Why do transfer objects need to implement Serializable?

Posted by smaye81 on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by smaye81
Published on 2010-03-16T01:11:57Z Indexed on 2010/03/16 1:19 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 390

I realized today that I have blindly just followed this requirement for years without ever really asking why. Today, I ran across a NotSerializableException with a model object I created from scratch and I realized enough is enough.

I was told this was because of session replication between load-balanced servers, but I know I've seen other objects at session scope that do not implement Serializable. Is this the real reason?

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about java

Related posts about serialization