Search Results

Search found 3263 results on 131 pages for 'w3c markup validator'.

Page 39/131 | < Previous Page | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46  | Next Page >

  • FilteredTextBox - allow non-english characters

    - by superexsl
    Hey, I'm using the AJAX FilteredTextBoxExtender, but I'm not sure how to let it accept non-english characters such as é and á. I know I can manually add these in the InvalidChar's property, but is there an easier, more practical way? When using Regex, the [\w] seems to let it through, but I'm guessing the FTBE is using another system to check for valid characters? (I know I can use the regex validator, but for UI experience, I'd like a real time input check) Thanks for any suggestions

    Read the article

  • Redirect output logs of javax.xml.ws and com.sun.xml.ws

    - by chrisnfoneur
    I am working on a SOAP based web service, with Sun's Metro. I am facing an annoying bug, each time I send a malformed SOAP object to my web service, sun's api spam the System.out with logs like this: javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException: com.sun.istack.XMLStreamException2: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute 'type' must appear on element 'object'. at com.sun.xml.ws.util.pipe.AbstractSchemaValidationTube.doProcess(AbstractSchemaValidationTube.java:206) at com.sun.xml.ws.util.pipe.AbstractSchemaValidationTube.processRequest(AbstractSchemaValidationTube.java:175) at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber.__doRun(Fiber.java:595) at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber._doRun(Fiber.java:554) at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber.doRun(Fiber.java:539) at com.sun.xml.ws.api.pipe.Fiber.runSync(Fiber.java:436) at com.sun.xml.ws.server.WSEndpointImpl$2.process(WSEndpointImpl.java:243) at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter$HttpToolkit.handle(HttpAdapter.java:444) at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.HttpAdapter.handle(HttpAdapter.java:244) at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.server.WSHttpHandler.handleExchange(WSHttpHandler.java:106) at com.sun.xml.ws.transport.http.server.WSHttpHandler.handle(WSHttpHandler.java:91) at com.sun.net.httpserver.Filter$Chain.doFilter(Filter.java:65) at sun.net.httpserver.AuthFilter.doFilter(AuthFilter.java:54) at com.sun.net.httpserver.Filter$Chain.doFilter(Filter.java:68) at sun.net.httpserver.ServerImpl$Exchange$LinkHandler.handle(ServerImpl.java:555) at com.sun.net.httpserver.Filter$Chain.doFilter(Filter.java:65) at sun.net.httpserver.ServerImpl$Exchange.run(ServerImpl.java:527) at sun.net.httpserver.ServerImpl$DefaultExecutor.execute(ServerImpl.java:119) at sun.net.httpserver.ServerImpl$Dispatcher.handle(ServerImpl.java:349) at sun.net.httpserver.ServerImpl$Dispatcher.run(ServerImpl.java:321) at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:619) Caused by: com.sun.istack.XMLStreamException2: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.4: Attribute 'type' must appear on element 'object'. at com.sun.xml.ws.util.xml.StAXSource$1.parse(StAXSource.java:185) at com.sun.xml.ws.util.xml.StAXSource$1.parse(StAXSource.java:170) at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.validation.ValidatorHandlerImpl.validate(Unknown Source) at org.apache.xerces.jaxp.validation.ValidatorImpl.validate(Unknown Source) at javax.xml.validation.Validator.validate(Validator.java:127) at com.sun.xml.ws.util.pipe.AbstractSchemaValidationTube.doProcess(AbstractSchemaValidationTube.java:204) ... 20 more I would like to switch off this log or redirect it to my error/warn/debug.log files used by log4j. I tried to add a rule in my log4j.xml file : <category name="javax.xml.ws"> <priority value="error" /> </category> It didn't worked. So I tried the following trick: java.util.logging.Logger.getLogger("javax.xml.ws.WebServiceException").setLevel( java.util.logging.Level.OFF); it didn't worked neither. Any ideas ? It is not a big issue but it makes my catalina.log getting bigger & bigger and it's not the appropriate place for this kind of log. Chris

    Read the article

  • asp.net with jquery valduation issue

    - by Eyla
    Greetings, I have 2 textboxs, 2 checkboxs and 2 labels. first textbox, checkbox, and label related to each other and the same for the rest. textbox should accept valid phone number based on jquery validation plugin and when the chackbox check the validation rule would change and in both option the error message would disply inside the label. I have no problem to implement that for one text box but when I add second one will have a problem and only the validation will happen for the second one only. please look at my code and advice. <script src="js/jquery-1.4.1.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script src="js/jquery.validate.js" type="text/javascript"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> var RegularExpression; var USAPhone = /^[01]?[- .]?(\([2-9]\d{2}\)|[2-9]\d{2})[- .]?\d{3}[- .]?\d{4}$/; var InterPhone = /^\d{9,12}$/; var errmsg; function ValidPhoneHome(sender) { if (sender.checked == true) { RegularExpression = InterPhone; errmsg = "Enter 9 to 12 numbers as international number"; } else { RegularExpression = USAPhone; errmsg = "Enter a valid number"; } jQuery.validator.addMethod("phonehome", function(value, element) { return this.optional(element) || RegularExpression.test(value); }, errmsg); } function ValidMobileHome(sender) { if (sender.checked == true) { RegularExpression = InterPhone; errmsg = "Enter 9 to 12 numbers as international number"; } else { RegularExpression = USAPhone; errmsg = "Enter a valid number"; } jQuery.validator.addMethod("mobilephone", function(value, element) { return this.optional(element) || RegularExpression.test(value); }, errmsg); } $(document).ready(function() { ValidPhoneHome("#<%= chkIntphoneHome%>"); ValidMobileHome("#<%= chkIntMobileHome%>"); $("#aspnetForm").validate({ rules: { "<%=txtHomePhone.UniqueID %>": { phonehome: true } } , errorLabelContainer: "#lblHomePhone", rules: { "<%=txtMobileHome.UniqueID %>": { mobilephone: true } } , errorLabelContainer: "#lblMobileHome" }) </script> <asp:CheckBox ID="chkIntphoneHome" runat="server" Text="Internation Code" onclick="ValidPhoneHome(this)" > <asp:TextBox ID="txtHomePhone" runat="server" ></asp:TextBox> <label id="lblHomePhone"></label> <asp:CheckBox ID="chkIntMobileHome" runat="server" Text="Internation Code" onclick="ValidMobileHome(this)" /> <asp:TextBox ID="txtMobileHome" runat="server"></asp:TextBox> <label id="lblMobileHome"></label>

    Read the article

  • Validating XML using XSD with regex pattern

    - by Steel Plume
    Hello, I am parsing a XML file against a XSD containing some regex patterns used for checking input data, but only this regex generates an error, even if it passes into the Eclipse XSD plugin: InvalidRegex: Pattern value '(((com|it|org)\.)+(\b[a-z]+[.]{1}\b)+)?[A-Z]{1}[A-Za-z]+' is not a valid regular expression. The reported error was: 'This expression is not supported in the current option setting.'. So, with SAX validator where can I find the fatal "current option setting"?

    Read the article

  • Validate a long type input

    - by Santiago
    I'm trying to validate that a user only enters a long value as input (long bigger than 0 actually). Compare and Range validator has DataTypeCheck for int values only. I was planning on using this class in a CustomValidator but then I would need to write both, client and server side validation code. Do you know of any other good way of doing this? Thanks!

    Read the article

  • Symfony Forms - trigger a custom error message in a form

    - by Martin Sikora
    Hello, in my frontend application I'm using my own login form (just email and password fields) and in the login action I'm trying to check whether the user was logged in successfuly or not. My question is: If the user wasn't logged in successfuly is there a simple way how can I add an error message to my login form? Do I have to write my own validator?

    Read the article

  • jQuery Validation addMethod - Check if same domain

    - by Ricky
    I'm trying to check whether a URL is from the same domain with jQuery Validation addMethod. Here's what i got so far, but it doesn't seem to be working: jQuery.validator.addMethod("domain", function(value, element) { return this.optional(element) || /^http:\/\/testsite.com/.test(value); }, "The URL doesn't match."); $("#url_form").validate({ rules: { url: { required: true, url: true, domain : true } } });

    Read the article

  • How can I highlight empty fields in ASP.NET MVC 2 before model binding has occurred?

    - by Richard Poole
    I'm trying to highlight certain form fields (let's call them important fields) when they're empty. In essence, they should behave a bit like required fields, but they should be highlighted if they are empty when the user first GETs the form, before POST & model validation has occurred. The user can also ignore the warnings and submit the form when these fields are empty (i.e. empty important fields won't cause ModelState.IsValid to be false). Ideally it needs to work server-side (empty important fields are highlighted with warning message on GET) and client-side (highlighted if empty when losing focus). I've thought of a few ways of doing this, but I'm hoping some bright spark can come up with a nice elegant solution... Just use a CSS class to flag important fields Update every view/template to render important fields with an important CSS class. Write some jQuery to highlight empty important fields when the DOM is ready and hook their blur events so highlights & warning messages can be shown/hidden as appropriate. Pros: Quick and easy. Cons: Unnecessary duplication of importance flags and warning messages across views & templates. Clients with JavaScript disabled will never see highlights/warnings. Custom data annotation and client-side validator Create classes similar to RequiredAttribute, RequiredAttributeAdapter and ModelClientValidationRequiredRule, and register the adapter with DataAnnotationsModelValidatorProvider.RegisterAdapter. Create a client-side validator like this that responds to the blur event. Pros: Data annotation follows DRY principle (Html.ValidationMessageFor<T> picks up field importance and warning message from attribute, no duplication). Cons: Must call TryValidateModel from GET actions to ensure empty fields are decorated. Not technically validation (client- & server-side rules don't match) so it's at the mercy of framework changes. Clients with JavaScript disabled will never see highlights/warnings. Clone the entire validation framework It strikes me that I'm trying to achieve exactly the same thing as validation but with warnings rather than errors. It needs to run before model binding (and therefore validation) has occurred. Perhaps it's worth designing a similar framework with annotations like Required, RegularExpression, StringLength, etc. that somehow cause Html.TextBoxFor<T> etc. to render the warning CSS class and Html.ValidationMessageFor<T> to emit the warning message and JSON needed to enable client-side blur checks. Pros: Sounds like something MVC 2 could do with out of the box. Cons: Way too much effort for my current requirement! I'm swaying towards option 1. Can anyone think of a better solution?

    Read the article

  • Where to put a glossary of important terms and patterns in documentation?

    - by Tetha
    Greetings. I want to document certain patterns in the code in order to build up a consistent terminology (in order to easen communication about the software). I am, however, unsure, where to define the terms given. In order to get on the same level, an example: I have a code generator. This code generator receives a certain InputStructure from the Parser (yes, the name InputStructure might be less than ideal). This InputStructure is then transformed into various subsequent datastructures (like an abstract description of the validation process). Each of these datastructures can be either transformed into another value of the same datastructure or it can be transformed into the next datastructure. This should sound like Pipes and Filters to some degree. Given this, I call an operation which takes a datastructures and constructs a value of the same datastructure a transformation, while I call an operation which takes a datastructure and produces a different follow-up datastructure a derivation. The final step of deriving a string containing code is called emitting. (So, overall, the codegenerator takes the input-structure and transforms, transforms, derives, transforms, derives and finally emits). I think emphasizing these terms will be benefitial in communications, because then it is easy to talk about things. If you hear "transformation", you know "Ok, I only need to think about these two datastructures", if you hear "emitting", you know "Ok, I only need to know this datastructure and the target language.". However, where do I document these patterns? The current code base uses visitors and offers classes called like ValidatorTransformationBase<ResultType> (or InputStructureTransformationBase<ResultType>, and so one and so on). I do not really want to add the definition of such terms to the interfaces, because in that case, I'd have to repeat myself on each and every interface, which clearly violates DRY. I am considering to emphasize the distinction between Transformations and Derivations by adding further interfaces (I would have to think about a better name for the TransformationBase-classes, but then I could do thinks like ValidatorTransformation extends ValidatorTransformationBase<Validator>, or ValidatorDerivationFromInputStructure extends InputStructureTransformation<Validator>). I also think I should add a custom page to the doxygen documentation already existing, as in "Glossary" or "Architecture Principles", which contains such principles. The only disadvantage of this would be that a contributor will need to find this page in order to actually learn about this. Am I missing possibilities or am I judging something wrong here in your opinion? -- Regards, Tetha

    Read the article

  • Html validation error for property attribute

    - by Castor
    I am using few facebook social plugins and I am using the meta header. When validating the page, the W3C validator is throwing the error - "Error: there is no attribute "property". I am using the XHTML Transitional doctype - Pls Suggest if I have to change the doctype to something else.

    Read the article

  • Validating method arguments with Data Annotation attributes

    - by schemer
    The "Silverlight Business Application" template bundled with VS2010 / Silverlight 4 uses DataAnnotations on method arguments in its domain service class, which are invoked automagically: public CreateUserStatus CreateUser(RegistrationData user, [Required(ErrorMessageResourceName = "ValidationErrorRequiredField", ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(ValidationErrorResources))] [RegularExpression("^.*[^a-zA-Z0-9].*$", ErrorMessageResourceName = "ValidationErrorBadPasswordStrength", ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(ValidationErrorResources))] [StringLength(50, MinimumLength = 7, ErrorMessageResourceName = "ValidationErrorBadPasswordLength", ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(ValidationErrorResources))] string password) { /* do something */ } If I need to implement this in my POCO class methods, how do I get the framework to invoke the validations OR how do I invoke the validation on all the arguments imperatively (using Validator or otherwise?).

    Read the article

  • Symfony2 bindrequest error

    - by user1321109
    namespace Topxia\LiftBundle\Form; use Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraint as Assert; class AddUser { /** * @Assert\NotBlank(message="???????") */ public $username; /** * @Assert\NotBlank(message="????????") */ public $name; /** * @Assert\NotBlank(message="??????") * @Assert\MinLength(limit=4,message="?????") * @Assert\MaxLength(limit=24,message="?????") */ public $password; /** * @Assert\NotBlank(message="??????") */ public $rpassword; /** * @Assert\NotBlank(message="???????") * @Assert\Email(message="???????") */ public $email; /** * @Assert\NotBlank(message="k3????????") */ public $num; /** * @Assert\NotBlank() * @Assert\Choice({"0", "1", "2", "3", "4"}) */ public $roles; public $changePassword; } namespace Topxia\LiftBundle\Form; use Symfony\Component\Form\AbstractType; use Symfony\Component\Form\FormBuilder; class AddUserType extends AbstractType{ public function buildForm(FormBuilder $builder, array $options){ $builder->add('username', 'text', array('label' => '????')); $builder->add('name', 'text', array('label' => '???')); $builder->add('password', 'password', array('label' => '??')); $builder->add('rpassword', 'password', array('label' => '????')); $builder->add('email', 'email', array('label' => '??')); $builder->add('num', 'text', array('label' => 'K3????')); $builder->add('roles', 'choice', array('label' => '???', 'multiple' => false, 'expanded' => true, 'choices' => array( '0' => '?????', '1' => '?????', '2' => '?????', '3' => '???', '4' => '???' ), )); $builder->add('changePassword', 'checkbox', array('label' => '??????', 'value' => '1')); } public function getName(){ return 'add_user'; } } when i use $form-bindRequest($request); in conctollor there is an error : [Semantical Error] The annotation "@Symfony\Component\Validator\Constraint\NotBlank" in property Topxia\LiftBundle\Form\AddUser::$username does not exist, or could not be auto-loaded. 500 Internal Server Error - AnnotationException I have no idea about this. Thanks

    Read the article

  • Silverlight + WCF + client credentials

    - by Bram
    I have a WCF Web Service with a custom username/password validator. How does one specify the username and password as the ClientCredentials properties when creating a service in Silverlight are read-only? Thanks for any help.

    Read the article

  • Facebook: Invalid mark up on FBML

    - by Jhourlad Estrella
    I am using the W3C XHTML validator to check my sites and I am getting some errors on pages with FBML. Most of the cause of such errors is the "&" character. Since FBML values and attributes are generated on the fly, I have no way to encode the character properly before displaying it. Question: Is there a way for me to tell Facebook Connect to render the mark up properly? Thanks.

    Read the article

  • change validate message in data annotation

    - by user276640
    my object has field with data type int. when i put in html form in this textbox letter not number the validator say- The field must be a number. how can i change this messages like this [Required(ErrorMessage = "??????? ????????")] [DisplayName("????????")] public int age { get; set; }

    Read the article

  • Android sdk download/update failing

    - by tad604
    I'm trying to update and install the latest Android SDK (API 8) and keep getting the following error: Failed to fetch URL https://dl-ssl.google.com/android/repository/repository.xml, reason: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find valid certification path to requested target I'm running on OS X 10.6.3 If I visit the url in a browser I'm not getting any errors about an untrusted cert.

    Read the article

  • Developing a custom-validation in asp.net for specific control and criteria

    - by Gaurav
    Hello There is another relevant question asked Validation Check in asp.net In the same scenario we need a custom validator control which will alert user for any wrong entry. This will work like this : Developer will pass the control-name, input-value and format-required For instance like for textbox it can be: txtName,txtName.Text, allow-alphabets-only The accordingly format if the user input is invalid he/she will be got prompt. Please suggest the right way to do the smae. Thanks in advance.

    Read the article

  • NoSuchMessageException: No message found

    - by adisembiring
    Hi .... I try to learn Spring MVC 3.0 validation. but I got NoSuchMessageException: No message found under code 'name.required' for locale 'en_US' error message when form submted. I have create message.properties in src/message.properties and the content of that file is: name.required = User Name is required password.required = Password is required gender.required = Gender is required I have set ResourceBundleMessageSource in my app-servlet.xml <bean id="messageSource" class="org.springframework.context.support.ResourceBundleMessageSource" p:basename="messages" /> My validator code is: @Component("registrationValidator") public class RegistrationValidator implements Validator { @Override public boolean supports(Class<?> clazz) { return RegistrationCommand.class.isAssignableFrom(clazz); } @Override public void validate(Object target, Errors errors) { RegistrationCommand registrationCommand = (RegistrationCommand) target; ValidationUtils.rejectIfEmptyOrWhitespace(errors, "name", "name.required"); ValidationUtils.rejectIfEmptyOrWhitespace(errors, "password", "password.required"); ValidationUtils.rejectIfEmpty(errors, "gender", "gender.required"); ValidationUtils.rejectIfEmpty(errors, "country", "country.required"); //ValidationUtils.rejectIfEmpty(errors, "community", "community.required"); ValidationUtils.rejectIfEmptyOrWhitespace(errors, "description", "description.required"); if (registrationCommand.getCommunity().length == 0) { errors.rejectValue("community", "community.required"); } } } and JSP Page is: <form:form commandName="registrationCommand"> <p class="name"> <label for="name">Name</label> <form:input path="name" /> <form:errors path="name" cssClass="error"></form:errors> </p> <p class="password"> <label for="password">Password</label> <form:password path="password" /> <form:errors path="password" cssClass="error"></form:errors> </p> <p class="gender"> <label>Gender</label> <form:radiobutton path="gender" value="M" label="M" /> <form:radiobutton path="gender" value="F" label="F" /> <form:errors path="gender" cssClass="error"></form:errors> </p> <p class="submit"> <input type="submit" value="Submit" /> </p> </form:form>

    Read the article

  • QValidator for hex input

    - by Evan Teran
    I have a Qt widget which should only accept a hex string as input. It is very simple to restrict the input characters to [0-9A-Fa-f], but I would like to have it display with a delimiter between "bytes" so for example if the delimiter is a space, and the user types 0011223344 I would like the line edit to display 00 11 22 33 44 Now if the user presses the backspace key 3 times, then I want it to display 00 11 22 3. I almost have what i want, so far there is only one subtle bug involving using the delete key to remove a delimiter. Does anyone have a better way to implement this validator? Here's my code so far: class HexStringValidator : public QValidator { public: HexStringValidator(QObject * parent) : QValidator(parent) {} public: virtual void fixup(QString &input) const { QString temp; int index = 0; // every 2 digits insert a space if they didn't explicitly type one Q_FOREACH(QChar ch, input) { if(std::isxdigit(ch.toAscii())) { if(index != 0 && (index & 1) == 0) { temp += ' '; } temp += ch.toUpper(); ++index; } } input = temp; } virtual State validate(QString &input, int &pos) const { if(!input.isEmpty()) { // TODO: can we detect if the char which was JUST deleted // (if any was deleted) was a space? and special case this? // as to not have the bug in this case? const int char_pos = pos - input.left(pos).count(' '); int chars = 0; fixup(input); pos = 0; while(chars != char_pos) { if(input[pos] != ' ') { ++chars; } ++pos; } // favor the right side of a space if(input[pos] == ' ') { ++pos; } } return QValidator::Acceptable; } }; For now this code is functional enough, but I'd love to have it work 100% as expected. Obviously the ideal would be the just separate the display of the hex string from the actual characters stored in the QLineEdit's internal buffer but I have no idea where to start with that and I imagine is a non-trivial undertaking. In essence, I would like to have a Validator which conforms to this regex: "[0-9A-Fa-f]( [0-9A-Fa-f])*" but I don't want the user to ever have to type a space as delimiter. Likewise, when editing what they types, the spaces should be managed implicitly.

    Read the article

  • jQuery - How to dynamically add a validation rule

    - by Justin
    Hey, I'm trying to dynamically add a validation rule to some dynamic controls: $("input[id*=Hours]").rules("add", "required"); However this line gives me the following error: $.data(element.form, "validator") is null Defining rules the static way with the validate function works fine. What am I doing wrong? Thanks, Justin

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46  | Next Page >