Search Results

Search found 28279 results on 1132 pages for 'syntax case'.

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

Page 77/1132 | < Previous Page | 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84  | Next Page >

  • "...redeclared as different kind of symbol"?

    - by CodeNewb
    #include <stdio.h> #include <math.h> double integrateF(double low, double high) { double low = 0; double high = 20; double delta_x=0; double x, ans; double s = 1/2*exp((-x*x)/2); for(x=low;x<=high;x++) delta_x = x+delta_x; ans = delta_x*s; return ans; } It says that low and high are "redeclared as different type of symbol" and I don't know what that means. Basically, all I'm doing here (READ: trying) is integrating from low (which I set to 0) to high (20) to find the Riemann sum. The for loop looks kinda trippy too...I'm so lost.

    Read the article

  • What is the "x = x || {}" technique in JavaScript - and how does it affect this IIFE?

    - by Micky Hulse
    First, a pseudo code example: ;(function(foo){ foo.init = function(baz) { ... } foo.other = function() { ... } return foo; }(window.FOO = window.FOO || {})); Called like so: FOO.init(); My question: What is the technical name/description of: window.FOO = window.FOO || {}? I understand what the code does... See below for my reason(s) for asking. Reason for asking: I'm calling the passed in global like so: ;(function(foo){ ... foo vs. FOO, anyone else potentially confused? ... }(window.FOO = window.FOO || {})); ... but I just don't like calling that lowercase "foo", considering that the global is called capitalized FOO... It just seems confusing. If I knew the technical name of this technique, I could say: ;(function(technicalname){ ... do something with technicalname, not to be confused with FOO ... }(window.FOO = window.FOO || {})); I've seen a recent (awesome) example where they called it "exports": ;(function(exports){ ... }(window.Lib = window.Lib || {})); I guess I'm just trying to standardize my coding conventions... I'd like to learn what the pros do and how they think (that's why I'm asking here)!

    Read the article

  • Doubt in switch case

    - by user302593
    Hi.. When i executes the following program it get the user input for account details and then print it correctly...But it cannot read the opt value(y/n)..it automatically calls again..i want to exit the program when i press n value... please help to solve this problem.. char opt; do { //Getting user input printf("\n Enter the Account Number:\n "); scanf("%d",&gAccNo_i); printf("\n Enter the Account Holder's Name:\n "); scanf("%s",gCustName_c); printf("\n Enter the Balance Amount:\n "); scanf("%f",&gBlncAmt_f); //Printing the inputted data. printf("\n Account Number : %d",gAccNo_i); printf("\n Customer Name : %s",gCustName_c); printf("\n Balance Amount : %f",gBlncAmt_f); printf("\n Do u want to wish to continue?(y/n)"); scanf("%c",&opt); }while(opt!='n');

    Read the article

  • jQuery syntax for changing the value of a table cell

    - by cf_PhillipSenn
    I have a table where every row has a unique id. The last table cell has class="status" where I want to show the user the result of their action. In my $.ajax call, I have: ,success: function(result){ $('tr#'+result).td('.status').text('Updated'); }; result is the id of the row that was updated. It's just throwing an error message that says $( and that's all.

    Read the article

  • strange(?) module import syntax

    - by morpheous
    I've come across the following code in a Python script from pprint import pprint why not simply import pprint? Unless the module pprint contains a function called pprint which is being aliased as pprint (surely, this must be the definition of madness?)

    Read the article

  • C# Why does calling an interface member from a class generate an error?

    - by Jack
    So I have an interface: interface IFoo { int Bar(); int this[int i] {get; set;} } And a class that derives from it class Foo : IFoo { public int IFoo.Bar() { //Implementation { public int IFoo.this[int i] { //Implementation } } Now, I try to do this: var fooey = new Foo(); int i = Fooey.Bar(); or this: int i = Fooey[4]; I would expect these to work properly. However, the compiler generates an error as if such members don't exist. Why is that? I am aware I can cast Foo as IFoo, but I am also aware that casting is costly to performance, which is often the reason to use interfaces in the first place. EDIT 1: These are the errors generated 'Foo' does not contain a definition for 'Bar' and no extension method 'Bar' accepting a first argument of type 'Foo' could be found (are you missing a using directive or an assembly reference?) "Cannot apply indexing to an expression of type 'Foo'"

    Read the article

  • C++, strange behavior reusing variable name

    - by aaa
    hello. I have following snippet: { double scale = 3; // not used? { double scale = 4*scale; // what is RHS scale? for (...) { // scale is 0 here, using g++ } } } moreover, g++ reports first scale is not used. how is second scale initialize? What should be correct behavior? thanks

    Read the article

  • why does twitter use the !function syntax in their embed code

    - by samccone
    I was looking at twitters embed code and saw that they are using !function ... while i know that this evaluates to false I was wondering what the point of it was. thoughts? !function(d,s,id){var js,fjs=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];if(!d.getElementById(id)){js=d.createElement(s);js.id=id;js.src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js";fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js,fjs);}}(document,"script","twitter-wjs");

    Read the article

  • Javascript syntax for abbreviating repeated access to same identifier

    - by yongjieli
    Hi all I wanted to ask if there is a formal way of describing the following code, whereby we can access the same object repeatedly without re-typing the object's identifier: myObj.render(1).render(2).print(); I didn't know how to describe it when trying to form a question; I wanted to know whether or not something like this is possible in javascript, I know that I can do it in VB: myObj.render(1) if(foo == 'bar') .render(2) .print(); Thanks!

    Read the article

  • CakePHP ACL use case(s)

    - by Jonathan
    I have got a simple web app in development, i want to establish a couple of user groups; Admin, Doctors & Patients. Each group would have their access restricted to particular controller actions rather than individual content. So for example, Doctors can view patient records (index & view actions), but cannot delete them. Usually i would create a groups model, and assign the various users to a group. And filter in the beforeFilter() method to determine if the user has access. But if ACL can do the job, why right the code, right? Thanks

    Read the article

  • Why cant i use the field user in SQL Server 8?

    - by acidzombie24
    Maybe not literally but the query below gets an error near user. If i change it to userZ it works. WHY can i not use that name? Is there a way to specific its a field instead of a keyword? (or whatever it is) create table Post2 ( id INTEGER PRIMARY KEY NOT NULL, title nvarchar(max) NOT NULL, body nvarchar(max) NOT NULL, user integer REFERENCES Post1(id));

    Read the article

  • What does @@variable mean in Ruby?

    - by Andrew
    What are Ruby variables preceded with double at signs (@@)? My understanding of a variable preceded with an at sign is that it is an instance variable, like this in PHP: PHP version class Person { public $name; public function setName($name) { $this->name = $name; } public function getName() { return $this->name; } } Ruby equivalent class Person def set_name(name) @name = name end def get_name() @name end end What does the double at sign @@ mean, and how does it differ from a single at sign?

    Read the article

  • jQuery extend $.fn and calling method syntax

    - by MBax
    I understand that you call a method like this when you are extending $.fn. ( $ == jQuery ) //$("div").myMethod(); $.fn.extend({ myMethod: function(){...} }); And like this when you extend the jQuery Object: //$.myMethod2(); $.extend({ myMethod2: function(){...} }); But I don't quite understand what the $() is doing here: $().functionName({ something: 'something' }).myMethod(); Does it have to do with the fact the method is being called including the function name? Thanks in advance and hope this makes sense.

    Read the article

facebook twitter digg google delicious technorati stumbleupon myspace wordpress linkedin gmail igoogle windows live tumblr viadeo yahoo buzz yahoo mail yahoo bookmarks favorites email print

< Previous Page | 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84  | Next Page >