Search Results

Search found 5991 results on 240 pages for 'w3 validation'.

Page 67/240 | < Previous Page | 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74  | Next Page >

  • How do you remove invalid hexadecimal characters from an XML-based data source prior to constructing

    - by Oppositional
    Is there any easy/general way to clean an XML based data source prior to using it in an XmlReader so that I can gracefully consume XML data that is non-conformant to the hexadecimal character restrictions placed on XML? Note: The solution needs to handle XML data sources that use character encodings other than UTF-8, e.g. by specifying the character encoding at the XML document declaration. Not mangling the character encoding of the source while stripping invalid hexadecimal characters has been a major sticking point. The removal of invalid hexadecimal characters should only remove hexadecimal encoded values, as you can often find href values in data that happens to contains a string that would be a string match for a hexadecimal character. Background: I need to consume an XML-based data source that conforms to a specific format (think Atom or RSS feeds), but want to be able to consume data sources that have been published which contain invalid hexadecimal characters per the XML specification. In .NET if you have a Stream that represents the XML data source, and then attempt to parse it using an XmlReader and/or XPathDocument, an exception is raised due to the inclusion of invalid hexadecimal characters in the XML data. My current attempt to resolve this issue is to parse the Stream as a string and use a regular expression to remove and/or replace the invalid hexadecimal characters, but I am looking for a more performant solution.

    Read the article

  • Unable to verify body hash for DKIM

    - by Joshua
    I'm writing a C# DKIM validator and have come across a problem that I cannot solve. Right now I am working on calculating the body hash, as described in Section 3.7 Computing the Message Hashes. I am working with emails that I have dumped using a modified version of EdgeTransportAsyncLogging sample in the Exchange 2010 Transport Agent SDK. Instead of converting the emails when saving, it just opens a file based on the MessageID and dumps the raw data to disk. I am able to successfully compute the body hash of the sample email provided in Section A.2 using the following code: SHA256Managed hasher = new SHA256Managed(); ASCIIEncoding asciiEncoding = new ASCIIEncoding(); string rawFullMessage = File.ReadAllText(@"C:\Repositories\Sample-A.2.txt"); string headerDelimiter = "\r\n\r\n"; int headerEnd = rawFullMessage.IndexOf(headerDelimiter); string header = rawFullMessage.Substring(0, headerEnd); string body = rawFullMessage.Substring(headerEnd + headerDelimiter.Length); byte[] bodyBytes = asciiEncoding.GetBytes(body); byte[] bodyHash = hasher.ComputeHash(bodyBytes); string bodyBase64 = Convert.ToBase64String(bodyHash); string expectedBase64 = "2jUSOH9NhtVGCQWNr9BrIAPreKQjO6Sn7XIkfJVOzv8="; Console.WriteLine("Expected hash: {1}{0}Computed hash: {2}{0}Are equal: {3}", Environment.NewLine, expectedBase64, bodyBase64, expectedBase64 == bodyBase64); The output from the above code is: Expected hash: 2jUSOH9NhtVGCQWNr9BrIAPreKQjO6Sn7XIkfJVOzv8= Computed hash: 2jUSOH9NhtVGCQWNr9BrIAPreKQjO6Sn7XIkfJVOzv8= Are equal: True Now, most emails come across with the c=relaxed/relaxed setting, which requires you to do some work on the body and header before hashing and verifying. And while I was working on it (failing to get it to work) I finally came across a message with c=simple/simple which means that you process the whole body as is minus any empty CRLF at the end of the body. (Really, the rules for Body Canonicalization are quite ... simple.) Here is the real DKIM email with a signature using the simple algorithm (with only unneeded headers cleaned up). Now, using the above code and updating the expectedBase64 hash I get the following results: Expected hash: VnGg12/s7xH3BraeN5LiiN+I2Ul/db5/jZYYgt4wEIw= Computed hash: ISNNtgnFZxmW6iuey/3Qql5u6nflKPTke4sMXWMxNUw= Are equal: False The expected hash is the value from the bh= field of the DKIM-Signature header. Now, the file used in the second test is a direct raw output from the Exchange 2010 Transport Agent. If so inclined, you can view the modified EdgeTransportLogging.txt. At this point, no matter how I modify the second email, changing the start position or number of CRLF at the end of the file I cannot get the files to match. What worries me is that I have been unable to validate any body hash so far (simple or relaxed) and that it may not be feasible to process DKIM through Exchange 2010.

    Read the article

  • Spring validator default message codes not resolving

    - by Derek Clarkson
    Hi all, I have a custom spring validator which has the following default message: public @interface FieldMatch { String message() default "au.com.xxx.website.FieldMatchValidation"; ... The problem I'm having is that the message code is not being resolved and <form:error...> is simply displaying the code rather than the message (Which is in a properties file which is being used by a ResourceBundleMessageSource). I've also tried this as String message() default "{au.com.xxx.website.FieldMatchValidation}"; Which causes the message source to crash with an exception indicating that it thinks that the "{}" brackets should contain a number because it thinks it's a parameter place holder. I think that the issue is that the message code is not being seen as a message code and therefore not resolved, but I cannot figure out why. Any suggestions?

    Read the article

  • How to validates cyrilic email in Rails 3.1?

    - by iKeler
    Let's say I had the email address like putin-crab@?????????.?? How to validate that address in rails 3.1? My Model(i use Mongoid): #encoding: utf-8 class User include Mongoid::Document field :email, :type => String validates :email, :presence => true, :format => { :with => RFC822::EMAIL } end For validations reqexp i use gem https://github.com/dim/rfc-822 in rails console (normal email): ruby-1.9.2-p290 :001 > usr = User.new( :email => "[email protected]" ) => #<User _id: 4ec627cf4934db7e4d000001, _type: nil, email: "[email protected]"> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :002 > usr.valid? => true in rails console (fu@#ing email): ruby-1.9.2-p290 :003 > usr = User.new( :email => "putin-crab@?????????.??" ) => #<User _id: 4ec627f44934db7e4d000002, _type: nil, email: "putin-crab@?????????.??"> ruby-1.9.2-p290 :004 > usr.valid? Encoding::CompatibilityError: incompatible encoding regexp match (ASCII-8BIT regexp with UTF-8 string) from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/format.rb:9:in `=~' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/format.rb:9:in `!~' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/format.rb:9:in `validate_each' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validator.rb:153:in `block in validate' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validator.rb:150:in `each' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validator.rb:150:in `validate' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:302:in `_callback_before_13' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:404:in `_run_validate_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:81:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:42:in `block in run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `call' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `run_cascading_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:41:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations.rb:212:in `run_validations!' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/callbacks.rb:53:in `block in run_validations!' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:390:in `_run_validation_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activesupport-3.1.1/lib/active_support/callbacks.rb:81:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:42:in `block in run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `call' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:67:in `run_cascading_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/callbacks.rb:41:in `run_callbacks' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations/callbacks.rb:53:in `run_validations!' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/activemodel-3.1.1/lib/active_model/validations.rb:179:in `valid?' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/mongoid-2.3.3/lib/mongoid/validations.rb:70:in `valid?' from (irb):4 from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/railties-3.1.1/lib/rails/commands/console.rb:45:in `start' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/railties-3.1.1/lib/rails/commands/console.rb:8:in `start' from /home/username/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@rail31/gems/railties-3.1.1/lib/rails/commands.rb:40:in `<top (required)>' from script/rails:6:in `require'

    Read the article

  • Ruby email_veracity_checker getting Recipient OK for invalid emails

    - by digger69
    I was testing out email_veracity_checker from rails console and found that when I tested a google apps domain (w/ catchall), yahoo and another company domain, the smtp server always returned 250 recipient ok for invalid emails (wellformed, but bogus). It seems that these servers are always returning OK perhaps to prevent email harvesting. But it does seem to raise the question 'why even validate up-front', is this approach even valid in today's environment? Note: gmail did return 550 email account doesn't exist for invalid. related to How check if an email exist without send in Ruby? Use of email_veracity_checker send-in-ruby-use-of-email-veracity-checker I appreciate your thoughts.

    Read the article

  • MessageBox if Recordset Update is Successful

    - by Paolo Bernasconi
    In Access 2007, I have a form to add a new contact to a table: RecSet.AddNew RecSet![Code_Personal] = Me.txtCodePersonal.Value RecSet![FName] = Me.TxtFName.Value RecSet![LName] = Me.txtLName.Value RecSet![Tel Natel] = Me.txtNatTel.Value RecSet![Tel Home] = Me.txtHomeTel.Value RecSet![Email] = Me.txtEmail.Value RecSet.Update This has worked so far, and the contact has successfully been aded. But I'm having two problems: I want to display a messagebox to tell the user the contact was successfully added If the contact was not successfully added because A contact with this name already exists A different issue Then display a message box "Contact already exists" or "error occured" respectively. My idea of doing this is: If recSet.Update = true Then MsgBox "Paolo Bernasconi was successfully added" Else if RecSet![FName] & RecSet![LName] 'already exist in table MsgBox "Contact already exists" Else MsgBox "An unknown error occured" I know this code is wrong, and obviously doesn't work, but it's just to give you an idea of what I'm trying to achieve. Thanks for all your help in advance.

    Read the article

  • Can I copy/clone a function in JavaScript?

    - by Craig Stuntz
    I'm using jQuery with the validators plugin. I would like to replace the "required" validator with one of my own. This is easy: jQuery.validator.addMethod("required", function(value, element, param) { return myRequired(value, element, param); }, jQuery.validator.messages.required); So far, so good. This works just fine. But what I really want to do is call my function in some cases, and the default validator for the rest. Unfortunately, this turns out to be recursive: jQuery.validator.addMethod("required", function(value, element, param) { // handle comboboxes with empty guids if (someTest(element)) { return myRequired(value, element, param); } return jQuery.validator.methods.required(value, element, param); }, jQuery.validator.messages.required); I looked at the source code for the validators, and the default implementation of "required" is defined as an anonymous method at jQuery.validator.messages.required. So there is no other (non-anonymous) reference to the function that I can use. Storing a reference to the function externally before calling addMethod and calling the default validator via that reference makes no difference. What I really need to do is to be able to copy the default required validator function by value instead of by reference. But after quite a bit of searching, I can't figure out how to do that. Is it possible? If it's impossible, then I can copy the source for the original function. But that creates a maintenance problem, and I would rather not do that unless there is no "better way."

    Read the article

  • CustomValidator, pagemethods and JQuery what fun

    - by Goosey
    Hey all, I have a CustomValidator, RequiredFieldValidator and ValidationSummary controls on an aspx page to check the current password and make sure the new password is not blank. When I click submit I get the js alert() box from the summary control telling me about just the RequiredFieldValidator being false, but the client script for the CustomValidator does not seem to get its return value used. I have checked the "arguments.IsValid" value using FireBug, so it is getting called and returning the correct bool, but it never shows up in the val summary box? Thanks, Goosey

    Read the article

  • What is the regular expression for valdating a 'price' in a jtextfield

    - by wniroshan
    I want to validate a jtextfield as user inputs a price of some item. I have a perfectly working code which beeps and discard if user inputs some character that doesnt match the regular expression.(for regular expression "[0-9]+" it accepts any number of digits and beeps if a letter is given as input) But the problem is I want to validate an input like "12500.00". Format should be any number of digits before decimal point and two digits after the decimal point. eg: ddd.dd I tried the following regular expression. But the i doesnt allow user to input "." character. It allows user to input any number of digits but when "." key is pressed input is not accepted. here is the regular expression I used. "[0-9]+ | [0-9]+. | [0-9]+.[0-9]{1} | [0-9]+{2}" important: user input is validated character by character as the user inputs them to the jtextfield.

    Read the article

  • Rails: ValidationReflection and Formtastic not working together

    - by user336777
    I installed validation_reflection as a gem and out of the box it picked up on my validates_presence_of validations. But it is not picking up on any of the other default rails validations such as validates_format_of. I know from the documentation that i am supposed to add something like: config.reflected_validations << :validates_format_of to my config/plugins/validation_reflection.rb file (which didn't exist initially). I did this but nothing changed (i restarted the web server in between). I am not sure if it just isn't picking up on my file and loading validation_reflection.rb or if i have done something wrong. Anyone have any insights?

    Read the article

  • DDD: Client-side script to enforce invariants

    - by Mosh
    Hello, One thing that I'm confused about in regards to DDD is that our domain is supposed to handle all business logic and enforce invariants. I have noticed some people (me included) handle certain invariants in the presentation layer (i.e. WebForms, Views, etc) with javascript. This is mainly done to improve performance so the server is not hit for every request which may be invalid. Even though this approach may be beneficial performance-wise, it violates DDD principles. What if the business rules are changed? This way we don't have a rich domain where all the business rules are captured. In case of a change, we should change the domain as well as the presentation layer. Has anyone come across this situation before? I'd like to know your thoughts on this. Cheers, Mosh

    Read the article

  • Display a boolean model field in a django form as a radio button rather than the default Checkbox.

    - by Lakshman Prasad
    This is how I went about, to display a Boolean model field in the form as Radio buttons Yes and No. choices = ( (1,'Yes'), (0,'No'), ) class EmailEditForm(forms.ModelForm): #Display radio buttons instead of checkboxes to_send_form = forms.ChoiceField(choices=choices,widget=forms.RadioSelect) class Meta: model = EmailParticipant fields = ('to_send_email','to_send_form') def clean(self): """ A workaround as the cleaned_data seems to contain u'1' and u'0'. There may be a better way. """ self.cleaned_data['to_send_form'] = int(self.cleaned_data['to_send_form']) return self.cleaned_data As you can see in the code above, I need a clean method that converts input string to an integer, which may be unnecessary. Is there a better and/or djangoic way to do this. If so, how? And no, using BooleanField seems to cause a lot more problems. Using that seemed obvious to me; but it isn't. Why is it so.

    Read the article

  • why isn't my validator working?

    - by Lina
    hi, can anybody tell me why is the following code not working? <script type="text/javascript" src="../../Scripts/jquery.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript" src="../../Scripts/jquery.validate.js"></script> <script type="text/javascript"> $(function() { // validate contact form on keyup and submit $("#myform").validate({ //set the rules for the fild names rules: { hour: { required: true, minlength: 2, range:[0,23] }, minute: { required: true, minlength: 2, range:[0,60] }, }, //set messages to appear inline messages: { hour: "Please enter a valid hour", minute: "Please enter a valid minute" } }); }); </script> <style type="text/css"> .error { color: red; font: 12pt verdana; padding-left: 10px } </style> <form id="myform" method="" action=""> <input id="hour" type="text" name="hour" style="width:30px; text-align:center;"></input> : <input id="minute" type="text" name="minute" style="width:30px; text-align:center;"></input> <br/> <input type="submit" value="Validate!" /> </form> thanks a million in advance, Lina

    Read the article

  • built-in schema datatype for html / xhtml

    - by John Clements
    Is there a built-in schema datatype for xhtml data? Suppose I want to specify a "boozle" element that contains two "woozles", each of which is arbitrary xhtml. I want to write something like this, using the relax NG compact syntax: namespace nifty = "http://brinckerhoff.org/nifty/" start = element nifty:boozle {woozle, woozle} woozle = element nifty:woozle {xhtml} Unfortunately, xmllint then signals this error: ./lab.rng:43: element ref: Relax-NG parser error : Reference xhtml has no matching definition ./lab.rng:43: element ref: Relax-NG parser error : Internal found no define for ref xhtml So my question is this: is there something sensible that I should put in place of "xhtml" above?

    Read the article

  • IValidator.Validate method and adding error message to a custom type

    - by user102533
    I have several server controls that implement the IValidator interface. As such, they have their own Validate() methods that look like this. public void Validate() { this.IsValid = true; if (someConditionFails()) { ErrorMessage = "Condition failed!"; this.IsValid = false; } } I understand that these Validate() methods are executed on postback before the load completed event that is executed before the save button's event handler. What I would like to do is pass in a reference to an instance of a custom class that collects all the error messages that I can access from Save button event handler. In other words, I would like to do something like this: public void Validate(ref SummaryOfErrorMessages sum) I guess I can't do this as the signature is different from what the IValidator interface has. The other option I can think of is on Load Completed event, I would iterate through all the validators on page, get the ones with IsValid = false and create my SummaryOfErrorMessages there. Does this sound right? Is there a better way of doing it?

    Read the article

  • how to check if the enddate is after the startdate in a zend form

    - by murze
    I have a zend form with a start- and an endate. $form = new Zend_Form(); $form->setName($this->formName) ->setMethod('post'); $feStartdate = new Zend_Form_Element_Text('startdate'); $feEnddate = new Zend_Form_Element_Text('enddate'); $form->addElement($feStartDate) ->addElement($feEndDate) ->addElement('submit', 'submit', array('label' => 'Save')); I assume I must write a custom validator for to check this. How would this custom validator look like and how can I call it? I assume something like $feEnddate->addValidator('dateComesAfter', $feStartDate)

    Read the article

  • Registration Form check PostgreSQL is username is already taken

    - by MrEnder
    Hey I'm really new to PHP and PostgreSQP or any database in that matter. So I'm at a loss how to do this. I need an if statement that says. If(the username user just typed in is already in database) { my code here } the variable the username that the user just typed in is $userNameSignup how would I do that with PHP for PostgreSQL? also how might I redirect people to a new page once they have completed the form properly? Thanks Shelby

    Read the article

  • Flex Force Decimal

    - by babyangel86
    Hi, I'm looking for a regex or a way to format the NumberValidator so that only decimal places are allowed. The domain="real" allows you to put integer values, but I need to force the user to but in 2.0 if they want an integer. This is because they pass through a Castor mapping file, it complains if it gets an integer when it expects a decimal. I dont want to restrict the number of decimal places, just insist that there must be a point, and a number after it. Any help would be much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Have VB.Net 2010 ErrorProvider Fire on Tabbing Out of BindingSource TextBox on a WinForm

    - by OneSource
    I have a TextBox control on a Windows Form that uses a DataSource custom object as its BindingSource. I have associated an ErrorProvider with the BindingSource like so: Dim dobExample As New DOExample ExampleBS.DataSource = dobExample epExample.DataSource = ExampleBS The ErrorProvider fires if I type a blank space in the TextBox and then press Tab to move to the next control, which is correct. But it doesn't fire if I just press Tab without entering anything. I want the ErrorProvider to show the Error, even if the TextBox is empty and not just validate when there is text in the TextBox. How do I accomplish this? As an additional bit of info, when I execute the following statement: epDOContact.GetError(TextBox) an empty string is returned even though the TextBox is empty when it is required to be present.

    Read the article

  • Data validate tools (ETL tools) for SQL server

    - by Stan
    I have some data in Excel and need to import into database. Is there any tool that can validate and maybe clean the data? Does Red Gate have such tool? The input will be Excel. Given table constraints, eg. CHECK, UNIQUE KEY, datetime format, NOT NULL. Desire output should be as least shows which lines are having problems, and then fix some trivial error automatically, like fill in default value for NULL columns, automatically correct datetime format. I know using Python can build such a script. But just wonder what's the popular way to do this. Thanks.

    Read the article

  • iphone - Regex for date in user entered textfield

    - by vikinara
    Hi all, Am a newbie to iphone programming. i have a input box and the user can write his DOB(mm/dd/yyyy) into the box. Before i save the data i like to test for valid input. I am using Regexlite.h and Regexlite.m.i have the regular expression too. i want to compare the regex to the user entered value in text box.But am not knowing how to do it.Please help. Any idea how to test for a valid date? (in .NET i use a simple regex but for the iPhone sdk i am a bit helpless) - but somebody must have been done this before... Thanks Viki

    Read the article

  • Retrieve Table Row Index of Current Row

    - by Jon
    Hi Everyone, I am trying to validate a text input when it loses focus. I would like to know which row of the table it is in. This is what I have so far and it keeps coming back as undefined. Any ideas? $("div#step-2 fieldset table tbody tr td input").blur(function() { var tableRow = $(this).parent().parent(); if ($.trim($(this).val()) == "") { $(this).addClass("invalid"); alert(tableRow.rowIndex); $(this).val(""); } else { $(this).removeClass("invalid"); checkTextChanges(); } });

    Read the article

  • Localizing DataAnnotations Custom Validator

    - by Gabe G
    Hello SO, I'm currently working in an MVC 2 app which has to have everything localized in n-languages (currently 2, none of them english btw). I validate my model classes with DataAnnotations but when I wanted to validate a DateTime field found out that the DataTypeAttribute returns always true, no matter it was a valid date or not (that's because when I enter a random string "foo", the IsValid() method checks against "01/01/0001 ", dont know why). Decided to write my own validator extending ValidationAtribute class: public class DateTimeAttribute : ValidationAttribute { public override bool IsValid(object value) { DateTime result; if (value.ToString().Equals("01/01/0001 0:00:00")) { return false; } return DateTime.TryParse(value.ToString(), out result); } } Now it checks OK when is valid and when it's not, but my problem starts when I try to localize it: [Required(ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(MSG), ErrorMessageResourceName = "INS_DATA_Required")] [CustomValidation.DateTime(ErrorMessageResourceType = typeof(MSG), ErrorMessageResourceName = "INS_DATA_DataType")] public DateTime INS_DATA { get; set; } If I put nothing in the field I get a localized MSG (MSG being my resource class) for the key=INS_DATA_Required but if I put a bad-formatted date I get the "The value 'foo' is not valid for INS_DATA" default message and not the localized MSG. What am I misssing?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74  | Next Page >