Why is there no IronPerl (Perl for .Net)?

Posted by Renaud Bompuis on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Renaud Bompuis
Published on 2008-12-15T23:41:06Z Indexed on 2010/03/13 2:07 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 592

Filed under:
|

I'm a bit disappointed that there doesn't seem to be any effort to make Perl a first-class citizen of the .Net world.

I've read a few 'reasons' in the past but I don't see why they can't be overcome (different garbage collectors, hard-to-parse syntax, part of CPAN modules couldn't be ported, different communities, ...).

Activestate has a Perl.Net product but it's a hack (in the good sense) around a standard interpreter and some syntactic sugar to interoperate with .Net assemblies.
A few years ago they stopped they visual studio integration of Perl citing lack of interest. That was a while ago, before all the changes to .Net to make it more 'dynamic'.

Am I the only one who yearns for IronPerl?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about perl

Related posts about .NET