultSize()); //Some pages are empty fullTextQuery.setFirstResult(( (pageNumber - 1) * pageSize )); fullTextQuery.setMaxResults( pageSize ); result.setResults(fullTextQuery.list()); I suspect Lucene return full result of the full text search without taking the criteria into account and then hibernate search applies the criteria after, therefore some page are empty (after filtering by criteria) What is proper way to do fullTextSearch with some criteria, is it possible to apply the criteria before the lucene search? Or do I have to use pure Lucene (if so what's the point of Hibernate Search?) Thanks in advance

Read the article
How to build an interactive search engine web interface using python

- by asmaier

I have build a static web interface for searching data from some tables in my PostgreSQL database. The query website consists of a simple textfield for entering the search term, the result website presents the results as a simple html table. The server side code for searching the PostgreSQL database and returning the results is written in python using psycopg2. Now I would like to add some interactive "Ajax features" to my search engine. When entering the search term I would like to be able to see a list of possible search terms like Google does it. On the results page, I would like to be able to sort the table showing the results. What would be the easiest/recommended way to implement these features for my search engine web site? Do I need a full-fledged web framework like Django for that?

Read the article
MS Sql Full-text search vs. LIKE expression

- by Marks

Hi. I'm currently looking for a way to search a big database (500MB - 10GB or more on 10 tables) with a lot of different fields(nvarchars and bigints). Many of the fields, that should be searched are not in the same table. An example: A search for '5124 Peter' should return all items, that ... have an ID with 5124 in it, have 'Peter' in the title or description have item type id with 5124 in it created by a user named 'peter' or a user whose id has 5124 in it created by a user with '5124' or 'peter' in his street address. How should i do the search? I read that the full-text search of MS-Sql is a lot more performant than a query with the LIKE keyword and i think the syntax is more clear, but i think it cant search on bigint(id) values and i read it has performance problems with indexing and therefore slows down inserts to the DB. In my project there will be more inserting than reading, so this could be a matter. Thanks in advance, Marks

Read the article
Writing a search engine

- by wvd

Hello all, The title might be a bit misleading, but I couldn't figure out a better title. I'm writing a simple search engine which will search on several sites for the specific domain. To be concrete: I'm writing a search engine for hardstyle livesets/aftermovies/tracks. To do I will search on the sites who provide livesets, tracks, and such. The problem here is speed, I need to pass the search query to 5-7 sites, get the results and then use my own algorithm to display the results in a sorted order. I could just "multithread" it, but it's easier said then done so I have a few questions. What would be the best solution to this problem? Should I just multithread/process this application, so I'm going to get a bit of speed-up? Are there any other solutions or I am doing something really wrong? Thanks, William van Doorn

Read the article
Spotlight search with PHP

- by htf

Hi. I want to add a spotlight search functionality - search results being displayed with rich contents like thumbnail etc in a drop down menu changing on each keyup event - just like the apple.com search - to a site, having data in MySQL InnoDB tables. The data is spread into separate tables for categories, help pages, blog pages and so on. The search script must take into account just a subset of columns. Since it seems to be a popular demand, I guess there are some PHP search engine projects (preferably open-source and with memcached support), which could be integrated into the existing system on the basis of regular exports of relevant data from the working db/tables. Are there any solutions out there? Which one would you recommend? Or maybe it would be better to implement it the other way around? Thanks

Read the article
Open Source PHP search engine

- by Ravi Gupta

I am looking for an open source search engine plugin written in php for my website(eCommerce). Before anybody answer that I have a doubt regarding the search engine. Usually search engine crawl web pages, create indexes and then use them while looking for contents. But will the same model work for eCommerce websites? Yeah, it can crawl products pages, index them but don't you think it would be better if it crawls the database directly and index the products stored in the database? And when a user search for any product, it will simply give us the rows of the table which matches the user query? May be what I am asking is a stupid question but I am new to web development, so kindly help me to understand the concept. I have looked at a search engine called Sphider but didn't get what all I have to do to make it work with an eCommerce website.

Read the article
Usage examples of binary search

- by python dude

I just realized that in my 4+ years of Java programming (mostly desktop apps) I never used the binary search methods in the Arrays class for anything practical. Not even once. Some reasons I can think of: 100% of the time you can get away with linear search, maps or something else that isn't binary search. The incoming data is almost never sorted, and making it sorted requires an extra sorting step. So I wonder if it's just me, or do a lot of people never use binary search? And what are some good, practical usage examples of binary search?

Read the article
How to cleanly add after-the-fact commits from the same feature into git tree

- by Dennis

I am one of two developers on a system. I make most of the commits at this time period. My current git workflow is as such: there is master branch only (no develop/release) I make a new branch when I want to do a feature, do lots of commits, and then when I'm done, I merge that branch back into master, and usually push it to remote. ...except, I am usually not done. I often come back to alter one thing or another and every time I think it is done, but it can be 3-4 commits before I am really done and move onto something else. Problem The problem I have now is that .. my feature branch tree is merged and pushed into master and remote master, and then I realize that I am not really done with that feature, as in I have finishing touches I want to add, where finishing touches may be cosmetic only, or may be significant, but they still belong to that one feature I just worked on. What I do now Currently, when I have extra after-the-fact commits like this, I solve this problem by rolling back my merge, and re-merging my feature branch into master with my new commits, and I do that so that git tree looks clean. One clean feature branch branched out of master and merged back into it. I then push --force my changes to origin, since my origin doesn't see much traffic at the moment, so I can almost count that things will be safe, or I can even talk to other dev if I have to coordinate. But I know it is not a good way to do this in general, as it rewrites what others may have already pulled, causing potential issues. And it did happen even with my dev, where git had to do an extra weird merge when our trees diverged. Other ways to solve this which I deem to be not so great Next best way is to just make those extra commits to the master branch directly, be it fast-forward merge, or not. It doesn't make the tree look as pretty as in my current way I'm solving this, but then it's not rewriting history. Yet another way is to wait. Maybe wait 24 hours and not push things to origin. That way I can rewrite things as I see fit. The con of this approach is time wasted waiting, when people may be waiting for a fix now. Yet another way is to make a "new" feature branch every time I realize I need to fix something extra. I may end up with things like feature-branch feature-branch-html-fix, feature-branch-checkbox-fix, and so on, kind of polluting the git tree somewhat. Is there a way to manage what I am trying to do without the drawbacks I described? I'm going for clean-looking history here, but maybe I need to drop this goal, if technically it is not a possibility.

Read the article
With ' N ' no of nodes, how many different Binary and Binary Search Trees possible ?

- by siva

For Binary tree: You no need to consider tree node values, I am interested about different tree topologies with 'N' nodes. For Binary Search Tree: We obviously consider tree node values.

Read the article
unicode capable bittorrent search engine

- by muhan

Does anyone know of a way to search for bittorrents who's titles are in non english characters. In my case, I am looking for Korean language torrents, namely Korean TV Dramas.

Read the article
home page of my site is not appear in google search, when I type site:mario--games.com

- by Bimal Das

I am totally confused, when I place site:mario--games.com in google I see every page of my website in serp(search engine result page) except the home page. I don’t know why it’s happening but I check everything according to google SEO rule. But not getting success.I try to check my site through google webmaster tool everything is perfect there, Please help me to solve this. htaccess rule of my site RewriteEngine on #RewriteBase / #RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$ #RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(www\.)?jocuri-barbie.ro/.*$ [NC] #RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(www\.)?joc-jocuri-barbie.ro/.*$ [NC] #RewriteRule \.(gif|jpg|swf|flv|png)$ / [F] RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^sitename\.com$ RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.sitename.com/$1 [R=301,L] RewriteRule ^privacy_policy.html$ privacy.php RewriteRule ^contact_us.html$ contact.php #RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^sitename.com$ #RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://sitename.com/$1 [L,QSA,R=301] RewriteRule ^index\.php$ / [QSA,R=301] RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_]+)_([0-9]+).html$ articol.php?id=$2 RewriteRule ^([a-z_]+).html$ categorii.php?abbr=$1 RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9+]+)$ search.php?cuvinte=$1 RewriteRule ^images/$ images [F] RewriteRule ^o_articole/$ o_articole [F]

Read the article
home page of my site is not appear in google search, when I type site:example.com

- by Bimal Das

I am totally confused, when I place site:example.com in google I see every page of my website in serp(search engine result page) except the home page. I don’t know why it’s happening but I check everything according to google SEO rule. But not getting success.I try to check my site through google webmaster tool everything is perfect there, Please help me to solve this. htaccess rule of my site RewriteEngine on #RewriteBase / #RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^$ #RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(www\.)?example.ro/.*$ [NC] #RewriteCond %{HTTP_REFERER} !^http://(www\.)?exa-example.ro/.*$ [NC] #RewriteRule \.(gif|jpg|swf|flv|png)$ / [F] RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} ^sitename\.com$ RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://www.sitename.com/$1 [R=301,L] RewriteRule ^privacy_policy.html$ privacy.php RewriteRule ^contact_us.html$ contact.php #RewriteCond %{HTTP_HOST} !^sitename.com$ #RewriteRule ^(.*)$ http://sitename.com/$1 [L,QSA,R=301] RewriteRule ^index\.php$ / [QSA,R=301] RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9_]+)_([0-9]+).html$ articol.php?id=$2 RewriteRule ^([a-z_]+).html$ categorii.php?abbr=$1 RewriteRule ^([A-Za-z0-9+]+)$ search.php?cuvinte=$1 RewriteRule ^images/$ images [F] RewriteRule ^o_articole/$ o_articole [F]

Read the article
Change find method in database search so that it isn't case sensitive in Rails app

- by Ryan

Hello, I am learning Rails and have created a work-in-progress app that does one-word searches on a database of shortcut keys for various programs (http://keyboardcuts.heroku.com/shortcuts/home). The search method in the Shortcut model is the following: def self.search(search) search_condition = "%" + search + "%" find(:all, :conditions => ['action LIKE ? OR application LIKE ?', search_condition, search_condition]) end ...where 'action' and 'application' are columns in a SQLite table. (source: https://we.riseup.net/rails/simple-search-tutorial) For some reason, the search seems to be case sensitive (you can see this by searching 'Paste' vs. 'paste'). Can anyone help me figure out why and what I can do to make it not case sensitive? If not, can you at least point me in the right direction? Database creation: I first copied shortcuts from various website into Excel and saved it as a CSV. Then I migrated the database and filled it with the data using db:seed and a small script I wrote (I viewed the database and it looked fine). To get the SQLite database to the server, I used Taps as outline by the Heroku website (http://blog.heroku.com/archives/2009/3/18/push_and_pull_databases_to_and_from_heroku/). I am using Ubuntu. Please let me know if you need more information. Thanks in advance for you help, very much appreciated! Ryan

Read the article
Windows Search Indexer keeps taking the focus

- by Thomaschaaf

I am trying to watch a video with MPC and then Windows Search Indexer keeps taking the focus.. how do I prevent it from doing that? running Windows 7 with x64

Read the article
How to list my blog to google search

- by messy123

Hi, i had created a blog in blogspot.com, after few days later i updated. but my blog is not appearing in google search. even if i give the full link of blog its not coming.. i have some other blogs, it works well.. i dont no whats wrong with new one.. can any one know what to do

Read the article
Software to search for shared files/folders in all machines in a windows network

- by nikhil

I am on a windows network and would like to search for files and folders across all the shared folders in the network. What is a good software/tool that can do this? Thanks.

Read the article
Website Search with many fields (ie Lastname, Firstname, Age, Gender, Income Range) combined with AN

- by metashockwave

How do we go about creating Search with many fields (ie Lastname, Firstname, Age, Gender, Income Range) combined with AND or OR? Thank yoU!

Read the article
Is it true that the Google Spider gives the most relevance of a search result to the first 68 characters of the <title>?

- by leeand00

I am reading documentation about my CMS and it states that an HTML page <title> tag is really important in SEO. It states that the Google Spider gives the most relevance to the first 68 characters of a site title. (68 characters being the number of characters that Google will display in it's search engine result pages,) Can anyone verify this is still true? I read in The Information Diet that content farms were getting too good at gaming Google's algorithm for collecting and posting SERPs and so google had to change the search algorithm.

Read the article
Will rewriting your .htaccess to 404 to return search results from your site negatively effect your ranking in Google?

- by leeand00

Depending on the type of site that you are running, it may or may not be advantageous to display search results instead of a 404 page, when someone visits a non-existent page on your site. I believe that the site I've been maintaining recently would benefit from this as it is the site of a publication. With a publication the more people you can get to read your site the better. But after reading up on how Google ranks the "quality" of your site, where you will appear in SERPs, based on how much the meta text of a page relates to the content of the page, I have to wonder if making a 404 page link to the search results would harm the "quality" of your site in Google eyes.

Read the article
How to make Google Search look dumb?

- by nasekt

I know its a silly question,but i want the search results to be intentionally inaccurate. Sorry, i am not fluent in english,so i will explain using the images below with Breaking Bad tv series as an example : Pic[1]: http://i.imgur.com/QN741LV.jpg Pic[2]: http://i.imgur.com/QcaoV8c.jpg Using (-) sign i can exclude unwanted results,but dont want the other users become aware of it Any script and software that can help me achieve this? Thank you for your help in advance.

Read the article

< Previous Page | 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 | Next Page >