Why is it a bad idea to use multiple NAT layers or is it?
Posted
by iamrohitbanga
on Server Fault
See other posts from Server Fault
or by iamrohitbanga
Published on 2010-03-10T15:57:38Z
Indexed on
2010/03/14
5:25 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 319
networking
|nat
The computer network of an organization has a NAT with 192.168/16 IP address range. There is a department with a server that has an IP address 192.168.x.y and this server handles hosts of this department with another NAT with the IP address range 172.16/16.
Thus there are 2 layers of NAT. Why don't they have subnetting instead. This would allow easy routing.
I feel multiple layers of NAT can cause performance losses. Could you please help me compare the two design strategies.
© Server Fault or respective owner