Why is there no IronPerl (Perl for .Net)?
Posted
by Renaud Bompuis
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Renaud Bompuis
Published on 2008-12-15T23:41:06Z
Indexed on
2010/03/13
2:07 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 592
I'm a bit disappointed that there doesn't seem to be any effort to make Perl a first-class citizen of the .Net world.
I've read a few 'reasons' in the past but I don't see why they can't be overcome (different garbage collectors, hard-to-parse syntax, part of CPAN modules couldn't be ported, different communities, ...).
Activestate has a Perl.Net product but it's a hack (in the good sense) around a standard interpreter and some syntactic sugar to interoperate with .Net assemblies.
A few years ago they stopped they visual studio integration of Perl citing lack of interest.
That was a while ago, before all the changes to .Net to make it more 'dynamic'.
Am I the only one who yearns for IronPerl?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner