Fundamental types
Posted
by smerlin
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by smerlin
Published on 2010-03-12T10:45:24Z
Indexed on
2010/03/12
10:47 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 242
I always thought the following types are "fundamental types", so i thought my anwser to this question would be correct, but surprisingly it got downvoted...
Searching the web, i found this. So, IBM says aswell those types are fundamental types..
Well how do you interpret the Standard, are following types (and similar types), "fundamental types" according to the c++ standard ?
unsigned int
signed char
long double
long long
long long int
unsigned long long int
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
