Search Results

Search found 62990 results on 2520 pages for 'asp net mvc framework'.

Page 40/2520 | < Previous Page | 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47  | Next Page >

  • Use-cases for node.js and c#

    - by Chase Florell
    I do quite a bit of ASP.NET work (C#, MVC), but most of it is typical web development. I do Restful architecture using CRUD repositories. Most of my clients don't have a lot of advanced requirements within their applications. I'm now looking at node.js and it's performance implications (I'm addicted to speed), but I haven't delved into it all that much. I'm wondering if node.js can realistically replace my typical web development in C# and ASP.NET MVC (not rewriting existing apps, but when working on new ones) node.js can complement an ASP.NET MVC app by adding some async goodness to the existing architecture. Are there use-cases for/against C# and node.js? Edit I love ASP.NET MVC and am super excited with where it's going. Just trying to see if there are special use cases that would favor node.js

    Read the article

  • Is the .NET/Microsoft technology stack a financially viable option for a startup with limited finances?

    - by Ein Doofus
    I have an unpaid internship for a very new startup company with little tech experience that's trying to be a Groupon clone. They're currently using Wordpress and I've been trying to decide what web framework to push them towards, since I'll have to learn that language and implement it as well. Is ASP.Net MVC a realistic option for a web based startup company with little financial backing? For example, I know in the Rails hosting is slightly cheaper because of the whole free OS thing and there are free "gems" available to do things like a mailers, but how much more expensive can it get if I go with ASP.Net MVC since such add-ons stop being open source? How much does the cost of hosting for .NET applications add to the equation?

    Read the article

  • Performance Related features for migration from .net 2003 Framework 1.1 to .net 2008 framework 3.5?

    - by KuldipMCA
    I am work on VB.net 2003 Framework 1.1 for last 3.5 years in windows Application. We are currently migrating to VB.net 2008 framework 3.5, but i don't know about the features which related to ADO.net and which is important to performance. I know linq to SQL but our architecture is made in .net 2003 so we should follow this. Any features which is very important to enhance the performance?

    Read the article

  • what's the right way to bind sqldatasource to asp:label in asp.net 4.0?

    - by cskilbeck
    Is it possible using Eval? If so, can someone post a short fragment to illustrate? My SqlDataSource returns 1 record with 3 fields, I'd like to Format these into a string. eg: Record Field 'Name' = 'Jack' Field 'Amount' = 100 Field 'Date' = 12.02.2010 asp:Label text should end up being: Welcome Jack, last payment was 100 on 12.02.2010 if another control than asp:Label is appropriate, that would be good to know also.

    Read the article

  • Upgrading to ASP.NET 3.5

    - by rs
    I have a server with some asp, asp.net 1.0 and 2.0 running on them. Now I'm planning to host 3.5 apps on them. Do i have to make any changes to server other than installing framework to make it handle all my previous version apps? Do i have to install new IIS or i can use same iis for 3.5? Do i have to install ajax newer version to suport ajax 3.5?

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET MVC Route based on Web Browser/Device (e.g. iPhone)

    - by Alex
    Is it possible, from within ASP.NET MVC, to route to different controllers or actions based on the accessing device/browser? I'm thinking of setting up alternative actions and views for some parts of my website in case it is accessed from the iPhone, to optimize display and functionality of it. I don't want to create a completely separate project for the iPhone though as the majority of the site is fine on any device. Any idea on how to do this?

    Read the article

  • MVC on Server 2008 R2 - How?

    - by Redeemed1
    I have a new WIndows Server 2008 R2 x64 DataCentre with Framework 3.5 SP1 and Framework 4 installed. When I install my MVC application (VS 2008 MVC 2.0 using a Web Setup project installer) and browse to the application I get an error that System.Web.Mvc cannot be found. If I copy the relevant DLLs (System.Web.Mvc etc)into the bin directory the app runs up perfectly. I have checked everywhere for an installer but can only find the VS2008 related bits, no server runtime. How do I get ASP.Net MVC installed in this environment so that we don't have to Copy Local the dlls? Many thanks Brian

    Read the article

  • Looking into Entity Framework Code First Migrations

    - by nikolaosk
    In this post I will introduce you to Code First Migrations, an Entity Framework feature introduced in version 4.3 back in February of 2012.I have extensively covered Entity Framework in this blog. Please find my other Entity Framework posts here .   Before the addition of Code First Migrations (4.1,4.2 versions), Code First database initialisation meant that Code First would create the database if it does not exist (the default behaviour - CreateDatabaseIfNotExists). The other pattern we could use is DropCreateDatabaseIfModelChanges which means that Entity Framework, will drop the database if it realises that model has changes since the last time it created the database.The final pattern is DropCreateDatabaseAlways which means that Code First will recreate the database every time one runs the application.That is of course fine for the development database but totally unacceptable and catastrophic when you have a production database. We cannot lose our data because of the work that Code First works.Migrations solve this problem.With migrations we can modify the database without completely dropping it.We can modify the database schema to reflect the changes to the model without losing data.In version EF 5.0 migrations are fully included and supported. I will demonstrate migrations with a hands-on example.Let me say a few words first about Entity Framework first. The .Net framework provides support for Object Relational Mappingthrough EF. So EF is a an ORM tool and it is now the main data access technology that microsoft works on. I use it quite extensively in my projects. Through EF we have many things out of the box provided for us. We have the automatic generation of SQL code.It maps relational data to strongly types objects.All the changes made to the objects in the memory are persisted in a transactional way back to the data store. You can find in this post an example on how to use the Entity Framework to retrieve data from an SQL Server Database using the "Database/Schema First" approach.In this approach we make all the changes at the database level and then we update the model with those changes. In this post you can see an example on how to use the "Model First" approach when working with ASP.Net and the Entity Framework.This model was firstly introduced in EF version 4.0 and we could start with a blank model and then create a database from that model.When we made changes to the model , we could recreate the database from the new model. The Code First approach is the more code-centric than the other two. Basically we write POCO classes and then we persist to a database using something called DBContext.Code First relies on DbContext. We create 2,3 classes (e.g Person,Product) with properties and then these classes interact with the DbContext class we can create a new database based upon our POCOS classes and have tables generated from those classes.We do not have an .edmx file in this approach.By using this approach we can write much easier unit tests.DbContext is a new context class and is smaller,lightweight wrapper for the main context class which is ObjectContext (Schema First and Model First).Let's move on to our hands-on example.I have installed VS 2012 Ultimate edition in my Windows 8 machine. 1)  Create an empty asp.net web application. Give your application a suitable name. Choose C# as the development language2) Add a new web form item in your application. Leave the default name.3) Create a new folder. Name it CodeFirst .4) Add a new item in your application, a class file. Name it Footballer.cs. This is going to be a simple POCO class.Place this class file in the CodeFirst folder.The code follows    public class Footballer     {         public int FootballerID { get; set; }         public string FirstName { get; set; }         public string LastName { get; set; }         public double Weight { get; set; }         public double Height { get; set; }              }5) We will have to add EF 5.0 to our project. Right-click on the project in the Solution Explorer and select Manage NuGet Packages... for it.In the window that will pop up search for Entity Framework and install it.Have a look at the picture below   If you want to find out if indeed EF version is 5.0 version is installed have a look at the References. Have a look at the picture below to see what you will see if you have installed everything correctly.Have a look at the picture below 6) Then we need to create a context class that inherits from DbContext.Add a new class to the CodeFirst folder.Name it FootballerDBContext.Now that we have the entity classes created, we must let the model know.I will have to use the DbSet<T> property.The code for this class follows     public class FootballerDBContext:DbContext     {         public DbSet<Footballer> Footballers { get; set; }             }    Do not forget to add  (using System.Data.Entity;) in the beginning of the class file 7) We must take care of the connection string. It is very easy to create one in the web.config.It does not matter that we do not have a database yet.When we run the DbContext and query against it , it will use a connection string in the web.config and will create the database based on the classes.I will use the name "FootballTraining" for the database.In my case the connection string inside the web.config, looks like this    <connectionStrings>    <add name="CodeFirstDBContext" connectionString="server=.;integrated security=true; database=FootballTraining" providerName="System.Data.SqlClient"/>                       </connectionStrings>8) Now it is time to create Linq to Entities queries to retrieve data from the database . Add a new class to your application in the CodeFirst folder.Name the file DALfootballer.csWe will create a simple public method to retrieve the footballers. The code for the class followspublic class DALfootballer     {         FootballerDBContext ctx = new FootballerDBContext();         public List<Footballer> GetFootballers()         {             var query = from player in ctx.Footballers select player;             return query.ToList();         }     } 9) Place a GridView control on the Default.aspx page and leave the default name.Add an ObjectDataSource control on the Default.aspx page and leave the default name. Set the DatasourceID property of the GridView control to the ID of the ObjectDataSource control.(DataSourceID="ObjectDataSource1" ). Let's configure the ObjectDataSource control. Click on the smart tag item of the ObjectDataSource control and select Configure Data Source. In the Wizzard that pops up select the DALFootballer class and then in the next step choose the GetFootballers() method.Click Finish to complete the steps of the wizzard.Build and Run your application.  10) Obviously you will not see any records coming back from your database, because we have not inserted anything. The database is created, though.Have a look at the picture below.  11) Now let's change the POCO class. Let's add a new property to the Footballer.cs class.        public int Age { get; set; } Build and run your application again. You will receive an error. Have a look at the picture below 12) That was to be expected.EF Code First Migrations is not activated by default. We have to activate them manually and configure them according to your needs. We will open the Package Manager Console from the Tools menu within Visual Studio 2012.Then we will activate the EF Code First Migration Features by writing the command “Enable-Migrations”.  Have a look at the picture below. This adds a new folder Migrations in our project. A new auto-generated class Configuration.cs is created.Another class is also created [CURRENTDATE]_InitialCreate.cs and added to our project.The Configuration.cs  is shown in the picture below. The [CURRENTDATE]_InitialCreate.cs is shown in the picture below  13) ??w we are ready to migrate the changes in the database. We need to run the Add-Migration Age command in Package Manager ConsoleAdd-Migration will scaffold the next migration based on changes you have made to your model since the last migration was created.In the Migrations folder, the file 201211201231066_Age.cs is created.Have a look at the picture below to see the newly generated file and its contents. Now we can run the Update-Database command in Package Manager Console .See the picture above.Code First Migrations will compare the migrations in our Migrations folder with the ones that have been applied to the database. It will see that the Age migration needs to be applied, and run it.The EFMigrations.CodeFirst.FootballeDBContext database is now updated to include the Age column in the Footballers table.Build and run your application.Everything will work fine now.Have a look at the picture below to see the migrations applied to our table. 14) We may want it to automatically upgrade the database (by applying any pending migrations) when the application launches.Let's add another property to our Poco class.          public string TShirtNo { get; set; }We want this change to migrate automatically to the database.We go to the Configuration.cs we enable automatic migrations.     public Configuration()        {            AutomaticMigrationsEnabled = true;        } In the Page_Load event handling routine we have to register the MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion database initializer. A database initializer simply contains some logic that is used to make sure the database is setup correctly.   protected void Page_Load(object sender, EventArgs e)        {            Database.SetInitializer(new MigrateDatabaseToLatestVersion<FootballerDBContext, Configuration>());        } Build and run your application. It will work fine. Have a look at the picture below to see the migrations applied to our table in the database. Hope it helps!!!  

    Read the article

  • asp.net CustomValidator never fires OnServerValidate

    - by Bryce Fischer
    I have the following ASP page: <asp:Content ID="Content2" ContentPlaceHolderID="ShellContent" runat="server"> <form runat="server" id="AddNewNoteForm" method="post""> <fieldset id="NoteContainer"> <legend>Add New Note</legend> <asp:ValidationSummary ID="ValidationSummary1" runat="server" /> <div class="ctrlHolder"> <asp:Label ID="LabelNoteDate" runat="server" Text="Note Date" AssociatedControlID="NoteDateTextBox"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="NoteDateTextBox" runat="server" class="textInput" CausesValidation="True" ></asp:TextBox> <asp:CustomValidator ID="CustomValidator1" runat="server" ErrorMessage="CustomValidator" ControlToValidate="NoteDateTextBox" OnServerValidate="CustomValidator1_ServerValidate" Display="Dynamic" >*</asp:CustomValidator> </div> <div class="ctrlHolder"> <asp:Label ID="LabelNoteText" AssociatedControlID="NoteTextTextBox" runat="server" Text="Note"></asp:Label> <asp:TextBox ID="NoteTextTextBox" runat="server" Height="102px" TextMode="MultiLine" class="textInput" ></asp:TextBox> <asp:RequiredFieldValidator ID="RequiredFieldValidator2" runat="server" ErrorMessage="Note Text is Required" ControlToValidate="NoteTextTextBox">*</asp:RequiredFieldValidator> </div> <div class="buttonHolder"> <asp:Button ID="OkButton" runat="server" Text="Add New Note" CssClass="primaryAction" onclick="OkButton_Click"/> <asp:HyperLink ID="HyperLink1" runat="server">Cancel</asp:HyperLink> </div> </fieldset> </form> </asp:Content> and the following code behind for the CustomValidator1_ServerValidate() method: protected void CustomValidator1_ServerValidate(object source, ServerValidateEventArgs args) { if (string.IsNullOrEmpty(args.Value.Trim())) { args.IsValid = false; CustomValidator1.ErrorMessage = "Note Date is Required!"; return; } DateTime testDate; if (DateTime.TryParse(args.Value, out testDate)) { args.IsValid = true; CustomValidator1.ErrorMessage = "Invalid Date!"; } } It never seems to fail validation no matter what I put in the text box... Should mention this is ASP.NET 2.0

    Read the article

  • ASP.NET ViewState Tips and Tricks #2

    - by João Angelo
    If you need to store complex types in ViewState DO implement IStateManager to control view state persistence and reduce its size. By default a serializable object will be fully stored in view state using BinaryFormatter. A quick comparison for a complex type with two integers and one string property produces the following results measured using ASP.NET tracing: BinaryFormatter: 328 bytes in view state IStateManager: 28 bytes in view state BinaryFormatter sample code: // DO NOT [Serializable] public class Info { public int Id { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } } public class ExampleControl : WebControl { protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e) { base.OnLoad(e); if (!this.Page.IsPostBack) { this.User = new Info { Id = 1, Name = "John Doe", Age = 27 }; } } public Info User { get { object o = this.ViewState["Example_User"]; if (o == null) return null; return (Info)o; } set { this.ViewState["Example_User"] = value; } } } IStateManager sample code: // DO public class Info : IStateManager { public int Id { get; set; } public string Name { get; set; } public int Age { get; set; } private bool isTrackingViewState; bool IStateManager.IsTrackingViewState { get { return this.isTrackingViewState; } } void IStateManager.LoadViewState(object state) { var triplet = (Triplet)state; this.Id = (int)triplet.First; this.Name = (string)triplet.Second; this.Age = (int)triplet.Third; } object IStateManager.SaveViewState() { return new Triplet(this.Id, this.Name, this.Age); } void IStateManager.TrackViewState() { this.isTrackingViewState = true; } } public class ExampleControl : WebControl { protected override void OnLoad(EventArgs e) { base.OnLoad(e); if (!this.Page.IsPostBack) { this.User = new Info { Id = 1, Name = "John Doe", Age = 27 }; } } public Info User { get; set; } protected override object SaveViewState() { return new Pair( ((IStateManager)this.User).SaveViewState(), base.SaveViewState()); } protected override void LoadViewState(object savedState) { if (savedState != null) { var pair = (Pair)savedState; this.User = new Info(); ((IStateManager)this.User).LoadViewState(pair.First); base.LoadViewState(pair.Second); } } }

    Read the article

  • .NET Framework 4 Client Profile vs .NET Framework 3.5 Client Profile

    - by Janusz
    Currently I am targeting .NET Framework 3.5 Client profile. Under certain conditions (when .NET 1.x or 2.x is installed) the client profile is not installed and instead full version of .NET Framework 3.5. is installed. This limitation has been removed from .NET 4.0 profile - therefore its a nice improvement that significantly reduces download size on certain PCs. However, if I target application to .NET 4.0 then all the clients will have to download new framework. I think ideal scenario would be to target .NET 3.5 profile but point installer to .NET 4.0 client profile. This way PCs with 3.5 installed (65% from our tests at the moment) would be fine and the rest would install .NET 4.0. Is my thinking correct or its not feasible? Will .NET 3.5 profile application run with only .NET 4.0 profile installed? Thank you

    Read the article

  • asp.net mvc asp.net

    - by mazhar
    I want to Develop a similar sort of wizard mechanism for the design like in the picture above .How would I do that. Please reply how would i code the above mechanism . At this time I am completely blank so any idea will be great.

    Read the article

  • Correct way to perform an update using ADO.Net Entity Model in .net 4

    - by sf
    Hi, I just wanted to clarify if this is the appropriate way to perform an update using a designer generated ADO.NET Entity Model. I was wondering if there was a way to perform an update without creating the sqlMenu object. public class MenusRepository { public void UpdateMenu(Menu menu) { // _context is instantiated in constructor Menu sqlMenu = (from m in _context.Menus where m.MenuId == menu.MenuId select m).FirstOrDefault(); if (sqlMenu == null) throw new ArgumentException("Can't update a Menu which does not exist"); // associate values here sqlMenu.Name = menu.Name; _context.SaveChanges(); } }

    Read the article

  • How do I insert data using a DetailsView into an access database without everything breaking?

    - by Steve
    Hey I'm getting the error: Data type mismatch in criteria expression. when I try to submit a DetailsView insert. Code for Default.aspx: (from inside an asp:Content tag) <asp:DetailsView ID="DetailsView1" runat="server" Height="50px" Width="125px" AutoGenerateRows="False" DataKeyNames="user_id" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource1" CellPadding="4" ForeColor="#333333" GridLines="None"> <FooterStyle BackColor="#5D7B9D" Font-Bold="True" ForeColor="White" /> <CommandRowStyle BackColor="#E2DED6" Font-Bold="True" /> <RowStyle BackColor="#F7F6F3" ForeColor="#333333" /> <FieldHeaderStyle BackColor="#E9ECF1" Font-Bold="True" /> <PagerStyle BackColor="#284775" ForeColor="White" HorizontalAlign="Center" /> <Fields> <asp:BoundField DataField="email" HeaderText="email" SortExpression="email" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="password" HeaderText="password" SortExpression="password" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="users_name" HeaderText="users_name" SortExpression="users_name" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="image_path" HeaderText="image_path" SortExpression="image_path" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="mobile" HeaderText="mobile" SortExpression="mobile" /> <asp:BoundField DataField="twitter" HeaderText="twitter" SortExpression="twitter" /> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="privacy_level_id" SortExpression="privacy_level_id"> <InsertItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList2" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource2" DataTextField="privacy_level_name" DataValueField="privacy_level_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource2" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [PrivacyLevels]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="Label1" runat="server" Text='<%# Bind("date_of_birth") %>'></asp:Label> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="course_id" SortExpression="course_id"> <EditItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList3" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource3" DataTextField="course_name" DataValueField="course_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource3" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Courses]"> </asp:AccessDataSource> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList22" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource22" DataTextField="privacy_level_name" DataValueField="privacy_level_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource22" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [PrivacyLevels]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList3" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource3" DataTextField="course_name" DataValueField="course_id" Enabled="False"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource3" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Courses]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="nationality_id" SortExpression="nationality_id"> <EditItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList1" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource20" DataTextField="nationality_name" DataValueField="nationality_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource20" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Nationalities]"> </asp:AccessDataSource> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList1" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource20" DataTextField="nationality_name" DataValueField="nationality_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource20" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Nationalities]"> </asp:AccessDataSource> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList1" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource20" DataTextField="nationality_name" DataValueField="nationality_id" Enabled="False"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource20" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Nationalities]"> </asp:AccessDataSource> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="residence_id" SortExpression="residence_id"> <EditItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList4" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource4" DataTextField="residence_name" DataValueField="residence_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource4" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Residences]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList4" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource4" DataTextField="residence_name" DataValueField="residence_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource4" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Residences]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList4" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource4" DataTextField="residence_name" DataValueField="residence_id" Enabled="False"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource4" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Residences]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:BoundField DataField="course_year" HeaderText="course_year" SortExpression="course_year" /> <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="gender_id" SortExpression="gender_id"> <EditItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList5" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource5" DataTextField="gender_name" DataValueField="gender_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource5" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Genders]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </EditItemTemplate> <InsertItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList5" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource5" DataTextField="gender_name" DataValueField="gender_id"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource5" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Genders]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </InsertItemTemplate> <ItemTemplate> <asp:DropDownList ID="DropDownList5" runat="server" DataSourceID="AccessDataSource5" DataTextField="gender_name" DataValueField="gender_id" Enabled="False"> </asp:DropDownList> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource5" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Genders]"></asp:AccessDataSource> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> <asp:CommandField ShowInsertButton="True" InsertText="Create my user!" /> </Fields> <HeaderStyle BackColor="#5D7B9D" Font-Bold="True" ForeColor="White" /> <EditRowStyle BackColor="#999999" /> <AlternatingRowStyle BackColor="White" ForeColor="#284775" /> </asp:DetailsView> <asp:Button ID="Button1" runat="server" Text="Button" /> <asp:AccessDataSource ID="AccessDataSource1" runat="server" DataFile="~/App_Data/VisageFinal.mdb" DeleteCommand="DELETE FROM [Users] WHERE [user_id] = ?" InsertCommand="INSERT INTO [Users] ([email], [password], [users_name], [image_path], [mobile], [twitter], [privacy_level_id], [nationality_id], [course_id], [residence_id], [course_year], [gender_id]) VALUES ('?', '?', '?', '?', '?', '?', ?, ?, ?, ?, ?, ?)" SelectCommand="SELECT * FROM [Users]" UpdateCommand="UPDATE [Users] SET [email] = ?, [password] = ?, [users_name] = ?, [date_of_birth] = ?, [image_path] = ?, [mobile] = ?, [twitter] = ?, [privacy_level_id] = ?, [nationality_id] = ?, [course_id] = ?, [residence_id] = ?, [has_set_privacy_level] = ?, [course_year] = ?, [gender_id] = ? WHERE [user_id] = ?"> <DeleteParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="user_id" Type="Int32" /> </DeleteParameters> <UpdateParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="email" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="password" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="users_name" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="image_path" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="mobile" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="twitter" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="privacy_level_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="nationality_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="course_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="residence_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="has_set_privacy_level" Type="Boolean" /> <asp:Parameter Name="course_year" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="gender_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="user_id" Type="Int32" /> </UpdateParameters> <InsertParameters> <asp:Parameter Name="email" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="password" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="users_name" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="image_path" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="mobile" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="twitter" Type="String" /> <asp:Parameter Name="privacy_level_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="nationality_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="course_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="residence_id" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="course_year" Type="Int32" /> <asp:Parameter Name="gender_id" Type="Int32" /> </InsertParameters> </asp:AccessDataSource> Any ideas what I've broken?

    Read the article

  • Bind ISet in ASP.NET MVC2

    - by Dmitriy Nagirnyak
    Hi, I am trying to find out what would be the best bind first element of ISet (Iesi.Collection) as a first element. So basically I only have to use some kind of collection that has an indexer (and ISet doesn't) then I can write code like this (which works perfectly well): <%: Html.EditorFor(x => x.Company.PrimaryUsers[0].Email) %> But as the ISet has no indexer I cannot use it. So how can I then bind the first element of ISet in MVC2? Thanks, Dmitriy.

    Read the article

  • How can we set authorization for a whole area in ASP.NET MVC?

    - by CodingTales
    I've an Admin area and I want only Admins to enter the area. I considered adding the Authorized attribute to every controller in the Admin area. Isn't there an elegant solution or is this feature not there in the framework itself? EDIT: I'm sorry, I should to have mentioned this before. I'm using a custom AuthorizedAttribute derived from AuthorizeAttribute.

    Read the article

  • Running BlogEngine.NET with ASP.NET MVC under same website?

    - by Raj Aththanayake
    Hi Can anyone please help me with this? I have a Windows 2008 server and MVC 2.0 site is hosted under IIS 7.0 root directory. The site works fine. I want to use the BlogEngine.NET with my site. For example if my mite name is http:// mysite.com (which is the root of IIS) and the blog should be http://mysite.com/blog/Default.aspx Is this possible? Can I create a sub virtual directory within my root (where the MVC 2 app is hosted) and run the ASP.NET BlogEngine.Net in it? Any ideas appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Wordpress like dynamic permalinks in ASP.NET MVC2/3 or ASP.NET 4.0

    - by Aseem Gautam
    Scenario: There are two entities say 'Books' and 'Book Reviews'. There can be multiple books and each book can have multiple reviews. Each review and book should have a separate permalink. Books and Reviews can be added by users using separate input forms. As soon as any book/review is added it should be accessible by its permalink. Anyone can point me in the right direction on how should this be implemented?

    Read the article

  • EntityFramework .net 4 Update entity with a simple method

    - by Dennis Larsen
    I was looking at this SO question: http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1168215/ado-net-entity-framework-update-only-certian-properties-on-a-detached-entity. This was a big help for me. I know now that I need to attach an entity before making my changes to it. But how can do I do this: I have an MVC website, a Customer Update Page with fields: ID, Name, Address, etc. My MVC is parsing this into a Customer entity. How do I do the following: Update my entity and Save the changes to it. Catch the exception if my changes have been made since I loaded my entity.

    Read the article

  • ASP.Net Layered app - Share Entity Data Model amongst layers

    - by Chris Klepeis
    How can I share the auto-generated entity data model (generated object classes) amongst all layers of my C# web app whilst only granting query access in the data layer? This uses the typical 3 layer approach: data, business, presentation. My data layer returns an IEnumerable<T> to my business layer, but I cannot return type T to the presentation layer because I do not want the presentation layer to know of the existence of the data layer - which is where the entity framework auto-generated my classes. It was recommended to have a seperate layer with just the data model, but I'm unsure how to seperate the data model from the query functionality the entity framework provides.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47  | Next Page >