Microsoft Sync Framework - Local DB and Remote DB have to have the same schema?
Posted
by Josh
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Josh
Published on 2009-12-13T06:47:10Z
Indexed on
2010/03/20
17:51 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 359
When using MSF, is it implied in the technology that the sync tables are supposed to be 1-1?
The reason I'm wondering is that if I'm synching from a SQL2005 database to a SQLCE, I might want the CE one to be a little more flattened out so I can get data out with a simpler SELECT statement (as CE does not support sprocs).
For example, I might have a tblCustomer, tblOrder, and tblCustomerOrder in the central database, but in the local databases one table with all the data might be preferred. Of course I'd still want the updates to reflect back and forth between the two databases. Does MSF make this possible, or does the local DB have to have the same tables as the central?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner