WCF: What is the practical difference between transport and message reliability?
Posted
by mrlane
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by mrlane
Published on 2010-03-12T01:46:52Z
Indexed on
2010/03/12
1:57 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 310
wcf
|reliability
Hello
I am looking at differences between using WPF in .NET or using Silverlight 4 for the GUI front end of an app that connects to WCF services.
I have read that net.tcp binding in Silverlight 4 only supports transport level reliability. With a WPF desktop app we can use message level reliability.
What is the actual difference? If transport level reliability ensures that all TCP packets get through, doesnt that also mean that all WCF SOAP messages will also get through?
I am also concerned that Silverlight only supports async message but thats a different issue.
Thanks
© Stack Overflow or respective owner