WCF: WSDL-first approach: Problems with generating fault types
Posted
by Juri
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Juri
Published on 2010-03-16T14:22:47Z
Indexed on
2010/03/16
14:26 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 630
Hi,
I'm currently in the process of creating a WCF webservice which should be compatible with WS-I Basic Profile 1.1. I'm using a wsdl-first approach (actually for the first time), defining first the xsd for the complex types, the WSDL and then using svcutil.exe for generating the according server as well as client-side interfaces/proxies. So far everything works fine. Then I decided to add a fault to my WSDL.
Regenerating with svcutil succeeded, but then I noticed that my generated fault doesn't have the properties I defined in my xsd file (which is imported by my WSDL).
Fault XSD definition
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<schema xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
targetNamespace="http://product.mycompany.com/groupsfault_v1.xsd"
xmlns:tns="http://product.mycompany.com/groupsfault_v1.xsd">
<complexType name="groupsFault">
<sequence>
<element name="code" type="int"/>
<element name="message" type="string"/>
</sequence>
</complexType>
</schema>
Generated .Net fault object
[System.Diagnostics.DebuggerStepThroughAttribute()]
[System.CodeDom.Compiler.GeneratedCodeAttribute("System.Runtime.Serialization", "3.0.0.0")]
[System.Xml.Serialization.XmlSchemaProviderAttribute("ExportSchema")]
[System.Xml.Serialization.XmlRootAttribute(IsNullable=false)]
public partial class groupFault : object, System.Xml.Serialization.IXmlSerializable
{
private System.Xml.XmlNode[] nodesField;
private static System.Xml.XmlQualifiedName typeName = new System.Xml.XmlQualifiedName("groupFault", "http://sicp.services.siag.it/groups_v1.wsdl");
public System.Xml.XmlNode[] Nodes
{
get
{
return this.nodesField;
}
set
{
this.nodesField = value;
}
}
public void ReadXml(System.Xml.XmlReader reader)
{
this.nodesField = System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlSerializableServices.ReadNodes(reader);
}
public void WriteXml(System.Xml.XmlWriter writer)
{
System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlSerializableServices.WriteNodes(writer, this.Nodes);
}
public System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchema GetSchema()
{
return null;
}
public static System.Xml.XmlQualifiedName ExportSchema(System.Xml.Schema.XmlSchemaSet schemas)
{
System.Runtime.Serialization.XmlSerializableServices.AddDefaultSchema(schemas, typeName);
return typeName;
}
}
Is this ok?? I'd expect to have an object created that contains properties for "code" and "message" s.t. you can then throw it by using something like
...
throw new FaultException<groupFault>(new groupFault { code=100, message="error" });
...
(sorry for the lower-case type definitions, but this is generated code from the WSDL)
Why doesn't the svcutil.exe generate those properties??
Some sources on the web suggested to add the /useSerializerForFaults option. I tried it, it doesn't work giving me an exception that the fault type is missing on the wsdl:portType
declaration. Validation with several other tools succeeded however.
Any help is VERY appreciated :) thx
© Stack Overflow or respective owner