Search Results

Search found 3146 results on 126 pages for 'hibernate annotations'.

Page 35/126 | < Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >

  • How to define index by several columns in hibernate entity?

    - by foobar
    Morning. I need to add indexing in hibernate entity. As I know it is possible to do using @Index annotation to specify index for separate column but I need an index for several fields of entity. I've googled and found jboss annotation @Table, that allows to do this (by specification). But (I don't know why) this functionality doesn't work. May be jboss version is lower than necessary, or maybe I don't understant how to use this annotation, but... complex index is not created. Why index may not be created? jboss version 4.2.3.GA Entity example: package somepackage; import org.hibernate.annotations.Index; import javax.persistence.Column; import javax.persistence.Entity; import javax.persistence.GeneratedValue; import javax.persistence.Id; @Entity @org.hibernate.annotations.Table(appliesTo = House.TABLE_NAME, indexes = { @Index(name = "IDX_XDN_DFN", columnNames = {House.XDN, House.DFN} ) } ) public class House { public final static String TABLE_NAME = "house"; public final static String XDN = "xdn"; public final static String DFN = "dfn"; @Id @GeneratedValue private long Id; @Column(name = XDN) private long xdn; @Column(name = DFN) private long dfn; @Column private String address; public long getId() { return Id; } public void setId(long id) { this.Id = id; } public long getXdn() { return xdn; } public void setXdn(long xdn) { this.xdn = xdn; } public long getDfn() { return dfn; } public void setDfn(long dfn) { this.dfn = dfn; } public String getAddress() { return address; } public void setAddress(String address) { this.address = address; } } When jboss/hibernate tries to create table "house" it throws following exception: Reason: org.hibernate.AnnotationException: @org.hibernate.annotations.Table references an unknown table: house

    Read the article

  • Hibernate does not allow an embedded object with an int field to be null?

    - by Jason Novak
    Hibernate does not allow me to persist an object that contains an null embedded object with an integer field. For example, if I have a class called Thing that looks like this @Entity public class Thing { @Id public String id; public Part part; } where Part is an embeddable class that looks like this @Embeddable public class Part { public String a; public int b; } then trying to persist a Thing object with a null Part causes Hibernate to throw an Exception. In particular, this code Thing th = new Thing(); th.id = "thing.1"; th.part = null; session.saveOrUpdate(th); causes Hibernate to throw this Exception org.hibernate.PropertyValueException: not-null property references a null or transient value: com.ace.moab.api.jobs.Thing.part My guess is that this is happening because Part is an embedded class and so Part.a and Part.b are simply columns in the Thing database table. Since the Thing.part is null Hibernate wants to set the Part.a and Part.b column values to null for the row for thing.1. However, Part.b is an integer and Hibernate will not allow integer columns in the database to be null. This is what causes the Exception, right? So I am looking for workarounds for this problem. I noticed making Part.b an Integer instead of an int seems to work, but for reasons I won't bore you with this is not a good option for us. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Hibernate criteria query to match against all child collection elements

    - by Andrew Harrison
    Hi, This question is very similar to link text but the responses were minimal to that question. I have a parent class with a Set of child entities. The child entities are just a wrapper for a string and live in a different table to the parent entity. I want to have a criteria query that returns the parent entities when all the members of the set of child entities return true to a condition. This condition is matching against one of a list of strings. Here's where I am: Criteria c = criteria(); Criteria ands = c.createCriteria("ands"); Disjunction dis = Restrictions.disjunction(); for (String value : values) { dis.add(Restrictions.like("value", "%" + value + "%")); } ands.add(dis); return list(c); "ands" is the set of entities with a "value" field that is a string. "criteria()" creates a criteria for the parent class. "list()" just calls criteria.list(); This is just matching against any of the elements, rather than all. Hope this makes sense. Any help much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Grails GORM (Hibernate) query

    - by bsreekanth
    Hello, I'm trying to do the below sql statement in GORM select * from table1 where table1.x not in (select x from table 2 where y='something'); so, I have two tables, and needs to find the entries from table 1 which are not in table 2. In Grails def xx= table2.findByY('something') def c = table1.createCriteria() def result= c.list { not ( in('x', xx) ) } the syntax is wrong, and I'm not sure how to simulate not in sql logic. As a learning point, if someone can also tell me why minus (-) operator in grails/groovy doesn't work with list. I tried getting x and y seperately, and doing x.minus(y), but it doesn't change the list. I saw an explanation at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1754576/groovy-on-grails-list-not-working , but I would expect the list defined are local. thank you so much.

    Read the article

  • Self referencing symmetrical Hibernate Map Table using @ManyToMany

    - by sammichy
    I have the following class public class ElementBean { private String link; private Set<ElementBean> connections; } I need to create a map table where elements are mapped to each other in a many-to-many symmetrical relationship. @ManyToMany(targetEntity=ElementBean.class) @JoinTable( name="element_elements", joinColumns=@JoinColumn(name="FROM_ELEMENT_ID", nullable=false), inverseJoinColumns=@JoinColumn(name="TO_ELEMENT_ID", nullable=false) ) public Set<ElementBean> getConnections() { return connections; } I have the following requirements When element A is added as a connection to Element B, then element B should become a connection of Element A. So A.getConnections() should return B and B.getConnections() should return A. I do not want to explicitly create 2 records one for mapping A to B and another for B to A. Is this possible?

    Read the article

  • Hibernate Criteria: Add restrictions to Criteria and DetachedCriteria

    - by Gilean
    Currently our queries add a variety of Restrictions to ensure the results are considered active or live. These Restrictions are used in several places/queries so a method was setup similar to public Criteria addStandardCriteria(Criteria criteria, ...) { // Add restrictions, create aliases based on parameters // and other non-trivial logic criteria.add(...); return criteria; } This has worked fine so far, but now this standard criteria needs to be added to a subquery using DetachedCriteria. Is there a way to modify this method to accept Criteria or DetachedCriteria or a Better way to add restrictions?

    Read the article

  • How to solve lazy initialization exception using JPA and Hibernate as provider

    - by rupertin
    I am working on a project for a customer who wants to use lazy initialization. They always get "lazy initialization exception" when mapping classes with the default lazy loading mode. @JoinTable(name = "join_profilo_funzionalita", joinColumns = {@JoinColumn(name = "profilo_id", referencedColumnName = "profilo_id")}, inverseJoinColumns = {@JoinColumn(name = "funzionalita_id", referencedColumnName = "funzionalita_id")}) //@ManyToMany(fetch=FetchType.EAGER) - no exceptions if uncommented @ManyToMany private Collection<Funzionalita> funzionalitaIdCollection; Is there a standard pattern using JPA classes to avoid this error? Snippets are welcome, thanks a lot for your time.

    Read the article

  • hibernate get unique field result

    - by cometta
    i use below to get unique "departmentCode" , but by using distinct, my list only return 'departmentCode' all other fields are not retrieved from table, how to retrieve other fields as well like 'divisionCode' and make sure 'departmentCode' is always unique? DetachedCriteria crit = DetachedCriteria.forClass(Company.class); crit.setProjection(Projections.distinct(Projections.property("departmentCode")));

    Read the article

  • Hibernate aliastobean

    - by cometta
    Query query = getHibernateTemplate().getSessionFactory().getCurrentSession().createSQLQuery( "select proj_employee.employee_no as employeeNo, ... .setResultTransformer(Transformers.aliasToBean(User.class)); Inside User.class does the property employeNo need to be in capital letter? private String EMPLOYEENO //get/set for EMPLOYEENO if i changed to small letter, it doesnt work. can anyone explain why must be in capital letter?

    Read the article

  • Does hibernate query result always return a list?

    - by Phoenix
    Does a query execution always have to return a list ? How do I replace the code below if I am sure it will only return a single object ? @Override public List<DocInfo> findAllByDocId(String docId) { Query q = getCurrentSession().createQuery("from DocInfo item where item.id = :docId"); q.setString("docId", docId); List<DocInfo> docInfoList = q.list(); return docInfoList; }

    Read the article

  • JPA + Hibernate + Named Query + how to JOIN a subquery result

    - by Srihari
    Can anybody help me in converting the following native query into a Named Query? Native Query: SELECT usr1.user_id, urr1.role_id, usr2.user_id, urr2.role_id, usr1.school_id, term.term_name, count(material.material_id) as "Total Book Count", fpc.FOLLETT_PENDING_COUNT as "Follett Pending Count", rrc.RESOLUTION_REQUIRED_COUNT as "Resolution Required Count" FROM va_school sch JOIN va_user_school_rel usr1 on sch.school_id=usr1.school_id JOIN va_user_role_rel urr1 on usr1.user_id=urr1.user_id and urr1.role_id=1001 JOIN va_user_school_rel usr2 on sch.school_id=usr2.school_id JOIN va_user_role_rel urr2 on usr2.user_id=urr2.user_id and urr2.role_id=1002 JOIN va_term term on term.school_id = usr1.school_id JOIN va_class course on course.term_id = term.term_id JOIN va_material material on material.class_id = course.class_id LEFT JOIN (SELECT VA_CLASS.TERM_ID as "TERM_ID", COUNT(*) as "FOLLETT_PENDING_COUNT" FROM VA_CLASS JOIN VA_MATERIAL ON VA_MATERIAL.CLASS_ID = VA_CLASS.CLASS_ID WHERE VA_CLASS.reference_flag = 'A' AND trunc(VA_MATERIAL.FOLLETT_STATUS) = 0 GROUP BY VA_CLASS.TERM_ID) fpc on term.term_id = fpc.term_id LEFT JOIN (SELECT VA_CLASS.TERM_ID as "TERM_ID", COUNT(*) as "RESOLUTION_REQUIRED_COUNT" FROM VA_CLASS JOIN VA_MATERIAL ON VA_MATERIAL.CLASS_ID = VA_CLASS.CLASS_ID WHERE VA_CLASS.reference_flag = 'A' AND trunc(VA_MATERIAL.FOLLETT_STATUS) = 1 GROUP BY VA_CLASS.TERM_ID) rrc on term.term_id = rrc.term_id WHERE course.reference_flag = 'A' GROUP BY usr1.user_id, urr1.role_id, usr2.user_id, urr2.role_id, usr1.school_id, term.term_name, fpc.FOLLETT_PENDING_COUNT, rrc.RESOLUTION_REQUIRED_COUNT ORDER BY usr1.school_id, term.term_name; Thanks in advance. Srihari

    Read the article

  • Grails: Problem with nested associations in criteria builder

    - by Mr.B
    I have a frustrating problem with the criteria builder. I have an application in which one user has one calendar, and a calendar has many entries. Seems straightforward enough, but when I try to get the calendar entries for a given user, I can't access the user property (MissingMethodException). Here's the code: def getEntries(User user) { def entries = Entries.createCriteria().list() { calendar { user { eq("user.id", user.id) } } } } I have even tried the following variation: def getEntries(User user) { def entries = Entries.createCriteria().list() { calendar { eq("user", user) } } } That did not raise an exception, but didn't work either. Here's the relevant parts of the domain classes: class Calendar { static belongsTo = [user: User] static hasMany = [entries: Entries] ... } class User { Calendar calendar ... } class Entry { static belongsTo = [calendar: Calendar] ... } When Googling I came across a similar problem noted in early 2008: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/GRAILS-1412 But according to that link this issue should have been solved long ago. What am I doing wrong?

    Read the article

  • Hibernate - query caching/second level cache does not work by value object containing subitems

    - by Zoltan Hamori
    Hi! I have been struggling with the following problem: I have a value object containing different panels. Each panel has a list of fields. Mapping: <class name="com.aviseurope.core.application.RACountryPanels" table="CTRY" schema="DBDEV1A" where="PEARL_CTRY='Y'" lazy="join"> <cache usage="read-only"/> <id name="ctryCode"> <column name="CTRY_CD_ID" sql-type="VARCHAR2(2)" not-null="true"/> </id> <bag name="panelPE" table="RA_COUNTRY_MAPPING" fetch="join" where="MANDATORY_FLAG!='N'"> <key column="COUNTRY_LOCATION_ID"/> <many-to-many class="com.aviseurope.core.application.RAFieldVO" column="RA_FIELD_MID" where="PANEL_ID='PE'"/> </bag> </class> I use the following criteria to get the value object: Session m_Session = HibernateUtil.currentSession(); m_Criteria = m_Session.createCriteria(RACountryPanels.class); m_Criteria.add(Expression.eq("ctryCode", p_Country)); m_Criteria.setCacheable(true); As I see the query cache contains only the main select like select * from CTRY where ctry_cd_id=? Both RACountryPanels and RAFieldVO are second level cached. If I check the 2nd level cache content I can see that it cointains the RAFields and the RACountryPanels as well and I can see the select .. from CTRY where ctry_cd_id=... in query cache region as well. When I call the servlet it seems that it is using the cache, but second time not. If I check the content of the cache using JMX, everything seems to be ok, but when I measure the object access time, it seems that it does not always use the cache. Cheers Zoltan

    Read the article

  • JPA + Hibernate + Named Query + how to JOIN a subquery result

    - by Srihari
    Hi, Can anybody help me in converting the following native query into a Named Query? Native Query: SELECT usr1.user_id, urr1.role_id, usr2.user_id, urr2.role_id, usr1.school_id, term.term_name, count(material.material_id) as "Total Book Count", fpc.FOLLETT_PENDING_COUNT as "Follett Pending Count", rrc.RESOLUTION_REQUIRED_COUNT as "Resolution Required Count" FROM va_school sch JOIN va_user_school_rel usr1 on sch.school_id=usr1.school_id JOIN va_user_role_rel urr1 on usr1.user_id=urr1.user_id and urr1.role_id=1001 JOIN va_user_school_rel usr2 on sch.school_id=usr2.school_id JOIN va_user_role_rel urr2 on usr2.user_id=urr2.user_id and urr2.role_id=1002 JOIN va_term term on term.school_id = usr1.school_id JOIN va_class course on course.term_id = term.term_id JOIN va_material material on material.class_id = course.class_id LEFT JOIN (SELECT VA_CLASS.TERM_ID as "TERM_ID", COUNT(*) as "FOLLETT_PENDING_COUNT" FROM VA_CLASS JOIN VA_MATERIAL ON VA_MATERIAL.CLASS_ID = VA_CLASS.CLASS_ID WHERE VA_CLASS.reference_flag = 'A' AND trunc(VA_MATERIAL.FOLLETT_STATUS) = 0 GROUP BY VA_CLASS.TERM_ID) fpc on term.term_id = fpc.term_id LEFT JOIN (SELECT VA_CLASS.TERM_ID as "TERM_ID", COUNT(*) as "RESOLUTION_REQUIRED_COUNT" FROM VA_CLASS JOIN VA_MATERIAL ON VA_MATERIAL.CLASS_ID = VA_CLASS.CLASS_ID WHERE VA_CLASS.reference_flag = 'A' AND trunc(VA_MATERIAL.FOLLETT_STATUS) = 1 GROUP BY VA_CLASS.TERM_ID) rrc on term.term_id = rrc.term_id WHERE course.reference_flag = 'A' GROUP BY usr1.user_id, urr1.role_id, usr2.user_id, urr2.role_id, usr1.school_id, term.term_name, fpc.FOLLETT_PENDING_COUNT, rrc.RESOLUTION_REQUIRED_COUNT ORDER BY usr1.school_id, term.term_name; Thanks in advance. Srihari

    Read the article

  • hibernate foreign key mapping many-to-one

    - by Lily
    I have been working on it for quite a while, but still can't figure out what's wrong with my code. Each Service has multiple profiles, but each profile only has one Service. Service { Long service_id; // primary key ... getter/setter } Profile { Long profile_id; // primary key Long service_id; // foreign key ... getter and setter } in Profile.hbm.xml. I add < many-to-one name="service_id" class="com.mot.diva.dto.Service" column="SERVICE_ID" cascade="save-update"> < /many-to-one> Is it the correct way to map it?

    Read the article

  • Looking for an HQL builder (Hibernate Query Language)

    - by Sébastien RoccaSerra
    I'm looking for a builder for HQL in Java. I want to get rid of things like: StringBuilder builder = new StringBuilder() .append("select stock from ") .append( Stock.class.getName() ) .append( " as stock where stock.id = ") .append( id ); I'd rather have something like: HqlBuilder builder = new HqlBuilder() .select( "stock" ) .from( Stock.class.getName() ).as( "stock" ) .where( "stock.id" ).equals( id ); I googled a bit, and I couldn't find one. I wrote a quick & dumb HqlBuilder that suits my needs for now, but I'd love to find one that has more users and tests than me alone. Note: I'd like to be able to do things like this and more, which I failed to do with the Criteria API: select stock from com.something.Stock as stock, com.something.Bonus as bonus where stock.someValue = bonus.id ie. select all stocks whose property someValue points to any bonus from the Bonus table. Thanks!

    Read the article

  • hibernate query cache specify cache duration

    - by cometta
    below is how i do query cache getHibernateTemplate().setCacheQueries(true); List<IssSection> result = (List<IssSection>) getHibernateTemplate().findByCriteria(crit); getHibernateTemplate().setCacheQueries(false); may i know how to specify duration of maximum time to cache this method? let say i want to clear cache after 5 mins expirated

    Read the article

  • Hibernate @OneToOne @NotNull

    - by Marty Pitt
    Is it valid to declare @OneToOne and @NotNull on both sides of a relationship, such as: class ChangeEntry { @OneToOne(cascade=CascadeType.ALL) @NotNull ChangeEntryDetails changeEntryDetails; } class ChangeEntryDetails { @OneToOne(cascase=CascadeType.ALL) @NotNull ChangeEntry changeEntry; } I can't find anything that says this is invalid, but it seems that during persistence at least one side of the relationship must be violated. (Eg., if writing changeEntry first, changeEntryDetails will be null temporarily). When trying this, I see an exception thrown not-null property references a null or transient value. I'd like to avoid relaxing the constraint if possible, because both sides must be present.

    Read the article

  • Nhibernate/Hibernate, lookup tables and object design

    - by Simon G
    Hi, I've got two tables. Invoice with columns CustomerID, InvoiceDate, Value, InvoiceTypeID (CustomerID and InvoiceDate make up a composite key) and InvoiceType with InvoiceTypeID and InvoiceTypeName columns. I know I can create my objects like: public class Invoice { public virtual int CustomerID { get; set; } public virtual DateTime InvoiceDate { get; set; } public virtual decimal Value { get; set; } public virtual InvoiceType InvoiceType { get; set; } } public class InvoiceType { public virtual InvoiceTypeID { get; set; } public virtual InvoiceTypeName { get; set; } } So the generated sql would look something like: SELECT CustomerID, InvoiceDate, Value, InvoiceTypeID FROM Invoice WHERE CustomerID = x AND InvoiceDate = y SELECT InvoiceTypeID, InvoiceTypeName FROM InvoiceType WHERE InvoiceTypeID = z But rather that having two select queries executed to retrieve the data I would rather have one. I would also like to avoid using child object for simple lookup lists. So my object would look something like: public class Invoice { public virtual int CustomerID { get; set; } public virtual DateTime InvoiceDate { get; set; } public virtual decimal Value { get; set; } public virtual InvoiceTypeID { get; set; } public virtual InvoiceTypeName { get; set; } } And my sql would look something like: SELECT CustomerID, InvoiceDate, Value, InvoiceTypeID FROM Invoice INNER JOIN InvoiceType ON Invoice.InvoiceTypeID = InvoiceType.InvoiceTypeID WHERE CustomerID = x AND InvoiceDate = y My question is how do I create the mapping for this? I've tried using join but this tried to join using CustomerID and InvoiceDate, am I missing something obvious? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Blob in Java/Hibernate/sql-server 2005

    - by Ramy
    Hi, I'm trying to insert an HTML blob into our sql-server2005 database. i've been using the data-type [text] for the field the blob will eventually live in. i've also put a '@Lob' annotation on the field in the domain model. The problem comes in when the HTML blob I'm attempting to store is larger than 65536 characters. Its seems that is the caracter-limit for a text data type when using the @Lob annotation. Ideally I'd like to keep the whole blob in tact rather than chunk it up into multiple rows in the database. I appreciate any help or insight that might be provided. Thanks! _Ramy Allow me to clarify annotation: @Lob @Column(length = Integer. MAX_VALUE) //per an answer on stackoverflow private String htmlBlob; database side (sql-server-2005): CREATE TABLE dbo.IndustrySectorTearSheetBlob( ... htmlBlob text NULL ... ) Still seeing truncation after 65536 characters... EDIT: i've printed out the contents of all possible strings (only 10 right now) that would be inserted into the Database. Each string seems to contain all cahracters, judging by the fact that the close html tag is present at the end of the string....

    Read the article

  • Hibernate - how to delete bidirectional many-to-many association

    - by slomir
    Problem: I have many-to-many association between two entities A and B. I set A entity as an owner of their relationship(inverse=true is on A's collection in b.hbm.xml). When i delete an A entity, corresponding records in join table are deleted. When i delete an B entity, corresponding records in join table are not deleted (integrity violation exception). -- Let's consider some very simple example: class A{ Set<B> bset=new HashSet<B>(); //... } class B{ Set<A> aset=new HashSet<A>(); //... } File a.hbm.xml [m-to-m mappings only]: <set name="bset" table="AB"> <key name="a_id"/> <many-to-many column="b_id" class="B"/> </set> File b.hbm.xml [m-to-m mappings only]: <set name="aset" table="AB" inverse="true"> <key name="b_id"/> <many-to-many column="a_id" class="A"/> </set> Database relations: A(id,...) B(id,...) AB(a_id,b_id) Suppose that we have some records in AB joint table. For example: AB = {(1,1),(1,2)} where AB= { (a_id , b_id) | ... ... } -- Situation 1 - works probably because A is owner of AB relationship: A a=aDao.read(1); //read A entity with id=1 aDao.delete(a); //delete 'a' entity and both relations with B-entities Situation 2 - doesn't work: B b=bDao.read(1); //read B entity with id=1 bDao.delete(b); //foreign key integrity violation On the one hand, this is somehow logical to me, because the A entity is responsible for his relation with B. But, on the other hand, it is not logical or at least it is not orm-like solution that I have to explicitly delete all records in join table where concrete B entity appears, and then to delete the B entity, as I show in situation 3: Situation 3 - works, but it is not 'elegant': B b=bDao.read(1); Set<A> aset=b.getA(); //get set with A entities Iterator i=aset.iterator(); //while removes 'b' from all related A entities //while breaks relationships on A-side of relation (A is owner) while(i.hasNext()){ A a=i.next(); a.bset.remove(b); //remove entity 'b' from related 'a' entity aDao.update(a); //key point!!! this line breaks relation in database } bDao.delete(b); //'b' is deleted because there is no related A-entities -- So, my question: is there any more convenient way to delete no-owner entity (B in my example) in bidirectional many-to-many association and all of his many-to-many relations from joint table?

    Read the article

  • Integration testing - Hibernate & DbUnit

    - by Marco
    Hi, I'm writing some integrations tests in JUnit. What happens here is that when i run all the tests together in a row (and not separately), the data persisted in the database always changes and the tests find unexpected data (inserted by the previous test) during their execution. I was thinking to use DbUnit, but i wonder if it resets the auto-increment index between each execution or not (because the tests also check the IDs of the persisted entities). Thanks M.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42  | Next Page >