Search Results

Search found 5146 results on 206 pages for 'foo chow'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 31/206 | < Previous Page | 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38  | Next Page >

  • Frustration with generics

    - by sbi
    I have a bunch of functions which are currently overloaded to operate on int and string: bool foo(int); bool foo(string); bool bar(int); bool bar(string); void baz(int p); void baz(string p); I then have a bunch of functions taking 1, 2, 3, or 4 arguments of either int or string, which call the aforementioned functions: void g(int p1) { if(foo(p1)) baz(p1); } void g(string p1) { if(foo(p1)) baz(p1); } void g(int p2, int p2) { if(foo(p1)) baz(p1); if(bar(p2)) baz(p2); } void g(int p2, string p2) { if(foo(p1)) baz(p1); if(bar(p2)) baz(p2); } void g(string p2, int p2) { if(foo(p1)) baz(p1); if(bar(p2)) baz(p2); } void g(string p2, string p2) { if(foo(p1)) baz(p1); if(bar(p2)) baz(p2); } // etc. (The implementation of the g() family is just a placeholder. actually they are more complicated.) More types than the current int or string might have to be introduced at any time. The same goes for functions with more arguments than 4. The current number of identical functions is barely manageable. Add one more variant in either dimension and the combinatoric explosion will be so huge, it might blow away the application. In C++, I'd templatize g() and be done. I understand that .NET generics are different. <sigh> But I have been fighting them for two hours trying to come up with a solution that doesn't involve too much copy&paste of code. To no avail. Surely, C#/.NET/generics/whatever won't require me to type out identical code for a family of functions taking five arguments of either of three types? So what am I missing here?

    Read the article

  • C++ Array Initialization in Function Call or Constructor Call

    - by david
    This question is related to the post here. Is it possible to initialize an array in a function call or constructor call? For example, class foo's constructor wants an array of size 3, so I want to call foo( { 0, 0, 0 } ). I've tried this, and it does not work. I'd like to be able to initialize objects of type foo in other objects' constructor initialization lists, or initialize foo's without first creating a separate array. Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • Scanf fails with bus error

    - by Mikulas Dite
    I'm playing with C and I've run into this error: #include <stdio.h> int main () { char* foo; scanf("%s", foo); printf("entered %s", foo); return 0; } scanf takes pointer, foo is pointer, yet I get bus error. How can I make it work?

    Read the article

  • Sql query listing Fathers and childs with joins, how to distinct them?

    - by DaNieL
    Having those tables: table_n1: | t1_id | t1_name | | 1 | foo | table_n2: | t2_id | t1_id | t2_name | | 1 | 1 | bar | I need a query that gives me two result: | names | | foo | | foo / bar | But i cant figure out the right way. I wrote this one: SELECT CONCAT_WS(' / ', table_n1.t1_name, table_n2.t2_name) AS names FROM table_n1 LEFT JOIN table_n2 ON table_n2.t1_id = table_n1.t1_id that works for an half: this only return the 2° row (in the example above): | names | | foo - bar | This query return the 'father' (table_n1) name only when it doesnt have 'childs' (table_n2). How can i fix it?

    Read the article

  • How to retrieve caller context object in Ruby ?

    - by David
    Hi, hereafter is my piece of code that I want to simplify in order to avoid passing an extra argument on each call : module M def do_something(context) puts "Called from #{context}" end module_function :do_something end class Foo def do_stuff M.do_something(self) end end Foo.new.do_stuff Is there a way to do the same think without passing 'self' as an input argument to 'do_something' method like this ? module M def do_something puts "Called from #{method that returns caller object}" end module_function :do_something end class Foo def do_stuff M.do_something end end Foo.new.do_stuff Thanks for your support!

    Read the article

  • Constructor or Explicit cast

    - by Felan
    In working with Linq to Sql I create a seperate class to ferry data to a web page. To simplify creating these ferry objects I either use a specialized constructor or an explicit conversion operator. I have two questions. First which approach is better from a readibility perspective? Second while the clr code that is generated appeared to be the same to me, are there situations where one would be treated different than the other by the compiler (in lambda's or such). Example code (DatabaseFoo uses specialized constructor and BusinessFoo uses explicit operator): public class DatabaseFoo { private static int idCounter; // just to help with generating data public int Id { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public DatabaseFoo() { Id = idCounter++; Name = string.Format("Test{0}", Id); } public DatabaseFoo(BusinessFoo foo) { this.Id = foo.Id; this.Name = foo.Name; } } public class BusinessFoo { public int Id { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public static explicit operator BusinessFoo(DatabaseFoo foo) { return FromDatabaseFoo(foo); } public static BusinessFoo FromDatabaseFoo(DatabaseFoo foo) { return new BusinessFoo {Id = foo.Id, Name = foo.Name}; } } public class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("Creating the initial list of DatabaseFoo"); IEnumerable<DatabaseFoo> dafoos = new List<DatabaseFoo>() { new DatabaseFoo(), new DatabaseFoo(), new DatabaseFoo(), new DatabaseFoo(), new DatabaseFoo(), new DatabaseFoo()}; foreach(DatabaseFoo dafoo in dafoos) Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}\t{1}", dafoo.Id, dafoo.Name)); Console.WriteLine("Casting the list of DatabaseFoo to a list of BusinessFoo"); IEnumerable<BusinessFoo> bufoos = from x in dafoos select (BusinessFoo) x; foreach (BusinessFoo bufoo in bufoos) Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}\t{1}", bufoo.Id, bufoo.Name)); Console.WriteLine("Creating a new list of DatabaseFoo by calling the constructor taking BusinessFoo"); IEnumerable<DatabaseFoo> fufoos = from x in bufoos select new DatabaseFoo(x); foreach(DatabaseFoo fufoo in fufoos) Console.WriteLine(string.Format("{0}\t{1}", fufoo.Id, fufoo.Name)); } }

    Read the article

  • Exclude entry from glossary?

    - by draebek
    I'm using the glossaries package in LaTeX. I've got \gls{foo} in my document, but I don't want the entry for "foo" to appear in the glossary. How can I keep a working (i.e. expanding) \gls{foo} in the body of my document, but exclude the entry for "foo" from the glossary?

    Read the article

  • Usage of @specialized in traits

    - by paradigmatic
    I have a trait and an implementation looking like: trait Foo[A] { def bar[B >: A: Ordering]: Foo[B] } class FooImpl[A]( val a: A, val values: List[Foo[A]] ) extends Foo[A] { def bar[B >: A] = { /* concrete implementation */} } I would like to use the @specialized annotation on A and B to avoid autoboxing. Do I need to use it in both trait and implementation, only in implementation, or only in trait ?

    Read the article

  • iPhone init method return type

    - by William Jockusch
    Suppose we are writing a class (let's call it Class) in an iPhone program. In all the samples out there, the init methods are typically declared like this: -(id) initWithFoo: (Foo *) foo My question is: would it be more logical to do the following? Why or why not? -(Class *) initWithFoo: (Foo *) foo

    Read the article

  • MySQL - query to return CSV in a field?

    - by StackOverflowNewbie
    Assume I have the following tables: TABLE: foo - foo_id (PK) TABLE: tag - tag_id (PK) - name TABLE: foo_tag - foo_tag_id (PK) - foo_id (FK) - tag_id (FK) How do I query this so that I get a result like this: ========================== | foo_id | tags | ========================== | 1 | foo, bar | | 2 | foo | | 3 | bar | -------------------------- Basically, I need all of foo's tags in one column, comma separated. Possible in MySQL?

    Read the article

  • Fundamental question about boxing / c#

    - by maxp
    Is it possible to change the value stored inside bar after it has been added? I have tried 'boxing' the string foo but it doesnt work. string foo = "aaaaaaa"; var bar = new System.Web.UI.HtmlControls.HtmlGenericControl("div") { InnerHtml =foo }; foo = "zzzzzz"; plcBody.Controls.Add(bar);//want this to contain 'zzzzzz'

    Read the article

  • templates and casting operators

    - by Jonathan Swinney
    This code compiles in CodeGear 2009 and Visual Studio 2010 but not gcc. Why? class Foo { public: operator int() const; template <typename T> T get() const { return this->operator T(); } }; Foo::operator int() const { return 5; } The error message is: test.cpp: In member function `T Foo::get() const': test.cpp:6: error: 'const class Foo' has no member named 'operator T'

    Read the article

  • How do I select the first row per group in an SQL Query?

    - by mafutrct
    I've got this SQL query: SELECT Foo, Bar, SUM(Values) AS Sum FROM SomeTable GROUP BY Foo, Bar ORDER BY Foo DESC, Sum DESC This results in an output similar to this: 47 1 100 47 0 10 47 2 10 46 0 100 46 1 10 46 2 10 44 0 2 I'd like to have only the first row per Foo and ignore the rest. 47 1 100 46 0 100 44 0 2 How do I do that?

    Read the article

  • Makefile and rm -f file.{ext1,ext2,ext3} issue

    - by ak91
    Hello, Could you explain me, why Makefile rule: clean: rm -f foo.{bar1,bar2,bar3} does not result in removing files: foo.bar1 foo.bar2 and foo.bar3? I believe I saw pattern like that many times in various Makefiles, but I'm currently writing my own Makefile and can't make that rule work correctly (no files are removed). I'm using: gnu make 3.81 gnu bash 4.1.5 Bash evals that pattern as I suspect: $ echo test.{a,b,c} test.a test.b test.c Thanks!

    Read the article

  • What are nested/unnested packages in Scala 2.8?

    - by retronym
    In Scala 2.7, I could write: package com.acme.bar class Bar . package com.acme.foo class Foo { new bar.Bar } This doesn't compile in Scala 2.8 -- however this does: package com.acme package bar class Bar . package com.acme package foo class Foo { new bar.Bar } What was the motivation for this? What is the precise meaning, with regards to scope and visibility? When should I use one form over the other?

    Read the article

  • List comprehension from multiple sources in Python?

    - by Noah
    Is it possible to replace the following with a list comprehension? res = [] for a, _, c in myList: for i in c: res.append((a, i)) For example: # Input myList = [("Foo", None, [1, 2, 3]), ("Bar", None, ["i", "j"])] # Output res = [("Foo", 1), ("Foo", 2), ("Foo", 3), ("Bar", "i"), ("Bar", "j")]

    Read the article

  • c++ object sizes

    - by anon
    Suppose I have: struct Foo: public Bar { .... } Foo introduces no new member varaibles. Foo only introduces a bunch of member functions & static functions. Does any part of the C++ standard now guarantee me that: sizeof(Foo) == sizeof(Bar) ? Thanks!

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38  | Next Page >