Search Results

Search found 5685 results on 228 pages for 'encrypted partition'.

Page 33/228 | < Previous Page | 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40  | Next Page >

  • Why does this loopback device creation malfunction?

    - by user50118
    The stackoverflow people thought this was more appropriate here, I put it there as it is part of a program but I can see their POV, so here it is: At the bottom of the code you can see it failing. In fact, I'll put it here at the start too because it is the problem I need to solve: [350591.924819] EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 9750806 exceeds size of device (9750168 blocks) I don't understand why the device is supposedly too small. I made this partition two days ago with normal fdisk, it was created and formatted with ext4 supplying no options other than the partition (/dev/sdb2) to format. The only explaination I can think of is that ext4 has the size of the partition wrong somehow but that seems very unlikely. What is wrong with my math? The offset is correct, you can see that with the file command, and the size should be correct too because End - Start comes to the same number of sectors minus 1, just like it should (A disk starting on sector 1 and ending on sector 2 would be 2 - 1 = 1 and have two sectors). # sfdisk -luS /dev/sdb Disk /dev/sdb: 9729 cylinders, 255 heads, 63 sectors/track Units = sectors of 512 bytes, counting from 0 Device Boot Start End #sectors Id System /dev/sdb2 78295040 156296384 78001345 83 Linux # losetup -r -f --show -o $((78295040 * 512)) --sizelimit $((78001345 * 512)) /dev/sdb /dev/loop0 # file -s /dev/loop0 /dev/loop0: Linux rev 1.0 ext4 filesystem data (needs journal recovery) (extents) (large files) (huge files) # mount -o ro -t ext4 /dev/loop0 /mnt mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/loop0, missing codepage or helper program, or other error In some cases useful info is found in syslog - try dmesg | tail or so # dmesg | tail -n 1 [350591.924819] EXT4-fs (loop0): bad geometry: block count 9750806 exceeds size of device (9750168 blocks)

    Read the article

  • GRUB- error: no such partition grub rescue and Error: No default or UI configuration directive found boot > on pendrive

    - by Ash
    I have dell inspiron, previously I installed Ubuntu 11.10 on my Windows 7 and made it dual boot. But since I want to upgrade my Ubuntu version and change the partition spacing, I deleted 11.10 partition directly and extended my hardrive space (Windows + Ubuntu) at that moment everything was fine. Then I prepared a 12.04 32bit USB and installed it . It was installed but isn't showing dual boot option like 11.10 and my machine directly boot into Windows 7. So instantly i again deleted my 12.04 partition . Now I login into Windows 7 but whenever I put USB ( with 12.04 ) to boot from it, I am facing error of "no such partition grub rescue" even though I try to put lower version(11.04) it showing another error "Error: No default or UI configuration directive found boot " I have reinstall Windows 7 and reformat all partition, still I am facing same error :(

    Read the article

  • Recovering a mdadm+lvm+ext4 partition with read error

    - by bitwelder
    One of disks in my NAS has failed. The NAS is running Linux, and it uses mdadm + LVM technology for its filesystems. I do have backup for most of the contents, but not for the very last changes, and if possible, I'd like to recover that from this failing disk. The disk (a 'green drive' WD10EARS 1TB in size) throws this kind of errors: Oct 3 12:00:41 kernel: [ 3625.620000] ata5.00: read unc at 9453282 Oct 3 12:00:41 kernel: [ 3625.620000] lba 9453282 start 9453280 end 1953511007 Oct 3 12:00:41 kernel: [ 3625.620000] sde5 auto_remap 0 Oct 3 12:00:41 kernel: [ 3625.630000] ata5.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x1 SErr 0x0 action 0x6 Oct 3 12:00:41 kernel: [ 3625.630000] ata5.00: edma_err_cause=00000084 pp_flags=00000003, dev error, EDMA self-disable Oct 3 12:00:41 kernel: [ 3625.640000] ata5.00: failed command: READ FPDMA QUEUED Oct 3 12:00:41 kernel: [ 3625.650000] ata5.00: cmd 60/40:00:e0:3e:90/00:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq 32768 in Oct 3 12:00:41 kernel: [ 3625.650000] res 41/40:00:e2:3e:90/12:00:00:00:00/40 Emask 0x409 (media error) <F> Oct 3 12:00:41 kernel: [ 3625.660000] ata5.00: status: { DRDY ERR } However, while testing with 'dd', I noticed that if I skip the first 4kB, the read seems to be ok, i.e. a command like. dd if=/dev/sde5 of=dev/null bs=4k count=1000 skip=1 doesn't return any read error. Supposing that there is no other read failure in the rest of the disk, would I be able to recover this 900 GB partition (as I mentioned before, it's a 'linux raid autodetect' partition, that contains a a LVM2 volume that contains a ext4 filesystem) if I copy-clone the partition somewhere else, but the first 4kB?

    Read the article

  • Windows recovery partition with GRUB2

    - by Actorclavilis
    So I recently got a new Toshiba laptop and installed Ubuntu 12.04 on it. Since it is a "Windows 7 Enabled" machine or some other proprietary nonsense like that, a few hardware features are designed only to work with W7. Eventually I found a way to enable these hardware functions by booting into the W7 recovery disc; however, they sporadically stop working. I'm moderately surprised that I was able to get anything to work at all, so I don't especially want to spend more time fixing the problems in a different fashion. Now I don't actually own the recovery disc; it's my father's. Since it's a pain to have to go asking for the disc every time the features stop working, I made an image of the disc and was hoping to make a 'recovery' partition like some computers have. However, unetbootin and GRUB2 both want a kernel and initrd to point to on startup, and something like set root=(hd0,1) loopback lo /w7r.iso set root=(lo) chainloader +1 in the spirit of the makeactive/ chainloader +1 commands that I used to use to dual-boot Linux and Windows simply gives me a file-not-found error. My question, therefore, is: Is it possible to, having written a Windows iso to a partition (such as with dd if=w7r.iso of=/dev/sda4) to a partition, convince GRUB2 to boot from it? Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • ext3: maximum recommended partition size / handling large partitions

    - by Hansi
    Hi! I would like to do an encrypted install of Ubuntu on a 2 Terabyte drive (i.e., using LUKS/DMcrypt). In order to not have to type in passwords too often, the partitioning scheme will be 50 GB for / and about 1 TB for /home (and the rest for Windows 7), just for clarity. Even though by now LVM is regarded as being stable, I don't want to bother having more room for errors by introducing unnecessary layers of complexity. For both Ubuntu partitions I want encrypted ext3 with the default blocksize of ext3 (4k?). Thoughts: When I look at most partition schemes here on this site or elsewhere, I usually see at most about 400 or 500 GB partitions (maybe I didn't see enough). There may be different reasons for this, but is reliability an issue here? Are larger ext3 partitions, like about 1 TB, harder to handle for the OS or filesystem driver or at some other level? If I make the partition too large, will it be harder to repair in case of corruptions? Are there some default settings for ext3 that I should change for 1 TB partitions? Question: What maximum partition size for ext3 do you recommend and why? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Restoring MBR, partition table, and boot sector of memory card without data loss ("USBC")

    - by Synetech
    Abstract I have a FAT32 memory card that when inserted into a computer causes Windows to prompt to format it. The card is definitely not supposed to be blank and has a bunch of files on it. Symptoms Using a hex-editor/disk-viewer, I examined the card and found that several sectors/clusters have been overwritten with something that has a signature of USBC at the start of the sector. Specifically, the master boot record (and partition table) is gone (hence Windows thinking the card is blank and needing to be formatted), as are the boot sectors (they have the USBC signature and a volume label of NO NAME and partition type of FAT32). Fortunately, it looks like both copies of the FAT are almost entirely intact (a few FAT entries at the start of a cluster here and there seem to be overwritten by USBC). The root directory is also nearly intact—I can see the volume label entry and subdirectory listings, but one sector is overwritten. (There are no more instances of USBC after the last one in the FAT2.) Hypothesis These observations seem to indicate some sort of virus that erases a few key filesystem structures, and then overwrites a few extra sectors here and there. Googling it seems to corroborate the idea of a virus, except that others report a file called USBC which does not apply here, and in fact, could not be possible since there is no filesystem to even see files. I cannot find any information about a virus with these symptoms, nor a removal tool. (I can't help but wonder if it is actually due to an autorun virus prevention tool.) Question I can likely fix the FAT corruption since they are mostly contiguous chains and maybe even the lost sector of the root directory, but does anyone know of a convenient way to restore or (re)create the MBR/partition table and boot sectors (without formatting or overwriting the data)?

    Read the article

  • W7-pro indexing mydoc on disk partition does not work

    - by Yvan Thery
    I am working on a HP-7100 mini tower running W7 Pro 64bits. My Local HD includes C:/ + 2 disk partitions : all my documents are located on disk partition L:/ and all my media files are on disk partition M:/ The indexing process works well on C:/ and M:/ but does not index the L:/ any more also all of them are allowed to be indexed, also the system is present on all drive security tabs. I have tested to rebuilt the indexing file with a new setting including few directories present on drive C/M/L but still with L: does not work ! One more thing I can tell you is that even after rebuilding the indexing file, I can find some residual directories or files which are out of the test selection. It is like unerased components remaining in the indexing database. As I do not know precisely how the indexing process works it is hard to know what to do ... Recently I had a bad time after using a past restoration procedure ... maybe it did corrupt the indexing file ???? If I start indexing the all L:/ disk partition the system stop at 39 found index also many more are existing .... Does any one from you guys could advise the process to create a new indexing database ... ? Any idea to get out of this mess ? Many thanks for assistance Yvan

    Read the article

  • What should I encrypt in Debian during install?

    - by ianfuture
    I have seen various guides and recommendations on web about how best to do this but nothing that clearly explains the best way and why. So I understand there is a need for part of Debian during install to be un-encrypted on its own partition to allow it to boot. Most info I have seen is call this /boot and set the boot flag. Next I believe the best approach is to create another partition out of all the rest of the disk space, encrypt this, then on top of that create a LVM and then within the LVM create my various partitions , name them , select size, and file system type. Can I include /swap in the encrypted LVM part ? Is this approach sound? If so what are the partitions I should use (this is going to be a minimal server install with a view to install as and when what I need for a dev server)? Finally how does the installer know what to put in each partition I define ? I appreciate there are more than one question but any help and suggestions would be appreciated. If further clarification is needed please mention in the comments . EDIT : 16/3/2010 After Richard Holloways reply I thought it relevant to add this info: The reasons why I want to do this are to explore maximising security on any server install and set up, due to interest in the area of Computer Security and Forensics. Also I am trying to peform the task as if it being performed in an enterprise situation. On a technical matter, once set up and configured with minimal packages and ssh this server will not physically be easy to access so I will only be entering via ssh. (Yes I know why encrypt something no one will ever be able to get their hands on? Because I can and I want to is the simple answer, but see above too).

    Read the article

  • How to split currently used partition on Ubuntu server?

    - by KrizzzyS
    I would like to split a currently used partition that is mounted to /usr directory. I did this because / only had 1 gb of data allocated to it. Now, I did not account for the /home directory when I made this partition (or I would have made two partitions). So I have 14 gb mounted to usr/ with 12 gb free. Is there a way I can reclaim the free space on this partition to make another partition to mount to /home? Here is the result of a df -h: I have tried to split the /dev/mmcblk1p4 into 2 different partitions but I was not able to save the partition table correctly.

    Read the article

  • Is it safe to format this partition?

    - by xanesis4
    On a ubuntu server I own, I am running out of space. When I ran sudo parted /dev/sda -l to find all available drives, I got this: Model: ATA ST31000528AS (scsi) Disk /dev/sda: 1000GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: msdos Number Start End Size Type File system Flags 1 1049kB 256MB 255MB primary ext2 boot 2 257MB 1000GB 1000GB extended 5 257MB 1000GB 1000GB logical lvm Model: Linux device-mapper (linear) (dm) Disk /dev/mapper/server--vg-swap_1: 2135MB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: loop Number Start End Size File system Flags 1 0.00B 2135MB 2135MB linux-swap(v1) Model: Linux device-mapper (linear) (dm) Disk /dev/mapper/server--vg-root: 998GB Sector size (logical/physical): 512B/512B Partition Table: loop Number Start End Size File system Flags 1 0.00B 998GB 998GB ext4 I understand /dev/mapper/server--vg-root is the filesystem, and /dev/sda1 has some stuff related to GRUB. But, what about /dev/sda2 and /dev/sda5? When I tried to mount /dev/sda2, it said that I needed to specify the file system, which according to the table, is nonexistent. So, is it safe to format this with, say ext4 and mount it? Also, when I tried to mount /dev/sd5, it gave me this error: mount: unknown filesystem type 'LVM2_member' I assume it is NOT save to reformat this. If I'm wrong, then that would be great, because I could save some space. Please let me know either way. Thanks in advance! UPDATE: Here is the result of mount: /dev/mapper/server--vg-root on / type ext4 (rw,errors=remount-ro) proc on /proc type proc (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) sysfs on /sys type sysfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev) none on /sys/fs/fuse/connections type fusectl (rw) none on /sys/kernel/debug type debugfs (rw) none on /sys/kernel/security type securityfs (rw) udev on /dev type devtmpfs (rw,mode=0755) devpts on /dev/pts type devpts (rw,noexec,nosuid,gid=5,mode=0620) tmpfs on /run type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,size=10%,mode=0755) none on /run/lock type tmpfs (rw,noexec,nosuid,nodev,size=5242880) none on /run/shm type tmpfs (rw,nosuid,nodev) /dev/sda1 on /boot type ext2 (rw,acl) /dev/sda1 on /media/hd2 type ext2 (rw)

    Read the article

  • Resizing a LUKS encrypted volume

    - by mgorven
    I have a 500GiB ext4 filesystem on top of LUKS on top of an LVM LV. I want to resize the LV to 100GiB. I know how to resize ext4 on top of an LVM LV, but how do I deal with the LUKS volume? mgorven@moab:~% sudo lvdisplay /dev/moab/backup --- Logical volume --- LV Name /dev/moab/backup VG Name moab LV UUID nQ3z1J-Pemd-uTEB-fazN-yEux-nOxP-QQair5 LV Write Access read/write LV Status available # open 1 LV Size 500.00 GiB Current LE 128000 Segments 1 Allocation inherit Read ahead sectors auto - currently set to 2048 Block device 252:3 mgorven@moab:~% sudo cryptsetup status backup /dev/mapper/backup is active and is in use. type: LUKS1 cipher: aes-cbc-essiv:sha256 keysize: 256 bits device: /dev/mapper/moab-backup offset: 3072 sectors size: 1048572928 sectors mode: read/write mgorven@moab:~% sudo tune2fs -l /dev/mapper/backup tune2fs 1.42 (29-Nov-2011) Filesystem volume name: backup Last mounted on: /srv/backup Filesystem UUID: 63877e0e-0549-4c73-8535-b7a81eb363ed Filesystem magic number: 0xEF53 Filesystem revision #: 1 (dynamic) Filesystem features: has_journal ext_attr resize_inode dir_index filetype extent flex_bg sparse_super large_file huge_file uninit_bg dir_nlink extra_isize Filesystem flags: signed_directory_hash Default mount options: (none) Filesystem state: clean with errors Errors behavior: Continue Filesystem OS type: Linux Inode count: 32768000 Block count: 131071616 Reserved block count: 0 Free blocks: 112894078 Free inodes: 32044830 First block: 0 Block size: 4096 Fragment size: 4096 Reserved GDT blocks: 992 Blocks per group: 32768 Fragments per group: 32768 Inodes per group: 8192 Inode blocks per group: 512 RAID stride: 128 RAID stripe width: 128 Flex block group size: 16 Filesystem created: Sun Mar 11 19:24:53 2012 Last mount time: Sat May 19 13:29:27 2012 Last write time: Fri Jun 1 11:07:22 2012 Mount count: 0 Maximum mount count: 100 Last checked: Fri Jun 1 11:03:50 2012 Check interval: 31104000 (12 months) Next check after: Mon May 27 11:03:50 2013 Lifetime writes: 118 GB Reserved blocks uid: 0 (user root) Reserved blocks gid: 0 (group root) First inode: 11 Inode size: 256 Required extra isize: 28 Desired extra isize: 28 Journal inode: 8 Default directory hash: half_md4 Directory Hash Seed: 383bcbc5-fde9-4720-b98e-2d6224713ecf Journal backup: inode blocks

    Read the article

  • SASL (Postfix) authentication with MySQL and Blowfish pre-encrypted passwords

    - by webo
    I have a Rails app with the Devise authentication gem running user registration and login. I want to use the db table that Devise populates when a user registers as the table that Postfix uses to authenticate users. The table has all the fields that Postfix may want for SASL authentication except that Devise encrypts the password using Blowfish before placing it in the database. How could I go about getting Postfix/SASL to decrypt those passwords so that the user can be authenticated properly? Devise salts the password so I'm not sure if that helps. Any suggestions? I'd likely want to do something similar with Dovecot or Courier, I'm not attached to one quite yet.

    Read the article

  • Variable size encrypted container

    - by Cray
    Is there an application similar to TrueCrypt, but the one that can make variable size containers opposed to fixed-size or only-growing-to-certain-amount containers which can be made by TrueCrypt? I want this container to be able to be mounted to a drive/folder, and the size of the outer container not be much different from the total size of all the files that I put into the mounted folder, while still providing strong encryption. If to put it in other words, I want a program like truecrypt, which not only automatically grows the container if I put in new files, but also decreases it's size if some files are deleted. I know there are some issues of course, and it would not work 100% as truecrypt, because it basically works on the sector level of the disk, giving all the filesystem-control to the OS, and so when I remove a file, it might as well be left there, or there might be some fragmentation issues that would stop just truncating the volume from working, but perhaps a program can be built in some other way? Instead of providing sector-level interface, it would provide filesystem-level interface? A filesystem inside a file which would support shrinking when files are deleted?

    Read the article

  • OS X: Storing MySQL data securely, on an encrypted FileVault image using a soft link

    - by GJ
    I am trying to get a macports-installed MySQL to use a data directory stored inside my FileVault-protected home dir. I used sudo cp -a /opt/local/var/db/mysql5 ~/db/ (the -a to ensure file permissions remain intact) and then replaced the original mysql5 directory with a soft link: sudo ln -s ~/db/mysql5 /opt/local/var/db/mysql5 However, when I now try to start MySQL it fails. It follows the soft link at least to the extent that it modifies some files in the ~/db/mysql5 dir, notably the error log which gets appended to it this: 110108 15:33:08 mysqld_safe Starting mysqld daemon with databases from /opt/local/var/db/mysql5 110108 15:33:08 [Warning] '--skip-locking' is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Please use '--skip-external-locking' instead. 110108 15:33:08 [Warning] '--log_slow_queries' is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Please use ''--slow_query_log'/'--slow_query_log_file'' instead. 110108 15:33:08 [Warning] '--default-character-set' is deprecated and will be removed in a future release. Please use '--character-set-server' instead. 110108 15:33:08 [Warning] Setting lower_case_table_names=2 because file system for /opt/local/var/db/mysql5/ is case insensitive 110108 15:33:08 [Note] Plugin 'FEDERATED' is disabled. 110108 15:33:08 [Note] Plugin 'ndbcluster' is disabled. /opt/local/libexec/mysqld: Table 'mysql.plugin' doesn't exist 110108 15:33:08 [ERROR] Can't open the mysql.plugin table. Please run mysql_upgrade to create it. 110108 15:33:09 InnoDB: Started; log sequence number 4 1596664332 110108 15:33:09 [ERROR] /opt/local/libexec/mysqld: Can't create/write to file '/opt/local/var/db/mysql5/mac.local.pid' (Errcode: 13) 110108 15:33:09 [ERROR] Can't start server: can't create PID file: Permission denied 110108 15:33:09 mysqld_safe mysqld from pid file /opt/local/var/db/mysql5/gPod.local.pid ended I can't see why MySQL can't create the pid file, since manually creating it using the _mysql user succeeds (sudo -u _mysql touch mac.local.pid from inside ~/db/mysql5) Any ideas how to resolve this?

    Read the article

  • SSL certificates with password encrypted key at hosting provider

    - by Jurian Sluiman
    We are a software company and offer hosting to our clients. We have a VPS at a large Dutch datacenter. For some of the applications, we need an SSL certificate which we'd like to encrypt with a password protected keyfile. Our VPS reboots now and then because of updates whatsoever, but that means our apache doesn't start right away because the passwords are needed. This results in downtime and is of course a real big problem. We can give the passwords to our VPS datacenter, or create certificates based on keyfiles without passwords. Both solutions seem not the best one, because they compromise the security of our certificates. What's the best solution for this issue?

    Read the article

  • Hacked website, code is encrypted in hex, unable to identify

    - by dhakad
    my web site hacked and i am getting code in index page, but i am unable to find that where is the code in my web site... %3c%68%74%6d%6c%3e%3c%68%65%61%64%3e%0d%0a%3c%6d%65%74%61%20%63%6f%6e%74%65%6e%74%3d%22%74%65%78%74%2f%68%74%6d%6c%3b%20%63%68%61%72%73%65%74%3d%75%74%66%2d%38%22%3e%0d%0a%3c%74%69%74%6c%65%3e%2e%2f%20%72%45%64%20%58%20%7c%20%33%78%70%31%72%33%20%43%79%62%65%72%20%41%72%6d%79%3c%2f%74%69%74%6c%65%3e%0d%0a%3c%6d%65%74%61%20%6e%61%6d%65%3d%22%61%75%74%68%6f%72%22%20%63%6f%6e%74%65%6e%74%3d%22%72%45%64%20%58%22%20%2f%3e%0d%0a%3c%6d%65%74%61%20%6e%61%6d%65%3d%22%6b%65%79%77%6f%72%64%73%22%20%63%6f%6e%74%65%6e%74%3d%22%72%45%64%20%58%2c%33%78%70%31%72%33%20%43%79%62%65%72%20%41%72%6d%79%2c%5a%6f%6e%65%2d%48%2c%42%61%6e%67%6c%61%64%65%73%68%69%20%48%61%63%6b%65%72%22%20%2f%3e%0d%0a%3c%6d%65%74%61%20%6e%61%6d%65%3d%22%64%65%73%63%72%69%70%74%69%6f%6e%22%20%63%6f%6e%74%65%6e%74%3d%22%5b%20%72%45%64%20%58%20%2e%2e%20%54%68%65%20%52%65%61%6c%20%4f%75%74%72%61%67%65%6f%75%73%20%5d%22%20%2f%3e%0d%0a%3c%6c%69%6e%6b%20%72%65%6c%3d%22%53%48%4f%52%54%43%55%54%20%49%43%4f%4e%22%20%68%72%65%66%3d%22%68%74%74%70%3a%2f%2f%75%73%2e%79%69%6d%67%2e%63%6f%6d%2f%69%2f%6d%65%73%67%2f%65%6d%6f%74%69%63%6f%6e%73%37%2f%36%31%2e%67%69%66%22%3e%0d%0a%3c%73%74%79%6c%65%20%74%79%70%65%3d%22%74%65%78%74%2f%63%73%73%22%3e%0d%0a%62%6f%64%79%20%7b%62%61%63%6b%67%72%6f%75%6e%64%2d%69%6d%61%67%65%3a%20%75%72%6c%28%68%74%74%70%3a%2f%2f%6d%65%64%69%61%2e%73%6f%6d%65%77%68%65%72%65%69%6e%62%6c%6f%67%2e%6e%65%74%2f%69%6d%61%67%65%73%2f%6f%6e%64%68%6f%6b%61%72%65%72%5f%72%61%6a%70%75%74%72%61%5f%31%33%33%38%32%35%30%34%33%31%5f%31%2d%62%67%2e%67%69%66%29%3b%0d%0a%62%61%63%6b%67%72%6f%75%6e%64%2d%63%6f%6c%6f%72%3a%20%62%6c%61%63%6b%3b%63%6f%6c%6f%72%3a%20%23%46%46%41%35%30%30%3b%66%6f%6e%74%2d%77%65%69%67%68%74%3a%20%62%6f%6c%64%3b%74%65%78%74%2d%61%6c%69%67%6e%3a%20%63%65%6e%74%65%72%3b%7d%0d%0a%69%6d%67%7b%6f%70%61%63%69%74%79%3a%30%2e%37%35%3b%20%66%69%6c%74%65%72%3a%61%6c%70%68%61%28%6f%70%61%63%69%74%79%3d%37%35%29%3b%7d%0d%0a%2e%72%65%64%78%20%7b%74%65%78%74%2d%73%68%61%64%6f%77%3a%20%30%20%30%20%36%70%78%20%72%65%64%2c%20%30%20%30%20%35%70%78%20%72%65%64%2c%20%30%20%30%20%35%70%78%20%72%65%64%3b%63%6f%6c%6f%72%3a%20%23%46%46%46%7d%0d%0a%3c%2f%73%74%79%6c%65%3e%0d%0a%3c%2f%68%65%61%64%3e%0d%0a%3c%62%6f%64%79%20%6f%6e%63%6f%6e%74%65%78%74%6d%65%6e%75%3d%22%72%65%74%75%72%6e%20%66%61%6c%73%65%22%20%6f%6e%6b%65%79%64%6f%77%6e%3d%22%72%65%74%75%72%6e%20%66%61%6c%73%65%22%20%6f%6e%6d%6f%75%73%65%64%6f%77%6e%3d%22%72%65%74%75%72%6e%20%66%61%6c%73%65%22%3e%0d%0a%3c%64%69%76%20%73%74%79%6c%65%3d%22%66%6f%6e%74%2d%66%61%6d%69%6c%79%3a%20%50%61%6c%61%74%69%6e%6f%20%4c%69%6e%6f%74%79%70%65%3b%66%6f%6e%74%2d%73%69%7a%65%3a%20%34%36%70%78%3b%22%20%63%6c%61%73%73%3d%22%72%65%64%78%22%3e%2e%3a%3a%20%72%45%64%20%58%20%57%61%73%20%48%65%72%65%20%3a%3a%2e%3c%2f%64%69%76%3e%3c%62%72%2f%3e%0d%0a%3c%69%6d%67%20%73%72%63%3d%22%68%74%74%70%3a%2f%2f%6d%65%64%69%61%2e%73%6f%6d%65%77%68%65%72%65%69%6e%62%6c%6f%67%2e%6e%65%74%2f%69%6d%61%67%65%73%2f%6f%6e%64%68%6f%6b%61%72%65%72%5f%72%61%6a%70%75%74%72%61%5f%31%33%35%33%35%35%32%36%35%31%5f%31%2d%72%65%64%2d%78%2e%6a%70%67%22%3e%3c%62%72%2f%3e%0d%0a%3c%64%69%76%20%73%74%79%6c%65%3d%22%66%6f%6e%74%2d%66%61%6d%69%6c%79%3a%20%42%6f%6f%6b%6d%61%6e%20%4f%6c%64%20%53%74%79%6c%65%3b%63%6f%6c%6f%72%3a%20%23%30%30%30%3b%66%6f%6e%74%2d%73%69%7a%65%3a%20%32%30%70%78%3b%6d%61%72%67%69%6e%3a%30%3b%74%65%78%74%2d%73%68%61%64%6f%77%3a%20%30%20%31%70%78%20%33%70%78%20%23%30%30%46%46%30%30%2c%20%2d%31%70%78%20%30%20%33%70%78%20%23%30%30%46%46%30%30%2c%20%30%20%2d%31%70%78%20%33%70%78%20%23%30%30%46%46%30%30%2c%20%31%70%78%20%30%20%33%70%78%20%23%30%30%46%46%30%30%3b%22%3e%50%72%6f%75%64%20%54%6f%20%62%65%20%61%20%42%61%6e%67%6c%61%64%65%73%68%69%20%48%61%63%6b%65%72%3c%2f%64%69%76%3e%3c%62%72%2f%3e%0d%0a%3c%64%69%76%20%73%74%79%6c%65%3d%22%66%6f%6e%74%2d%66%61%6d%69%6c%79%3a%20%42%65%72%6c%69%6e%20%53%61%6e%73%20%46%42%3b%63%6f%6c%6f%72%3a%20%23%31%35%31%42%35%34%3b%66%6f%6e%74%2d%73%69%7a%65%3a%20%32%30%70%78%3b%74%65%78%74%2d%73%68%61%64%6f%77%3a%20%30%20%30%20%33%70%78%20%23%30%30%46%46%30%30%2c%20%30%20%30%20%33%70%78%20%23%30%30%46%46%30%30%2c%20%30%20%30%20%33%70%78%20%23%66%66%66%2c%20%30%20%30%20%35%70%78%20%23%46%30%30%2c%20%30%20%30%20%35%70%78%20%23%66%66%32%64%39%35%3b%22%3e%44%65%61%72%20%41%44%4d%49%4e%3c%62%72%2f%3e%21%20%53%65%63%75%72%65%20%79%6f%75%72%20%53%49%54%45%20%21%3c%2f%64%69%76%3e%3c%62%72%2f%3e%0d%0a%3c%64%69%76%20%73%74%79%6c%65%3d%22%66%6f%6e%74%2d%73%69%7a%65%3a%20%31%38%70%78%3b%66%6f%6e%74%2d%66%61%6d%69%6c%79%3a%20%43%65%6e%74%75%72%79%20%47%6f%74%68%69%63%3b%63%6f%6c%6f%72%3a%20%23%30%30%30%3b%74%65%78%74%2d%73%68%61%64%6f%77%3a%20%30%20%30%20%33%70%78%20%6c%69%6d%65%2c%20%30%20%30%20%33%70%78%20%6c%69%6d%65%2c%20%30%20%30%20%35%70%78%20%23%66%66%32%64%39%35%2c%20%30%20%30%20%35%70%78%20%23%66%66%32%64%39%35%3b%22%3e%72%65%64%2d%78%40%68%61%63%6b%65%72%6d%61%69%6c%2e%63%6f%6d%3c%2f%64%69%76%3e%0d%0a%3c%62%72%2f%3e%3c%64%69%76%20%73%74%79%6c%65%3d%22%66%6f%6e%74%2d%73%69%7a%65%3a%20%32%30%70%78%3b%22%3e%2e%2e%3a%3a%7c%20%47%72%65%65%74%7a%20%7c%3a%3a%2e%2e%3c%2f%64%69%76%3e%0d%0a%3c%64%69%76%20%73%74%79%6c%65%3d%22%66%6f%6e%74%2d%66%61%6d%69%6c%79%3a%20%42%6f%6f%6b%20%41%6e%74%69%71%75%61%3b%63%6f%6c%6f%72%3a%20%67%72%65%79%3b%66%6f%6e%74%2d%73%69%7a%65%3a%20%32%30%70%78%3b%74%65%78%74%2d%73%68%61%64%6f%77%3a%20%72%65%64%20%31%70%78%20%2d%30%70%78%20%36%70%78%22%3e%2e%3a%3a%20%78%33%6f%2d%31%33%33%37%20%7c%20%47%61%62%62%79%20%7c%20%24%70%21%72%21%74%7e%24%33%33%6b%33%72%20%7c%20%46%72%45%61%4b%79%20%3a%3a%2e%3c%62%72%2f%3e%41%6c%6c%20%4d%65%6d%62%65%72%73%20%6f%66%20%33%78%70%31%72%33%20%43%79%62%65%72%20%41%72%6d%79%3c%2f%64%69%76%3e%3c%62%72%2f%3e%0d%0a%3c%65%6d%62%65%64%20%73%72%63%3d%22%68%74%74%70%3a%2f%2f%79%6f%75%74%75%62%65%2e%67%6f%6f%67%6c%65%61%70%69%73%2e%63%6f%6d%2f%76%2f%70%74%5a%31%77%6f%33%4a%73%50%63%26%61%75%74%6f%70%6c%61%79%3d%31%26%6c%6f%6f%70%3d%31%22%20%74%79%70%65%3d%22%61%70%70%6c%69%63%61%74%69%6f%6e%2f%78%2d%73%68%6f%63%6b%77%61%76%65%2d%66%6c%61%73%68%22%20%77%6d%6f%64%65%3d%22%74%72%61%6e%73%70%61%72%65%6e%74%22%20%77%69%64%74%68%3d%22%31%22%20%68%65%69%67%68%74%3d%22%31%22%3e%3c%2f%62%6f%64%79%3e%3c%2f%68%74%6d%6c%3e'

    Read the article

  • SASL (Postfix) authentication with MySQL and SHA1 pre-encrypted passwords

    - by webo
    I have a Rails app with the Devise authentication gem running user registration and login. I want to use the db table that Devise populates when a user registers as the table that Postfix uses to authenticate users. The table has all the fields that Postfix may want for SASL authentication except that Devise encrypts the password using SHA1 before placing it in the database. How could I go about getting Postfix/SASL to decrypt those passwords so that the user can be authenticated properly? Devise salts the password so I'm not sure if that helps. Any suggestions? I'd likely want to do something similar with Dovecot or Courier, I'm not attached to one quite yet.

    Read the article

  • Exchange: encrypted mail database?

    - by Matt
    For an Microsoft Exchange server, is it possible to encrypt the email database such that the sysadmin cannot see the emails? In other words, the admin would be responsible for all aspects of running the Windows server and Exchange process, but would not be able to see the contents of any one email (except those sent to him, obviously). Only another individual (e.g. company owner) would be able to see all emails contained in the database.

    Read the article

  • Program keeping encrypted files.

    - by Giorgi
    I am looking for a program which will encrypt files specified by me and allow me to view/edit/delete those files without creating a virtual disk. I do not want to have virtual disk as a domain administrator can access it so truecrypt is not the possibility. One possibility is to use winrar with password protected archive but winrar serves a different goal so it is not very user friendly for this purpose. If it's possible it would be nice if the program does not creates temp files while I open the files. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • Are Google Chrome's suggestions encrypted?

    - by NullUser
    Some of you might have noticed that Google has changed their search to use SSL by default. I noticed that even if you set your search engine on Chrome to unsecured Google, the results are delivered via HTTPS. I was wondering if the suggestions typed on the address bar are also sent via SSL. If not, how can I make them so? I can change the default search provider to Google SSL, but then I lose the suggestions.

    Read the article

  • Program for keeping encrypted files.

    - by Giorgi
    I am looking for a program which will encrypt files specified by me and allow me to view/edit/delete those files without creating a virtual disk. I do not want to have virtual disk as a domain administrator can access it so truecrypt is not the possibility. One possibility is to use winrar with password protected archive but winrar serves a different goal so it is not very user friendly for this purpose. If it's possible it would be nice if the program does not creates temp files while I open the files. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40  | Next Page >