-
as seen on ASP.net Weblogs
- Search for 'ASP.net Weblogs'
I have been wanting to have a play with Object Databases for a while now, and today I have done just that. One of the obvious choices I had to make was which one to use. My criteria for choosing one today was simple, I wanted one which I could literally wack in and start using, which means…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm playing around with db4o, and I have the Object Manager viewer thingy for Visual Studio. It seems okay, but not exactly on par with tools like HeidiSQL/SQL Studio/etc., not to mention that it locks the db4o file--I can't use my db4o app and Object Manager at the same time.
Maybe I'm using it…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I recently stumbled over the object database engine db4o which I think looks really interesting. I would like to use it in an ASP.NET MVC application that will be deployed to a shared hosting environment under medium trust. Because of the trust level, I'm restricted to using db4o in embedded/in-process…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi,
I am trying to do standard bi-directional replication as follows. However, I get a NullReferenceException. This is a separate replication project. I did import the classes involved in the original project (such as Item, Category etc.) in this replication project. What am I doing wrong? (If I…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
We've been trying db4o for persisting objects on the compact framework. It works very well from our tests so far. However, it appears they are on the expensive side for small startups with minimal units needed.
Does anyone know of any similar object databases for the compact framework? How about…
>>> More
-
as seen on Programmers
- Search for 'Programmers'
I have come across a book that claims that alterations
and augmentations to GPL works can be kept close-source
as long as these are not redistributed into the wild.
Therefore, customizations of websites deriving from
GPL packages need not be released under the GPL and
developers can earn profit on…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Let's say I write some code, which we'll call X. It uses some GPL code, let's call it library Y. Clearly I would have to release X with a GPL license. That's fine. My question is, can I additionally release X under a license such as MIT, so that if someone only wants X but not Y they don't need to…
>>> More
-
as seen on Programmers
- Search for 'Programmers'
I understand that linking to a program licensed under the GPL requires that you release the source of your program under the GPL as well, while the LGPL does not require this. The terminology of the (L)GPL is very clear about this.
#include "gpl_program.h"
means you'd have to license GPL, because…
>>> More
-
as seen on Programmers
- Search for 'Programmers'
There has been much debate over whether or not merely linking to a piece of code makes it a derivative work. I know FSF says "yes", so according to them I can't dynamically link a non-GPL compatible program to a GPL library and distribute the whole. But I could do that for private use, as long as…
>>> More
-
as seen on Programmers
- Search for 'Programmers'
I've recently run into some argument with a person that claims to be a lawyer (I have my suspicions about this not being completely true, though).
As far as I know, copying even one line of code from GPLed program into proprietary body of code requires you to release the whole thing under GPL, if…
>>> More
