Why is the volatile qualifier used through out std::atomic?
Posted
by Caspin
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Caspin
Published on 2010-03-19T16:52:59Z
Indexed on
2010/03/19
17:21 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 412
From what I've read from Herb Sutter and others you would think that volatile and concurrent programming were completely orthogonal concepts, at least as far as C/C++ are concerned.
However, in GCC c++0x extension all of std::atomic's member functions have the volatile qualifier. The same is true in Anthony Williams's implementation of std::atomic.
So what's deal, do my atomic<> variables need be volatile or not?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner
