Programming R/Sweave for proper \Sexpr output

Posted by deoksu on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by deoksu
Published on 2010-03-21T06:02:22Z Indexed on 2010/03/21 6:11 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 478

Filed under:
|
|
|

Hi I'm having a bit of a problem programming R for Sweave, and the #rstats twitter group often points here, so I thought I'd put this question to the SO crowd. I'm an analyst- not a programmer- so go easy on me my first post.

Here's the problem: I am drafting a survey report in Sweave with R and would like to report the marginal returns in line using \Sexpr{}. For example, rather than saying:

Only 14% of respondents said 'X'.

I want to write the report like this:

Only \Sexpr{p.mean(variable)}$\%$ of respondents said 'X'.

The problem is that Sweave() converts the results of the expression in \Sexpr{} to a character string, which means that the output from expression in R and the output that appears in my document are different. For example, above I use the function 'p.mean':

p.mean<- function (x) {options(digits=1)  
mmm<-weighted.mean(x, weight=weight, na.rm=T)  
print(100*mmm)  
}

In R, the output looks like this:

p.mean(variable)
>14

but when I use \Sexpr{p.mean(variable)}, I get an unrounded character string (in this case: 13.5857142857143) in my document. I have tried to limit the output of my function to 'digits=1' in the global environment, in the function itself, and and in various commands. It only seems to contain what R prints, not the character transformation that is the result of the expression and which eventually prints in the LaTeX file.

as.character(p.mean(variable))  
>[1] 14  
>[1] "13.5857142857143"  

Does anyone know what I can do to limit the digits printed in the LaTeX file, either by reprogramming the R function or with a setting in Sweave or \Sexpr{}? I'd greatly appreciate any help you can give.

Thanks, David

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about r

    Related posts about sweave