5 x 3GB drives and 4 x 1500GB drive best raid setup?

Posted by Zen_Silence on Super User See other posts from Super User or by Zen_Silence
Published on 2010-03-13T05:30:46Z Indexed on 2010/03/13 5:35 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 233

Filed under:

raid

|

sata

|

pata

|

pci

|

pci-express

Hello,

I am building a file server my plan is the have the Operating system on one raid partition and the data storage on another partition.

I currently have 5 x 3GB IDE drives that i would like to put the operating system on theses drives are old but that doesnt matter to me at the moment i have a ton of them so for this raid partition i would probably want to be able to pull out dead a drive and rebuild the array.

My file partition is going to consist of 4 x 1.5TB SATA drives I would like the maximum storage with some redundancy.

Any suggestions to which Raid level i should use would be greatly appreciated and if you could also suggest a PCI or PCI-e raid controller to handle theses arrays.

Thanks in Advance,

Zen_Silence

© Super User or respective owner

Related posts about raid

Booting from integrated RAID controller when another RAID controller is installed in a PCIe slot

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I have a GA MA785GT UD3H motherboard with Windows Server 2008 R2 installed on a RAID1 using the on-board RAID controller. I have now installed a RocketRaid 2680 controller and set up a RAID5 for all my data to be stored on. Unfortunately I now cannot boot from the RAID1 anymore, the PC is trying… >>> More
Onboard RAID vs Software RAID

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
My motherboard, an Asus M4a79t Deluxe, advertises RAID 0/1/5 capabilities. My limited understanding is that onboard RAID is better than software RAID. Is this necessarily true? Is an onboard RAID controller closer in performance to a software controller or a dedicated hardware controller? >>> More
RAID-1 and regular drive removal (using RAID-1 as a backup measure)

as seen on Super User - Search for 'Super User'
Is using mdadm's RAID-1 of 2 partitions (one on laptop's internal HDD, one on external HDD) a good idea. I want the system to work as RAID-1 if both drives are present, work as regular volume (degradad RAID-1) if external HDD is unplugged and quickly resync when I plug external HDD again. Questions: Is… >>> More
Explain difference in SQLIO numbers for RAID 0 versus RAID 5 over 6 disks

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
When using the SQLIO benchmark tool on a 4-core Dell server with 6 15k 450GB (fast) drives, RAID 0, we found the max throughput was 2MB per second. But when configured as RAID 5, we get 30 MB per second. It seems that the RAID controller, Dell Perc 5i integrated controller, is maxing out the… >>> More
RAID 5 RECONSTRUCT with RAID Reconstructor

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
I have Dell Poweredge server 2600 with Raid 5 in 3 hard drive Scsi 36gb each, it was fail to boot sinc the third drive is offline. I attached Sata card adapter to Sata hard drive and install OS SERVER 2003 to it, downloaded drivers for Raid and everything goes fine when I use recovery data software… >>> More

Related posts about sata

SATA vs SATA-II

as seen on Super User - Search for 'Super User'
Hi all, I'm looking to replace my hard disk, which is a Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 ST3500320AS 500GB. My friend told me to get a SATA HDD, not a SATA-II. What is the difference between the two? And is my old HDD a SATA or SATA-II? The new HDD I'm looking at is a Seagate 7200.12 ST3500418AS, which… >>> More
Desktop SATA drives in SATA <-> FC array

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Let's assume you've got a box like one of these with space for 24 SATA disks. What are the best bits of advice for deploying this? For instance, should you be greedy and go for the 1.5 or 2tb disks or are they just not reliable enough to be used in an array like this and you should stick with 640gb… >>> More
SATA-II motherboard and drives but only connected at SATA-I

as seen on Super User - Search for 'Super User'
I have an Abit AB9 QuadGT motherboard which has a SATA-II controller. Connected to it I have a Kingston SSDNow V Series 64GB as boot drive and a Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 as a data drive. I also have 2 x Optiarc AD-7170S DVD burners attached by SATA. Both SSD and HDD are SATA-II and the optical… >>> More
SATA 300 mobo and drives but only connected at SATA 150

as seen on Super User - Search for 'Super User'
I have an Abit AB9 QuadGT motherboard which supports SATA 300 drives Connected to it I have a Kingston SSDNow V Series 64GB as boot drive and a Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 as a data drive. I also have 2 x Optiarc AD-7170S DVD burners attached by SATA Both SSD and HDD are SATA 300 and the optical… >>> More
MacBook Pro Late 2009 SATA Resets, Slowness

as seen on Ask Ubuntu - Search for 'Ask Ubuntu'
My MacBook Pro runs slower the longer it's on. I am getting kernel warnings. The resets correlate with AC power connects and disconnects. I don't know if the warnings do. (How do I tell?) Are these bus CRC errors? Or something else? Can this damage the drive or corrupt data? What is it seeing… >>> More