Search Results

Search found 15059 results on 603 pages for 'associative array'.

Page 35/603 | < Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >

  • Objective-C global array of ints not working as expected

    - by Fran
    In my MyConstants.h file... I have: int abc[3]; In my matching MyConstants.m file... I have: extern int abc[3] = {11, 22, 33}; In each of my other *.m files... I have #import "MyConstants.h" Inside 1 of my viewDidLoad{} methods, I have: extern int abc[]; NSLog(@"abc = (%d) (%d)", abc[1], sizeof(abc)/sizeof(int)); Why does it display "abc = (0) (3)" instead of "abc = (22) (3)"? How do I make this work as expected?

    Read the article

  • How do I move an element from an array to another array in javascript?

    - by TiansHUo
    My code is like var shapes1 = [ r.image("node.gif",190, 100, 47, 45)]; var shapes2 =[]; for (var i = 0, ii = shapes1.length; i < ii; i++) { shapes1[i].mousedown(function(e){ var temp=this.clone(); shapes1.push(temp); //now I want to remove "this" from shapes1 //and put it into shape2 //HOW?? isDrag=true; e.preventDefault(); }); } Maybe this is the wrong way to do it? I should be using a class instead, but isn't that for DOM items?

    Read the article

  • Multidimensional array (parent and childs)

    - by Juan
    I have a category system in a MySQL database with parents and childs. The database only stores the id of it''s immediate parent (or 0 if on root). Since the system allows multiple subcategories there are cases of multiple childs. For example [98] Storage [1] External [3] Pendrives [4] Portable hhdds [2] Internal [5] Sata hhdd [6] IDE hhdd [...] [99] Clothing The database would be id parent_id name 1 98 External 2 98 Internal 3 1 Pendrives 4 1 Portable 5 2 Sata 6 2 IDE 98 0 Storage 99 0 Clothing I also have a products table with a category id and I need to get a list of all the products in the first level of categories. For example: Product Category A 3 B 4 C 5 D 6 E 74 Should return 98: A, B, C, D 99: X, Y, Z... I'm stuck and I can't think of the logic to retrieve it in that way. I started by getting the IDs of all the categories that aren't in the first level by: while ($row = mysql_fetch_assoc($result)) { if ($row['parent_id'] != 0) { $level1[$i]['name'] = utf8_encode($row['categories_name']); $level1[$i]['id'] = $row['categories_id']; } $i++; } but I'm having a burnout and can't think of a way that would nest them. I thought some kind of while but it's infinite :P Any ideas please?

    Read the article

  • Implicit array casting in C#

    - by Malki
    Hi, I have the following classes with an implicit cast operator defined: class A { ... } class B { private A m_a; public B(A a) { this.m_a = a; } public static implicit operator B(A a) { return new B(a); } } Now, I can implicitly cast A to B. But why can't I implicitly cast A[] to B[] ? static void Main(string[] args) { // compiles A a = new A(); B b = a; // doesn't compile A[] arrA = new A[] {new A(), new A()}; B[] arrB = arrA; } Thanks, Malki.

    Read the article

  • Java copyOf method problem with an Array of Objects

    - by Greg
    elementData = Arrays.copyOf(elementData, newCapacity); Gives error: "The method copyOf(Object[], int) is undefined for the type Arrays" This was not a problem on my home computer, but at my school's it gives the error above. I'm guessing it's running an older JRE version - any workaround? Thanks

    Read the article

  • C# Multidimensional Array Definition

    - by Blaenk
    Can someone help me convert this to C#. I've already spent more time than I would have liked trying to do it myself and it's preventing me from actually getting any work done. I guess it seems like C# has a limitation regarding how one can define arrays. I think somewhere inside I have to keep doing new int[] but I'm not sure exactly where. You don't have to convert the whole thing, just enough so I can understand how to do it. I would really appreciate it. I would like to use integers instead of characters, by the way. Thanks again // Pieces definition char mArray [7][4][5][5] = { // Square { { {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 2, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 1, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0} }, { {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 2, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 1, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0} }, { {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 2, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 1, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0} }, { {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0}, {0, 0, 2, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 1, 1, 0}, {0, 0, 0, 0, 0} } }, // and so on and so forth, for 6 more };

    Read the article

  • Postfix and right-associative operators in LR(0) parsers

    - by Ian
    Is it possible to construct an LR(0) parser that could parse a language with both prefix and postfix operators? For example, if I had a grammar with the + (addition) and ! (factorial) operators with the usual precedence then 1+3! should be 1 + 3! = 1 + 6 = 7, but surely if the parser were LR(0) then when it had 1+3 on the stack it would reduce rather than shift? Also, do right associative operators pose a problem? For example, 2^3^4 should be 2^(3^4) but again, when the parser have 2^3 on the stack how would it know to reduce or shift? If this isn't possible is there still a way to use an LR(0) parser, possibly by converting the input into Polish or Reverse Polish notation or adding brackets in the appropriate places? Would this be done before, during or after the lexing stage?

    Read the article

  • How do I efficiently locate key-value pairs in a multi-dimensional PHP array?

    - by Kyle Noland
    I have an array in PHP as a result of the following query to a Wordpress database: SELECT * FROM wp_postmeta WHERE post_id = :id I am returned a multidimensional array that looks like this: Array ( [0] => Array ( [meta_id] => 380 [post_id] => 72 [meta_key] => _edit_last [meta_value] => 1 ) ... etc. What is the best way to find a particular key-value pair in this array? For instance, how would I located the row where [meta_key] = event_name so that I can extract that same row's [meta_value] value into a PHP variable? I realize I could turn this into many individual MySQL queries. Does anyone have an opinion of the efficiency of doing 10 SQL queries in a row rather than searching the array 10 times? I would think since the array is in memory, that will be the fastest method to find the values I need. Alternatively, is there a better way to query the database from the beginning so that my result set is formatted in a way that is easier to search?

    Read the article

  • initialize a const array in a class initializer in C++

    - by Nathan Fellman
    I have the following class in C++: class a { const int b[2]; // other stuff follows // and here's the constructor a(void); } The question is, how do I initialize b in the initialization list, given that I can't initialize it inside the body of the function of the constructor, because b is const? This doesn't work: a::a(void) : b([2,3]) { // other initialization stuff } Edit: The case in point is when I can have different values for b for different instances, but the values are known to be constant for the lifetime of the instance.

    Read the article

  • C++ associative array with arbitrary types for values

    - by Gerald Kaszuba
    What is the best way to have an associative array with arbitrary value types for each key in C++? Currently my plan is to create a "value" class with member variables of the types I will be expecting. For example: class Value { int iValue; Value(int v) { iValue = v; } std::string sValue; Value(std::string v) { sValue = v; } SomeClass *cValue; Value(SomeClass *v) { cValue = c; } }; std::map<std::string, Value> table; A downside with this is you have to know the type when accessing the "Value". i.e.: table["something"] = Value(5); SomeClass *s = table["something"].cValue; // broken pointer Also the more types that are put in Value, the more bloated the array will be. Any better suggestions?

    Read the article

  • java hashmap array to double array

    - by Tweety
    Hi, I declared LinkedHashMap<String, float[]> and now I want to convert float[] values into double[][]. I am using following code. LinkedHashMap<String, float[]> fData; double data[][] = null; Iterator<String> iter = fData.keySet().iterator(); int i = 0; while (iter.hasNext()) { faName = iter.next(); tValue = fData.get(faName); //data = new double[fData.size()][tValue.length]; for (int j = 0; j < tValue.length; j++) { data[i][j] = tValue[j]; } i++; } When I try to print data System.out.println(Arrays.deepToString(data)); it doesn't show the data :( I tried to debug my code and i figured out that I have to initialize data outside the while loop but then I don't know the array dimensions :( How to solve it? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Allocating memory for a array to char pointer

    - by nunos
    The following piece of code gives a segmentation fault when allocating memory for the last arg. What am I doing wrong? Thanks. int n_args = 0, i = 0; while (line[i] != '\0') { if (isspace(line[i++])) n_args++; } for (i = 0; i < n_args; i++) command = malloc (n_args * sizeof(char*)); char* arg = NULL; arg = strtok(line, " \n"); while (arg != NULL) { arg = strtok(NULL, " \n"); command[i] = malloc ( (strlen(arg)+1) * sizeof(char) ); strcpy(command[i], arg); i++; } Thanks.

    Read the article

  • OpenGL Mapping Textures to a Grid Stored Inside Vertex Array

    - by Matthew Hoggan
    I am writing a test to verify something. This is not production code, just verification code. So I would appreciate it if the specific question was answered. I have code that uses indices and vertices to draw a set of triangles in the shape of a grid. All the vertices are drawn using glDrawElements(). Now for each vertex I will set its corresponding Texture Coordinates to 0 or 1 for each set of triangles that form a square in the grid. Basically I want to draw a collage of random textures in each one of the "squares" (consisting of two triangles). I can do this using the glBegin() and glEnd() method calls inside a for loop using the fixed functional pipeline, but I would like to know how to do this using Vertex Arrays.

    Read the article

  • java applet - array checking

    - by Dan
    OK so my code is here: http://www.so.pastebin.com/m7V8rQ2n What I want to know... let's say I have an image which I can redraw on tiles... is there a way to check for future tiles so I DON'T go out of bounds of my already defined tile map? Like if I were at the edge of a map... it would NOT let me go past it? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • How can I use an array within a SQL query

    - by ThinkingInBits
    So I'm trying to take a search string (could be any number of words) and turn each value into a list to use in the following IN statement) in addition, I need a count of all these values to use with my having count filter $search_array = explode(" ",$this->search_string); $tag_count = count($search_array); $db = Connect::connect(); $query = "select p.id from photographs p left join photograph_tags c on p.id = c.photograph_id and c.value IN ($search_array) group by p.id having count(c.value) >= $tag_count"; This currently returns no results, any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Confusion in multi dimensional array in Java

    - by Alvin
    Hello, I'm not able to understand the following multi-dimensional code. Could someone please clarify me? int[][] myJaggedArr = new int [][] { new int[] {1,3,5,7,9}, new int[] {0,2,4,6}, new int[] {11,22} }; May I know how it is different from the following code? int[][] myArr = new int [][] { {1,3,5,7,9}, {0,2,4,6}, {11,22} };

    Read the article

  • C# Array Maximum

    - by Betamoo
    I have 2 arrays named Arr1 and Arr2 in C#. They are of the exact same dimensions... I need to get the element of Arr1 corresponding to maximum of elements in Arr2 beginning with given indices ... e.g Get indices of the max of Arr2 [ 1 , 10 , 3 , i , j ] for all i,j Return Arr1 [ 1 , 10 , 3 , i , j ] Of course I need the elegant solution (not the "loop for them" one...) Please Note: I do not want to loop through the arrays, because it is 11 dimensional!!.. the code will be ugly and error prone.. and I may run out of variable names :)

    Read the article

  • Duplicate array but maintain pointer links

    - by St. John Johnson
    Suppose I have an array of nodes (objects). I need to create a duplicate of this array that I can modify without affecting the source array. But changing the nodes will affect the source nodes. Basically maintaining pointers to the objects instead of duplicating their values. // node(x, y) $array[0] = new node(15, 10); $array[1] = new node(30, -10); $array[2] = new node(-2, 49); // Some sort of copy system $array2 = $array; // Just to show modification to the array doesn't affect the source array array_pop($array2); if (count($array) == count($array2)) echo "Fail"; // Changing the node value should affect the source array $array2[0]->x = 30; if ($array2[0]->x == $array[0]->x) echo "Goal"; What would be the best way to do this?

    Read the article

  • Array Intersect giving wrong output

    - by Pankaj Khurana
    Hi, I need to find common elements between two arrays. My code is: $sql="SELECT DISTINCT fk_paytbl_discounts_discountid as discountid from paytbl_discounts_students WHERE fk_vtiger_cf_601='".$categoryid."'"; $discountstudentinfo=$objdb->customQuery($sql,false); $sql1="SELECT DISTINCT fk_paytbl_discounts_discountid as discountid from paytbl_discounts_variants WHERE fk_vtiger_products_productid='".$variantid."'"; $discountvariantinfo=$objdb->customQuery($sql1,false); $commondiscount=array_intersect($discountvariantinfo,$discountstudentinfo); First array Array ( [0] => Array ( [discountid] => 2 ) [1] => Array ( [discountid] => 8 ) [2] => Array ( [discountid] => 5 ) [3] => Array ( [discountid] => 4 ) ) Second array Array ( [0] => Array ( [discountid] => 1 ) [1] => Array ( [discountid] => 5 ) ) Common array Array ( [0] => Array ( [discountid] => 1 ) [1] => Array ( [discountid] => 5 ) ) Common array should have only discountid 5 but its showing 1 also. Please help me on this Thanks

    Read the article

  • C++ dynamic array sizing problem

    - by Peter
    The basic pseudo code looks like this: void myFunction() { int size = 10; int * MyArray; MyArray = new int[size]; cout << size << endl; cout << sizeof(MyArray) << endl; } The first cout returns 10, as expected, while the second cout returns 4. Anyone have an explanation?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >