Count(*) vs Count(1)

Posted by Nai on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by Nai
Published on 2009-08-03T10:15:10Z Indexed on 2010/03/16 9:26 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 632

Filed under:

sql-server-2005

|

sql-server

|

count

|

sql

|

aggregate

Hi, just wondering if any of you guys use Count(1) over Count(*) and if there is a noticeable difference for SQL Server 2005 in performance? Or is this just a legacy habit that has been brought forward from days gone past?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about sql-server-2005

[MAJ] SQL Server 2005 Express Edition - La version gratuite de SQL Server 2005

as seen on ASP-PHP.net - Search for 'ASP-PHP.net'
Modification technique pour le site de l'article. >>> More
SQLAuthority News – Feature Pack for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 SP4

as seen on SQL Authority - Search for 'SQL Authority'
If you are still using SQL Server 2005 – I suggest that you consider migrating to later version of the SQL Server 2008/2008 R2. Due to any reason, you wanted to continue using SQL Server 2005, I suggest that you take a look at the Feature Pack for Microsoft SQL Server 2005 SP4. There are many… >>> More
SQL Server 2005 - Syncing development/production databases

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I've got a rather large SQL Server 2005 database that is under constant development. Every so often, I either get a new developer or need to deploy wide-scale schema changes to the production server. My main concern is deploying schema + data updates to developer machines from the "master" development… >>> More
Displaying the Row Number in a SELECT Query with SQL Server 2005

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
SQL Server 2005 introduced a function that is very handy when you want the result set to have row numbers assigned to each returned row. >>> More
Displaying the Row Number in a SELECT Query with SQL Server 2005

as seen on Internet.com - Search for 'Internet.com'
SQL Server 2005 introduced a function that is very handy when you want the result set to have row numbers assigned to each returned row. >>> More

Related posts about sql-server

SQL SERVER – Beginning SQL Server: One Step at a Time – SQL Server Magazine

as seen on SQL Authority - Search for 'SQL Authority'
I am glad to announce that along with SQLAuthority.com, I will be blogging on the prominent site of SQL Server Magazine. My very first blog post there is already live; read here: Beginning SQL Server: One Step at a Time. My association with SQL Server Magazine has been quite long, I have written nearly… >>> More
How to install SQL Server 2005 Configuration Manager without installing SQL Server Management Studio

as seen on Server Fault - Search for 'Server Fault'
Hi, I need to configure SQL Server aliases on a public-facing production server. To do that, I need to install SQL Server Configuration Manager. I was not able to find a standalone installer for that, so I am having to install SQL Server 2005 Client Components. This approach is not ideal as we don't… >>> More
[MAJ] SQL Server 2005 Express Edition - La version gratuite de SQL Server 2005

as seen on ASP-PHP.net - Search for 'ASP-PHP.net'
Modification technique pour le site de l'article. >>> More
How to create SQL Server Express DB from SQL Server DB

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
I have a SQL Server 2008 DB. I want to extract SOME tables (and associated schema, constraints, indexes, etc) and create a SQL Server Express DB. It isn't a sync of the target, we stomp on it. We ONLY need to do this in the file system (not across the wire). We are not fond of the synchronization… >>> More
sql server 2000 error, error trying to connect to sql server 2005

as seen on Stack Overflow - Search for 'Stack Overflow'
i am connecting to sql server 2000 on a remote computer with a dotnet application, but when i try to open the connection it gives the following error: When connecting to SQL Server 2005, this failure may be caused by the fact that under the default settings SQL Server does not allow remote connections What… >>> More