Is PNG the most economically sound file format to store pictures in?
Posted
by raoulsson
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by raoulsson
Published on 2010-03-19T14:56:25Z
Indexed on
2010/03/19
15:31 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 228
I am looking for an economically sound solution to store pictures long time. I read about the PNG file format that it has superior characteristics compared to JPEG, namely in these categories:
- no patents, no licenses, no royalities
- no quality loss
- yet compressed
I have a lot of big ESP's from PhotoShop that contain tons of metadata, like layers and color profiles that I don't need to store (those were handy for the designer, when he worked with it). I want to convert these images without that hidden data, to a new target file format.
Another side condition to my question is that the target file format has to be displayable in the browser. So I guess my options are limited anyway: GIF, JPEG, PNG.
Am I missing something or is PNG the best fit for my case?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner