Giving proper credit to a projects contributors

Posted by Greg B on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Greg B
Published on 2010-03-13T10:40:40Z Indexed on 2010/03/13 10:45 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 229

Filed under:

copyright

|

lgpl

|

opensource

I've recently been working with an opensource library for a commercial product. The opensource code is distributed from the website of the company who sells the proprietary product as a zip file.

The library is a (direct) port to C# of the original library which is in Java. As such, it uses methods instead of getter/setter properties. The code contains copyright notices to the supplier of the product. The C# port was originally provided to the company by a 3rd party individual.

I have modified the source to be more C# like and added a couple of small features.

I want to put my version of the code out there (Google code or where ever) so that C# users of the software can benefit from a more native feeling library.

How can I and/or how should I amend the copyright notice to give proper credit to

The comercial owner of the original source
The guy who provided the original C# port
Myself and anyone else who contributes to the project in the future

The source is provided under the LGPL V2.1,

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about copyright

How to insert a blank line above my copyright text inside the comment lines in intelliJ IDEA?

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm using intelliJ IDEA 9. It has a function to make a copyright profile and apply to all files I create. What I'm trying to do is to format the copyright comment right. Suppose I have a copyright text as this: Copyright (c) 2010 my.company. All rights reserved. I wish it to be inserted in files… >>> More
How (and Why) to Copyright your Web Images

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
Helen Bradley explains the basics of protecting your ecommerce product photos on the Web. >>> More
Making a copyright system that works

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
<b>Free Software Magazine:</b> "Aside from a few vested interests in the entertainment industry, nearly everyone hates the system we’ve got — it’s clearly overreaching and ill-adapted to the electronic world of the internet. But what sort of system would… >>> More
Copyright infringement - inside the legal minefield

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
<b>New Zealand Herald:</b> "Several weeks ago the Australian high court ruled in favour of Aussie ISP iiNet in a landmark legal battle where AFACT (Australian Federation Against Copyright Theft) argued that iiNet was as guilty as some of its subscribers of online copyright infringement… >>> More
Music Rhythm Game: Copyright Music Question for Independent (Indie) Game Developers

as seen on Game Development - Search for 'Game Development'
I have a curious question regarding on musics used in music rhythm game. In Guitar Hero for example, they used all different music albums in one program. Then, each album requires to ask permission to the owner, composer of the music, or the copyright owner of the music. Let's say, if you used 15… >>> More

Related posts about lgpl

Dual-licensing LGPL 2.1 and LGPL 3

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I maintain a software, a small PHP library, that is released under the LGPL version 3 license (LGPLv3). Someone wants to use the library in their software which has the GPL version 2 license. This license compatibility matrix suggests this is not possible without changing the licensing terms of one… >>> More
LGPL and Dual Licensing Ajax Library

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi guys, I'm the previous founder of Gaiaware and Gaia Ajax Widgets and when I used to work there we had this rhetoric (which I have confirmed with some very smart FOSS people is correct) that when using a GPL Ajax library you're basically "distributing" the JavaScript which in turn makes the GPL… >>> More
LGPL to MIT License

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
Hi, I was wondering if it is possible to release code I am working on which uses third party code licensed under the LGPL, under for instance the MIT License? Basically I dont want to change the license of the LGPL part, I am just wondering what happens with it if I chose a different license for… >>> More
Does the LGPL allow me to do this?

as seen on Programmers - Search for 'Programmers'
I am planning to develop a commercial software using a LGPL software. In the LGPL software that I am using some functions in a class are not fully implemented. I want to modify the LGPL code so that the class and not-implemented functions are made visible outside the dll by adding dllexport infront… >>> More
How to mark that a lgpl library is modified

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I am using an LGPL library in my code. For my needs, I need to modify the code in the library. How do I mark the jar file that it contains modified code? Some txt file in the jar? In that case, what do I write in the txt file? I will include in the license agreement that we are distributing a modified… >>> More