-
as seen on Oracle Blogs
- Search for 'Oracle Blogs'
Oracle OpenWorld 2012 is almost here! We're looking forward to updating you on our products, strategy, and roadmaps. This year, the E-Business Suite Applications Technology Group (ATG) will participate in 25 speaker sessions, two Meet the Experts round-table discussions, five demoground booths and…
>>> More
-
as seen on Oracle Blogs
- Search for 'Oracle Blogs'
Welcome to our countdown to Oracle OpenWorld!
Oracle OpenWorld 2012 is just around the corner. In less than
26 days, San Francisco will be invaded by an expected 50,000 people from all
over the world. Here on the Oracle WebCenter team, we’ve all been working to
help make the experience a great…
>>> More
-
as seen on Oracle Blogs
- Search for 'Oracle Blogs'
Database ??
Database ???????
Database ??????????
Java
WebLogic Server/????????·????
SOA/BPM/?????
???????/????
ID??/??????
?????EPM/BI
EPM/BI ???????
EPM/BI ????
OS/???
????
?????
MySQL
Database ??
????
??
?????????
???
??
ORACLE MASTER…
>>> More
-
as seen on Oracle Blogs
- Search for 'Oracle Blogs'
SOA PARTNER COMMUNITY NEWSLETTER JULY
2012
Dear
SOA partner community member
To
provide our community members the best of our knowledge, we want your feedback
on our SOA Partner community. Thus we are organizing SOA Partner Community Survey 2012. We…
>>> More
-
as seen on Oracle Blogs
- Search for 'Oracle Blogs'
Below is the schedule for all ADF related sessions at a glance. Note the Meet and greet session added for Wednesday Octiber 3rd from 4.30 pm to 5:30.
Oracle ADF and Fusion Development
General Session
Mon 1 Oct,…
>>> More
-
as seen on Programmers
- Search for 'Programmers'
So, if I want to declare an array of characters I can go this way
char a[2];
char * a ;
char * a = new char[2];
Ignoring the first declaration, the other two use pointers. As far as I know the third declaration is stored in heap and is freed using the delete operator . does the second declaration…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm having issues getting a small spirit/qi grammar to compile. The build stack trace is fugly enought to not make any sense to me (despite some assertion_failed i could notice in there but that didn't brought much information)
the input grammar header:
inputGrammar.h
#include <boost/config/warning_disable…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
So, I have two types at the moment:
const unsigned char* unencrypted_data_char;
string unencrypted_data;
I'm attempting to perform a simple conversion of data from one to the other (string - const unsigned char*)
As a result, I have the following:
strcpy((unencrypted_data_char),(unencrypted_data…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
When I compiled the sample codes of C++, I got following info:
c++ excxx_example_database_read.cpp -o dbApp -I /usr/local/BerkeleyDB.5.0/include/
Undefined symbols:
"Dbt::Dbt(void*, unsigned int)", referenced from:
show_vendor(MyDb&, char const*)in ccnaWItX.o
show_item(MyDb&…
>>> More
-
as seen on Stack Overflow
- Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I'm having issues getting a small spirit/qi grammar to compile. i am using boost 1.43 and g++ 4.4.1.
the input grammar header:
inputGrammar.h
#include <boost/config/warning_disable.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/include/qi.hpp>
#include <boost/spirit/include/phoenix_core.hpp>
#include…
>>> More
