When virtual destructor is not needed even there is a virtual function, Why ?
Posted
by skydoor
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by skydoor
Published on 2010-03-19T21:14:40Z
Indexed on
2010/03/19
21:21 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 103
c++
It says that if there is a virtual function, it is a good practice to have a virtual destructor. However, if the object is created on the stack but not on heap, do we still need to do that?
Regards,
© Stack Overflow or respective owner