Are we using IoC effectively?
Posted
by Juliet
on Stack Overflow
See other posts from Stack Overflow
or by Juliet
Published on 2010-03-21T21:32:12Z
Indexed on
2010/03/21
21:51 UTC
Read the original article
Hit count: 259
So my company uses Castle Windsor IoC container, but in a way that feels "off":
- All the data types are registered in code, not the config file.
- All data types are hard-coded to use one interface implementation. In fact, for nearly all given interfaces, there is and will only ever be one implementation.
- All registered data types have a default constructor, so Windsor doesn't instantiate an object graph for any registered types.
The people who designed the system insist the IoC container makes the system better. We have 1200+ public classes, so its a big system, the kind where you'd expect to find a framework like Windsor. But I'm still skeptical.
Is my company using IoC effectively? Is there an advantage to new'ing objects with Windsor than new'ing objects with the new
keyword?
© Stack Overflow or respective owner