Search Results

Search found 50304 results on 2013 pages for 'class variables'.

Page 615/2013 | < Previous Page | 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622  | Next Page >

  • Valid Dates in AppEngine forms (Beginner)

    - by codingJoe
    In AppEngine, I have a form that prompts a user for a date. The problem is that when the clicks enter there is an error: "Enter a Valid Date" How do I make my Form accept (for example) %d-%b-%Y as the date format? Is there a more elegant way to accomplish this? # Model and Forms class Task(db.Model): name=db.StringProperty() due=db.DateProperty() class TaskForm(djangoforms.ModelForm): class Meta: model = Task # my get function has the following. # using "now" for example. Could just as well be next Friday. tmStart = datetime.now() form = TaskForm(initial={'due': tmStart.strftime("%d-%b-%Y")}) template_values = {'form': form }

    Read the article

  • WPF: change DataTemples according to Value

    - by Kave
    I have a class called Cell with two properties. One is called Value of type int? And the other is called Candidates of type ObservableCollection during the initialization I am utilizing a DataTemplateSelector to choose between two datatemplates for two different scenarios. If the Value property has a value then template A should be used to present the Cell class. However if the Value property is null Then template B should be used to present the Cell class. While this works perfectly fine during the initialization however during the runtime the templates don't change any more when the value of the Value property actually changes. Is the approach of using DataTemplateSelector the wrong approach to change DataTemplates dynamically? What would you recommend I should do? Many thanks,

    Read the article

  • IStatelessSession insert object with many-to-one

    - by Andrew Kalashnikov
    Hello guys. I've got common mapping <class name="NotSyncPrice, Portal.Core" table='Not_sync_price'> <id name="Id" unsaved-value="0"> <column name="id" not-null="true"/> <generator class="native"/> </id> <many-to-one name="City" class="Clients.Core.Domains.City, Clients.Core" column="city_id" cascade="none"></many-to-one> <!--<property name="City"> <column name="city_id"/> </property>--> I want to use IStatelessSession for batch insert. But when i set city object to NotSyncPrice object and call IStatelessSession I've got strange exception: NHibernate.Impl.StatelessSessionImpl.get_Timestamp() When its null or int all is ok. I try use real && proxy city object. But no result. What's wrong:( Please help

    Read the article

  • Modelling a manyToMany relationship with attributes

    - by Javi
    Hello, I have a ManyToMany relationship between two classes, for instance class Customer and class Item. A customer can buy several items and an item can be bought by different customers. I need to store extra information in this relationship, for example the day when the item was bought. I wonder how is this usually modelled in JPA, cause I'm not sure how to express this in code. Do I have to create a new class to model all the attributes of the relationship and make a manyToMany relationship between the other classes or is a better way to do this? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Using Interfaces in action signature

    - by Dmitry Borovsky
    Hello, I want to use interface in Action signature. So I've tried make own ModelBinder by deriving DefaultModelBinder: public class InterfaceBinder<T> : DefaultModelBinder where T: new() { protected override object CreateModel(ControllerContext controllerContext, ModelBindingContext bindingContext, Type modelType) { return base.CreateModel(controllerContext, bindingContext, typeof(T)); } } public interface IFoo { string Data { get; set; } } public class Foo: IFoo /*other interfaces*/ { /* a lot of */ public string Data { get; set; } } public class MegaController: Controller { public ActionResult Process( [ModelBinder(typeof(InterfaceBinder))]IFoo foo){/bla-bla-bla/} } But it doesn't work. Does anybody have idea how release this behaviour? And yes, I know that I can make my own implementation of IModelBinder, but I'm looking for easier way.

    Read the article

  • XML strings in JAXB

    - by OOO
    I have a JPA entity class mimicking a table. Something like this: @XmlType(name="MyClassElementType") public class MyClass { String name; String xmlDesc; public MyClass() {} @XmlElement String getName() { return name; } void setName(String name) { this.name = name; } @XmlElement String getXmlDesc() { return xmlDesc; } void setXmlDesc(String xmlDesc) { this.xmlDesc = xmlDesc; } } In a Jersey REST get call I'm trying to return this class: @Get @Produces("application/xml") public MyClass get() { return myClass; } Now I'm expecting the already xml string(xmlStr) to be returned as is, but Jersey/JAXB escapes it... So anyway around this?

    Read the article

  • Asp.net JSON Deserialize problem

    - by Billy
    I want to deserialize the following JSON string: [ {"name":"photos","fql_result_set":[{"owner":"123456","caption":"Caption 1", "object_id":123},{"owner":"223456","caption":"Caption 2", "object_id":456}]}, {"name":"likes","fql_result_set":[{"object_id":123,"user_id":12156144},{"object_id":456,"user_id":140342725}]} ] and get the POCO like [DataContract] public class Photo{ [DataMember] public string owner{get;set;} [DataMember] public string caption{get;set;} [DataMember] public string object_id{get;set;} } [DataContract] public class Like { [DataMember] public string object_id { get; set; } [DataMember] public string user_id { get; set; } } What should I do? I already have this piece of code: public class JSONUtil { public static T Deserialize<T>(string json) { T obj = Activator.CreateInstance<T>(); MemoryStream ms = new MemoryStream(Encoding.Unicode.GetBytes(json)); System.Runtime.Serialization.Json.DataContractJsonSerializer serializer = new System.Runtime.Serialization.Json.DataContractJsonSerializer(obj.GetType()); obj = (T)serializer.ReadObject(ms); ms.Close(); return obj; }

    Read the article

  • Specifying distinct sequence per table in Hibernate on subclasses

    - by gutch
    Is there a way to specify distinct sequences for each table in Hibernate, if the ID is defined on a mapped superclass? All entities in our application extend a superclass called DataObject like this: @MappedSuperclass public abstract class DataObject implements Serializable { @Id @GeneratedValue(strategy = GenerationType.SEQUENCE) @Column(name = "id") private int id; } @Entity @Table(name = "entity_a") public class EntityA extends DataObject { ... } @Entity @Table(name = "entity_b") public class EntityB extends DataObject { ... } This causes all entities to use a shared sequence, the default hibernate_sequence. What I would like to do is use a separate sequence for each entity, for example entity_a_sequence and entity_b_sequence in the example above. If the ID were specified on the subclasses then I could use the @SequenceGenerator annotation to specify a sequence for each entity, but in this case the ID is on the superclass. Given that ID is in the superclass, is there a way I can use a separate sequence for each entity — and if so, how? (We are using PostgreSQL 8.3, in case that's relevant)

    Read the article

  • Generic type in generic collection

    - by Brian Triplett
    I have generic type that looks like: public class GenericClass<T, U> where T : IComparable<T> { // Class definition here } I then have a collection of these instances. What is the cleanest way to pass through the type constraints? public class GenericCollection<V> where V : GenericClass<T, U> // This won't compile { private GenericClass<T, U>[] entries; public V this[index] { get{ return this.entries[index]; } } } Is there perhaps a better way to design this? I think that specifying GenericCollection<T, U, V> where V : GenericClass<T, U> seems awkward. Might be my only option though....

    Read the article

  • Game Key Events: Event or Method Overload?

    - by Ell
    If you were going to develop a game in say, Ruby, and you were provided with a game framework, would you rather act on key up/down events by overloading a method on the main window like so: class MyGameWindow < Framework::GameWindow def button_down(id) case id when UpArrow do_something when DownArrow do_something end end end Or have an event class with which you can make a method and assign a handle to it, like so: class MyGameWindow < Framework::GameWindow def initialize key_down.add_handler(method(:do_something)) end def do_something puts "blah blah" end end Please give your views, which do you think would be better in a game developement area, and thanks in advance, ell.

    Read the article

  • How to call angular javascript directive methods from the global scope

    - by user1659278
    I have a directive like the one of the examples from AngularJS, shown below. How can I call the toggle method from the global scope? I want to be able to toggle the zippy from some legacy code. myApp.directive('zippy', function(){ return { restrict: 'E', replace: true, transclude: true, scope: { title:'bind' }, template: '<div class="zippy">' + '<div class="title">{{title}}</div>' + '<div class="body" ng-transclude></div>' + '</div>', link: function(scope, element, attrs) { var title = angular.element(element.children()[0]), opened = true; title.bind('click', toggle); function toggle() { opened = !opened; element.removeClass(opened ? 'closed' : 'opened'); element.addClass(opened ? 'opened' : 'closed'); } toggle(); } } });

    Read the article

  • What is a custom collection?

    - by Win Coder
    A Group of objects. However i am having confusion in the following case. A sample class Class A { public string; } Class A_list { public A[] list; public A_list(A[] _list) { list = new A[_list.length]; for (int i = 0; i < _list.Length; i++) { list[i] = _list[i]; } } } static void Main(String[] args) { A[] names = new A[3] { new A("some"), new A("another"), new A("one"), }; A_list just_an_object = new A_list(names); } Which of the above is a custom collection the array or the object that holds array as a field or are both custom collections.

    Read the article

  • Write to static field - is FindBugs wrong in this case?

    - by htorque
    I have a Java class like this: public class Foo { public static int counter = 0; public void bar(int counter) { Foo.counter = counter; } } FindBugs warns me about writing to the static field counter via the instance method bar. However, if I change the code to: public class Foo { public static int counter = 0; public static void setCounter(int counter) { Foo.counter = counter; } public void bar(int counter) { setCounter(counter); } } Then FindBugs won't complain. Isn't that wrong? I'm still writing to a static field from an instance method, just via a static method - no?

    Read the article

  • How to convert an existing callback interface to use boost signals & slots

    - by the_mandrill
    I've currently got a class that can notify a number of other objects via callbacks: class Callback { virtual NodulesChanged() =0; virtual TurkiesTwisted() =0; }; class Notifier { std::vector<Callback*> m_Callbacks; void AddCallback(Callback* cb) {m_Callbacks.push(cb); } ... void ChangeNodules() { for (iterator it=m_Callbacks.begin(); it!=m_Callbacks.end(); it++) { (*it)->NodulesChanged(); } } }; I'm considering changing this to use boost's signals and slots as it would be beneficial to reduce the likelihood of dangling pointers when the callee gets deleted, among other things. However, as it stands boost's signals seems more oriented towards dealing with function objects. What would be the best way of adapting my code to still use the callback interface but use signals and slots to deal with the connection and notification aspects?

    Read the article

  • How to query a date in HQL (Hibernate) with Joda Time?

    - by fabien7474
    I am sure that someone familiar with HQL (I am myself a newbie) can easily answer this question. In my Grails application, I have the following domain class. class Book { org.joda.time.DateTime releaseDate //I use the PersistentDateTime for persisting via Hibernate (that use a DATETIME type for MySQL DB) } In my HQL query, I want to retrieve books whose release date is included in range date1..date2 For instance I tried: DateTime date1, date2 ... def queryStr = "select * from Book as b where b.releaseDate > $date1 and b.releaseDate < $date2" def res = Book.executeQuery(queryStr) But I got the exception ...caused by: org.springframework.orm.hibernate3.HibernateQueryException: unexpected token: The error token points to date format (for instance 2009-11-27T21:57:18.010+01:00 or Fri Nov 27 22:01:20 CET 2009) I have also tried to convert date1 into a Date class without success So what is the correct HQL code ? Should I convert to a specific format (which one?) using the patternForStyle method or is there another -cleaner- way to do it? Thanks, Fabien.

    Read the article

  • How to import org.codehaus.groovy.scriptom.* on Groovy?

    - by Mulone
    Hi guys, I'm trying to run a Groovy app to manipulate Excel files on STS (by SpringSource) 2.3.0. My Groovy version is 1.7. Class: package com.mytool import org.codehaus.groovy.scriptom.ActiveXObject /** * @author Mulone * */ class SurveyTool { static main(args) { print 'test' def wshell = new ActiveXObject('Wscript.Shell') wshell.popup("Scriptom is Groovy") } } Sadly, this is what I get: org.codehaus.groovy.control.MultipleCompilationErrorsException: startup failed: C:\workspace\SurveyTool\src\com\geoadapta\surveytool\SurveyTool.groovy: 6: unable to resolve class org.codehaus.groovy.scriptom.ActiveXObject @ line 6, column 1. import org.codehaus.groovy.scriptom.ActiveXObject ^ 1 error I also tried to rename ActiveXObject to ActiveXProxy with the same result. I tried to import scriptom manually from the package scriptom-all-assembly-1.6.0 but I didn't work. Any idea? Cheers

    Read the article

  • Java How to call method of grand parents?

    - by Arkaha
    Let's assume I have 3 classes A, B and C, each one extending the previous one. How do I call the code in A.myMethod() from C.myMethod() if B also implements myMethod? class A { public void myMethod() { // some stuff for A } } class B extends A { public void myMethod() { // some stuff for B //and than calling A stuff super.myMethod(); } } class C extends B { public void myMethod() { // some stuff for C // i don't need stuff from b, but i need call stuff from A // something like: super.super.myMethod(); ?? how to call A.myMethod(); ?? } }

    Read the article

  • In C#, can I hide/modify accessors in subclasses?

    - by Diego
    I'm not even sure what this principle is called or how to search for it, so I sincerely apologize if it has been brought up before, but the best way to do it is with an example. class Properties { public string Name { get; set; } } class MyClass { class SubProperties: Properties { public override Name { get { return GetActualName(); } set { _value = SetActualName(value); } } } public SubProperties ClassProperties; private GetActualName() { ClassProperties.Name = "name"; } private SetActualName(string s) { ClassProperties.Name = SomeOtherFunction(s); } } The idea is to have any object that instantiates MyClass have a fully accessible property ClassProperties. To that object, it would look exactly like a Properties object, but behind the scenes, MyClass is actually computing and modifying the results of the fields. This method of declaration is obviously wrong since I can't access GetActualName() and SetActualName() from within the SubProperties definition. How would I achieve something like this?

    Read the article

  • Invoke an Overloaded Constructor through this keyword (What's the Different between this two Sample code?)

    - by Alireza Dehqani
    using System; namespace ConsoleApplication1 { class Program { static void Main() { // Sample Sample ob = new Sample(); // line1 // Output for line1 /* * Sample(int i) * Sample() / // Sample2 Sample2 ob2 = new Sample2(); // line2 // Output for line2 / * Sample2() */ } } class Sample { // Fields private int a; // Constructors public Sample(int i) // Main Constructor { Console.WriteLine(" Sample(int i)"); a = i; } // Default Constructor public Sample() : this(0) { Console.WriteLine(" Sample()"); } } class Sample2 { // fields private int a; // Constructors public Sample2(int i) { Console.WriteLine("Sample2(int i)"); a = i; } public Sample2() { Console.WriteLine("Sample2()"); a = 0; } } }

    Read the article

  • Why is the base() constructor not necessary?

    - by Earlz
    Hello, I have a class structure like abstract class Animal { public Animal(){ //init stuff.. } } class Cat : Animal { public Cat(bool is_keyboard) : base() //NOTE here { //other init stuff } } Now then, look at the noted line. If you remove : base() then it will compile without an error. Why is this? Is there a way to disable this behavior? I have had multiple bugs now from forgetting the base() which I would have thought to be required on such a special thing as a constructor.

    Read the article

  • Custom Classes Passed from Service to a UI threads via AIDL

    - by Honza Pokorny
    I have a service that regularly queries a web server for new messages. The service stores the new messages in an arrayList. These messages are implemented using a custom class, storing all kinds of metadata (strings and longs). An activity then connects to this service to retrieve those messages and display them to the user. I have an .aidl file that describes the interface that the service exposes. package com.example.package; interface MyInterface { List<Message> getMessages(); } The Message class extends the Parcelable class which should allow for the IPC transfer. The problem is this: Eclipse gives me an error saying that the type of List<Message> is unknown. Any imports are marked as invalid. Ideas? Thanks

    Read the article

  • WebLogic Server internal server error

    - by Abhinav Pandey
    when I deploy a project in Apache Tomcat 6.0 it's working fine. When I deploy the same project in weblogic server 10.3 it's showing an error like below: Error 500--Internal Server Error javax.servlet.ServletException: [HTTP:101249][weblogic.servlet.internal.WebAppServletContext@ae43b8 - appName: '_appsdir_ab_dir', name: 'ab', context-path: '/ab', spec-version: 'null']: Servlet class FirstServlet for servlet FirstServlet could not be loaded because the requested class was not found in the classpath . java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: FirstServlet : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0.

    Read the article

  • Why should i use EJB?

    - by Nitesh Panchal
    Hello, As we all know that EJB's in 3.1 or 3.0 are simple POJOs. You just need to give annotations here and there and it gets converted to EJB from simple class. So, now my question is why should i use EJBs at all? Can i not do without them? In .Net i created class library and got things done. I never felt the need for anything like EJB. Simple classes were enough. Then, why in Java people stress on EJB? What is difference between a simple POJO and EJB in terms of execution and memory? Further which function should i write in EJB and which should i write in simple class? Should i dump every function in EJB only? or there is some kind of strategy? Does EJB provide anything special?

    Read the article

  • Multiple key/value pairs in HTTP POST where key is the same name

    - by randombits
    I'm working on an API that accepts data from remote clients, some of which where the key in an HTTP POST almost functions as an array. In english what this means is say I have a resource on my server called "class". A class in this sense, is the type a student sits in and a teacher educates in. When the user submits an HTTP POST to create a new class for their application, a lot of the key value pairs look like: student_name: Bob Smith student_name: Jane Smith student_name: Chris Smith What's the best way to handle this on both the client side (let's say the client is cURL or ActiveResource, whatever..) and what's a decent way of handling this on the server-side if my server is a Ruby on Rails app? Need a way to allow for multiple keys with the same name and without any namespace clashing or loss of data.

    Read the article

  • Use the [Serializable] attribute or subclassing from MarshalByRefObject?

    - by Theo Lenndorff
    I'd like to use an object across AppDomains. For this I can use the [Serializeable] attribute: [Serializable] class MyClass { public string GetSomeString() { return "someString" } } Or subclass from MarshalByRefObject: class MyClass: MarshalByRefObject { public string GetSomeString() { return "someString" } } In both cases I can use the class like this: AppDomain appDomain = AppDomain.CreateDomain("AppDomain"); MyClass myObject = (MyClass)appDomain.CreateInstanceAndUnwrap( typeof(MyClass).Assembly.FullName, typeof(MyClass).FullName); Console.WriteLine(myObject.GetSomeString()); Why do both approaches seem to have the same effect? What is the difference in both approaches? When should I favor the one approach over the other? EDIT: At the surface I know that there are differences between both mechanisms, but if someone jumped out of a bush and asked me the question I couldn't give him a proper answer. The questions are quite open questions. I hoped that someone can explain it better than I could do.

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 611 612 613 614 615 616 617 618 619 620 621 622  | Next Page >