What are some arguments to support the position that the Dojo JavasScript library is secure, accessi

Posted by LES2 on Stack Overflow See other posts from Stack Overflow or by LES2
Published on 2010-03-19T16:42:17Z Indexed on 2010/03/21 22:11 UTC
Read the original article Hit count: 221

Filed under:
|
|
|

We have developed a small web application for a client. We decided on the Dojo framework to develop the app (requirements included were full i18n and a11y). Originally, the web app we developed was to be a "prototype", but we made the prototype production quality anyway, just in case. It turns out that the app we developed (or a variant of it) is going to production (many months hence), but it's so awesome that the enterprise architecture group is a little afraid.

508c compliant is a concern, as is security for this group. I now need to justify the use of Dojo to this architecture group, explicitly making the case that Dojo does not pose a security risk and that Dojo will not hurt accessibility (and that Dojo is there to help meet core requirements).

Note: the web app currently requires JavaScript to be turned on and a stylesheet to work. We use a relatively minor subset of Dojo: of course, dojo core, and dijit.form.Form, ValidationTextBox and a few others. We do use dojox.grid.DataGrid (but no drag N drop or editable cells, which are not fully a11y).

I have done some research of my own, of course, but I any information or advice you have would be most helpful.

Regards, LES2

© Stack Overflow or respective owner

Related posts about dojo

Related posts about a11y