Database sharing/versioning

Posted by DarkJaff on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by DarkJaff
Published on 2010-03-17T18:51:42Z Indexed on 2010/03/17 19:11 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 360

Filed under:
|
|

Hi everyone,

I have a question but I'm not sure of the word to use.

My problem: I have an application using a database to stock information. The database can ben in access (local) or in a server (SQL Server or Oracle). We support these 3 kind of database. We want to give the possibility to the user to do what I think we can call versioning.

Let me explain : We have a database 1. This is the master. We want to be able to create a database 2 that will be the same thing as database 1 but we can give it to someone else.

They each work on each other side, adding, modifying and deleting records on this very complex database. After that, we want the database 1 to include the change from database 2, but with the possibility to dismiss some of the change.

For you information, ou application is already multiuser so why don't we just use this multi-user and forget about this versionning? It's because sometimes, we need to give a copy of the database to another company on another site and they can't connect on our server. They work on their side and then, we want to merge.

Is there anyone here with experience with this type of requirement? We have a lot of ideas but most of them require a LOT of work, massive modification to the database or to the existing queries.

This is a 2 millions and growing C++ app, so rewriting it is not possible!

Thanks for any ideas that you may give us!

J-F

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about versioning

Related posts about sharing