Search Results

Search found 120608 results on 4825 pages for 'code access security'.

Page 61/4825 | < Previous Page | 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68  | Next Page >

• 'sudo apt-get update' error

  - by psilo

  I've been having an issue with 'sudo apt-get update' for several days now. I've tried every proposed solution I could find but to no avail. Here is the output to 'apt-get update'. Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports InRelease Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security InRelease Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com precise InRelease Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://archive.ubuntu.com precise Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates Release Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com precise Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security Release Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted TranslationIndex Ign http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe TranslationIndex Err http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse i386 Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/main Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/multiverse Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/restricted Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise/universe Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/main Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/multiverse Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/restricted Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-updates/universe Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/main Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/multiverse Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/restricted Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-backports/universe Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/main Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/multiverse Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/restricted Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: Err http://us.archive.ubuntu.com precise-security/universe Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/dists/precise/Release.gpg Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/dists/precise/main/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/dists/precise/main/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/source/Sources Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/binary-i386/Packages Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/main/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/restricted/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise/universe/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/dists/precise/main/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://archive.ubuntu.com/dists/precise/main/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/main/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/restricted/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-updates/universe/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/main/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/restricted/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-backports/universe/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/main/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/multiverse/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/restricted/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/i18n/Translation-en_US Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: W: Failed to fetch http://us.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/dists/precise-security/universe/i18n/Translation-en Unable to connect to 69.163.233.85:80: E: Some index files failed to download. They have been ignored, or old ones used instead.

  Read the article

• Does software rot refer primarily to performance, or to messy code?

  - by Kazark

  Wikipedia's definition of software rot focuses on the performance of the software. This is a different usage than I am used to; I had thought of it much more in terms of the cleanliness and design of the code—in terms of the code's having all the standard quality characteristics: readability, maintainability, etc. Now, performance is likely to go down when the code becomes unreadable, because no one knows what is going on. But does the term software rot have special reference to performance? or am I right in thinking it refers to the cleanliness of the code? or is this perhaps a case of multiple senses of the term being in common usage—from the user's perspective, it has do with performance; but for the software craftsman, it has to do more specifically with how the code reads?

  Read the article

• Are there any books dedicated to writing test code? [on hold]

  - by joshin4colours

  There are many programming books dedicated to useful programming and engineering topics, like working with legacy code or particular languages. The best of these books become "standard" or "canonical" references for professional programmers. Are there any books like this (or that could be like this) for writing test code? I don't mean books about Test-Driven Development, nor do I mean books about writing good (clean) code in general. I'm looking for books that discuss test code specifically (unit-level, integration-level, UI-level, design patterns, code structures and organization, etc.)

  Read the article

• What is missing and should be added to Code Complete 3rd Edition? [closed]

  - by Peter Turner

  It's been quite a few years since Code Complete was published. I really love the book, I keep it in the bathroom at the office and read a little out of it once or twice a day. What developments in computer software... development need to be added to Code Complete 3e, and for the sake of reductionism, what should be removed to make room for them? Is it necessary even possible to call Code Complete Code Complete if it doesn't have language features that even Delphi has like anonymous methods and generics? Also, what languages would be more appropriate than C++ to use for a majority of code examples?

  Read the article

• After how much line of code a function should be break down?

  - by Sumeet

  While working on existing code base, I usually come across procedures that contain Abusive use of IF and Switch statements. The procedures consist of overwhelming code, which I think require re-factoring badly. The situation gets worse when I identify that some of these are recursive as well. But this is always a matter of debate as the code is working fine and no one wants to wake up the dragon. But, everyone accepts it is very expensive code to manage. I am wondering if are any recommendations to determine if a particular Method is a culprit and needs a revisit/rewrite , so that it can broken down or polymophized in an effective manner. Are there any Metrics (like no. of lines in procedure) that can be used to identify such segment of code. The checklist or advice to convince everyone, will be great!

  Read the article

• Do you use to third party companies to review your company's code?

  - by CodeToGlory

  I am looking to get the following - Basic code review to make sure they follow the guidelines imposed. Security code analysis to make sure there are no loopholes. No performance bottlenecks by doing a load test etc. We have lot of code coming in from third parties and is becoming laborious to manage code reviews and hence looking to see if others employ such practices. I understand that it may be a concern for some and would raise the question "Well, who is going to make sure the agency is doing their job right?" But basically I am just looking for a third party who can hold all vendor code to the same standards.

  Read the article

• What is the right level of granularity for code commenting?

  - by Nick

  Commenting in code I believe is very important but recently I've been reviewing code that has left me wondering particular this one. //due to lack of confidence with web programming leaving this note in for now What is the right level of granularity for code commenting? EDIT: Obviously the above comment is shocking hence why I'm asking the question. I've recently noticed the inline comments in the code at my work place annoying. Instead of getting angry I want discovery the acceptable level of granularity for code commenting in the community.

  Read the article

• Is imposing the same code format for all developers a good idea?

  - by Stijn Geukens

  We are considering to impose a single standard code format in our project (auto format with save actions in Eclipse). The reason is that currently there is a big difference in the code formats used by several (10) developers which makes it harder for one developer to work on the code of another developer. The same Java file sometimes uses 3 different formats. So I believe the advantage is clear (readability = productivity) but would it be a good idea to impose this? And if not, why? UPDATE We all use Eclipse and everyone is aware of the plan. There already is a code format used by most but it is not enforced since some prefer to stick to their own code format. Because of the above reasons some would prefer to enforce it.

  Read the article

• which Project hosting service (Like google code, github) you will prefer to use? And Why?

  - by MobileDev123

  I am using to study (and at some point of time copy the desired module of) the code from these two sites (Google Code and Github). There is sourceforge too, I have some code, say some library that I want to share with the community, and I am to decide the hosting site. And before I decide I want to have opinions from this community. Which is your favorite Project hosting site or service? And why? There is one point where github can win over google code (may be I am wrong here), Github can let you forge whole project with a zip or tar file, but to do the same in google code we have to upload the zip file explicitly and put it in downloads.... Thanks

  Read the article

• Jetty and Access Denied

  - by Laurent

  Hello, I am using several libraries in a maven project and one of these libraries is Jetty (6.1.18). It is a mandatory dependency for an another library. If I run my application from eclipse, with the eclipse classpath which is set by the maven eclipse plugin, all works. However, if I generate a one jar with dependencies and then I run my application from this jar, I get the following exception : Exception in thread "main" java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError at org.mortbay.jetty.nio.SelectChannelConnector.<init>(SelectChannelConnector.java:70) ... Caused by: java.security.AccessControlException: access denied (java.util.PropertyPermission org.mortbay.io.nio.JVMBUG_THRESHHOLD read) at java.security.AccessControlContext.checkPermission(AccessControlContext.java:323) at java.security.AccessController.checkPermission(AccessController.java:546) at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPermission(SecurityManager.java:532) at java.lang.SecurityManager.checkPropertyAccess(SecurityManager.java:1285) at java.lang.System.getProperty(System.java:650) at java.lang.Integer.getInteger(Integer.java:865) at java.lang.Integer.getInteger(Integer.java:823) at org.mortbay.io.nio.SelectorManager.<clinit>(SelectorManager.java:47) ... 27 more I think it is due to a file which is overridden by an another with the same name when the one jar is built but I have no idea where to look for. Does someone has an idea ?

  Read the article

• Cross-domain data access in JavaScript

  - by vit

  We have an ASP.Net application hosted on our network and exposed to a specific client. This client wants to be able to import data from their own server into our application. The data is retrieved with an HTTP request and is CSV formatted. The problem is that they do not want to expose their server to our network and are requesting the import to be done on the client side (all clients are from the same network as their server). So, what needs to be done is: They request an import page from our server The client script on the page issues a request to their server to get CSV formatted data The data is sent back to our application This is not a challenge when both servers are on the same domain: a simple hidden iframe or something similar will do the trick, but here what I'm getting is a cross-domain "access denied" error. They also refuse to change the data format to return JSON or XML formatted data. What I tried and learned so far is: Hidden iframe -- "access denied" XMLHttpRequest -- behaviour depends on the browser security settings: may work, may work while nagging a user with security warnings, or may not work at all Dynamic script tags -- would have worked if they could have returned data in JSON format IE client data binding -- the same "access denied" error Is there anything else I can try before giving up and saying that it will not be possible without exposing their server to our application, changing their data format or changing their browser security settings? (DNS trick is not an option, by the way).

  Read the article

• Security strategies for storing password on disk

  - by Mike

  I am building a suite of batch jobs that require regular access to a database, running on a Solaris 10 machine. Because of (unchangable) design constraints, we are required use a certain program to connect to it. Said interface requires us to pass a plain-text password over a command line to connect to the database. This is a terrible security practice, but we are stuck with it. I am trying to make sure things are properly secured on our end. Since the processing is automated (ie, we can't prompt for a password), and I can't store anything outside the disk, I need a strategy for storing our password securely. Here are some basic rules The system has multiple users. We can assume that our permissions are properly enforced (ie, if a file with a is chmod'd to 600, it won't be publically readable) I don't mind anyone with superuser access looking at our stored password Here is what i've got so far Store password in password.txt $chmod 600 password.txt Process reads from password.txt when it's needed Buffer overwritten with zeros when it's no longer needed Although I'm sure there is a better way.

  Read the article

• Facebook Connect - Security Warning

  - by Skoder

  Hey all, I'm using Facebook connect using FBML tags. Although it works, when I run the site in Internet Explorer, a security warning comes up similar to this: The current webpage is trying to open a site in your Trusted sites list. Do you want to allow this? Current site: http://www.facebook.com Trusted site: http://localhost" My Facebook code involves these two: http://static.ak.connect.facebook.com/js/api_lib/v0.4/FeatureLoader.js.php http://static.ak.connect.facebook.com/js/api_lib/v0.4/XdCommReceiver.js I tried changing them to HTTPS: https://ssl.connect... but the errors still appear. None of my pages use SSL. I've also tried turning facebook-logo='false' but still no luck. Any ideas on how to fix this? Although it's not show-stopping, it doesn't give a good impression to users who may be feel it insecure. Thanks

  Read the article

• Flash CS4 AS3 Security Sandbox Violation

  - by Jennifer Heidelberg

  Hi, I have build my entire website with flash and embedded several swf objects (slideshows) into it. everything always worked fine when I published it as swf movie. but now that I want to upload my website an error message occurs saying: Error #2044: Unhandled SecurityErrorEvent:. text=Error #2140: Security sandbox violation: file:///mylayout.swf cannot load file:///slideshow_1.swf. Local-with-filesystem and local-with-networking SWF files cannot load each other. I know that it has something to do with the fact that one of the swf is local with filesystem and the other local with networking. but in my publish settings i told it to access local files only. but it didnt help. does anyone have an answer?

  Read the article

• How to inherit from DataAnnotations.ValidationAttribute (it appears SecureCritical under Visual Stud

  - by codetuner

  Hi, I have an [AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers] class library containing subtypes of the System.DataAnnotations.ValidationAttribute. The library is used on contract types of WCF services. In .NET 2/3.5, this worked fine. Since .NET 4.0 however, running a client of the service in the Visual Studio debugger results in the exception "Inheritance security rules violated by type: '(my subtype of ValidationAttribute)'. Derived types must either match the security accessibility of the base type or be less accessible." (System.TypeLoadException) The error appears to occure only when all of the following conditions are met: a subclass of ValidationAttribute is in an AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers assembly reflection is used to check for the attribute the Visual Studio hosting process is enabled (checkbox on Project properties, Debug tab) So basically, in Visual Studio.NET 2010: create a new Console project, add a reference to "System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations" 4.0.0.0, write the following code: . using System; [assembly: System.Security.AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers()] namespace TestingVaidationAttributeSecurity { public class MyValidationAttribute : System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.ValidationAttribute { } [MyValidation] public class FooBar { } class Program { static void Main(string[] args) { Console.WriteLine("ValidationAttribute IsCritical: {0}", typeof(System.ComponentModel.DataAnnotations.ValidationAttribute).IsSecurityCritical); FooBar fb = new FooBar(); fb.GetType().GetCustomAttributes(true); Console.WriteLine("Press enter to end."); Console.ReadLine(); } } } Press F5 and you get the exception ! Press Ctrl-F5 (start without debugging), and it all works fine without exception... The strange thing is that the ValidationAttribute will or will not be securitycritical depending on the way you run the program (F5 or Ctrl+F5). As illustrated by the Console.WriteLine in the above code. But then again, this appear to happen with other attributes (and types?) too. Now the questions... Why do I have this behaviour when inheriting from ValidationAttribute, but not when inheriting from System.Attribute ? (Using Reflector I don't find special settings on the ValidationAttribute class or it's assembly) And what can I do to solve this ? How can I keep MyValidationAttribute inheriting from ValidationAttribute in an AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers assembly without marking it SecurityCritical, still using the new .NET 4 level 2 security model and still have it work using the VS.NET debug host (or other hosts) ?? Thanks a lot! Rudi

  Read the article

• Spring-Security with X509?

  - by jschoen

  I am new to spring-security in general and am a bit confused. The project I am trying to integrate this with uses X509 certificates to identify users for signing in to the application. There are no usernames or passwords. We validate the certificates are good, and that they have been given access to our app. The question is how do I integrate spring in to this to get their roles using the X509 certificates? I have seen this: <http> ... <x509 subject-principal-regex="CN=(.*?)," user-service-ref="userService"/> ... </http> But I don't understand how this works. Will it still require something for a password? Or is the subject all it needs?

  Read the article

• Jersey, Spring, Tomcat and Security Annotations

  - by jr

  I need to secure a simple jersey RESTful API in a Tomcat 6.0.24 container. I'd like to keep the authentication with Basic Authentication using the tomcat-users.xml file to define the users and roles (this is for now, like I said its small). Now, for authorization I'd like to be able to use the JSR 250 annotations like @RolesAllowed, @PermitAll, @DenyAll, etc. I cannot for the life of me figure out how to wire this all up together. I really don't want to go spring-security route, since I need something very simple at the current time. Can someone point me in the right direction.

  Read the article

• Visual Studio / Visual Source Safe / Integrated Security / IIS 7

  - by Jason

  Using Visual Source Safe with IIS integration (the working dir is the IIS site) Visual Studio, pointed to the IIS site would load up the Web project. It would be under VSS control (have to check out files, etc). Recently, we had to switch to Integrated Security for our database connections from the web app. This means changing the impersonation of the IIS app pool (and anon authentication) to the impersonated account. Since I did this -- my project loads in Visual Studio, but it acts as if I'm not me, and the files aren't under source control anymore. I'm going to assume it's something with the pass-through from IIS to the VSS (as if you'll remember you had to add IIS_USERS to the VSS list of users). Even trying to add the impersonated account didn't work. Any ideas?

  Read the article

• Spring security custom principal bean

  - by wuntee

  I have a web application that is set up to use the default ldap server/authentication manager/authentication provider/user service. I have another DAO that already does majority of the work that those do (besides the authenticating a user) using Spring-LDAP. My problem is that I want the principal to be of my own custom bean class. What is the simplest way to do this? Initially I was thinking to create a custom authentication provider, but since the default one does exactly what I want, there doesnt seem to be a need. I am thinking I just need to override whatever object actually returns the Principal bean. Is this possible, and able to be injected into the security ldap authenticator context?

  Read the article

• security issue of Linux sudo command?

  - by George2

  Hello everyone, 1. I am using Red Hat Enterprise 5 Linux box. I find if a user is in /etc/sudoers file, then if the user run command with sudo, the user will run this command with root privilege (without knowing root password, the user runs sudo only need to input the user's own password in order to run a command with sudo). Is that correct understanding? 2. If yes, then is it a security hole? Since users other than root could run with root privilege? thanks in advance, George

  Read the article

• Security flaw in this code approach

  - by Alec Smart

  Hello, Am wondering if there would be any security flaw in this approach. I am writing a piece of code which allows users to upload files and another set to download those files. These files can be anything. User uploads the file (any file including .php files), it is renamed to an md5 hash (extension removed) and stored on server. A corresponding mySQL entry is made. The user trying to download the file, uses say download.php to download the file where the md5 file is sent (with the original name). Is there someway in which anyone can exploit the above scenario?

  Read the article

• Image Uploading - security issues

  - by TenaciousImpy

  Hi, I'm developing an ASP.NET Web app and would like the user to be able to either upload an image from their local system, or pass in a URL to an image. The image can either be a JPG or PNG. What security issues should I be concerned about doing this? I've seen various ways of embedding code within JPG files. Are there any methods in C# (or external libraries) which can confirm that a file is a JPG/PNG, otherwise throw an error? At the very least, I'm making the directory which holds uploaded images non-browsable and putting a max size limit of 1mb, but I'd like to implement further checks. Thanks for any advice.

  Read the article

• Security problem

  - by Mehmet Kaleli

  Hi All. I have a security problem in my website. A script code was added into my all pages like "<script src="Ip address/viewpic.asp"></script>" . It is between </head> and <body> tag. Now Google says "this site may be hartful for your pc!" about my site. How can i secure my website? I use C# and Visual Studio 2008.

  Read the article

• Methods for ensuring security between users in multi-user applications

  - by Emilio

  I'm writing a multiuser application (.NET - C#) in which each user's data is separated from the others and there is no data that's common between users. It's critical to ensure that no user has access to another user's data. What are some approaches for implementing security at the database level and/or in the application architecture to to accomplish this? For example (and this is totally made up - I'm not suggesting it's a good or bad approach) including a userID column in all data tables might be an approach. I'm developing the app in C# (asp.net) and SQL Server 2008. I'm looking for options that are are either native in the tools I'm using or general patterns.

  Read the article

• Help with Role Based Security.

  - by Bill K

  Hello, I'm trying to understand role based security and I have the following method: [PrincipalPermission(SecurityAction.Demand, Role = "Administrators")] static void Test() { //administratos only can call this code } What I wanna do is that only users that are members of the Windows Administrators group can call this code, however, if I do the following, it works: GenericIdentity genericIdentity = new GenericIdentity("test", "test"); GenericPrincipal genericPrincipal = new GenericPrincipal(genericIdentity, new string[] { "Administrators" }); AppDomain.CurrentDomain.SetThreadPrincipal(genericPrincipal); Test(); So, how can I make it work only if the user is in the Administrators windows group? thanks!

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68  | Next Page >