Search Results

Search found 2513 results on 101 pages for 'opengl'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 59/101 | < Previous Page | 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66  | Next Page >

  • Screen Capture with Open GL using glReadPixels

    - by Raja
    Hi, I created a CGRegisterScreenRefreshCallback(refreshCallback, NULL) and in the refreshCallback method get the list of rectangles which have changed. I am getting the rectangle data from frameBuffer using OpenGL glReadPixels. Is there a better way of screen capture either with/without opengl and also using OpenGL can I skip reading pixel by pixel ? I have looked at glGetTexImage and glCopyTexSubImage2D. Any simple code block which can explain how to use these functions to get the changed rectangle data would be very helpful ? Thanks, Raja.

    Read the article

  • Flipping an image using a one dimensional array of characters.

    - by Jeff
    I have the data of an image loaded into memory as a one dimensional array. Since I'm trying to use OpenGL to draw it, and since it reads from the bottom up, I want to try and flip the elements of the array before they're sent to OpenGL. Maybe there's a way to tell OpenGL to read from the top to the bottom? Anyways, I tried using a few methods of sorting arrays and they also flip the image horizontally, which is very much like the original problem. So can I flip the data only one way?

    Read the article

  • Should Windows Multipoint Server stations on individual video cards support hardware video acceleration?

    - by villares
    I've set up a test machine with multiple PCI-e nVidia GF440 Video cards and installed Windows Multipoint Server 2011. I use the same kind of hardware set up with a BeTwin multiseat solution to create a class lab for Google SketchUp teaching (highly OpenGL dependent) and it works ok. On the Multipoint Windows test machine the drivers seem to be installed OK but I don´t seem to get any hardware video acceleration. Is this a intrinsic limitation of this solution or am I doing something wrong?

    Read the article

  • E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

    - by Joel
    I cant install or uppdate anything on my system 12.04 I get the error... installArchives() failed: dpkg: error processing libqt4-xmlpatterns (--configure): libqt4-xmlpatterns:amd64 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 cannot be configured because libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 is in a different version (4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3) dpkg: error processing libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 (--configure): libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3 cannot be configured because libqt4-xmlpatterns:amd64 is in a different version (4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2) dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-declarative:i386: libqt4-declarative:i386 depends on libqt4-xmlpatterns (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-declarative:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-declarative: libqt4-declarative depends on libqt4-xmlpatterns (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Version of libqt4-xmlpatterns on system is 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2. dpkg: error processing libqt4-declarative (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqtgui4:i386: libqtgui4:i386 depends on libqt4-declarative (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqt4-declarative:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqtgui4:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqtgui4: No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. No apport report written because the error message indicates its a followup error from a previous failure. No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already No apport report written because MaxReports is reached already libqtgui4 depends on libqt4-declarative (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqt4-declarative is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqtgui4 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-designer: libqt4-designer depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-designer (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-designer:i386: libqt4-designer:i386 depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-designer:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-opengl: libqt4-opengl depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-opengl (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-opengl:i386: libqt4-opengl:i386 depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-opengl:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-qt3support: libqt4-qt3support depends on libqt4-designer (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqt4-designer is not configured yet. libqt4-qt3support depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-qt3support (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-qt3support:i386: libqt4-qt3support:i386 depends on libqt4-designer (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqt4-designer:i386 is not configured yet. libqt4-qt3support:i386 depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-qt3support:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-scripttools:i386: libqt4-scripttools:i386 depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-scripttools:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-svg: libqt4-svg depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-svg (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-svg:i386: libqt4-svg:i386 depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-svg:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured Errors were encountered while processing: libqt4-xmlpatterns libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 libqt4-declarative:i386 libqt4-declarative libqtgui4:i386 libqtgui4 libqt4-designer libqt4-designer:i386 libqt4-opengl libqt4-opengl:i386 libqt4-qt3support libqt4-qt3support:i386 libqt4-scripttools:i386 libqt4-svg libqt4-svg:i386 Error in function: dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-declarative: libqt4-declarative depends on libqt4-xmlpatterns (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Version of libqt4-xmlpatterns on system is 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2. dpkg: error processing libqt4-declarative (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: error processing libqt4-xmlpatterns (--configure): libqt4-xmlpatterns:amd64 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 cannot be configured because libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 is in a different version (4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3) dpkg: error processing libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 (--configure): libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3 cannot be configured because libqt4-xmlpatterns:amd64 is in a different version (4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2) dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqtgui4: libqtgui4 depends on libqt4-declarative (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqt4-declarative is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqtgui4 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-declarative:i386: libqt4-declarative:i386 depends on libqt4-xmlpatterns (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-declarative:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-svg: libqt4-svg depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-svg (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-opengl: libqt4-opengl depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-opengl (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-designer: libqt4-designer depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-designer (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-qt3support: libqt4-qt3support depends on libqt4-designer (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqt4-designer is not configured yet. libqt4-qt3support depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-qt3support (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqtgui4:i386: libqtgui4:i386 depends on libqt4-declarative (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqt4-declarative:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqtgui4:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-svg:i386: libqt4-svg:i386 depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-svg:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-opengl:i386: libqt4-opengl:i386 depends on libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3); however: Package libqtgui4:i386 is not configured yet. dpkg: error processing libqt4-opengl:i386 (--configure): dependency problems - leaving unconfigured dpkg: dependency problems prevent configuration of libqt4-designer:i386: joel@Joel-PC:~$ sudo apt-get install -f [sudo] password for joel: Läser paketlistor... Färdig Bygger beroendeträd Läser tillståndsinformation... Färdig Korrigerar beroenden.... Färdig Följande paket har installerats automatiskt och är inte längre nödvändiga: kde-l10n-sv language-pack-kde-sv-base language-pack-kde-zh-hans-base calligra-l10n-engb calligra-l10n-sv calligra-l10n-zhcn language-pack-kde-en kde-l10n-engb language-pack-kde-sv language-pack-zh-hans-base kde-l10n-zhcn language-pack-zh-hans language-pack-kde-zh-hans language-pack-kde-en-base Använd "apt-get autoremove" för att ta bort dem. Följande ytterligare paket kommer att installeras: libqt4-xmlpatterns Följande paket kommer att uppgraderas: libqt4-xmlpatterns 1 att uppgradera, 0 att nyinstallera, 0 att ta bort och 22 att inte uppgradera. 15 är inte helt installerade eller borttagna. Behöver hämta 0 B/1 033 kB arkiv. Efter denna åtgärd kommer ytterligare 0 B utrymme användas på disken. Vill du fortsätta [J/n]? J dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-xmlpatterns (--configure): libqt4-xmlpatterns:amd64 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2 cannot be configured because libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 is in a different version (4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3) dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 (--configure): libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3 cannot be configured because libqt4-xmlpatterns:amd64 is in a different version (4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2) dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-declarative:i386: libqt4-declarative:i386 är beroende av libqt4-xmlpatterns (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-declarative:i386 (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-declarative: libqt4-declarative är beroende av libqt4-xmlpatterns (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Versionen av libqt4-xmlpatterns på systemet är 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.2. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-declarative (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqtgui4:i386: libqtgui4:i386 är beroende av libqt4-declarative (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqt4-declarative:i386 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqtgui4:i386 (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar koIngen apport-rapport skrevs därför att felmeddelandet indikerar att det är ett efterföljande fel från ett tidigare problem. Ingen apport-rapport skrevs därför att felmeddelandet indikerar att det är ett efterföljande fel från ett tidigare problem. Ingen apport-rapport skrevs därför att felmeddelandet indikerar att det är ett efterföljande fel från ett tidigare problem. Ingen apport-rapport skrevs därför att felmeddelandet indikerar att det är ett efterföljande fel från ett tidigare problem. Ingen apport-rapport skrevs därför att felmeddelandet indikerar att det är ett efterföljande fel från ett tidigare problem. Ingen apport-rapport skrevs därför att felmeddelandet indikerar att det är ett efterföljande fel från ett tidigare problem. nfigurering av libqtgui4: libqtgui4 är beroende av libqt4-declarative (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqt4-declarative har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqtgui4 (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-designer: libqt4-designer är beroende av libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqtgui4 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-designer (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-designer:i386: libqt4-designer:i386 är beroende av libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqtgui4:i386 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-designer:i386 (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-opengl: libqt4-opengl är beroende av libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqtgui4 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-opengl (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-opengl:i386: libqt4-opengl:i386 är beroende av libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqtgui4:i386 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-opengl:i386 (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-qt3support: libqt4-qt3support är beroende av libqt4-designer (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqt4-designer har inte konfigurerats ännu. libqt4-qt3support är beroende av libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqtgui4 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-qt3support (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-qt3support:i386: libqt4-qt3support:i386 är beroende av libqt4-designer (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqt4-designer:i386 har inte konfigurerats ännu. libqt4-qt3support:i386 är beroende av libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqtgui4:i386 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-qt3support:i386 (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-scripttools:i386: libqt4-scripttools:i386 är beroende av libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqtgui4:i386 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-scripttools:i386 (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-svg: libqt4-svg är beroende av libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqtgui4 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-svg (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad dpkg: beroendeproblem förhindrar konfigurering av libqt4-svg:i386: libqt4-svg:i386 är beroende av libqtgui4 (= 4:4.8.1-0ubuntu4.3), men: Paketet libqtgui4:i386 har inte konfigurerats ännu. dpkg: fel vid hantering av libqt4-svg:i386 (--configure): beroendeproblem - lämnar okonfigurerad Fel uppstod vid hantering: libqt4-xmlpatterns libqt4-xmlpatterns:i386 libqt4-declarative:i386 libqt4-declarative libqtgui4:i386 libqtgui4 libqt4-designer libqt4-designer:i386 libqt4-opengl libqt4-opengl:i386 libqt4-qt3support libqt4-qt3support:i386 libqt4-scripttools:i386 libqt4-svg libqt4-svg:i386 E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)

    Read the article

  • Is there a way to make catalyst driver work in Trusty for the radeon hd4330?

    - by Laurent BERNABE
    Though official Catalyst software 13.1 is suitable for ati radeon hd4330, it can't be installed on Ubuntu 14.04 as it can't support Xorg = 7.6 As I need proprietary drivers for trusty, I would like to know if there is a way to bypass this limitation ? (For example by fetching driver sources) Here are some results from the terminal : $ Xorg -version X.Org X Server 1.15.1 Release Date: 2014-04-13 X Protocol Version 11, Revision 0 Build Operating System: Linux 3.2.0-37-generic x86_64 Ubuntu Current Operating System: Linux bordeaux80 3.13.0-27-generic #50-Ubuntu SMP Thu May 15 18:06:16 UTC 2014 x86_64 Kernel command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-3.13.0-27-generic root=UUID=4015e6f7-d11a-45fd-ac9b-5b6c7ab9eaa0 ro quiet splash vt.handoff=7 Build Date: 16 April 2014 01:36:29PM xorg-server 2:1.15.1-0ubuntu2 (For technical support please see http://www.ubuntu.com/support) Current version of pixman: 0.30.2 Before reporting problems, check http://wiki.x.org to make sure that you have the latest version. $ xrandr Screen 0: minimum 320 x 200, current 1366 x 768, maximum 8192 x 8192 LVDS connected primary 1366x768+0+0 (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) 353mm x 198mm 1366x768 60.0*+ 1280x720 59.9 1152x768 59.8 1024x768 59.9 800x600 59.9 848x480 59.7 720x480 59.7 640x480 59.4 VGA-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) HDMI-0 disconnected (normal left inverted right x axis y axis) $ uname -rp 3.13.0-27-generic x86_64 $ glxinfo | grep OpenGL OpenGL vendor string: X.Org OpenGL renderer string: Gallium 0.4 on AMD RV710 OpenGL core profile version string: 3.1 (Core Profile) Mesa 10.1.0 OpenGL core profile shading language version string: 1.40 OpenGL core profile context flags: (none) OpenGL core profile extensions: OpenGL version string: 3.0 Mesa 10.1.0 OpenGL shading language version string: 1.30 OpenGL context flags: (none) OpenGL extensions: Regards

    Read the article

  • Introduction to 3D Graphics Programming

    - by Jacob Relkin
    Hi everyone! I'm a self-taught programmer with absolutely nil 3D programming experience. A client of mine has related to me an idea for an iPhone app that requires OpenGL ES 2.0 for it's inherently complex 3D structure and animations. Where do I start on this ( albeit long ) journey toward OpenGL ES competence? I'm willing to put in a tremendous amount of time and effort into learning, and if i could please get some pointers to where I should start and what to expect, that would be awesome!

    Read the article

  • call glutinit in an php extension

    - by Yijinsei
    hi guys, I am developing an php extension that require the use of opengl I tried to initialize the library with glutinit, and it works in CLI environment, but when i tried on browser, it doesn't seem to execute the code. I very new to opengl, so I'm not sure what kind of error is this, does anybody have any knowledge with this?

    Read the article

  • How to center viewport at center of the sphere

    - by satyam
    Hi I want to create panorama view with opengl in android. Is it possible using spherical view and centering viewpoint at the sphere center to show bounded image on screen. will this be good aproch , i havent used opengl but want to achive this effect in android Am i going in right direction , any pointers for this will be great help . thanx in advance.

    Read the article

  • Graphic Setup tune-up checklist

    - by Click Ok
    I was trying to play the game Warzone 2100 and the games runs fine, with nice speed, but the screen stays with a horizontal lines "flickering"... My PC have a integrated GeForce Go 6100 vga. Ok, not a powerfull vga, but it's not the end of the world to run a "simple" game like this (compared with another games that ask you send your eyes to purchase a expensive vga). So, I think that the problem can be of the configuration of my machine. I use it in first instance for programming jobs, so I underpay attention to video setup. I would like about a checklist to know if my PC is "ready" to games. By example, I know that I need: Lastest vga drivers Updated DirectX and OpenGL What you suggest? There is too some good programs to test performance and suggests improvements in the system? Thank you! PS: I'm using Windows 7

    Read the article

  • Transform OpenGL coordinates to lower UIView coordinates

    - by John Qualis
    Hi, I am new to OpenGL over iPhone. I am developing an iPhone app similar to a barcode reader but with an extra OpenGL layer. The bottommost layer is UIImagePickerController, then I use UIView on top and draw a rectangle at certain co-ordinates on the iphone screen. So far everything is OK. Then I am trying to draw an OpenGL 3-D model in that rectangle. I am able to load a 3-D model in the iPhone based on this code here - http://iphonedevelopment.blogspot.com/2008/12/start-of-wavefront-obj-file-loader.html I am not able to transform the co-ordinates of the rectangle into OpenGL co-ordinates. Appreciate any help. Do I need to use a matrix to translate the currentPosition of the 3-D model so it is drawn within myRect? The code is given below.. Appreciate any help/pointers in this regards. John (void)drawView:(GLView*)view { static GLfloat rotation = 0.0; glClear(GL_COLOR_BUFFER_BIT | GL_DEPTH_BUFFER_BIT); glLoadIdentity(); glColor4f(0.0, 0.5, 1.0, 1.0); // The coordinates of the rectangle are myRect.x, // myRect.y, myRect.width, myRect.height // Do I need a transform matrix here? //glOrthof(-160.0f, 160.0f, -240.0f, 240.0f, -1.0f, 1.0f); [plane drawSelf]; .... } -(void)setupView:(GLView*)view { const GLfloat zNear = 0.01, zFar = 1000.0, fieldOfView = 45.0; GLfloat size; glEnable(GL_DEPTH_TEST); glMatrixMode(GL_PROJECTION); //glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW); size = zNear * tanf(DEGREES_TO_RADIANS(fieldOfView) / 2.0); CGRect rect = view.bounds; glFrustumf(-size, size, -size / (rect.size.width / rect.size.height), size / (rect.size.width / rect.size.height), zNear, zFar); glViewport(0, 0, rect.size.width, rect.size.height); glMatrixMode(GL_MODELVIEW); glLoadIdentity(); glClearColor(0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f, 0.0f); }

    Read the article

  • En direct des Qt DevDays 2012 : compte-rendu de la formation sur l'OpenGL moderne avec Qt 5

    Bonjour à tous, Actuellement, je suis à Berlin, au Cafe Moskau pour assister aux Qt DevDays 2012. Comme chaque année, la première journée est réservée aux formations. J'assiste à la formation appelée "Modern OpenGL with Qt5" réalisée par Sean Harmer de KDAB. Nous avons passé les deux heures de la matinée à voir la création et l'initialisation d'une fenêtre OpenGL dans Qt 5 (il y a quelques changements mineurs par rapport à Qt 4) et l'affichage d'un joli triangle en OpenGL moderne.

    Read the article

  • 3 index buffers

    - by bobobobo
    So, in both D3D and OpenGL there's ability to draw from an index buffer. The OBJ file format however does something weird. It specifies a bunch of vertices like: v -21.499660 6.424470 4.069845 v -25.117170 6.418100 4.068025 v -21.663851 8.282170 4.069585 v -21.651890 6.420180 4.068675 v -25.128481 8.281520 4.069585 Then it specifies a bunch of normals like.. vn 0.196004 0.558984 0.805680 vn -0.009523 0.210194 -0.977613 vn -0.147787 0.380832 -0.912757 vn 0.822108 0.567581 0.044617 vn 0.597037 0.057507 -0.800150 vn 0.809312 -0.045432 0.585619 Then it specifies a bunch of tex coords like vt 0.1225 0.5636 vt 0.6221 0.1111 vt 0.4865 0.8888 vt 0.2862 0.2586 vt 0.5865 0.2568 vt 0.1862 0.2166 THEN it specifies "faces" on the model like: f 1/2/5 2/3/7 8/2/6 f 5/9/7 6/3/8 5/2/1 So, in trying to render this with vertex buffers, In OpenGL I can use glVertexPointer, glNormalPointer and glTexCoordPointer to set pointers to each of the vertex, normal and texture coordinate arrays respectively.. but when it comes down to drawing with glDrawElements, I can only specify ONE set of indices, namely the indices it should use when visiting the vertices. Ok, then what? I still have 3 sets of indices to visit. In d3d its much the same - I can set up 3 streams: one for vertices, one for texcoords, and one for normals, but when it comes to using IDirect3DDevice9::DrawIndexedPrimitive, I can still only specify ONE index buffer, which will index into the vertices array. So, is it possible to draw from vertex buffers using different index arrays for each of the vertex, texcoord, and normal buffers (EITHER d3d or opengl!)

    Read the article

  • Draw LINE_STRIP with Unity

    - by Boozzz
    For a new project I am thinking about whether to use OpenGL or Unity3d. I have a bit of experience with OpenGL, but I am completely new to Unity. I already read through the Unity documentation and tutorials on the Unity Website. However, I could not find a way to draw a simple Line-Strip with Unity. In the following example (C#, OpenGL/SharpGL) I draw a round trajectory from a predifined point to an obstacle, which can be imagined as a divided circle with midpoint [cx,cy] and radius r. The position (x-y coordinates) of the obstacle is given by obst_x and obst_y. Question 1: How could I do the same with Unity? Question 2: In my new project, I will have to draw quite a lot of such geometric primitives. Does it make any sense to use Unity for those things? void drawCircle(float cx, float cy, float r, const float obst_x, const float obst_y) { float theta = 0.0f, pos_x, pos_y, dist; const float delta = 0.1; glBegin(GL_LINE_STRIP); while (theta < 180) { theta += delta; //get the current angle float x = r * cosf(theta); //calculate the x component float y = r * sinf(theta); //calculate the y component pos_x = x + cx; //calculate current x position pos_y = y + cy; //calculate current y position //calculate distance from current vertex to obstacle dist = sqrt(pow(pos_x - obst_x) + pow(pos_y - obst_y)); //check if current vertex intersects with obstacle if dist <= 0 { break; //stop drawing circle } else { glVertex2f(pos_x, pos_y); //draw vertex } } glEnd(); }

    Read the article

  • Android depth buffer issue: Advice for anyone experiencing problem

    - by Andrew Smith
    I've wasted around 30 hours this week writing and re-writing code, believing that I had misunderstood how the OpenGL depth buffer works. Everything I tried, failed. I have now resolved my problem by finding what may be an error in the Android implementation of OpenGL. See this API entry: http://www.opengl.org/sdk/docs/man/xhtml/glClearDepth.xml void glClearDepth(GLclampd depth); Specifies the depth value used when the depth buffer is cleared. The initial value is 1. Android's implementation has two versions of this command: glClearDepthx which takes an integer value, clamped 0-1 glClearDepthf which takes a floating point value, clamped 0-1 If you use glClearDepthf(1) then you get the results you would expect. If you use glClearDepthx(1), as I was doing then you get different results. (Note that 1 is the default value, but calling the command with the argument 1 produces different results than not calling it at all.) Quite what is happening I do not know, but the depth buffer was being cleared to a value different from what I had specified.

    Read the article

  • How can you transform a set of numbers into mostly whole ones?

    - by Alice
    Small amount of background: I am working on a converter that bridges between a map maker (Tiled) that outputs in XML, and an engine (Angel2D) that inputs lua tables. Most of this is straight forward However, Tiled outputs in pixel offsets (integers of absolute values), while Angel2D inputs OpenGL units (floats of relative values); a conversion factor between these two is needed (for example, 32px = 1gu). Since OpenGL units are abstract, and the camera can zoom in or out if the objects are too small or big, the actual conversion factor isn't important; I could use a random number, and the user would merely have to zoom in or out. But it would be best if the conversion factor was selected such that most numbers outputted were small and whole (or fractions of small whole numbers), because that makes it easier to work with (and the whole point of the OpenGL units is that they are easy to work with). How would I find such a conversion factor reliably? My first attempt was to use the smallest number given; this resulted in no fractions below 1, but often lead to lots of decimal places where the factors didn't line up. Then I tried the mode of the sequence, which lead to the largest number of 1's possible, but often lead to very long floats for background images. My current approach gets the GCD of the whole sequence, which, when it works, works great, but can easily be thrown off course by a single bad apple. Note that while I could easily just pass the numbers I am given along, or pick some fixed factor, or use one of the conversions I specified above, I am looking for a method to reliably scale this list of integers to small, whole numbers or simple fractions, because this would most likely be unsurprising to the end user; this is not a one off conversion. The end users tend to use 1.0 as their "base" for manipulations (because it's simple and obvious), so it would make more sense for the sizes of entities to cluster around this.

    Read the article

  • Maximized MFC window has dead region at the top

    - by John Calsbeek
    I'm trying to make a MFC window fullscreen whenever it is maximized. This window is being used to draw OpenGL content. So far it works fine—it fills the entire screen with the exception of the taskbar—but there's a dead black region at the top of the screen, 62 pixels in height. It's pretty darn close to the height of the Windows 7 taskbar, but it pretty much stays the same regardless of if the taskbar is on autohide or on a different side of the screen. When I get a CWind::OnSize callback, the height that is given is 988, which is 62 pixels short of the actual screen height (1050). I've tried to manually set the window height to 1050 with SetWindowPos, I've tried to give Windows the screen dimensions in CWnd::OnGetMinMaxInfo, and I've tried to give the screen dimensions to glViewport instead of the 988 pixels that I'm being given. None of these seem to work. I'm accomplishing the fullscreening with a call to… ModifyStyle(0, WS_MINIMIZEBOX | WS_MAXIMIZEBOX | WS_SYSMENU | WS_CAPTION | WS_POPUP, 0); …in the SIZE_MAXIMIZED CWnd::OnSize callback, which works fine, except for this dead region. I don't know if it's an OpenGL thing or a Win32 thing or a MFC thing. The GetClientRect function for my window reports the false 988 height. The same OpenGL rendering code works fine in my Mac OS X build. Curiously enough, I have gotten the dead region to move around a bit when I play with the taskbar (autohiding it, moving it around the screen, etc.). I've gotten the dead area to shrink to about half—not sure if the other half went to the bottom of the window or not.

    Read the article

  • Blit SDL_Surface onto another SDL_Surface and apply a colorkey

    - by NordCoder
    I want to load an SDL_Surface into an OpenGL texture with padding (so that NPOT-POT) and apply a color key on the surface afterwards. I either end up colorkeying all pixels, regardless of their color, or not colorkey anything at all. I have tried a lot of different things, but none of them seem to work. Here's the working snippet of my code. I use a custom color class for the colorkey (range [0-1]): // Create an empty surface with the same settings as the original image SDL_Surface* paddedImage = SDL_CreateRGBSurface(image->flags, width, height, image->format->BitsPerPixel, #if SDL_BYTEORDER == SDL_BIG_ENDIAN 0xff000000, 0x00ff0000, 0x0000ff00, 0x000000ff #else 0x000000ff, 0x0000ff00, 0x00ff0000, 0xff000000 #endif ); // Map RGBA color to pixel format value Uint32 colorKeyPixelFormat = SDL_MapRGBA(paddedImage->format, static_cast<Uint8>(colorKey.R * 255), static_cast<Uint8>(colorKey.G * 255), static_cast<Uint8>(colorKey.B * 255), static_cast<Uint8>(colorKey.A * 255)); SDL_FillRect(paddedImage, NULL, colorKeyPixelFormat); // Blit the image onto the padded image SDL_BlitSurface(image, NULL, paddedImage, NULL); SDL_SetColorKey(paddedImage, SDL_SRCCOLORKEY, colorKeyPixelFormat); Afterwards, I generate an OpenGL texture from paddedImage using similar code to the SDL+OpenGL texture loading code found online (I'll post if necessary). This code works if I just want the texture with or without padding, and is likely not the problem. I realize that I set all pixels in paddedImage to have alpha zero which causes the first problem I mentioned, but I can't seem to figure out how to do this. Should I just loop over the pixels and set the appropriate colors to have alpha zero?

    Read the article

  • Adobe premiere CS5 problem with the display driver

    - by user30179
    This error is really hindering our project. I get an error, it started showing-up June 16th 2010. There are no windows updates at the on the same date as the error, other than (Windows Defender) Seems to happen when working with Image overlays. ERROR: "The NVIDIA OpenGL driver detected a problem with the display driver and is unable to continue. The application must close." We opened the side of the case in the possibility there is an over heating problem. Nvidia Driver ver 8.16.11.9175 (nVidia Quadro FX 1700) I am running: Windows 7 x64 Adobe premiere CS5 Production nVidia Quadro FX 1700 (MRGA14L) 4 Gig ram RAID 10 2 750GB drives Duo core 3.0 6MB L2 Cache This is at least three other people that have come across this error: NVidia Forum EVGA Forum NVidia Forum UPDATE: Having the case open did not help. I also installed New Nvidia drivers now I get a different error: *ERROR:*Your hardware configuration does not meet minimum specifications needed to run the application. The application must close. I ran Windows Update and installed all four updates so now I am waiting to see if the error occurs again. Anything beyond this I am out of options.

    Read the article

  • How can I make the XAnalogTV xscreensaver fill my screen?

    - by Breakthrough
    I recently installed xscreensaver, as well as the additional/extra screensavers. Many of the OpenGL ones function correctly, going fullscreen as expected. However, for some reason, the XAnalogTV screensaver leaves two "blank" spots on the edges of my screen. If I manually launch XAnalogTV, it displays a window, which it fills correctly. When I maximize the window, the same effect occurs: the window maximizes, but the two edges of the screen are literally "transparent". This effect also occurs when the screensaver is set to fullscreen. For these reasons, I believe the problem may be related to the aspect ratio of the screen. The edges of the screen are literally "ignored", with nothing being drawn there. Specifically, note the transition between the maximized and full-screen screenshots (with the un-drawn whitespace shrinking as the vertical height has been increased). For reference, I am running Xubuntu 12.04 on a Dell Vostro 1520 (Intel P8600, Nvidia 9300M) with a 1440 x 900 display (16:10). I have also set the GetViewPortIsFullOfLies preference to true. Is there any way to force XAnalogTV to fill my entire screen? Alternatively, as I believe the problem is aspect-ratio related, is there any way I can get the screensaver to render larger than my display, and simply discard the extra pixels? Relevant screenshots (windowed, maximized, and full-screen, respectively): You can see in the last two that the scrollbar from Firefox is clearly visible, even though this is a full-screen screensaver.

    Read the article

  • How can I make XAnalogTV fill my screen?

    - by Breakthrough
    I recently installed xscreensaver, as well as the additional/extra screensavers. Many of the OpenGL ones function correctly, going fullscreen as expected. However, for some reason, the XAnalogTV screensaver leaves two "blank" spots on the edges of my screen. If I manually launch XAnalogTV, it displays a window, which it fills correctly. When I maximize the window, the same effect occurs: the window maximizes, but the two edges of the screen are literally "transparent". This effect also occurs when the screensaver is set to fullscreen. For these reasons, I believe the problem may be related to the aspect ratio of the screen. The edges of the screen are literally "ignored", with nothing being drawn there. Specifically, note the transition between the maximized and full-screen screenshots (with the un-drawn whitespace shrinking as the vertical height has been increased). For reference, I am running Xubuntu 12.04 on a Dell Vostro 1520 (Intel P8600, Nvidia 9300M) with a 1440 x 900 display (16:10). I have also set the GetViewPortIsFullOfLies preference to true. Is there any way to force XAnalogTV to fill my entire screen? Relevant screenshots (windowed, maximized, and full-screen, respectively):

    Read the article

  • Understanding the memory consumption on iPhone

    - by zoul
    Hello! I am working on a 2D iPhone game using OpenGL ES and I keep hitting the 24 MB memory limit – my application keeps crashing with the error code 101. I tried real hard to find where the memory goes, but the numbers in Instruments are still much bigger than what I would expect. I ran the application with the Memory Monitor, Object Alloc, Leaks and OpenGL ES instruments. When the application gets loaded, free physical memory drops from 37 MB to 23 MB, the Object Alloc settles around 7 MB, Leaks show two or three leaks a few bytes in size, the Gart Object Size is about 5 MB and Memory Monitor says the application takes up about 14 MB of real memory. I am perplexed as where did the memory go – when I dig into the Object Allocations, most of the memory is in the textures, exactly as I would expect. But both my own texture allocation counter and the Gart Object Size agree that the textures should take up somewhere around 5 MB. I am not aware of allocating anything else that would be worth mentioning, and the Object Alloc agrees. Where does the memory go? (I would be glad to supply more details if this is not enough.) Update: I really tried to find where I could allocate so much memory, but with no results. What drives me wild is the difference between the Object Allocations (~7 MB) and real memory usage as shown by Memory Monitor (~14 MB). Even if there were huge leaks or huge chunks of memory I forget about, the should still show up in the Object Allocations, shouldn’t they? I’ve already tried the usual suspects, ie. the UIImage with its caching, but that did not help. Is there a way to track memory usage “debugger-style”, line by line, watching each statement’s impact on memory usage? What I have found so far: I really am using that much memory. It is not easy to measure the real memory consumption, but after a lot of counting I think the memory consumption is really that high. My fault. I found no easy way to measure the memory used. The Memory Monitor numbers are accurate (these are the numbers that really matter), but the Memory Monitor can’t tell you where exactly the memory goes. The Object Alloc tool is almost useless for tracking the real memory usage. When I create a texture, the allocated memory counter goes up for a while (reading the texture into the memory), then drops (passing the texture data to OpenGL, freeing). This is OK, but does not always happen – sometimes the memory usage stays high even after the texture has been passed on to OpenGL and freed from “my” memory. This means that the total amount of memory allocated as shown by the Object Alloc tool is smaller than the real total memory consumption, but bigger than the real consumption minus textures (real – textures < object alloc < real). Go figure. I misread the Programming Guide. The memory limit of 24 MB applies to textures and surfaces, not the whole application. The actual red line lies a bit further, but I could not find any hard numbers. The consensus is that 25–30 MB is the ceiling. When the system gets short on memory, it starts sending the memory warning. I have almost nothing to free, but other applications do release some memory back to the system, especially Safari (which seems to be caching the websites). When the free memory as shown in the Memory Monitor goes zero, the system starts killing. I had to bite the bullet and rewrite some parts of the code to be more efficient on memory, but I am probably still pushing it. I

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66  | Next Page >