Search Results

Search found 3046 results on 122 pages for 'hibernate validator'.

Page 98/122 | < Previous Page | 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105  | Next Page >

• asp.net compare validators to allow comma and dot (both!) as decimal separator

  - by DanC

  I am using a compare validator, which validates that the entered number is a valid double and also validates it against a given value (greater than zero). I am validating money amounts. Because of the location where the app is used, the locale sets the comma as the decimal separator. The problem is that when a user enters the value using the numeric keyboard, the number gets written with the dot as decimal separator, and is rejected by the validation. I'd like to have this validation done before triggering a postback (like a customvalidator would) and accepting both separators. Any ideas? Thanks

  Read the article

• DataAnnotations in ASP.NET MVC 2 - Stop MVC from applying RequiredAttribute to Non-nullable DateTime

  - by jwwishart

  Im trying to create a custom version of the RequiredAttribute to replace the built in one and I've got it working for properties that have strings values, but with properties that are DateTime or integer for example, the default RequiredAttribute seems to be applied automatically (IF the property is not nullable!) My problem is that i want to be able to specify a DateTime property as required using my custom required validator which gets the error message from a resources file (I don't want to have to tell the RequiredAttribute the type of the resource file and the key every time i apply it. That is why I'm making a custom one.) How can i prevent the framework from applying the required attribute to properties of type DateTime and int etc without changing them to nullable. Thanks

  Read the article

• How to validate Data Annotations with a MetaData class

  - by Micah

  I'm trying to validate a class using Data Annotations but with a metadata class. [MetadataType(typeof(TestMetaData))] public class Test { public string Prop { get; set; } internal class TestMetaData { [Required] public string Prop { get; set; } } } [Test] [ExpectedException(typeof(ValidationException))] public void TestIt() { var invalidObject = new Test(); var context = new ValidationContext(invalidObject, null, null); context.MemberName = "Prop"; Validator.ValidateProperty(invalidObject.Prop, context); } The test fails. If I ditch the metadata class and just decorated the property on the actual class it works fine. WTH am I doing wrong? This is putting me on the verge of insanity. Please help.

  Read the article

• jQuery validation plugin , add custom method

  - by Eatdoku

  Hi, I am trying to add a method that validate a field to see if it contains a number value. so this is what i did, however it is not doing the check for me. anyone has any idea? thanks $(document).ready(function() { $.validator.addMethod('positiveNumber', function(value) { return Number(value) > 0; }, 'Enter a positive number.'); }); and jQuery('form').validate(); jQuery('.validateFieldToCheck').rules('add', { positiveNumber:, messages: { required: 'Field must contain a number.' } });

  Read the article

• Is there a dictionary about common programming vocabulary?

  - by _simon_

  When I need a name for a new class that extends behaviour of an existing class, I usually have hard time to come up with a name for it. For example, if I have a class MyClass, then the new class could be named something like MyClassAdapter, MyClassCalculator, MyClassDispatcher, MyClassParser,... This new name should of course represent the behaviour of the class and would ideally be same as the design pattern in which it is used (Adapter, Decorator, Factory,...). But since we don't overuse design patterns, this is not always the solution :) So, do you know for a dictionary or a list of common words, that we can use to represent the behaviour of the class, containing a short description of the expected behaviour? Some examples: replicator, shadow, token, acceptor, worker, mapper, driver, bucket, socket, validator, wrapper, parser, verifier,... You could also look at this list as a cheat sheet for metaphors, with which you can better understand your problem domain.

  Read the article

• How come module-level validators are evaluated only after property-level validators?

  - by jonathanconway

  I'm using the module-level validator: 'PropertiesMustMatch' on my view-model, like so: [PropertiesMustMatch("Password", "PasswordConfirm")] public class HomeIndex { [Required] public string Name { get; set; } public string Password { get; set; } public string PasswordConfirm { get; set; } } I'm noticing that if I submit the form without Name filled in, the ValidationSummary() helper returns only the following error: The Name field is required. However, if I fill in Name, then ValidationSummary() will return a PropertiesMustMatch error: 'Password' and 'PasswordConfirm' do not match. So it looks like the property-level validators are being evaluated first, then the model-level validators. I would much prefer if they were all validated at once, and ValidationSummary would return: The Name field is required. 'Password' and 'PasswordConfirm' do not match. Any ideas what I can do to fix this? I'm studying the MVC 2 source-code to try to determine why this happens.

  Read the article

• How to register XHTML namespaces??

  - by John Tyler

  My page use to validate for XHTML but I added the addthis buttons to page and it gives a new namespace: E.G.: <a addthis:url="http://domain.tld/path/to/stuff" addthis:title="Teh Title here"> I tried: <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xmlns:addthis="http://addthis.com/" lang="en"> Doesn't work. Can we register namespaces for the validator??? I AM EMOTIONALLY ATTACHED TO VALID XHTML. I like addthis, I think its the best button of its kind (yes, I need to use the namespace properties, I know you dont have to but I do for what im doing PHP project) :(

  Read the article

• autocomplete attribute is not passing XHTML 1.0 Transitional validation, why?

  - by rsturim

  I'm trying to cleanup my xhtml validation -- I'm running my pages through the W3C validator. For some puzzling reason it's not passing on input fields with the autocomplete="off" attribute: <input name="kwsearch" id="sli_search_1" type="text" autocomplete="off" onfocus="if(this.defaultValue==this.value) this.value='';" onblur="if(this.value=='')this.value=this.defaultValue;" class="searchbox" value="Search" /> I'm using this doctype: <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" xml:lang="en" lang="en"> And this is the validation error: Line 410, Column 81: there is no attribute "autocomplete" …li_search_1" type="text" autocomplete="off" onfocus="if(this.defaultValue==thi… I thought this was okay with the W3C -- but, maybe it's still in "submission" phase? http://www.w3.org/Submission/web-forms2/#autocomplete Thoughts?

  Read the article

• Nibernate, DynamicProxy, and Spring AOP

  - by jeff

  We have an Spring IOC managed application that uses NHibernate in its persistence layer. We have use the Spring AOP and understand its terminology and capabilities. We have some investment in Spring proxies. Now, we want to add a PropertyChangedMixin and a ValidatorInterceptor (not nhibernate validator, but based on Spring validation) onto our NHibernate managed objects. I've looked at the hooks for NHiberate IInterceptor and EventListeners and that gives me a place to apply the desired proxies. If I use the Spring proxies is it going to play nice with the existing nhibernate proxies. We don't lazy load. From the simple nhibernate stuff the benefits of DynamicProxy look appealing. I can go either way, but I'd like to hear suggestions. Thanks, jeff

  Read the article

• Multiple schema validation in Java

  - by user279554

  Hi, I am trying to do multiple schema validation in Java. I don't understand where I am doing wrong. Any help will be appreciated. abc.xsd <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:xn="project-xml-r4j_another.xsd"> <xsd:import namespace="project-xml-r4j_another.xsd"/> <xsd:element name="abc" type="abc"> </xsd:element> <xsd:complexType name="abc"> <xsd:sequence> <xsd:element name="test" type="test" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1"> </xsd:element> <!--<xsd:element name="proj" type="xn:proj"/>--> </xsd:sequence> <xsd:attribute name="id" type="xsd:ID" use="required"/> </xsd:complexType> <xsd:complexType name="test"> <xsd:attribute name="id" type="xsd:ID" use="required"></xsd:attribute> <xsd:attribute name="value" use="required"> <xsd:simpleType> <xsd:restriction base="xsd:string"> <xsd:maxLength value="100" /> </xsd:restriction> </xsd:simpleType> </xsd:attribute> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:schema> project-xml-r4j_another.xsd <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?> <xsd:schema xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" targetNamespace="project-xml-r4j_another.xsd" xmlns="project-xml-r4j_another.xsd" elementFormDefault="qualified" attributeFormDefault="unqualified"> <xsd:element name="proj" type="proj"> <xsd:annotation> <xsd:documentation> The project is the root tag of a project-xml. </xsd:documentation> </xsd:annotation> </xsd:element> <xsd:complexType name="proj"> <xsd:attribute name="id" type="xsd:ID" use="required"/> </xsd:complexType> </xsd:schema> Test case package test; import java.io.File; import java.io.IOException; import javax.xml.XMLConstants; import javax.xml.transform.Source; import javax.xml.transform.stream.StreamSource; import javax.xml.validation.Schema; import javax.xml.validation.SchemaFactory; import javax.xml.validation.Validator; import org.apache.log4j.Logger; import org.junit.Test; import org.xml.sax.SAXException; import org.xml.sax.SAXParseException; import org.xml.sax.helpers.DefaultHandler; import com.ericsson.ccrtool.core.project.projectxml.InvalidProjectXmlException; public class TestSchema { private static final Logger logger = Logger.getLogger(TestSchema.class); static final String W3C_XML_SCHEMA = XMLConstants.W3C_XML_SCHEMA_NS_URI; @Test public void test() { System.out.println("TestSchema.test()"); try { SchemaFactory schemaFactory = SchemaFactory.newInstance(W3C_XML_SCHEMA); // create a grammar object. Source [] source = { new StreamSource(new File("C:\\jaydeep\\Ericsson\\R5B\\abc.xsd")), new StreamSource(new File("C:\\jaydeep\\Ericsson\\R5B\\project-xml-r4j.xsd"))}; Schema schemaGrammar = schemaFactory.newSchema(source); Validator schemaValidator = schemaGrammar.newValidator(); schemaValidator.setErrorHandler(new MessageHandler()); // validate xml instance against the grammar. schemaValidator.validate(new StreamSource("C:\\jaydeep\\Ericsson\\R5B\\project_tmmk17cells_xnaveen_project-xml.xml")); } catch (SAXException e) { throw new InvalidProjectXmlException("Project-xml validation failed, Exception: " + e.getMessage(), e); } catch (IOException e) { throw new InvalidProjectXmlException("Project-xml validation failed, Exception: " + e.getMessage(), e); } } class MessageHandler extends DefaultHandler { private String errMessage = ""; @Override public void warning(SAXParseException e) { logger.info("Warning Line " + e.getLineNumber() + ": " + e.getMessage()); } @Override public void error(SAXParseException e) { errMessage = new String("Error Line " + e.getLineNumber() + ": " + e.getMessage()); logger.info(errMessage); throw new InvalidProjectXmlException("Project-xml validation failed, Exception: " + errMessage); } @Override public void fatalError(SAXParseException e) { errMessage = new String("Error Line " + e.getLineNumber() + ": " + e.getMessage()); logger.info(errMessage); throw new InvalidProjectXmlException("Project-xml validation failed, Exception: " + errMessage); } } } Thanks, Jaydeep

  Read the article

• validates_uniqueness_of with HABTM relationship

  - by jeffshantz

  I've got a HABTM relationship between two models: Publication and Author. I want to ensure that one cannot create a publication with the same title, year, and author list. However, if I try something like this: class Publication < ActiveRecord::Base validates_uniqueness_of :title, :scope => [:year, :authors] end This obviously won't work since there is no authors column. Can this be done with validates_uniqueness_of, or do I need a custom validator? Thank you.

  Read the article

• To what point is making an HTML page valid worth it?

  - by Martín Fixman

  Since a long time ago, when I found out about the W3C Validator, I made sure every HTML document I made was valid HTML. However, I think sometimes it just isn't necessary to waste time making it valid. Of course, for actual Internet pages may be important, but is making pages on an Intranet, or even little front-ends that are used with other programs, when the HTML page renders correctly in the most used browsers (not necessarily counting IE 6 and 7). I think I'm mostly talking about little improvements over code, such as wrapping every shown element of the page on <p> or <div> tags.

  Read the article

• custom validation does not seem to get registered.

  - by viet pham

  Hi, Inside a tab, I have a form that is dynamically loaded via ajax. Since the name of the field is dynamic too (e.g. ), I write a custom validation method inside the "on complete" like this. However, the custom code does not get executed (bolded alert never pops up) no matter what i try. $.ajax ( { url: 'index.php?func=trainingmgr&aAction=displayAddForm', type: 'GET', dataType: 'html', complete: function(req, err) { //Append response to the tab's body $(href, '#trainingTabs').append(req.responseText); $.validator.addMethod ( 'tRequired', function(value, element) { if(value == '') { **alert('I am empty');** return true; } else return false; }, '<br>Required field' ); $('#upload' + index).click ( function() { $('#addForm' + index).validate().numberOfInvalids(); } ); } } );

  Read the article

• Spring struts and forms

  - by Kiva

  Hi guy, I need to integrate struts with spring for a project. I read the doc to ingrate struts and it's ok for classic beans but I have a problem for my forms. I have a form like this in my struts-config.xml: <form-beans> <form-bean name="creationForm" type="org.apache.struts.validator.DynaValidatorActionForm" > <form-property name="libelle" type="java.lang.String" /> <form-property name="quantite" type="java.lang.String" /> <form-property name="prix" type="java.lang.String" initial="10" /> </form-bean> But it's strange for me to have a "type" in struts-config because it's spring which manages beans. I don't found anything in the doc to manage forms by spring and the attribute "type" is mandatory for form in struts-config. Someone can help me please ?

  Read the article

• SSL connection using Java standalone app

  - by Marquinio

  I have created a standalone executable JAR program that needs to send private information over a SSL connection. I was not able to establish the SSL connection using certificates. Was getting this: javax.net.ssl.SSLHandshakeException: sun.security.validator.ValidatorException: PKIX path `building failed: sun.security.provider.certpath.SunCertPathBuilderException: unable to find valid certification path to requested target` So I found some code somewhere that creates a trust manager that does not validate certificate chains: // Create a trust manager that does not validate certificate chains TrustManager[] trustAllCerts = new TrustManager[]{ new X509TrustManager() { public java.security.cert.X509Certificate[] getAcceptedIssuers() { return null; } public void checkClientTrusted( java.security.cert.X509Certificate[] certs, String authType) { } public void checkServerTrusted( java.security.cert.X509Certificate[] certs, String authType) { } } }; That did the trick and I was able to establish SSL connection without any certificates. My concern is if the data will still be encrypted when exchanging private information. This is an execute JAR file that clients will be downloading to their computers. So is a certificate really necessary for this case? Thanks.

  Read the article

• jquery validation problems

  - by CoffeeCode

  to custom validate an input i wrote a script: function cardNumberCheck(value, element) { var res = false; $.get("/CaseHistories/ValidateCardNumber", { caseHistoryId: $('#CaseHistory_Id').val(), cardNumber: $('#CaseHistory_CardNumber').val() }, function(data) { res = data }); //alert(res) => works fine return true/false return res; } $.validator.addMethod("cardValidate", cardNumberCheck, "invalid"); if ($('#CaseHistory_CardNumber').is("form *")) { //<= check if elem is in a form $('#CaseHistory_CardNumber').rules("add", { required: true, cardValidate: true, messages: { required: "*", cardValidate: "invalid" } }); } EDIT: the required rule works fine, but my validation method doesn't dispalt the message. and the submit works even if the elements data havent passed the cardNumberCheck validation whats not right here?

  Read the article

• this.optional() in jQuery validation method doesn't seem to work

  - by HiveHicks

  Hello, I've got a little problem here. I've got the following rule for one of my fields: StartDate: { required: isDelayed, dateRU: true } isDelayed() returns false, so I guess StartDate field should be optional. However if I check it inside my dateRU method: $.validator.addMethod( "dateRU", function(value, element) { return this.optional(element) || isValidDate($.trim(value)); }, "Date is incorrect" ); this.optional(element) always returns false for StartDate. I can't figure out what's wrong. Any ideas? UPD. Does optional() returns true only if element is not required AND IS EMPTY? 'Cause that may be my problem.

  Read the article

• Struts2 JPA Validation error how to forward to action and not lose ActionErrors messages ?

  - by Sebastien Dionne

  I'm using Hibernate validator 4.1 to validate my entity. I have a dashboard that I can access from the action : viewDashboard. In my action, I load 2 List in my acion like this. public String execute() throws Exception { listDocteur = service.listDocteur(); listUser = service.listUser(); return SUCCESS; } In the DashBoard, I have a submit that can add a User. <action name="saveUser" class="com.test.action.CreateUserAction" method="execute" <interceptor-ref name="mybasicStackWithValidation" </interceptor-ref <result name="input"/WEB-INF/jsp/viewDashboard.jsp</result <result name="success" type="redirectAction"viewDashboard</result </action if I submit invalid value, I'll see the error messages, but I'll lose my 2 Lists. If I have a type="redirectAction".. I lose the error messages. in Struts 1, I would forward to the action viewDashboard.do without a redirect and that will works.. but How to do that in Struts2 ?

  Read the article

• jQuery Validation using the class instead of the name value

  - by Matt

  Hi, I'd like to validate a form using the jquery validate plugin, but I'm unable to use the 'name' value within the html - as this is a field also used by the server app. Specifically, I need to limit the number of checkboxes checked from a group. (Maximum of 3.) All of the examples I have seen, use the name attribute of each element. What I'd like to do is use the class instead, and then declare a rule for that. html This works: <input class="checkBox" type="checkbox" id="i0000zxthy" name="salutation" value="1" /> This doesn't work, but is what I'm aiming for: <input class="checkBox" type="checkbox" id="i0000zxthy" name="i0000zxthy" value="1" /> javascript: var validator = $(".formToValidate").validate({ rules:{ "salutation":{ required:true, }, "checkBox":{ required:true, minlength:3 } } }); Is it possible to do this - is there a way of targeting the class instead of the name within the rules options? Or do I have to add a custom method? Cheers, Matt

  Read the article

• .NET Recaptcha https

  - by TygerKrash

  We've started using the ASP.NET recaptcha control and it works fine. but one of the requirements we have is that all outbound traffic goes over Https. I know that recaptcha supports https, but It's not clear how to configure (or even if it is configurable) when using the ASP.NET plugin option. has anyone got any experience of this? I'll expand a little on what I've found so far.... The Recaptcha package contains 3 public classes RecaptchaControl, RecaptchaValidator and RecaptchaResponse RecaptchaControl is an Asp.NET control, the recaptcha specific methods on there seem to be concerning themes/look and feel. An instance of the Validator has a RemoteIP field (which I presume would represent the verification server), but I can't a way of binding that to the control. RecaptchaResponse seems to more or less represent an enum with possible responses (valid/invalid/failed to connect).

  Read the article

• how is this jquery app validating the username? (3rd party script)

  - by SarmenHB

  The tutorial that I'm trying to figure out is this: http://www.position-absolute.com/articles/jquery-form-validator-because-form-validation-is-a-mess/ The username field looks like this: <input value="" class="validate[required,custom[noSpecialCaracters],length[0,20],ajax[ajaxUser]]" type="text" name="user" id="user" /> That <input> field has a class item named ajax[ajaxUser] which has its rules contained in this script (jquery.validationEngine-en.js). The snippet for that item looks like this: "ajaxUser":{ "file":"validateUser.php", "extraData":"name=eric", "alertTextOk":"* This user is available", "alertTextLoad":"* Loading, please wait", "alertText":"* This user is already taken"}, What I can't figure out at all is how its PHP page is working which is validateUser.php. Where are all those post fields coming from? I looked around and can't find a field with those names. Thanks

  Read the article

• jQuery validate - how do I ignore letter case?

  - by Jamie

  Probably a goofy question, but I can't seem to find anything in google land. I simply need one of my methods to ignore the case of the entered field. I am doing a city name match, but need both "Atlanta" and "atlanta" to be valid. How should I edit this to get the validation love that I need? jQuery.validator.addMethod("atlanta", function(value) { return value == "Atlanta"; //Need 'atlanta' to work too }, '**Recipient must reside in Chicago City Limits**'); Pre thanks to any and all :)

  Read the article

• Flex 3 Regular Expression Problem

  - by Tommy

  I've written a url validator for a project I am working on. For my requirements it works great, except when the last part for the url goes longer than 22 characters it breaks. My expression: /((https?):\/\/)([^\s.]+.)+([^\s.]+)(:\d+\/\S+)/i It expects input that looks like "http(s)://hostname:port/location". When I give it the input: https://demo10:443/111112222233333444445 it works, but if I pass the input https://demo10:443/1111122222333334444455 it breaks. You can test it out easily at http://ryanswanson.com/regexp/#start. Oddly, I can't reproduce the problem with just the relevant (I would think) part /(:\d+\/\S+)/i. I can have as many characters after the required / and it works great. Any ideas or known bugs?

  Read the article

• Does anyone know of a syntax checker for classic ASP ?

  - by Edelcom

  As part of my my web development system I have written a text editor witch (among other formats like CSS and HTML) has got ASP syntax highlighting. Does anyone know of an ASP syntax checker program of (preferably) DLL that I could call from within this editor, so that I could present my users with a list of errors (like I already do with an HTML validator). I would like to check for the ASP syntax before using the code on a web page. Now, depending on the type and the place of the error, it can take days or weeks before some error pops up.

  Read the article

• mocking command object in grails controller results in hasErrors() return false no matter what! Plea

  - by egervari

  I have a controller that uses a command object in a controller action. When mocking this command object in a grails' controller unit test, the hasErrors() method always returns false, even when I am purposefully violating its constraints. def save = { RegistrationForm form -> if(form.hasErrors()) { // code block never gets executed } else { // code block always gets executed } } In the test itself, I do this: mockCommandObject(RegistrationForm) def form = new RegistrationForm(emailAddress: "ken.bad@gmail", password: "secret", confirmPassword: "wrong") controller.save(form) I am purposefully giving it a bad email address, and I am making sure the password and the confirmPassword properties are different. In this case, hasErrors() should return true... but it doesn't. I don't know how my testing can be any where reliable if such a basic thing does not work :/ Here is the RegistrationForm class, so you can see the constraints I am using: class RegistrationForm { def springSecurityService String emailAddress String password String confirmPassword String getEncryptedPassword() { springSecurityService.encodePassword(password) } static constraints = { emailAddress(blank: false, email: true) password(blank: false, minSize:4, maxSize: 10) confirmPassword(blank: false, validator: { confirmPassword, form -> confirmPassword == form.password }) } }

  Read the article

< Previous Page | 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105  | Next Page >