Search Results

Search found 8490 results on 340 pages for 'push linq'.

Page 68/340 | < Previous Page | 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75  | Next Page >

  • How do I get values of Linq Expression

    - by Yucel
    Hi, I have a method that takes Expression type parameter, in my method i want to get values of this expression but cant find out hot to do that. private User GetUser(Expression<Func<User, bool>> query) { User user = Context.User.Where(query).FirstOrDefault(); return user; } I am calling this method with different parameters like GetUser(u => u.Username == username); GetUser(u=> u.Email == email); I want to change GetUser method to work with stored procedures but i need to find what is inside query parameter I want to check if query is u.Username == username I will call GetUserByUsername SP if query is u.Email == email I will call GetuserByEmail SP

    Read the article

  • LINQ transform Dictionary<key,value> to Dictionary<value,key>

    - by code4life
    I'm having a low-brainwave day... Does anyone know of a quick & elegant way to transform a Dictionary so that the key becomes the value and vice-versa? Example: var originalDictionary = new Dictionary<int, string>() { {1, "One"}, {2, "Two"}, {3, "Three"} }; becomes var newDictionary = new Dictionary<string, int>(); // contents: // { // {"One". 1}, {"Two". 2}, {"Three", 3} // };

    Read the article

  • LINQ to SQL filter combobox output

    - by Brendan
    OK so I've got 2 tables for this instance, Users{UserID, Name}, Company{CompanyID, UserID, Name, Payrate} i also have 2 combo boxes, first one is for Users which Displays Name, and the Value is UserID i need the second combobox to get the Names from the Company table, but only showing Companies that are relevant to the selected user. I cant work out how to get it to go... Any ideas???

    Read the article

  • linq include with condition

    - by user276640
    i have function public Menu Details(int? id) { return _dataContext.Menu.Include("ChildMenu").FirstOrDefault(m => m.MenuId == id); } now i need to add condition to child list ChildMenu something like fieldname=id. how can i do it?

    Read the article

  • Select more then one node from XML using LINQ

    - by podeig
    I have such XML <root> <content> .... </content> <index> .... </index> <keywords> .... </keywords> </root> But I need to select just and nodes. <content> .... </content> <index> .... </index> I found out how to select just one node. XElement Content = new XElement("content", from el in xml.Elements() select el.Element("content").Elements()); How can I get both nodes?

    Read the article

  • A linq join combined with a regex

    - by Geert Beckx
    Is it possible to combine these 2 queries or would this make my code too complex? Also I think there should be a performance gain by combining these queries since I think in the near future my source table could be over 11000 records. This is what i came up with so far : Dim lit As LiteralControl ' check characters not in alphabet Dim r As New Regex("^[^a-zA-Z]+") Dim query = From o In source.ToTable _ Where r.IsMatch(o.Field(Of String)("nam")) lit = New LiteralControl(String.Format("letter: {0}, count: {1}<br />", "0-9", query.Count)) plhAlpabetLinks.Controls.Add(lit) Dim q = From l In "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ".ToLower.ToCharArray _ Group Join o In source.ToTable _ On l Equals o.Field(Of String)("nam").ToLowerInvariant(0) Into g = Group _ Select l, g.Count ' iterate the alphabet to generate all the links. For Each letter In q.AsEnumerable lit = New LiteralControl(String.Format("letter: {0}, count: {1}<br />", letter.l, letter.Count)) plhAlpabetLinks.Controls.Add(lit) Next Kind regards, G.

    Read the article

  • linq min question/bug

    - by jdelator
    Anyone care to guess what currentIndex is at the end of execution? int[] ints = new int[] { -1, 12, 26, 41, 52, -1, -1 }; int currentIndex = ints.Min(); It's 110. Does anyone know why?

    Read the article

  • Removing values from a returned linq query

    - by Diver D
    HI there I am hoping for some help with a query I have. I have this query var group = from r in CustomerItem group r by r.StoreItemID into g select new { StoreItemID = g.Key, ItemCount = g.Count(), ItemAmount = Customer.Sum(cr => cr.ItemAmount),RedeemedAmount = Customer.Sum(x => x.RedeemedAmount) }; I am returning my results to a list so I can bind it listbox. I have a property called EntryType which is an int. There are 2 available numbers 1 or 2 Lets say I had 3 items that my query is working with 2 of them had the EntryType = 1 and the 3rd had EntryType2. The first records had a ItemAmount of 55.00 and the 3rd had a ItemAmount of 50.00 How can I group using something simlar to above but minus the ItemAmount of 50.00 from the grouped amount to return 60.00? Any help would be great!!

    Read the article

  • How to get comma-separated values in Linq?

    - by Mujtaba Hassan
    I have the query below: var users = (from a in dc.UserRoles join u in dc.Users on a.intUserId equals u.ID join r in dc.Roles on a.intRoleId equals r.ID where r.intClientId == clientID select new UserRoleDetail { ID = a.ID, intUserId = a.intUserId, intRoleId = a.intRoleId, Name =u.FullName, //Here I need comma separated values. intAssignedById = a.intAssignedById, RoleName = r.vchName, Function = u.vchFunction }); I require all the values of "Name =u.FullName" to be comma-separated in a single record group by intRoleId. I mean for every role I need all the usernames in a sigle record comma separated. Any suggestion?

    Read the article

  • Linq: How to calculate the sales Total price and group them by product

    - by Daoming Yang
    I have a order list and I want to generate and rank the product with its total sales and quantity. With @tvanfosson's help, I can bring the grouped product detail with the following code, but how can I calculate and add up the total sales and quantity into each productListResult's object? Can anyone help me with this? Many thanks. var orderProductVariantListResult = productList.SelectMany(o => o.OrderProductVariantList) .Select(opv => new { Product = opv.ProductVariant.Product, Quantity = opv.Quantity, PriceSales = opv.PriceSales, Sales = opv.Quantity * opv.PriceSales, }); var productListResult = orderProductVariantResult .Select(pv => pv.Product) .GroupBy(p => p) .Select(g => new { Product = g.Key, TotalOrderCount = g.Count() }) .OrderByDescending(x => x.TotalOrderCount).ToList();

    Read the article

  • Linq order by aggregate in the select { }

    - by Joe Pitz
    Here is one I am working on: var fStep = from insp in sq.Inspections where insp.TestTimeStamp > dStartTime && insp.TestTimeStamp < dEndTime && insp.Model == "EP" && insp.TestResults != "P" group insp by new { insp.TestResults, insp.FailStep } into grp select new { FailedCount = (grp.Key.TestResults == "F" ? grp.Count() : 0), CancelCount = (grp.Key.TestResults == "C" ? grp.Count() : 0), grp.Key.TestResults, grp.Key.FailStep, PercentFailed = Convert.ToDecimal(1.0 * grp.Count() /tcount*100) } ; I would like to orderby one or more of the fields in the select projection.

    Read the article

  • nested join linq-to-sql queries

    - by ile
    var result = ( from contact in db.Contacts where contact.ContactID == id join referContactID in db.ContactRefferedBies on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID join referContactName in db.Contacts on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID orderby contact.ContactID descending select new ContactReferredByView { ContactReferredByID = referContactID.ContactReferredByID, ContactReferredByName = referContactName.FirstName + " " + referContactName.LastName }).Single(); Problem is in this line: join referContactName in db.Contacts on contact.ContactID equals referContactID.ContactID where referContactID.ContactID is called from the above join line. How to nest these two joins? Thanks in advance! Ile

    Read the article

  • Does AsEnumerable() cache all result (LINQ)

    - by Akshay
    When we call a query operator on a sequence, a sequence-specific operator gets called. I mean if i call Where<>() operator on IEnumerable<>, the operator that will be called will be defined in Enumerable class and if it's called on IQueryable<>, the one defined in Queryable class will be called. Consider the operator Reverse, defined in the Enumerable class. If i want to call it on Iqueryable<> then I must use the AsEnumerable<>() operator to first convert it into IEnumerable<>. db.Countries.OrderBy(cntry=>cntry.CountryName).AsEnumerable().Reverse() But the Reverse operator got to have all records at the same time so that it can reverse them. In the above code do all the records get loaded in memory first and then the Reverse() operator is reversing it ?

    Read the article

  • Linq 2 SQL Grouping Question

    - by Jack Marchetti
    var groups = from p in dc.Pool join pm in dc.PoolMembers on p.ID equals pm.PoolID group p by p.Group into grp select new { grp.ID }; This isn't working. Basically I want to do the grouping, and then select certain columns, but when I do select new { grp. } I get no intellisense, so I'm obviously doing something wrong. Any ideas?

    Read the article

  • Linq Scope Problem + Reduce Repeated Code

    - by Tom Gullen
    If the parameter is -1, it needs to run a different query as to if an ID was specified... how do I do this? I've tried initialising var q; outside the If block but no luck! // Loads by Entry ID, or if -1, by latest entry private void LoadEntryByID(int EntryID) { IEnumerable<tblBlogEntry> q; if (EntryID == -1) { q = ( from Blog in db.tblBlogEntries orderby Blog.date descending select new { Blog.ID, Blog.title, Blog.entry, Blog.date, Blog.userID, Comments = ( from BlogComments in db.tblBlogComments where BlogComments.blogID == Blog.ID select BlogComments).Count(), Username = ( from Users in db.yaf_Users where Users.UserID == Blog.userID select new { Users.DisplayName }) }).FirstOrDefault(); } else { q = ( from Blog in db.tblBlogEntries where Blog.ID == EntryID select new { Blog.ID, Blog.title, Blog.entry, Blog.date, Blog.userID, Comments = ( from BlogComments in db.tblBlogComments where BlogComments.blogID == Blog.ID select BlogComments).Count(), Username = ( from Users in db.yaf_Users where Users.UserID == Blog.userID select new { Users.DisplayName }) }).SingleOrDefault(); } if (q == null) { this.Loaded = false; } else { this.ID = q.ID; this.Title = q.title; this.Entry = q.entry; this.Date = (DateTime)q.date; this.UserID = (int)q.userID; this.Loaded = true; this.AuthorUsername = q.Username; } } My main aim is to reduce repeating code

    Read the article

  • LINQ extention SelectMany in 3.5 vs 4.0?

    - by Moberg
    Hi When I saw Darins suggestion here .. IEnumerable<Process> processes = new[] { "process1", "process2" } .SelectMany(Process.GetProcessesByName); ( http://stackoverflow.com/questions/3059667/process-getprocessesbyname/3059733#3059733 ) .. I was a bit intrigued and I tried it in VS2008 with .NET 3.5 - and it did not compiling unless I changed it to .. IEnumerable<Process> res = new string[] { "notepad", "firefox", "outlook" } .SelectMany(s => Process.GetProcessesByName(s)); Having read some Darins answers before I suspected that it was me that were the problem, and when I later got my hands on a VS2010 with.NET 4.0 - as expected - the original suggestion worked beautifully. My question is : What have happend from 3.5 to 4.0 that makes this (new syntax) possible? Is it the extentionmethods that have been extended(hmm) or new rules for lambda syntax or? I've tried to search but my google-fu was not strong enough. Please forgive if the question is a bit naive and note that I've taged it as beginner :)

    Read the article

  • C# Linq: Can you merge DataContexts?

    - by Andreas Grech
    Say I have one database, and this database has a set of tables that are general to all Clients and some tables that are specific to certain clients. Now what I have in mind is creating a primary DataContext that includes only the tables that are general to all the clients, and then create separate DataContexts that contain only the tables that are specific to the client. Is there a way to kind of "merge" DataContexts so that it becomes one context? So for Client A, I need one DataContext that includes both the general tables and also the tables for that specific client (retrieved from two different DataContexts) ? [Update] What I think I can do is, from the Partial Class of the DataContext instead of letting my DataContext inherit from DataContext I make it inherit from MyDataContext; that way, the tables from MyDataContext and the other DataContext will be available in one DataContext class. What do you think about this approach? Of course with something like this you can only merge two datacontexts at once though...

    Read the article

  • Need help with a Linq XML conditional grouping query

    - by FiveTools
    I have the following xml fragment: <BANNER ID="Banner 2" ROW_WIDTH="200"> <BANNER_TEXTS ID="BANNER_TEXTS"> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px"></BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="3" WIDTHT="234px">Years In Practice</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="3" WIDTHT="234px">Internet Usage</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="4" WIDTHT="312px">Sales Reps Seen / Week</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="3" WIDTHT="234px">Prescription Volume</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="3" WIDTHT="222px">Patient Load</BANNER_TEXT> </BANNER_TEXTS> <BANNER_TEXTS ID="COLUMN_TEXTS"> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">Total</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">&#60; 11 years</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">11-20 years</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">21-30 years</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">Light 1-5 hrs</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">Medium 6-10 hrs</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">Heavy &#62;10 hrs</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">0</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">1-2</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">3-5</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">&#62;5</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">1-100</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">101-150</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="78px">&#62;150</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="74px">1-100</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="74px">101-200</BANNER_TEXT> <BANNER_TEXT UNDERLINE="true" SPAN_COL="1" WIDTHT="74px">&#62;200</BANNER_TEXT> </BANNER_TEXTS> <BANNER_TEXTS ID="COLUMN_TEXTS"> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(A)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(B)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(C)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(D)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(E)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(F)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(G)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(H)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(I)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(J)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(K)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(L)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(M)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(N)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(O)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(P)</COLUMN_TEXT> <COLUMN_TEXT UNDERLINE="false" SPAN_COL="1">(Q)</COLUMN_TEXT> </BANNER_TEXTS> </BANNER> I would like to group all the 'BANNER_TEXT' in the second sequence using the first sequence 'BANNER_TEXT' as the key (only include elements where string is not null or empty). The span_col attribute in the first 'BANNER_TEXT' sequence indicates which elements by position in the 2nd sequence are related. An example: 'Years in Practice' would be the first key and the attribute SPAN_COL=3 for that element indicates it would contain '< 11 years', '11-20 years', '21-30 years' (the first grouping of string.empty = Total would be skipped).

    Read the article

  • Sort List by occurrence of a word by LINQ C#

    - by Thomas
    i have stored data in list like List<SearchResult> list = new List<SearchResult>(); SearchResult sr = new SearchResult(); sr.Description = "sample description"; list.Add(sr); suppose my data is stored in description field like "JCB Excavator - ECU P/N: 728/35700" "Geo Prism 1995 - ABS #16213899" "Geo Prism 1995 - ABS #16213899" "Geo Prism 1995 - ABS #16213899" "Wie man BBA reman erreicht" "this test JCB" "Ersatz Airbags, Gurtstrammer und Auto Körper Teile" now i want to query the list with my search term like geo jcb if you look then the word geo has stored many times in the description field. so i want to sort my list in such way that the word in search term found maximum that data will come first. please help me to do so. thanks

    Read the article

  • Databinding expression for retrieving value of related collection using LINQ

    - by joshb
    I have a GridView that is bound to a LINQDataSource control that is returning a collection of customers. Within my DataGrid I need to display the home phone number of a customer, if they have one. The phone numbers of a customer are stored in a separate table with a foreign key pointing to the customer table. The following binding expression gets me the first phone number for a customer: <asp:TemplateField HeaderText="LastName" SortExpression="LastName"> <ItemTemplate> <asp:Label ID="PhoneLabel" runat="server" Text='<%# Eval("Phones[0].PhoneNumber") %>'></asp:Label> </ItemTemplate> </asp:TemplateField> I need to figure out how to get the home phone number specifically (filter based on phone type) and handle the scenario where the customer does not have a home phone in the database. Right now it's throwing an out of range exception if the customer does not have any phone numbers. I've tried using the Where operator with a lambda expression to filter the phone type but it doesn't work: <%# Eval("Phones.Where(p => p.PhoneTypeId == 2).PhoneNumber") %> Solutions or links to any good articles on the subject would be much appreciated.

    Read the article

  • Linq, should I join those two queries together?

    - by 5YrsLaterDBA
    I have a Logins table which records when user is login, logout or loginFailed and its timestamp. Now I want to get the list of loginFailed after last login and the loginFailed happened within 24 hrs. What I am doing now is get the last login timestamp first. then use second query to get the final list. do you think I should join those two queris together? why not? why yes? var lastLoginTime = (from inRecord in db.Logins where inRecord.Users.UserId == userId && inRecord.Action == "I" orderby inRecord.Timestamp descending select inRecord.Timestamp).Take(1); if (lastLoginTime.Count() == 1) { DateTime lastInTime = (DateTime)lastLoginTime.First(); DateTime since = DateTime.Now.AddHours(-24); String actionStr = "F"; var records = from record in db.Logins where record.Users.UserId == userId && record.Timestamp >= since && record.Action == actionStr && record.Timestamp > lastInTime orderby record.Timestamp select record; }

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75  | Next Page >