Search Results

Search found 64045 results on 2562 pages for 'test class'.

Page 76/2562 | < Previous Page | 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83  | Next Page >

  • Scala - Enumeration vs. Case-Classes

    - by tzofia
    I've created akka actor called LogActor. The LogActors's receive method handling messages from other actors and logging them to the specified log level. I can distinguish between the different levels in 2 ways. The first one: import LogLevel._ object LogLevel extends Enumeration { type LogLevel = Value val Error, Warning, Info, Debug = Value } case class LogMessage(level : LogLevel, msg : String) The second: (EDIT) abstract class LogMessage(msg : String) case class LogMessageError(msg : String) extends LogMessage(msg) case class LogMessageWarning(msg : String) extends LogMessage(msg) case class LogMessageInfo(msg : String) extends LogMessage(msg) case class LogMessageDebug(msg : String) extends LogMessage(msg) Which way is more efficient? does it take less time to match case class or to match enum value? (I read this question but there isn't any answer referring to the runtime issue)

    Read the article

  • Passing Interface Class as a Parameter in Java

    - by aleclerc
    I have an interface: public interface IMech { } and a class that implements it public class Email implements IMech { } and a third class that has this method implemented: public void sendNotification( Class< IMech > mechanism ){ } now I'm trying to call that method like so foo.sendNotification(Email.class); but i keep getting an exception saying: The method sendNotification(Class<IMechanism>) in the type RemediationOperator is not applicable for the arguments (Class<EmailNotification>) Shouldn't this work if it interfaces that class?

    Read the article

  • Loop append div and repeat

    - by Diego Vieira
    I have this code <div class="round-3-top"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> <div class="round-3-bottom"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> But i want generate dynamically, how i do that? Ex.: i have 4 rounds, this would be the generated code <div class="round-4-top"> <div class="round-3-top"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> <div class="round-3-bottom"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> </div> <div class="round-4-bottom"> <div class="round-3-top"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> <div class="round-3-bottom"> <div class="round-2-top"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> <div class="round-2-bottom"> <div class="round-1-top"></div> <div class="round-1-bottom"></div> </div> </div> </div> I try using TagBuilder in MVC C# but I can not do. What should happen is, if you are 3 rounds, adding he should go inside each div is like the example above. Any idea how can I develop it?

    Read the article

  • PHP Nested classes work... sort of?

    - by SeanJA
    So, if you try to do a nested class like this: //nestedtest.php class nestedTest{ function test(){ class E extends Exception{} throw new E; } } You will get an error Fatal error: Class declarations may not be nested in [...] but if you have a class in a separate file like so: //nestedtest2.php class nestedTest2{ function test(){ include('e.php'); throw new E; } } //e.php class E Extends Exception{} So, why does the second hacky way of doing it work, but the non-hacky way of doing it does not work?

    Read the article

  • Singleton class issue in Qt

    - by sijith
    i created a singleton class and trying to access that class in other class but getting error "cannot access private member" Setupconfig is my singleton class and i am trying to access this class in other class which have QMainWindow Error 'Setupconfig::Setupconfig' : cannot access private member declared in class 'Setupconfig' ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////// Setupconfig.h static Setupconfig *buiderObj() { static Setupconfig *_setupObj= new Setupconfig(); return _setupObj; } private: Setupconfig(); ////////////////////////////////////// EasyBudget.h class EasyBudget : public QMainWindow, public Ui::EasyBudgetClass, public Setupconfig { Q_OBJECT public: Setupconfig *setupObj; } ////////////////////////////////////// EasyBudget.cpp EasyBudget::EasyBudget(QWidget *parent, Qt::WFlags flags) : QMainWindow(parent,Qt::FramelessWindowHint) { setupObj=Setupconfig::buiderObj(); }

    Read the article

  • Nested class with hidden constructor impossible in c#?

    - by luckyluke
    I' ve been doing some programming lately and faced an issue which i found weird in c#. (at least for me) public class Foo { //whatever public class FooSpecificCollection : List<Bar> { //implementation details } public FooSpecificCollection GetFoosStuff() { //return the collection } } I want the consumer of Foo to be able to obtain a reference to FooSpecificCollection, even perform some operations on it. Maybe even set it to some other property of Foo or smth like that, but not To be able to CREATE an instance of this class. (the only class that should be able to instatiate this collection should be Foo. Is my request really that far-fetched? I know that people way smarter defined c# but shouldn't there be such an option that a parent class can create a nested class instance but nobody else can't. So far I created a solution to make an abstract class, or interface available through the property and implement a concrete private class that is not available anywhere else. Is this a correct way to handle such a situation.?

    Read the article

  • Workaround for abstract attributes in Java

    - by deamon
    In Scala I would write an abstract class with an abstract attribute path: abstract class Base { val path: String } class Sub extends Base { override val path = "/demo/" } Java doesn't know abstract attributes and I wonder what would be the best way to work around this limitation. My ideas: a) constructor parameter abstract class Base { protected String path; protected Base(String path) { this.path = path; } } class Sub extends Base { public Sub() { super("/demo/"); } } b) abstract method abstract class Base { // could be an interface too abstract String getPath(); } class Sub extends Base { public String getPath() { return "/demo/"; } } Which one do you like better? Other ideas? I tend to use the constructor since the path value should not be computed at runtime.

    Read the article

  • Selecting first instance of class but not nested instances via jQuery

    - by DA
    Given the following hypothetical markup: <ul class="monkey"> <li> <p class="horse"></p> <p class="cow"></p> </li> </ul> <dl class="monkey"> <dt class="horse"></dt> <dd class="cow"> <dl> <dt></dt> <dd></dd> </dl> <dl class="monkey"> <dt class="horse"></dt> <dd class="cow"></dd> </dl> </dd> </dl> I want to be able to grab the 'first level' of horse and cow classes within each monkey class. But I don't want the NESTED horse and cow classes. I started with .children, but that won't work with the UL example as they aren't direct children of .monkey. I can use find: $('.monkey').find('.horse, .cow') but that returns all instances, including the nested ones. I can filter the find: $('.monkey').find('.horse, .cow').not('.cow .horse, .cow .cow') but that prevents me from selecting nested instances on a second function call. So...I guess what I'm looking for is 'find first "level" of this descendant'. I could likely do this with some looping logic, but was wondering if there is a selector and/or some combo of selectors that would achieve that logic.

    Read the article

  • Detect LaTeX class name

    - by Matthew Leingang
    I'm working on a LaTeX package which might need to do some things differently depending on the class that's being used. I'm wondering if there's a way to auto-detect or test the document class. One could certainly look up the class files and test for the existence of a specific macro defined by that class, but is there a smarter way? I looked at the definition of the \ProvidesClass macro and can't see if it saves the class name anywhere except \@currname. I believe \@currname is just the name of the current package or class being read. Basically I want to execute \author{\longauthorname} in the article class but \author[\shortauthorname]{\longauthorname} in the beamer class.

    Read the article

  • Zend Framework decorator subform add a class tag to DD wrapper tag

    - by Samuele
    I have this form: class Request_Form_Prova extends Zend_Form { public function init() { $this->setMethod('post'); $SubForm_Step = new Zend_Form_SubForm(); $SubForm_Step->setAttrib('class','Step'); $this->addSubform($SubForm_Step, 'Chicco'); $PrivacyCheck = $SubForm_Step->createElement('CheckBox', 'PrivacyCheck'); $PrivacyCheck->setLabel('I have read and I agre bla bla...') ->setRequired(true) ->setUncheckedValue(''); $PrivacyCheck->getDecorator('Label')->setOption('class', 'inline'); $SubForm_Step->addElement($PrivacyCheck); $SubForm_Step->addElement('submit', 'submit', array( 'ignore' => true, 'label' => 'OK', )); } } That generate this HTML: <form enctype="application/x-www-form-urlencoded" method="post" action=""> <dl class="zend_form"> <dt id="Chicco-label">&nbsp;</dt> <dd id="Chicco-element"> <fieldset id="fieldset-Chicco" class="Step"> <dl> <dt id="Chicco-PrivacyCheck-label"><label for="Chicco-PrivacyCheck" class="inline required">I have read and I agre bla bla...</label></dt> <dd id="Chicco-PrivacyCheck-element"> <input type="hidden" name="Chicco[PrivacyCheck]" value=""><input type="checkbox" name="Chicco[PrivacyCheck]" id="Chicco-PrivacyCheck" value="1"> </dd> <dt id="submit-label">&nbsp;</dt> <dd id="submit-element"> <input type="submit" name="Chicco[submit]" id="Chicco-submit" value="OK"> </dd> </dl> </fieldset> </dd> </dl> </form> How can I add a class="Test" to the <dd id="Chicco-element"> elemnt? In order to have it like that: <dd id="Chicco-element" class="Test"> I thought something like that but it don't work: $SubForm_Step->getDecorator('DdWrapper')->setOption('class', 'Test'); OR $SubForm_Step->getDecorator('DtDdWrapper')->setOption('class', 'Test'); How can I do it? And last question: How can I wrap that DD and DT element of a SubForm in another DL element? Like that: ( second line ) <dl class="zend_form"> <dl> <dt id="Chicco-label">&nbsp;</dt> <dd id="Chicco-element"> <fieldset id="fieldset-Chicco" class="Step"> <dl> .......

    Read the article

  • Test MVC using moq

    - by Raminder
    I am new to moq and I was trying to test a controller (MVC) behaviour that when the view raises a certain event, controller calls a certain function on model, here are the classes - public class Model { public void CalculateAverage() { ... } ... } public class View { public event EventHandler CalculateAverage; private void RaiseCalculateAverage() { if (CalculateAverage != null) { CalculateAverage(this, EventArgs.Empty); } } ... } public class Controller { private Model model; private View view; public Controller(Model model, View view) { this.model = model this.view = view; view.CalculaeAverage += view_CalculateAverage; } priavate void view_CalculateAverage(object sender, EventArgs args) { model.CalculateAverage(); } } and the test - [Test] public void ModelCalculateAverageCalled() { Mock<Model> modelMock = new Mock<Model>(); Mock<View> viewMock = new Mock<View>(); Controller controller = new Controller(modelMock.Object, viewMock.Object); viewMock.Raise(x => x.CalculateAverage += null, new EventArgs.Empty); modelMock.Verify(x => x.CalculateAverage()); //never comes here, test fails in above line and exits Assert.True(true); } The issue is that the test is failing in the second last line with "Invocation was not performed on the mock: x = x.CalculateAverage()". Another thing I noticed is that the test terminates on this second last line and the last line is never executed. Am I doing everything correct?

    Read the article

  • Link error for user defined class type template parameter

    - by isurulucky
    Hi, I implemented a Simple STL map in C++. Factored out the comparison as a type as I was instructed to, then implemented the comparison as shown below: template <typename T> int KeyCompare<T>::operator () (T tKey1, T tKey2) { if(tKey1 < tKey2) return -1; else if(tKey1 > tKey2) return 1; else return 0; } here, tKey1 and tKet2 are the two keys I'm comparing. This worked well for all the basic data types and string. I added a template specialization to compare keys of a user defined type named Test and added a specialization as follows: int KeyCompare<Test>::operator () (Test tKey1, Test tKey2) { if(tKey1.a < tKey2.a) return -1; else if(tKey1.a > tKey2.a) return 1; else return 0; } when I run this, I get a linking error saying SimpleMap.obj : error LNK2005: "public: int __thiscall KeyCompare::operator()(class Test,class Test)" (??R?$KeyCompare@VTest@@@@QAEHVTest@@0@Z) already defined in MapTest.obj SimpleMap.obj : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall KeyCompare::~KeyCompare(void)" (??1?$KeyCompare@VTest@@@@QAE@XZ) already defined in MapTest.obj SimpleMap.obj : error LNK2005: "public: __thiscall KeyCompare::KeyCompare(void)" (??0?$KeyCompare@VTester@@@@QAE@XZ) already defined in MapTest.obj MapTest.cpp is the test harness class in which I wrote the test case. I have used include guards as well, to stop multiple inclusions. Any idea what the matter is?? Thank you very much!!

    Read the article

  • PHP static function self:: in joomla JFactory class explanation?

    - by Carbon6
    Hi I'm looking at the code of Joomla and trying to figure out what exactly happends in this function. index.php makes a call to function $app = JFactory::getApplication('site'); jfactory.php code public static function getApplication($id = null, $config = array(), $prefix='J') { if (!self::$application) { jimport('joomla.application.application'); self::$application = JApplication::getInstance($id, $config, $prefix); } return self::$application; } application.php code.. public static function getInstance($client, $config = array(), $prefix = 'J') { static $instances; if (!isset($instances)) { $instances = array(); } ....... more code ........ return $instances[$client]; } Now I cannot figure out in function getApplication why is self:$application used. self::$application = JApplication::getInstance($id, $config, $prefix); $application is always null, what is the purpose of using this approach. I tryied modifying it to $var = JApplication::getInstance($id, $config, $prefix); and returnig it but it doesn't work. I would be very glad if someone with more knowledge could explain what is happening here detailed as possible. Many thanks.

    Read the article

  • Django models & Python class attributes

    - by Geo
    The tutorial on the django website shows this code for the models: from django.db import models class Poll(models.Model): question = models.CharField(max_length=200) pub_date = models.DateTimeField('date published') class Choice(models.Model): poll = models.ForeignKey(Poll) choice = models.CharField(max_length=200) votes = models.IntegerField() Now, each of those attribute, is a class attribute, right? So, the same attribute should be shared by all instances of the class. A bit later, they present this code: class Poll(models.Model): # ... def __unicode__(self): return self.question class Choice(models.Model): # ... def __unicode__(self): return self.choice How did they turn from class attributes into instance attributes? Did I get class attributes wrong?

    Read the article

  • Running single test class or group with Surefire and TestNG

    - by Slartibartfast
    I want to run single test class from command line using Maven and TestNG Things that doesn't work: mvn -Dtest=ClassName test I have defined groups in pom.xml, and this class isn't in one of those groups. So it got excluded on those grounds. mvn -Dgroups=skipped-group test mvn -Dsurefire.groups=skipped-group test when config is <plugin> <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId> <artifactId>maven-surefire-plugin</artifactId> <version>2.7.1</version> <configuration> <groups>functest</groups> </configuration> </plugin> Parameters work fine in there are no groups defined in pom.xml. Similarly, when surefire is configured with <configuration> <includes> <include>**/*UnitTest.java</include> </includes> </configuration> I can add another test with -Dtest parameter, but cannot add group. In any combination, I can narrow down tests to be executed with groups, but not expand them. What's wrong with my configuration? Is there a way to run a single test or group outside of those defined in pom.xml? Tried on Ubuntu 10.04 with Maven 2.2.1, TestNG 5.14.6 and Surefire 2.7.1

    Read the article

  • How to copy subdirectories of multiple un-named directories

    - by Scrubbie
    Using just Ant, I want to copy subdirectories of some top-level directories but the names of top-level directories can change so I need Ant to programatically determine which directories to copy. In other words, given the sample directory structure below, copy the contents of each ./<projectX>/bin directory to ./bin. bin project1 \-- bin \-- com \-- name \-- dir1 \-- file1.class \-- file2.class \-- file3.class \-- dir2 \-- file4.class \-- file5.class project2 \-- bin \-- com \-- name \-- dir3 \-- file6.class \-- file7.class \-- file8.class project3 \-- bin \-- com \-- name \-- dir4 \-- file9.class \-- dir5 \-- file10.class \-- file11.class And the end result would be a bin directory that looks like this: bin \-- com \-- name \-- dir1 \-- file1.class \-- file2.class \-- file3.class \-- dir2 \-- file4.class \-- file5.class \-- dir3 \-- file6.class \-- file7.class \-- file8.class \-- dir4 \-- file9.class \-- dir5 \-- file10.class \-- file11.class I've tried <copy todir="${basedir}/bin"> <fileset dir="${basedir}"> <include name="**/bin/*"/> <exclude name="bin"/> </fileset> </copy> but that includes the projectX/bin directories underneath the top-level bin directory.

    Read the article

  • Passing a paramter/object to a ruby unit/test before running it using TestRunner

    - by Nahir Khan
    I'm building a tool that automates a process then runs some tests on it's own results then goes to do some other stuff. In trying to clean up my code I have created a separate file that just has the test cases class. Now before I can run these tests, I have to pass the class a couple of parameters/objects before they can be run. Now the problem is that I can't seem to find a way to pass a parameter/object to the test class. Right now I am thinking to generate a Yaml file and read it in the test class but it feels "wrong" to use a temporary file for this. If anyone has a nicer solution that would be great! *********Edit******* Example Code of what I am doing right now: #!/usr/bin/ruby require 'test/unit/ui/console/testrunner' require 'yaml' require 'TS_SampleTestSuite' automatingSomething() importantInfo = getImportantInfo() File.open('filename.yml', 'w') do |f| f.puts importantInfo.to_yaml end Test::Unit::UI::Console::TestRunner.run(TS_SampleTestSuite) Now in the example above TS_SampleTestSuite needs importantInfo, so the first "test case" is a method that just reads in the information from the Yaml file filname.yml. I hope that clears up some confusion.

    Read the article

  • Python:How to override inner class methods if the inner class is defined as a property of the top cl

    - by Maddy
    I have a code snippet like this class A(object): class b: def print_hello(self): print "Hello world" b = property(b) And I want to override the inner class 'b'(please dont worry about the lowercase name) behaviour. Say, I want to add a new method or I want to change an existing method, like: class C(A): class b(A.b): def print_hello(self): print "Inner Class: Hello world" b = property(b) Now if I create C's object as c = C(), and call c.b I get TypeError: 'property' object is not callable error. How would I get pass this and call print_hello of the extended inner class? Disclaimer: I dont want to change the code for A class.

    Read the article

  • How can I unit test my custom validation attribute

    - by MightyAtom
    I have a custom asp.net mvc class validation attribute. My question is how can I unit test it? It would be one thing to test that the class has the attribute but this would not actually test that the logic inside it. This is what I want to test. [Serializable] [EligabilityStudentDebtsAttribute(ErrorMessage = "You must answer yes or no to all questions")] public class Eligability { [BooleanRequiredToBeTrue(ErrorMessage = "You must agree to the statements listed")] public bool StatementAgree { get; set; } [Required(ErrorMessage = "Please choose an option")] public bool? Income { get; set; } .....removed for brevity } [AttributeUsage(AttributeTargets.Class)] public class EligabilityStudentDebtsAttribute : ValidationAttribute { // If AnyDebts is true then // StudentDebts must be true or false public override bool IsValid(object value) { Eligability elig = (Eligability)value; bool ok = true; if (elig.AnyDebts == true) { if (elig.StudentDebts == null) { ok = false; } } return ok; } } I have tried to write a test as follows but this does not work: [TestMethod] public void Eligability_model_StudentDebts_is_required_if_AnyDebts_is_true() { // Arrange var eligability = new Eligability(); var controller = new ApplicationController(); // Act controller.ModelState.Clear(); controller.ValidateModel(eligability); var actionResult = controller.Section2(eligability,null,string.Empty); // Assert Assert.IsInstanceOfType(actionResult, typeof(ViewResult)); Assert.AreEqual(string.Empty, ((ViewResult)actionResult).ViewName); Assert.AreEqual(eligability, ((ViewResult)actionResult).ViewData.Model); Assert.IsFalse(((ViewResult)actionResult).ViewData.ModelState.IsValid); } The ModelStateDictionary does not contain the key for this custom attribute. It only contains the attributes for the standard validation attributes. Why is this? What is the best way to test these custom attributes? Thanks

    Read the article

  • why the class of subclass is superclass

    - by Raj
    def singleton_class class << self self end end end class Human proc = lambda { puts 'proc says my class is ' + self.name.to_s } singleton_class.instance_eval do define_method(:lab) do proc.call end end end class Developer < Human end Human.lab # class is Human Developer.lab # class is Human ; oops Why Developer.lab is reporting that it is Human ?

    Read the article

< Previous Page | 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83  | Next Page >